Fig 1.
Wheelchair ergometer inside EON IcubeTM Mobile.
Fig 2.
This graph shows what systems each participant was exposed to, and in which sessions. Also, it shows how many training sessions each participant needed. Also, the blue rectangle marks the main sessions.
Fig 3.
Experiments started on the left side and proceeded to the right side.
Table 1.
Technical descriptions of the VR systems.
Fig 4.
The questions added to IPO.
Table 2.
IPQ data available for each participant.
Table 3.
MSAQ data available for each participant.
Table 4.
Details of statistical procedures for the analyses 1 to 5.
Table 5.
Details of statistical procedures for the analysis 6.
Table 6.
Details of statistical procedures for the non-parametric tests.
Table 7.
Number of participants (#females, #males) taking each number of training sessions.
Fig 5.
Average MSAQ score of all data for each subcategory.
Fig 6.
Mean and SD of subcategories of MSAQ for the first and the last training sessions.
The prefix INV- indicates outcomes that needed transformation to comply with the normal distribution condition.
Table 8.
Mean and SD of MSAQ subcategories for the training sessions.
Fig 7.
Mean and SD of MSAQ subcategories for the main sessions.
The prefix INV- indicates that transformation was needed to comply with the normal distribution condition.
Table 9.
Median of general and spatial presence (Scores are out of 6).
Table 10.
Mean and SD of presence factors (out of 6).
Fig 8.
The linear trend for INV and ER among the three systems.
The system with the lowest scores (VR_sysII) was placed far left and the system with the highest scores (VR_sysIII) was placed far right on the horizontal axis.
Fig 9.
Distances each system score has from the ideal situation (absolute similarity).
Table 11.
Descriptive statistics for Q15.
Fig 10.
Word cloud for VR_sysI (made using [34]).
Fig 11.
Word cloud for VR_sysII (made using [34]).
Fig 12.
Word cloud for VR_sysIII (made using [34]).