Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Representative image of tumor segmentation using thyroid US.

A diagonal region-of-interest (ROI) was drawn along the tumor border (red line) for feature extraction.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Demographic features of the total thyroid cancers and conventional PTCs<20-mm according to the presence of BRAFV600E mutation.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Texture feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression model.

(A) Tuning parameter (lambda, λ) selection in the LASSO model used 10-fold cross validation for 527 thyroid cancers. The mean deviance (goodness-of-fit statistics, red dots) was plotted versus log(λ), error bars displaying the range of standard error. Dotted vertical lines were drawn at the point of minimum deviance (λ value = 0.03229), and at the point where maximum λ was obtained among errors smaller than the standard error of minimum deviance (λ value = 0.08984). (B) LASSO coefficient profiles of the 730 texture features. A coefficient profile was plotted versus log(λ). The gray vertical line was drawn at the value selected using 10-fold cross validation, where the optimal λ resulted in 8 nonzero coefficients. (C) Tuning parameter (lambda, λ) selection in the LASSO model used 10-fold cross validation for 389 conventional PTCs <20-mm. The mean deviance (goodness-of-fit statistics, red dots) was plotted versus log(λ), error bars displaying the range of standard error. Dotted vertical lines were drawn at the point of minimum deviance (λ value = 0.0329208), and at the point where maximum λ was obtained among errors smaller than the standard error of minimum deviance (λ value = 0.072595). (D) LASSO coefficient profiles plotted versus log(λ), gray vertical line was drawn at the value selected using 10-fold cross validation, where the optimal λ resulted in 4 nonzero coefficients.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Univariable and multivariable analysis in predicting the presence of BRAFV600E mutation in the training cohort of the total thyroid cancers and conventional PTC<20-mm.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Calibration plots of the grouped prediction models for the presence of BRAFV600E mutation.

For each plot, the y-axis represents the actual probability of BRAFV600E mutation, and the x-axis represents the predicted risk for BRAFV600E mutation. (A) Calibration plot for the total thyroid cancers and (B) conventional PTCs measuring <20-mm included in this study.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Discrimination ability of the models in the total thyroid cancers and the conventional PTCs<20-mm.

More »

Table 3 Expand