Evaluation of the relative efficacy of a couple cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) for Premenstrual Disorders (PMDs), in comparison to one-to-one CBT and a wait list control: A randomized controlled trial

Jane M. Ussher; Janette Perz

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175068

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Evaluation of the relative efficacy of a couple cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) for Premenstrual Disorders (PMDs), in comparison to one-to-one CBT and a wait list control: A randomized controlled trial

Jane M. Ussher ,

Contributed equally to this work with: Jane M. Ussher, Janette Perz

* E-mail: j.ussher@westernsydney.edu.au

Affiliation Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2128-0019

⨯
Janette Perz

Contributed equally to this work with: Jane M. Ussher, Janette Perz

Affiliation Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
⨯

Evaluation of the relative efficacy of a couple cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) for Premenstrual Disorders (PMDs), in comparison to one-to-one CBT and a wait list control: A randomized controlled trial

Jane M. Ussher,
Janette Perz

Published: April 18, 2017
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175068

About the Authors

Jane M. Ussher

Contributed equally to this work with: Jane M. Ussher, Janette Perz

* E-mail: j.ussher@westernsydney.edu.au

Affiliation Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2128-0019

Janette Perz

Contributed equally to this work with: Jane M. Ussher, Janette Perz

Affiliation Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: JU JP. Data curation: JP. Formal analysis: JP JU. Funding acquisition: JU JP. Investigation: JU JP. Methodology: JU JP. Project administration: JU JP. Supervision: JU JP. Validation: JU JP. Visualization: JU JP. Writing – original draft: JU JP. Writing – review & editing: JU JP.

Subject Areas
?

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.
We want your feedback. Do these Subject Areas make sense for this article? Click the target next to the incorrect Subject Area and let us know. Thanks for your help!

Emotions
Is the Subject Area "Emotions" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Psychotherapy
Is the Subject Area "Psychotherapy" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Anxiety
Is the Subject Area "Anxiety" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Fats
Is the Subject Area "Fats" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Surveys
Is the Subject Area "Surveys" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Analysis of variance
Is the Subject Area "Analysis of variance" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Depression
Is the Subject Area "Depression" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Randomized controlled trials
Is the Subject Area "Randomized controlled trials" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.