Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closePotential confounding variables and generalisability issues
Posted by maxbarnish on 16 Jan 2016 at 12:48 GMT
I thought this was a very interesting study, however I have some questions/comments:
The authors might have investigated more what aspects of gender/relationship status could have driven this effect on walking speed
a) The gender effect might have been height related but this does not seem to have been a covariate
b)However, the absence of an effect with a non-romantic partner of the opposite gender seems to suggest that other factors might be at play - were the romantic partners talking more - i.e. a dual task condition?
c)Did they show any public displays of affection beyond those included as study variables - e.g. kissing or wrapping an arm around their girlfriend's waist? Both of these are likely to reduce walking speed.
d) Sexual arousal/an erection might physiologically impede walking gait as well
e) Were any of the women wearing high heels?
f) If they weren't wearing high heels during the study session, do they usually do so when walking with their partner? Men might change their pace more if their girlfriend regularly wear heels, since they are likely to reduce her walking pace
Regardless of these possible issues of confounding and generalisability, it is an interesting study and one I'm glad to see in the literature
Dr Max Barnish