Figures
Citation: Laustsen AH, Benard-Valle M, Habib AG, Casewell NR, Abouyannis M, Lalloo DG, et al. (2025) Target product profiles for pan-Africa recombinant antivenoms against neurotoxic or hemotoxic and cytotoxic snakebite envenoming. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 19(1): e0012833. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012833
Published: January 24, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Laustsen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: AHL is supported by a grant from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [850974] and a grant from Wellcome [221702/Z/20/Z]. MBV is supported by a Eurotech Postdoctoral fellowship from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement [899987]. AGH is supported by a grant from Tertiary Education Trust Fund Nigeria [NRF-BUK #1]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Snakebite envenoming is a neglected tropical disease that yearly causes more than 100,000 deaths worldwide and leaves many more individuals permanently disabled [1]. Because of this enormous human suffering, the World Health Organization (WHO) listed snakebite envenoming as a high-priority neglected tropical disease in 2017 [2], with the goal to reduce mortality and disability caused by snakebite envenoming by 50% by 2030 [3]. One of the avenues to reach this goal involves improving current envenoming therapy and developing new types of antivenom products. Today, the only specific treatments for snakebite envenoming are plasma-derived immunoglobulins or fragments of these (traditional antivenoms), which are obtained from large animals, such as horses, hyperimmunized with whole venoms from one or more snake species [4]. Although these traditional antivenoms continue to save lives, they come with some drawbacks, including limited efficacy against certain venoms or toxins, dependence on venoms for production, high production cost, batch-to-batch variation, and the risk of causing adverse immunological reactions upon administration [5]. To overcome these drawbacks, the development of recombinant antivenoms is being investigated [6]. These new types of antivenom are composed of broadly neutralizing, recombinantly produced antibodies or antibody fragments, and, today, several examples of how these can be discovered and optimized have been reported [7–11]. It is expected that, when properly engineered and developed, recombinant antivenoms have the potential to be safe, effective, and affordable [12,13]. However, to prove this in a clinical setting, the next step would be to develop and formulate specific antivenom products. To this end, decisions must be taken on desired product characteristics and properties, which can be outlined in so-called target product profiles (TPPs) (Fig 1). Such TPPs may also facilitate a regulatory harmonization of recombinant snakebite therapies in a centralized approach through the African Medicines Agency (similar to the European Medicines Agency) and thereby enable/expedite a timely introduction of products throughout sub-Saharan Africa [14].
The figure was created with BioRender.
As part of the WHO’s work within snakebite envenoming, recommended TPPs for traditional plasma-derived antivenoms for sub-Saharan Africa were developed and published in 2023 [15]. In these TPPs, key characteristics were defined by a technical and scientific advisory group, supported by the WHO and the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative. Thereafter, the public was consulted to allow relevant stakeholders to contribute to the final drafts. However, for completely new types of envenoming therapies, such as recombinant antivenoms, no recommended TPPs are available, and with the field of recombinant antivenom research moving at an increasing speed, a dire need for such TPPs is now presenting itself. In light of this, we developed our own suggested TPPs for recombinant antivenoms for the region of sub-Saharan Africa to serve as an exemplary starting point for the general development of recombinant antivenom products (S1 Text, TPPs). In these TPPs, we outline different product requirements depending on whether the product is intended for the treatment of neurotoxic or hemotoxic/cytotoxic snakebite envenoming. To facilitate easy translation and adaptation for researchers and product developers, we based our TPPs on WHO’s TPPs for plasma-derived antivenoms [15,16], but adapted the requirements to reflect the advantages that are anticipated for recombinant antivenoms compared to plasma-derived products in regards to safety, dosing, and manufacturing. This adaptation was based on literature and advice from experts in the field, who are mentioned in the acknowledgments, to ensure inclusivity and practical feasibility. We hope our TPPs can serve as an inspiration in the field of antivenom development and function as a starting point for the development of specific antivenom products for sub-Sahara Africa that will hopefully reach snakebite victims in the future. We also hope that our work serves as a foundation for the development of TPPs for recombinant antivenoms in other regions, allowing new TPPs to be tailored by incorporating clinical expertise and insights into regional variations in snake venom.
