Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Physical characteristics of the two groups of subjects.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The resistance training program.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

The endurance training program for the ER group.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Fiber composition, fiber area, and capillary density in biopsies from the vastus lateralis taken before (Pre) and after (Post) 7 weeks of training.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 1.

Levels of proteins in the Akt signaling pathway before and after 7 weeks of training.

(A) Akt, (B) mTOR and (C) S6K1 in skeletal muscle before (Pre) and after (Post) 7 weeks of strength training only (R) or combined endurance and resistance exercise (ER). The values presented are arbitrary units normalized to the corresponding level of GAPDH and represent means ± SD for 7 subjects in the R group and 9 subjects in the ER group. For all three proteins, the ANOVA revealed a main effect of time, in addition a significant interaction (time and group) was detected for levels of Akt. Representative immunoblots from two subjects (one from each group) are shown above of each graph. *P < 0.05 for Post vs. Pre training.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Expression of MAFbx and MuRF-1 before and after 7 weeks of training.

(A) mRNA and (B) protein levels of MAFbx, (C) mRNA and (D) protein levels of MuRF-1 in skeletal muscle before (Pre) and after (Post) 7 weeks of strength training only (R) or combined endurance and resistance exercise (ER). The values presented are arbitrary units normalized to the corresponding level for GAPDH and represent means ± SD for 7 subjects in the R group and 9 subjects in the ER group. The ANOVA revealed a main effect of time for total protein levels of MAFbx as well as an interaction (time and group) for mRNA expression of MuRF-1. Representative immunoblots from two subjects (one from each group) are shown above graphs C and D. *P < 0.05 for Post vs. Pre training.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Relationship between changes in Akt protein and changes in fiber area.

(A) correlation between changes in the level of Akt protein and changes in type I fiber area (r = 0.61; P<0.05), (B) correlation between changes in the level of Akt protein and changes in mean fiber area (r = 0.61; P<0.05).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Relationship between changes in mTOR protein and changes in fiber area.

(A) correlation between changes in the level of mTOR protein and changes in type I fiber area (r = 0.55; P<0.05), (B) correlation between changes in the level of mTOR protein and changes in mean fiber area (r = 0.55; P<0.05). One value differed considerably from the rest and was therefore regarded as an outlier and excluded from the calculations (1830; -0.16 and 1438; -0.16 in A and B, respectively).

More »

Fig 4 Expand