Fig 1.
IPAS structure pre and post factorial analysis.
Table 1.
Description of the characteristics from the patients that integrated S-1 and S-2.
Table 2.
IPAS feasibility (pre-validation version).
Table 3.
Experts IPAS items evaluation.
Table 4.
Preferred decision making role among the patients classified according their autonomy ideal.
Table 5.
IPAS internal consistency and reliability/temporal stability.
Table 6.
Characteristics from patients that integrated S-3.
Table 7.
Autonomy ideal distribution, among the 497 patients with a preferred autonomy ideal, according to specific rheumatic disease diagnosis.
Table 8.
Comparison of global PDRQ-9 score and individual items scores among patient-doctor encounters with/without concordance in the preferred ideal of autonomy.
Fig 2.
β coefficients of simple linear regression analysis, to ascertain the magnitude of the relationship between individual PDRQ-9 items scores and patient-doctor encounters with concordance in the ideal of autonomy.
p≤0.001 but * (p = 0.06).
Table 9.
Comparison of characteristics from patients with ideal of autonomy physician-centered (paternalistic) and those with ideal of autonomy patient-centered.