Fig 1.
CONSORT chart for the present study demonstrating group sizes for enrollment, allocation, follow-up, and analysis.
Table 1.
Composition of mindfulness training intervention.
Fig 2.
The Sustained-Attention-to-Response Task (SART).
Responses were withheld from targets (the digit 3). Responses to non-targets (all other single digits) were made with the space bar. Probe 1 and 2 appeared intermittently between trials.
Table 2.
Correlation values for self-report and performance variables on the SART at T1.
Fig 3.
Time 2 (T2) performance in each group after adjustment for variation in Time 1 (T1) performance for (A) A’, (B) ICV, and (C) Probe 2 response.
Asterisks denote a significant planned contrast at a p-value of < .05. ⟡ denotes a p-value of < .1. Error bars show standard error of the mean.
Fig 4.
A’ in each group from T1 to T2.
While the M8T and CIV groups did not change over time, the M8D and NTC groups degraded from T1 to T2. Asterisks denote a significant planed contrast at an alpha of .05. Error bars show standard error of the mean.