Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Risk of bias assessment tool.

Across trials (n = 15), information is either from trials at a low risk of bias (green), or from trials at unclear risk of bias (yellow), or from trials at high risk of bias (red).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Flow diagram.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 1.

General study characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Pooled estimates of effect size (95% confidence intervals) expressed as weighted mean difference for the effects of AET vs. RT, CT vs. AET and CT vs. RT on anthropometric outcomes, blood lipids and cardiorespiratory fitness.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Mean differences estimated from the random effects network meta-analysis model

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Ranking probabilities of AET, RT, and CT for the different outcome parameters.

More »

Table 4 Expand