Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Definitions of consensus for the Delphi survey and consensus meeting.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Demographics of patient Delphi participants who completed both rounds.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Demographics of HCP Delphi participants who completed both rounds.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Percentage of patients and HCPs scoring 7–9 (critical) for an outcome in rounds 1 and 2.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Percentages of patients and HCPs who voted 1–3 (not important), 4–6 (important but not critical), 7–9 (critical) for the “no consensus” outcomes at the consensus meeting.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

The 16 outcomes that constitute the Cauda Equina Syndrome core outcome set.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 1.

Overview of core outcome set development and the final Cauda Equina Syndrome core outcome set.

More »

Fig 1 Expand