Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographics of MERS positive HCW, MERS positive non-HCW and MERS negative cases.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of potential exposure factors among the three patient groups.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of clinical symptoms and co-morbidity status among the three patient groups.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of laboratory parameters among three patient groups.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of poor outcome among three patient groups.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Factors associated with poor outcome (admission to ICU or death) among 48 MERS patients.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Factors associated with fatal outcome in 48 MERS cases.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 1.

Time from hospital admission to death.

A: Comparing patients with MERS-CoV infection (red line) and those negative for MERS-CoV (black line) (p = 0.01). B: Comparing health care workers with MERS CoV (red dotted line; group1), non-HCW with MERS (red solid line; group 2) and patients without MERS-CoV infection (black solid line; group 3). Log rank test group 1 vs. group 2 p = 0.003; group 2 vs group 3 p = 0.45; group 1 vs group 3 p<0.001.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Time from hospital admission to death stratified by comorbid disease status among MERS positive cases.

Survival analysis was carried out to ascertain impact of co-morbidities on survival in patients with MERS-CoV infection. Black line (group 1): No comorbid disease; Red line (group 2): Diabetes with or without other comorbidities; Green line (group 3): Any other comorbid disease without diabetes. Log rank test: group 1 vs group 2 p = 0.01; Group 1 vs. group 3 p = 0.54; group 2 vs. group 3 p = 0.01.

More »

Fig 2 Expand