Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographic data from the healthy participants (group1), patients with obstructive lung disease (group 2), and patients with restrictive lung disease (group 3).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Two consecutive computed tomography lung volume measurements in healthy participants (group1), patients with obstructive lung disease (group 2), and patients with restrictive lung disease (group 3).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Comparisons between the two consecutive computed tomography (CT) lung volumes in healthy participants (group 1), patients with obstructive lung disease (group 2), and patients with restrictive lung disease (group 3).

Plots show the lung volumes from the first and follow-up CT scans. From left to right are the correlations from the two CT scans in (a) group 1 (n = 200, correlation coefficient (r) = 0.818, p<0.01), (b) group 2 (n = 100, r = 0.880, p<0.01), and (c) group 3 (n = 100, r = 0.910, p<0.01).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Bland-Altman plots of the correlations between the two consecutive computed tomography (CT) lung volumes in healthy participants (group1), patients with obstructive lung disease (group 2), and patients with restrictive lung disease (group 3).

(a) in group 1, (b) group 2,(c) group 3. The dashed line indicates the mean bias, while the solid line indicates ±1.96 standard deviation.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Repeatability of the CTvol measurements in healthy participants (group1), patients with obstructive lung disease (group 2), and patients with restrictive lung disease (group 3).

More »

Table 3 Expand