Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

This is not science

Posted by melaniemartin on 04 May 2016 at 16:00 GMT

I'm sorry but this is just a shameless grab for media headlines. I doubt the authors' objectivity in pursuing this question. There is no clear scientific question advanced here, It is hard to read this as motivated by anything other than political ideology. Furthermore, it's bound to feed perceptions in the public and congress of liberal bias in academics. This article should not have been published and I have serious doubts about the integrity of the PLoS ONE peer-review and editorial process upon reading this. Full disclosure: I am a progressive liberal Democrat and voted in a recent Democratic primary

No competing interests declared.

RE: This is not science

bblimmer replied to melaniemartin on 05 May 2016 at 11:49 GMT

Of course not. This poorly written opinion.

No competing interests declared.

RE: This is not science

PLOS_ONE_Group replied to melaniemartin on 06 May 2016 at 00:45 GMT

Please note that we have added a comment on behalf of the Academic Editor of the article:

http://journals.plos.org/...

Competing interests declared: PLOS ONE staff

RE: This is not science

alandrum replied to melaniemartin on 06 May 2016 at 04:08 GMT

I wrote a blog post on this and there are some others who are also working to examine the data. http://www.asheleylandrum...

No competing interests declared.