Table 1.
Allocation principles.
Fig 1.
Top row: three different sources of respondents; bottom row: self-declared medical background.
Table 2.
Three hypothetical situations of scarce medical resource allocation, and their respective nine allocation principle alternatives.
Fig 2.
Fairness ratings and forced choice of one single principle (percentage and 95% CI) by lay people versus general practitioners for three situations of scarce medical resource allocation.
For the groups medical students and other health professionals see S1 Fig).
Table 3.
Odds ratios (95% CIs) of allocation principles by explanatory variables such as medical background, gender, age, religion, political orientation, and health state in binary logistic regression model.