Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

(A) Pressure-generating and measuring equipment, consisting of a driving unit, a measuring unit, and a control program unit. (B) Operating unit. (C) Contactor.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Operating protocol for the pressure pain threshold measurements.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Pressure pain threshold measurement sites on the body.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Pain assessment sites in both front and back of the body.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Pressure pain thresholds for 15 body sites; mean values of three repeated measurements at each site for 100 participants.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Pressure pain threshold which is arithmetic mean from 3 repeated measurements.

Both percentile and quartile for arithmetic mean values.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Variations in pressure pain thresholds by (A) age and (B) body mass index (BMI).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Skin changes after pressure pain threshold measurements.

Mild changes, including depressions, erythema, and scratch, were primarily observed.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

(A) Distribution of pressure pain threshold measured at the forehead. (B) Peak values and (C) half-width determined from the Gaussian fit of the thresholds of 100 participants.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the first, second, and third measurements at each site.

The correlations were classified as good (ICC ≥ 0.75), fair-to-good (0.40 ≤ ICC < 0.75), or poor (ICC < 0.40).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals for multivariate log-normal regressions examining pressure pain thresholds as a function of age (A) and BMI (B).

More »

Fig 9 Expand