Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Averaged error rate as a function of degrees of assistant referees’ visual angle between the passer and the defender.

Note that the number of observations contributing to each bar varies.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Averaged error rate as a function of the separation in depth between the assistant referee and the passer in meters.

Note that the number of observations contributing to each bar varies.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Averaged error rate as a function of the separation in depth between the assistant referee and the defender in meters.

Note that the number of observations contributing to each bar varies.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Sequence of events in a trial with stimuli along the horizontal meridian.

(Note: Reprinted from [10] under CC-BY license).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

All offside calls made by the ten assistant referees who participated in the laboratory-based attentional spread task plotted as a deviation from each assistant referee’s maximum visual angle.

The error rate for the assistant referees’ decision requiring visual angles less than the assistant referees’ individual maximum visual angle measured in the laboratory task is presented in gray and for situations requiring visual angles greater than the individual maximum visual angle in black. The X-axis shows each assistant referee’s number and the Y-axis shows the assistant referees’ error rate.

More »

Fig 5 Expand