Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Model-Free Estimation of Tuning Curves and Their Attentional Modulation, Based on Sparse and Noisy Data

Fig 8

Effects of adding a second stimulus or attention to the receptive field.

A) Each dot in this cartoon (not based on measured data) represents the observed spike count in one trial. For a given stimulus, spike count distributions can differ between experimental conditions either significantly (e. g. at 60°) or not (e. g. at 240°). B) Distribution of the proportion of cells with a significant difference between conditions for a given number of stimuli (maximum 12). The green histograms represent the two conditions where a second stimulus was added and pink histograms the conditions where attention was switched. C-F) Histograms show the stimulus-dependent fraction of cells with a non-significant response modulation (blue), a significant response enhancement (green) or response suppression (pink). The dotted and orange arrows along the x-axes in E and F indicate the RDP direction not present in the uni condition and the attended RDP in ain condition, respectively. Across the population a second stimulus tended to increase firing rates around 120°(C,D) and to decrease them around 240°. Attention asymmetrically affected the left and right peak in the spatially separated paradigm (E) whereas it symmetrically increased both peaks for the transparent paradigm (F). These stimulus-specific changes were compatible with the results of the direct method discussed in the text.

Fig 8

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146500.g008