Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Percentage of Round Choices by Name Type and Gender in Experiment 1a.

The percentage of trials on which participants selected the round silhouette as the best match for round-sounding and sharp-sounding, female and male names. Error bars reflect 95% confidence intervals computed using the method outlined by Cousineau [31] to remove between-subject variability.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Summary of logistic regression predicting the likelihood of a round silhouette selection.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of logistic regression predicting the likelihood of a congruent silhouette selection.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Percentage of Round Choices by Name Type and Gender in Experiment 1b.

The percentage of trials on which participants selected the round silhouette as the best match for round-sounding and sharp-sounding, female and male names. Error bars reflect 95% confidence intervals computed using the method outlined by Cousineau [31] to remove between-subject variability.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of logistic regression predicting the likelihood of a round silhouette selection.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Summary of logistic regression predicting the likelihood of a congruent silhouette selection.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Percentage of Round-Sounding and Sharp-Sounding Consonants in Typical Names.

The percentage of round-sounding and sharp-sounding consonant phonemes within either typical female or male names. Error bars reflect 95% confidence intervals computed using the method outlined by Cousineau [31] to remove between-item variability.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 5.

Summary of the logistic regression predicting the likelihood of a name being female.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Percentage of Round Choices by Adjective Type and Name Pair Gender in Experiment 2.

The percentage of trials on which participants selected the round-sounding name as the best match for a metaphorically-round or a metaphorically-sharp adjective, when the trial included female or male names. Error bars reflect 95% confidence intervals computed using the method outlined by Cousineau [31] to remove between-subject variability.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 6.

Summary of logistic regression predicting the likelihood of a round name selection.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Summary of logistic regression predicting the likelihood of a congruent name selection.

More »

Table 7 Expand