Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

List of categories/dimensions used in canine research funding dataset content analysis, with example keywords.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Benefit for dog: Scoring table for numerical metric.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Benefit for dog: Scoring table for impact on wellbeing metric.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Pathway to impact: Scoring table for ideal-world impact metric.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Pathway to impact: Scoring table for real-world feasibility metric (represented by human behaviour change (HBC)).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Not-for-profit UK canine health and welfare research funding summary, 2012–2022.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 1.

Annual UK canine-relevant funding categorised by wide-scope and animal-directed funders, 2012–2022.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

UK canine-relevant funding categorised by type of funder and by broad category, 2012–2022.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

UK canine-focused funding categorised by funder, > £2million only, 2012–2022.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 7.

Funding organisations and grant provision for research investigating welfare impact of management protocols for dogs in UK shelters, 2012–2022.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 4.

Total UK canine-relevant funding, 2012–2022, categorised by type of main recipient institution.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Top ten UK universities by total in-scope canine relevant research funding, 2012–2022.

(RVC = Royal Veterinary College, AHT = Animal Health Trust).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Canine-relevant funding 2012–2022 by UK veterinary school, arranged by date of foundation.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Box-and-whisker plot showing benefit for dog score for UK canine-relevant research funding, categorised by funder and ordered by ascending median within wide-scope funder group (blue) and animal-directed funder group (green), 2012–2022.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 8.

Low and high-scoring ‘benefit for the dog’ (BFD) profiles for UK funders of canine health and welfare research, 2012–2022 (>10 grants only, divided by wide-scope and animal-directed sectors).

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 8.

Box-and-whisker plot showing pathway to impact score for UK canine-relevant research funding, categorised by funder and organised by ascending median within wide-scope funder group (blue) and animal-directed funder group (green), 2012–2022.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 9.

Low and high-scoring ‘pathway to impact’ (PTI) profiles for UK funders of canine health and welfare research, 2012–2022 (> 10 grants only, divided by wide-scope and animal-directed sectors).

More »

Table 9 Expand