Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

"Dissapeared" feedback

Posted by Reg_Connolly on 18 Jul 2012 at 19:55 GMT

I'm not a conspiracy theorist and I am sure there is perfectly rational explanation for this...

...however I am curious…

…this morning (18 July 2012) there were 8 comments which were critical of the scientific diligence demonstrated in the work “The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming” by Dr Wiseman et al.

Yet, this evening just 5 comments remain.

Could PLosONE please clarify?

Competing interests declared: NLP Trainer who has already commented on this research paper (see 14 July comment)

RE: "Dissapeared" feedback

PLOS_ONE_Group replied to Reg_Connolly on 19 Jul 2012 at 10:22 GMT

We have removed some comments that we felt contravened our guidelines for 'good practice'. More details can be found here:

We welcome all discourse that relates to the content of the paper and adheres to our practice guidelines.


No competing interests declared.