Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of the G-OSAD ratings of the three trained raters across all of the debriefings (N = 57).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Interrater reliability (as intraclass correlation coefficient) for the single and average ratings for each category across all of the debriefings (N = 57).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Psychometric properties of the original English Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) [17] and the German OSAD.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Fitting statistics for the one factor model for all of the debriefings (N = 57).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 1.

Factor structure of the G-OSAD.

Full model and standardised parameter estimates. Rectangles, observed variables; oval, latent construct. The paths from the latent construct to the observed variables indicate the standardised loading (β) of each variable. The arrows to the observed variables (left) indicate the measurement errors (ε). The category of ‘establishes learning environment’ was not assessed because it was not part of the video recordings of the debriefings, and therefore it was excluded.

More »

Fig 1 Expand