Reader Comments (21)

Post a new comment on this article

• 0 Responses
  18 May 2016
  17:19 GMT
  Most Recent
  Comment from Authors of the article Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 18 May 2016 at 17:19 GMT
• 0 Responses
  14 May 2016
  06:24 GMT
  Most Recent
  Bulls__t is in the eye of the beholder Posted by CraigDalton on 14 May 2016 at 06:24 GMT
• 0 Responses
  13 May 2016
  10:13 GMT
  Most Recent
  Not worthy of PLoS - see Ashley Landrum's critique Posted by msteinberg119 on 13 May 2016 at 10:13 GMT
• 0 Responses
  07 May 2016
  15:56 GMT
  Most Recent
  Questionable Motivation Posted by Niall.Bolger on 07 May 2016 at 15:56 GMT
• 2 Responses
  07 May 2016
  01:50 GMT
  Most Recent
  Suggested alternative title of this article: Being able to understand long words is correlated with conservatism Posted by bcowling on 06 May 2016 at 01:49 GMT
• 0 Responses
  06 May 2016
  15:09 GMT
  Most Recent
  Bull5hit! Posted by etzpcm on 06 May 2016 at 15:09 GMT
• 0 Responses
  06 May 2016
  13:18 GMT
  Most Recent
  A sad moment to PLOS One Posted by poliveira708 on 06 May 2016 at 13:18 GMT
• 3 Responses
  06 May 2016
  04:08 GMT
  Most Recent
  This is not science Posted by melaniemartin on 04 May 2016 at 16:00 GMT
• 2 Responses
  06 May 2016
  00:47 GMT
  Most Recent
  Is this article out of bounds? Posted by MichaelLichten on 03 May 2016 at 16:55 GMT
• 0 Responses
  06 May 2016
  00:41 GMT
  Most Recent
  Comment from Academic Editor of article Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 06 May 2016 at 00:41 GMT
• 1 Response
  06 May 2016
  00:23 GMT
  Most Recent
  Not finding result Posted by alandrum on 06 May 2016 at 00:17 GMT
• 0 Responses
  05 May 2016
  10:33 GMT
  Most Recent
  What is happening here....? Posted by canderson144 on 05 May 2016 at 10:33 GMT
• 0 Responses
  05 May 2016
  01:23 GMT
  Most Recent
  Differences in understanding of the word "profound"? Posted by canofuncanny on 05 May 2016 at 01:23 GMT