Figure 1.
Example of a congruent trial in the masked condition.
Table 1.
Mean reaction times (SD) and error rates (SD) in both conditions as a function of congruency on the previous and the current trial.
Figure 2.
Priming effects (RTincongruent – RTcongruent), interference effects (RTincongruent – RTneutral), and facilitation effects (RTneutral – RTcongruent) as a function of congruency on the current and previous trial (congruent, neutral or incongruent) and condition (conscious or unconscious). Lines depict the effects for RTs and bars depict the effects for error rates. Error bars reflect 95% within-subject confidence intervals.