TY - JOUR T1 - Widespread Nanoparticle-Assay Interference: Implications for Nanotoxicity Testing A1 - Ong, Kimberly J. A1 - MacCormack, Tyson J. A1 - Clark, Rhett J. A1 - Ede, James D. A1 - Ortega, Van A. A1 - Felix, Lindsey C. A1 - Dang, Michael K. M. A1 - Ma, Guibin A1 - Fenniri, Hicham A1 - Veinot, Jonathan G. C. A1 - Goss, Greg G. Y1 - 2014/03/11 N2 - The evaluation of engineered nanomaterial safety has been hindered by conflicting reports demonstrating differential degrees of toxicity with the same nanoparticles. The unique properties of these materials increase the likelihood that they will interfere with analytical techniques, which may contribute to this phenomenon. We tested the potential for: 1) nanoparticle intrinsic fluorescence/absorbance, 2) interactions between nanoparticles and assay components, and 3) the effects of adding both nanoparticles and analytes to an assay, to interfere with the accurate assessment of toxicity. Silicon, cadmium selenide, titanium dioxide, and helical rosette nanotubes each affected at least one of the six assays tested, resulting in either substantial over- or under-estimations of toxicity. Simulation of realistic assay conditions revealed that interference could not be predicted solely by interactions between nanoparticles and assay components. Moreover, the nature and degree of interference cannot be predicted solely based on our current understanding of nanomaterial behaviour. A literature survey indicated that ca. 95% of papers from 2010 using biochemical techniques to assess nanotoxicity did not account for potential interference of nanoparticles, and this number had not substantially improved in 2012. We provide guidance on avoiding and/or controlling for such interference to improve the accuracy of nanotoxicity assessments. JF - PLOS ONE JA - PLOS ONE VL - 9 IS - 3 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090650 SP - e90650 EP - PB - Public Library of Science M3 - doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090650 ER -