Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Summary of recruitment flow.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline demographics of control and revascularized subjects.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Box plot showing baseline (grey) and follow up (white) PV:isoSK-GFR characteristics in improver, stable and deteriorator kidneys.

*P<0.05 within group.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of imaging measurements between groups divided by renal functional outcome, comparing these outcome groups for stented ARVD kidneys and non-ARVD contralateral kidneys.

Between group statistical analysis is by ANCOVA.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Percentage change in isoSK-GFR at 4 months post-revascularization grouped according to PV:isoSK-GFR ratio.

“High ratio” indicates those kidneys which had a PV:isoSK-GFR that exceeded the 95% CI for a given volume of a control kidney.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

PV:isoSK-GFR characteristics of control kidneys used to establish 95% CI.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Receiver operating characteristic curves for >15% improvement in isoSK-GFR following revascularization.

Dashed line represents isoSK-GFR (AUC 0.81). Solid line represents addition of PV:isoSK-GFR values (AUC 0.93).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of predicted versus actual outcomes for individual stented kidneys.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Survival curves for revascularized patients divided into improvers versus non-improvers, and comparing with non ARVD control patients, adjusted for baseline age, co-morbidities, and GFR.

More »

Fig 5 Expand