Fig 1.
The three models previously applied to the MFQ: A: 2-factor model, B: 5-factor model, C: Hierarchical model.
Table 1.
MFQ fit metrics obtained in the previous studies.
Fig 2.
Incorporating multitrait-multimethod into a 5-foundation model of the MFQ.
Fig 3.
5-factor item-level model of including individualising and binding domains.
Table 2.
Study 1 comparative model fits, reported in order of most complex to least complex.
Table 3.
Model fit comparisons for the training dataset in Study 1.
Table 4.
Model fit comparisons for the holdout dataset replication in Study 1.
Fig 4.
Study 1 best-fitting model showing only the seven moral foundations and two general-factors (binding/individualizing and method variance paths in Fig 5 for clarity).
Fig 5.
Study 1 best-fitting model showing only the binding/individualizing and method variance paths (seven moral foundations and two general-factors in Fig 4 for clarity).
Fig 6.
Movement of items from the five MFQ foundations to the well-fitting 7 factor model.
Fig 7.
Structural part of the final model in Study 2.
Table 5.
Model fit comparisons for the replication dataset in Study 2.
Fig 8.
Structural part of the final model in Study 3.
Table 6.
Model fit comparisons for the replication dataset in the Study 3.
Fig 9.
Structural part of the final model in Study 4.
Table 7.
Model fit comparisons for the replication dataset in the Study 4.
Fig 10.
Structural part of the final model in Study 5.
Table 8.
Model fit comparisons for the replication dataset in the Study 5.