Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparisons of patient characteristics between groups with baseline liver stiffness of ≥1.82 and <1.82 m/s.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Stratified changes in liver stiffness and serum alanine aminotransferase levels from baseline to sustained virologic response visit.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

The paired values of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), platelet, liver stiffness, fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) compared between baseline and sustained virologic response (SVR) visit.

SVR status: yes, n = 219; no, n = 37; *P < 0.05.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Stratified changes in FIB-4 index and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index from baseline to sustained virologic response visit.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Multiple linear regression analysis for declines in liver stiffness, FIB-4 and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index from baseline to sustained virologic response visit.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Multiple logistic regressions for sustained virologic response status.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using baseline liver stiffness (LS), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, and the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and hepatitis C viral (HCV) load to dichotomize sustained virologic response (SVR) (no versus yes).

According to the ROC analysis, the areas under curves were 0.624 (95% confidence interval, 0.514–0.733), 0.655 (0.560–0.751), 0.594 (0.496–0.692), and 0.618 (0.520–0.716) for baseline LS (A), the FIB-4 index (B), APRI (C), and HCV viral load (D), respectively, to dichotomize SVR (no versus yes). The comparison of the AUCs was not significant between the FIB-4 index and LS (P = 0.4231), between the APRI and LS (P = 0.4621), or between the HCV viral load and LS (P = 0.8104).

More »

Fig 2 Expand