Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

IAP CURAPROX probe.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of the IDBs in relationship to the classification of the access diameter for the interdental space.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Distribution of characteristics in interproximal sites (30/subject), denoted in bars, corresponding to 99 adults*.

(A) Distribution of interproximal sites (99 x 30 = 2970 sites) from 99 adults according to the type of tooth. (B) Distribution of interproximal diameter access in 2408 sites with spaces. (C) Distribution of bleeding after interproximal brush in 2408 sites. * Note that the teeth are numbered.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Distribution (mean ± sd) of the number of interproximal sites according to the diameter of the interproximal brush in 99 adults.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

IDB and bleeding in sites with spaces (n = 2408) in 99 adults.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Distribution of interproximal sites (n = 2408a) from 99 adults according to adult’s variables.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Univariate and multivariate associationsa between studied variables and interproximal bleeding after IDB (n = 2408 sites).

More »

Table 5 Expand