Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Osteosynthesis with Locking Head Screws without and with axial load and callus formation only at the trans cortex.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Osteosynthesis with DLS without and with axial load and circumferential callus formation.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

DLS – Dynamic Locking Screw with PIN-Sleeve-Design.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Specimens had a diameter of 27's modulus of 16.7 GPa.

Passive markers were attached to both cylinders and the LCP to perform the measurement with the optical motion analysis system.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Test set-up.

Axial load was applied by a universal testing machine. 3D-motion at the fracture gap was measured with an optical motion analysis system and visualized by vectors. Raw data of the 3D-motion of every passive marker was analyzed using the software MATLAB.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

In comparison to the LS, the DLS showed a biphasic stiffness distribution with an initial and a secondary stiffness.

The initial axial stiffness of DLS was 612.4/mm and secondary stiffness was 2301.9 N/mm. The mean LS axial stiffness was 2394.9 N/mm.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

With application of a 200(0.210 mm; SD ± 0,004 mm) (compared to the LS group (0.033 mm; SD ± 0.02 mm).

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Figure 8.

With application of a 500(0.49 mm; SD ± 0,008 mm) compared to the LS group (0.089 mm; SD ± 0,03 mm).

More »

Figure 8 Expand

Figure 9.

With the same pitch angle of the osteosynthesis plate, interfragmentary motion is higher using the DLS than the LS.

More »

Figure 9 Expand