Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population (n = 4,952; nmen = 2,183; nwomen = 2,769).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Correlations between indicators of objective and subjective socioeconomic status, for the total sample and by sex (correlation coefficients).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Rotated factor matrix, for the total sample and by sex (factor loadings from principal factor analysis with orthogonal varimax rotation).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Prevalence of depressive symptoms according to age group and indicators of objective and subjective socioeconomic status, for the total sample and by sex.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Adjusted odds ratios of depressive symptoms according to objective socioeconomic status and subjective social status, for the total sample and by sex.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 1.

Mediation analysis of the association between objective socioeconomic status (SES) and depressive symptoms as mediated by subjective social status (SSS).

Standardized coefficients, adjusted for age, age2, residential region, immigrant status, chronic conditions, global activity limitations (plus sex and sex*age in the total sample). Coefficients for direct associations in parentheses. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 6.

Adjusted odds ratios of depressive symptoms according to individual dimensions of objective socioeconomic status and subjective social status, for the total sample and by sex.

More »

Table 6 Expand