Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Antenna’s radiation pattern obtention methods: Conventional (left, the ship circles and a probe antenna stays in the coast) and alternative (right, the vessel is static at sea and a UAV circles it).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Correction factor that should be applied to the estimated gain if radial distance deviation from the theoretical path exists.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Far field distance as a function of antenna's dimension for different wavelengths.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The two possible flight heights of the UAV and their influence on the clearance of the first Fresnel ellipsoid.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The first Fresnel's ellipsoid radius (flight level) for different frequencies.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Multipath issue based on the two-ray ground-reflection theory.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Received power at f = 900 MHz, having hAUT = 2 m and hUAV = 50 m.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Avoidable and recommended measurement zones due to multipath effect (f = 900 MHz, hAUT = 2 m, hUAV = 50 m).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

UAV's received signal power in AUT environment (0–800 m range).

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

UAV's received signal power in AUT environment (detail on 300–600 m range).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Circular trajectory calculated for lateral guidance.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Polarization vector evolution at receiving antenna when a UAV is rolling (rotating with respect to the x axis).

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Roll angle evolution and decoupling losses due to rotation with respect to the x axis.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Polarization vector evolution at receiving antenna in a real flight.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Decoupling losses in a real flight for pitch and roll motions.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 1.

F100 class main dimensions and equipment.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Minimum flight distance according to criteria.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Minimum flight distance according to criteria (reduced version).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 16.

Multipath scenario for f = 300 MHz, hUAV = hAUT = 21.5 m.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Power received in a multipath scenario for f = 300 MHz, hUAV = hAUT = 21.5 m.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Table 4.

First Fresnel’s ellipsoid height for hUAV = hAUT = 21.5 m.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Radius, flight level and measurement uncertainty for F-100’s class Spanish Navy frigates’ antenna.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 18.

Pitch and roll angle evolution for a 10° polygonal flight at v = 1 m/s, radius 50 m.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Pitch and roll angle evolution for a trajectory guided circle path, at v = 1 m/s, evel = 0.2 m/s and R = 50 m.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

UAV carrying the proposed measurement system: Vertical antenna and software radio receiver.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

Polarization decoupling losses vs time for a polygonal flight under 10° resolution, 1 m/s ground speed and R = 50 m.

More »

Fig 21 Expand