Reward Maximization Justifies the Transition from Sensory Selection at Childhood to Sensory Integration at Adulthood

Pedram Daee; Maryam S. Mirian; Majid Nili Ahmadabadi

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103143

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Reward Maximization Justifies the Transition from Sensory Selection at Childhood to Sensory Integration at Adulthood

Pedram Daee ,

* E-mail: pedram.daee@gmail.com

Affiliation Cognitive Robotics Laboratory, Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
⨯
Maryam S. Mirian,

Affiliation Cognitive Robotics Laboratory, Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
⨯
Majid Nili Ahmadabadi

Affiliations Cognitive Robotics Laboratory, Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran
⨯

Reward Maximization Justifies the Transition from Sensory Selection at Childhood to Sensory Integration at Adulthood

Pedram Daee,
Maryam S. Mirian,
Majid Nili Ahmadabadi

Published: July 24, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103143

About the Authors

Pedram Daee

* E-mail: pedram.daee@gmail.com

Affiliation Cognitive Robotics Laboratory, Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Maryam S. Mirian

Majid Nili Ahmadabadi

Affiliations Cognitive Robotics Laboratory, Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PD MNA. Performed the experiments: PD. Analyzed the data: PD MNA MSM. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: PD MNA MSM. Developed the model: PD MNA MSM.

Subject Areas
?

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.
We want your feedback. Do these Subject Areas make sense for this article? Click the target next to the incorrect Subject Area and let us know. Thanks for your help!

Sensory perception
Is the Subject Area "Sensory perception" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Decision making
Is the Subject Area "Decision making" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Learning
Is the Subject Area "Learning" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Vision
Is the Subject Area "Vision" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Human learning
Is the Subject Area "Human learning" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Graphs
Is the Subject Area "Graphs" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Behavior
Is the Subject Area "Behavior" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Gaussian noise
Is the Subject Area "Gaussian noise" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.