Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

The prevalence of the five comorbidities in the final dataset based on the five years of care.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Demographics of the patients included in the study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Framework.

General Scheme of the proposed method.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Unsupervised method.

Implementation of the Proposed Algorithm (Unsupervised).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Supervised method.

The network structure inferred from literature review.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Unsupervised network.

Learned BN structure from the proposed method (Unsupervised Method).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Similarity between the learned matrices.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The Area Under the Curve (AUC) performance of the competing methods for predicting future comorbidities, given comorbidity information of past years.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Conditional probabilities of the comorbidities in year two, given year one data, for a sample patients with the following risk factors, gender (male), marital status (unmarried), education (less than high school), race (white), and age (18-30).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

The confusion matrices of the unsupervised, semi-supervised, and supervised MTBNs for prediction of comorbidities of year 5, given year 1, 2, 3, 4 data, based on a 50% threshold.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 5.

Longest path.

The longest paths in the MTBNs. From left (a) Unsupervised Network (b) Semi-supervised Network and (c) Supervised Network.

More »

Fig 5 Expand