Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The relationships of trajectory planning.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

System model.

(a) The research subject: 5 DoFs manipulator. (b) The system model of manipulator.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

DH parameters of manipulator.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

The whole control scheme of trajectory optimization.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The program flow chart of trajectory optimization.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Simulation parameters.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Simulation sets.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

The trajectory planning results of Simulation 1 based on fifth order polynomial interpolation.

(a) Planning position, (b) Planning attitude, (c) Joint angle, (d) Joint angular velocity, (e) Joint angular acceleration, (f) Joint angular jerk.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The trajectory planning results of Simulation 2 based on fifth order polynomial interpolation.

(a) Planning position, (b) Planning attitude, (c) Joint angle, (d) Joint angular velocity, (e) Joint angular acceleration, (f) Joint angular jerk.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The trajectory planning results of Simulation 3 based on fifth order polynomial interpolation.

(a) Planning position, (b) Planning attitude, (c) Joint angle, (d) Joint angular velocity, (e) Joint angular acceleration, (f) Joint angular jerk.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The trajectory planning results of Simulation 4 based on fifth order polynomial interpolation.

(a) Planning position, (b) Planning attitude, (c) Joint angle, (d) Joint angular velocity, (e) Joint angular acceleration, (f) Joint angular jerk.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

The trajectory planning results of Simulation 5 based on the proposed optimization method.

(a) Planning position, (b) Planning attitude, (c) Joint angle, (d) Joint angular velocity, (e) Joint angular acceleration, (f) Joint angular jerk.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

The trajectory planning results of Simulation 6 based on the proposed optimization method.

(a) Planning position, (b) Planning attitude, (c) Joint angle, (d) Joint angular velocity, (e) Joint angular acceleration, (f) Joint angular jerk.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 4.

Comparisons of simulations.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 11.

The optimization process of planning time T = tft0 in Simulation 5.

(a) With initial value T = tft0 = 10s in Simulation 1, (b) With initial value T = tft0 = 20s in Simulation 2.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

The optimization process of planning time T = tft0 in Simulation 6.

(a) With initial value T = tft0 = 10s in Simulation 3, (b) With initial value T = tft0 = 20s in Simulation 4.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

The planning trajectory based on the proposed optimization method in Simulation 5.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 5.

Simulation parameters.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 14.

The trajectory planning results of experiment based on the proposed optimization method.

(a) Planning position, (b) Planning attitude, (c) Joint angle, (d) Joint angular velocity, (e) Joint angular acceleration, (f) Joint angular jerk.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

The optimization process of planning time T = tft0 in experiment.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

The velocity curves of trajectory planing based on third order polynomial interpolation with planning time t1 and t2.

More »

Fig 16 Expand