Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic illustration of the dual-labeling TRFIA for simultaneous detection of aCL IgG and IgM.

First, pipette 100μl/well pretreated standard substance or serum to microtiter plate that precoated with aCL antigen, and incubated the plate with shaking for 30 min at 25°C. A washing step removes unbound and unspecifically bound serum or plasma components. Second, added 100μl conjugate of buffer diluted Eu3+-labeled anti-human IgG and buffer diluted Sm3+-labeled anti-human IgM into each well, and incubated with shaking for 30min at 25°C. A second washing step removes unbound conjugate. Then, 200μl enhancement solution was pipette to each well and shaken for 5 min. Last, read the fluorescent intensity.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The calibration curves for aCL IgG and IgM using proposed dual-labeling TRFIA.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Intra- and Inter-assay precision of dual-label assay for aCL IgM and aCL IgG in serum of controls.

It was analyzed by measuring three pools of mixed serum specimens with high, intermediate and low concentration of aCL IgM and IgG 25 times in one series (intra-assay) and in duplicate in ten different series.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Recovery rate of dual-label assay for aCL IgG.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Recovery rate of dual-label assay for aCL IgM.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Correlation between ELISA and dual-label assay of aCL IgG (Fig 3a) and IgM (Fig 3b) in human sera (n = 52).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The comparison of liner range between ELISA and dual-label TRFIA for the detection of aCL IgG (Fig 4a) and IgM (Fig 4b), respectively.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Clinical positive rate.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

The strength and weakness of the dual-label TRFIA.

More »

Table 5 Expand