Supporting information
S1 Text. Target product profiles for pan-Africa recombinant antivenoms against neurotoxic or hemotoxic and cytotoxic snakebite envenoming.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012833.s001
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mike Turner (University of Glasgow), José María Gutiérrez (Universidad de Costa Rica), Leslie Boyer (University of Arizona and Ophirex) for valuable input on these TPPs.
References
- 1. Gutiérrez JM, Calvete JJ, Habib AG, Harrison RA, Williams DJ, Warrell DA. Snakebite envenoming. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Sep 14;3:17063. pmid:28905944
- 2. Chippaux J. Snakebite envenomation turns again into a neglected tropical disease! J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2017 Aug 8;23:38.
- 3.
World Health Organization. Snakebite envenoming: a strategy for prevention and control [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 [cited 2024 Oct 14. ]. 50 p. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/324838
- 4. Gutiérrez JM, Casewell NR, Laustsen AH. Progress and challenges in the field of snakebite envenoming therapeutics. 2024 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Oct 15. ]. Available from: https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-022024-033544
- 5. Laustsen AH, María Gutiérrez J, Knudsen C, Johansen KH, Bermúdez-Méndez E, Cerni FA, et al. Pros and cons of different therapeutic antibody formats for recombinant antivenom development. Toxicon. 2018 May 1;146:151–75. pmid:29534892
- 6. Laustsen AH. Recombinant snake antivenoms get closer to the clinic. Trends Immunol. 2024 Apr 1;45(4):225–7. pmid:38538486
- 7. Laustsen AH, Karatt-Vellatt A, Masters EW, Arias AS, Pus U, Knudsen C, et al. In vivo neutralization of dendrotoxin-mediated neurotoxicity of black mamba venom by oligoclonal human IgG antibodies. Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 2;9(1):3928. pmid:30279409
- 8. Ledsgaard L, Wade J, Jenkins TP, Boddum K, Oganesyan I, Harrison JA, et al. Discovery and optimization of a broadly-neutralizing human monoclonal antibody against long-chain α-neurotoxins from snakes. Nat Commun. 2023 Feb 8;14(1):682. pmid:36755049
- 9. Benard-Valle M, Wouters Y, Ljungars A, Nguyen GTT, Ahmadi S, Ebersole TW, et al. In vivo neutralization of coral snake venoms with an oligoclonal nanobody mixture in a murine challenge model. Nat Commun. 2024 May 21;15(1):4310. pmid:38773068
- 10. Khalek IS, Senji Laxme RR, Nguyen YTK, Khochare S, Patel RN, Woehl J, et al. Synthetic development of a broadly neutralizing antibody against snake venom long-chain α-neurotoxins. Sci Transl Med. 2024 Feb 21;16(735):eadk1867. pmid:38381847
- 11. Richard G, Meyers AJ, McLean MD, Arbabi-Ghahroudi M, MacKenzie R, Hall JC, et al. In vivo neutralization of α-cobratoxin with high-affinity llama single-domain antibodies (VHHs) and a VHH-Fc antibody. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e69495. pmid:23894495
- 12. Thumtecho S, Burlet NJ, Ljungars A, Laustsen AH. Towards better antivenoms: navigating the road to new types of snakebite envenoming therapies. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2023 Dec 18;29:e20230057. pmid:38116472
- 13. Jenkins TP, Laustsen AH. Cost of manufacturing for recombinant snakebite antivenoms. Front Bioeng Biotechnol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Sep 2. ];8. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00703
- 14. Gieber L, Muturi-Kioi V, Malhotra S, Sitlani A. Clinical and regulatory challenges and opportunities for monoclonal antibodies in low- and middle-income countries: lessons from COVID-19 and beyond. Pharm Med. 2023;37(3):203–14. pmid:37115494
- 15.
Target product profiles for animal plasma-derived antivenoms: antivenoms for treatment of snakebite envenoming in sub-Saharan Africa [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240074569
- 16.
Guidelines for the production, control and regulation of snake antivenom immunoglobulins, Annex 5, TRS No 1004 [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/snake-antivenom-immunoglobulins-annex-5-trs-no-1004