Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Not very useful

Posted by heinrichvs on 06 Jan 2010 at 16:05 GMT

1. The authors didn't follow the procedures employed by the Cleveland Clinic; hence, we're asked to compare apples and oranges.
2. There were no healthy controls.
3. There was no peer review for this paper, or if there was it lasted three days.

No competing interests declared.