Table 1.
Comparison of two types of concept cognition of economic resilience.
Table 2.
Comparison of two types of evaluation methods of economic resilience.
Fig 1.
The workflow diagram of the study steps.
Fig 2.
Determinants and framework of economic resilience [41].
Table 3.
Initial index system of economic resilience.
Table 4.
Cause-effect analysis of indicators.
Table 5.
Secondary index system of economic resilience.
Table 6.
Reachable set, antecedent set, and a common set.
Table 7.
The hierarchical structure of second-level indicators.
Table 8.
Final evaluation index system of economic resilience.
Table 9.
Existing megacities in China (Data from China’s seventh population census).
Fig 3.
Geographical location distribution of megacities in China.
Table 10.
Total GDP and proportion of mega cities in 2011–2020 (Unit: Trillion).
Fig 4.
(a). Beijing’s GDP and growth rate. (b). Tianjin’s GDP and growth rate. (c). Shanghai’s GDP and growth rate. (d). Guangzhou’s GDP and growth rate. (e). Shenzhen’s GDP and growth rate. (f). Chongqing’s GDP and growth rate. (g). Chengdu’s GDP and growth rate.
Table 11.
The 1–9 scale method of the analytic hierarchy process.
Table 12.
Indicators’ subjective weight based on the AHP method.
Table 13.
The indicators’ objective weight.
Table 14.
The indicators’ total weight.
Table 15.
Evaluation results of megacities’ economic resilience in 2011–2020.
Table 16.
Classification criteria of megacities’ economic resilience level.
Table 17.
Economic resilience level distribution of megacities in China during 2011–2020.
Fig 5.
Evaluation results of economic resilience of China’s megacities in 2011–2020.
Fig 6.
Economic resilience level distribution of megacities in China during 2011–2020.