Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeMedia Coverage of This Article
Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 12 Jul 2013 at 17:44 GMT
The following article represents some of the media coverage that has occurred for this paper:
Publication: Slate.fr
Title: “Pourquoi il y a de plus en plus d'études scientifiques retirées”
http://www.slate.fr/scien...
If you see any additional coverage of this paper in the press or blogosphere, please reply to this thread and add the link to the article.
Media Coverage of This Article
PLOS_ONE_Group replied to PLOS_ONE_Group on 22 Jul 2013 at 22:26 GMT
The following article represents some of the media coverage that has occurred for this paper:
Publication: Retraction Watch
Title: “Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? New study tries to answer”
http://retractionwatch.wo...
If you see any additional coverage of this paper in the press or blogosphere, please reply to this thread and add the link to the article.
Media Coverage of This Article
PLOS_ONE_Group replied to PLOS_ONE_Group on 18 Oct 2013 at 21:49 GMT
The following articles represent some of the media coverage that has occurred for this paper:
Publication: Impact of Social Sciences
Title: “Is scientific misconduct increasing? Retraction rates may present more questions than answers. | Impact of Social Sciences”
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/im...
If you see any additional coverage of this paper in the press or blogosphere, please reply to this thread and add the link to the article.