Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Knee moment vs. angle curve for a representative subject walking at .

Letters a-f on the graph correspond to the poses shown during a typical walking cycle (top, schematic timing is adapted from [60]). Quasi-stiffness is calculated based on the slope of the best line fit to the moment-angle curve of ab for the flexion stage (), and bd for the extension stage () of the weight acceptance phase (ad). The average of these two quasi-stiffness values is defined as the quasi-stiffness of the weight acceptance phase ().

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Details on Subjects and Experimental Trials used for Regression Fits.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

General-Form Models to Predict the Quasi-Stiffness of the Knee Joint in Stance for Normal Walking.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 2.

Knee quasi-stiffness for subject 10, as an example, in flexion (dark gray) and extension (light gray) stages, and weight acceptance phase (black) plotted against the gait speed.

The circles indicate the experimental values and the diamonds are the predictions of the general-form models (Table 2).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

The knee quasi-stiffness in the weight acceptance phase of the gait.

The experimental values are shown by circles, and the predictions of the general-form model by diamonds with average error of (14%), and the stature-based models by squares with average error of (9%) for the optimal gait speed.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 3.

Stature-Based Models to Predict the Quasi-Stiffness of the Knee Joint in Stance for Normal Walking at Optimal Gait Speed.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Average Error Values for Different Models.

More »

Table 4 Expand