Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

Elizabeth Gargon; Sarah L. Gorst; Paula R. Williamson

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225980

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

Elizabeth Gargon ,

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: e.gargon@liverpool.ac.uk

Affiliation Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3848-0113

⨯
Sarah L. Gorst,

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
⨯
Paula R. Williamson

Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
⨯

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

Elizabeth Gargon,
Sarah L. Gorst,
Paula R. Williamson

Published: December 12, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225980

About the Authors

Elizabeth Gargon

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: e.gargon@liverpool.ac.uk

Affiliation Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3848-0113

Sarah L. Gorst

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Paula R. Williamson

Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Competing Interests

EG and PW are members of the COMET Management Group. All other authors had no competing interests. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Subject Areas
?

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.
We want your feedback. Do these Subject Areas make sense for this article? Click the target next to the incorrect Subject Area and let us know. Thanks for your help!

Systematic reviews
Is the Subject Area "Systematic reviews" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Database searching
Is the Subject Area "Database searching" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Cancers and neoplasms
Is the Subject Area "Cancers and neoplasms" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Drug research and development
Is the Subject Area "Drug research and development" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Research reporting guidelines
Is the Subject Area "Research reporting guidelines" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Comparative effectiveness research
Is the Subject Area "Comparative effectiveness research" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Research quality assessment
Is the Subject Area "Research quality assessment" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Clinical trials
Is the Subject Area "Clinical trials" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.