Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Study design.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Participants’ characteristics.

Categorical variables expressed as absolute frequencies (relative frequencies) and continuous variables as mean (standard deviation).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Analysis of TMG variables in the five 2 min CPR-periods.

Results shown as mean (standard deviation). Analysis performed by repeated measures ANOVA.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Analysis of chest compression quality by 2-min CPR-period.

Below, analysis of the feedback-training inter-group factor in the total 10-CPR. All results shown as median (interquartile rank).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparison of CPR variables between participants with and without previous feedback training.

Ventilation section: graphic with % of ventilations with excessive, insufficient and null volume and global ventilation quality (left); participants who achieved a mean of 500–600 ml (right). Compression section: analysis of both protocols, standard CPR (left) and compression-only CPR (right).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Rescue breaths quality analysed from three inter-groups factors in the total 10-min CPR.

Results shown as median (interquartile rank).

More »

Table 4 Expand