Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Quality conceptual framework for cardiovascular diseases, the DCP3.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flow diagram describing the systematic literature review process.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Study Characteristics (n = 49).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

System level-acute phase CVD quality improvement studies identified during review.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

System level-chronic phase CVD quality improvement studies identified during review.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Patient/provider level-acute phase CVD quality improvement studies identified during review.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Patient/provider level-chronic phase CVD quality improvement studies identified during review.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 3.

Examples of acute phase CVD quality improvement interventions identified in the DCP3 systematic review.

Types of interventions targeting three levels of acute phase CVD prevention and management. Bullets in bold type are supported by evidence from the review. Bullets without bold type indicate that no supporting evidence was found in the review and are potential areas for further research.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Examples of chronic phase CVD quality improvement interventions identified in the DCP3 systematic review.

Types of interventions targeting three levels of chronic phase CVD prevention and management. Bullets in bold are supported by evidence from the review. Bullet without bold type indicate that no supporting evidence was found in the review and are potential areas for further research.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Duration of chronic cardiovascular disease or risk factor management studies identified in the DCP3 systematic review.

More »

Fig 5 Expand