Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

Identification of the parasite, Trypanosoma cruzi, in multiple tissues of epidemiological significance in the Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana): Implications for environmental and vertical transmission routes

  • Carson W. Torhorst,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America

  • Zoe S. White,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America

  • Chanakya R. Bhosale,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America

  • Norman L. Beatty,

    Roles Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine in the College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America

  • Samantha M. Wisely

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America, Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America



Trypanosoma cruzi, a parasitic protozoan, is endemic to the Americas and the causative agent of Chagas disease in humans. In South America, opossums facilitate transmission via infected anal gland secretions in addition to transmission via triatomine vectors. In North America, the Virginia opossum is a reservoir host for the parasite with transmission routes that are not clearly defined. The unique biology of this marsupial provides the opportunity to investigate vertical transmission in this wildlife species in situ. Our objectives were to investigate alternative routes of transmission that may facilitate spillover into other species and to determine if vertical transmission was evident.

Methodology/Principal findings

Virginia opossums were sampled at 10 trapping locations over a 10-month period in a 5-county region of north central Florida. Peripheral blood, fecal swabs, and anal gland secretions were collected from each adult individual, and peripheral blood was collected from joey opossums. Total DNA was extracted from each collected sample type, and T. cruzi infected individuals and the infecting Discrete Typing Unit (DTU) were identified using real time PCR methods. Adult Virginia opossums (n = 112) were infected with T. cruzi (51.8%, 95% CI [42.6–60.8%]) throughout the sampled period and at each location. T. cruzi DNA was found in each of the three biological sample types. Vertical transmission of T. cruzi was inferred in one litter of mother-dependent (n = 20, 5.0%, 95% CI [0.9–23.6%]) joey opossums where 2 joeys from this same litter were rtPCR positive for T. cruzi.


We inferred vertical transmission from mother to neonate which may serve to amplify the prevalence of T. cruzi in adult Virginia opossums. T. cruzi DNA was detected in the anal gland secretions of Virginia opossums. Infected anal gland secretions suggest a possible environmental route of transmission for T. cruzi via the deposition of contaminated feces and spraint at wildlife latrines. Only DTU1 was identified in the sampled population which is consistent with human autochthonous cases in the United States.

Author summary

The etiological agent of Chagas disease is the hemoflagellated protozoan, Trypanosoma cruzi. The classical route of infection is via the bite of triatomine bugs. In the southern two thirds of the United States, the Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) serves as a key reservoir host in the vector-borne transmission cycle of T. cruzi. Independent of the vector, Virginia opossums may maintain and transmit the parasite through vertical and alternative horizontal transmission pathways. In this study we observed vertical transmission in opossums which may amplify the natural infection prevalence. In the South American opossum species, Didelphis marsupialis, the anal gland secretions, when infected with T. cruzi, are known to cause infection in other mammalian hosts. In Virginia opossums, it is possible that this evolutionary relationship also exists; we identified T. cruzi present in anal gland secretions in the sampled Virginia opossums of Florida which may have important disease transmission implications. These findings provide evidence that the anal gland secretions of the Virginia opossum are infected with T. cruzi; however work remains to be done to determine if anal gland secretions are infectious and provide an alternative route of transmission to wildlife and potentially humans.


Trypanosoma cruzi, a kinetoplastid protozoan, is the causative agent of Chagas disease (CD) in humans, and vectored by triatomine bugs [1,2]. Across the United States (US), CD is an emerging and likely underdiagnosed infectious disease; only 78 cases of autochthonous Chagas have been diagnosed in the US since 1950 [36]. Despite the low prevalence in people, the parasite has been shown to infect 27 different mammal species in the US which serve as reservoir hosts [1,79]. Chagas is traditionally understood as a vector-borne disease, however, environmental and vertical transmission have been observed [1,5,6,8,10,11]. Vertical transmission is a known to occur in both humans and domestic dogs, however, its relative impact on the sylvatic transmission cycle is unknown [2,12]. Environmental transmission via the ingestion of food products contaminated with infected triatomine fecal matter is an increasingly recognized route of transmission [13]. This transmission route has caused large zoonotic T. cruzi outbreaks in Brazil, Venezuela, and other South American countries [1317]. Consumption of an infected kissing bug is an additional horizontal route that impacts domestic reservoirs, like dogs, and this route is presumed to be one way wildlife are infected with the parasite [7,1822].

Opossum species are also suspected to maintain independent, alternate transmission cycles of T. cruzi that do not involve the arthropod vector [23,24]. It has been shown that the parasite will reproduce and transition to its metacyclic trypomastigote, thus completing the life cycle of the parasite within the anal gland secretions of certain opossum species [23,24]. This life cycle has been confirmed in Didelphis marsupialis, a South and Central American opossum species [22,23,2528]. T. cruzi infected anal gland secretions of D. marsupial have been shown to be infectious in a laboratory setting, providing strong evidence for an independent sylvatic transmission cycle [23,24,26,29]. In North America, the parasite has been found in anal glands of D. virginiana, but the prevalence of infected secretions and its ability to infect other mammals is unknown. It is, however, suspected that D. virginiana may potentially transmit T. cruzi to other reservoir hosts [5,22].

In addition to their suspected role in pathogen transmission, the Virginia opossum, a marsupial, provides the unique opportunity to observe vertical transmission of T. cruzi in situ. Developing neonates and juveniles (joeys) can be observed within their mother’s marsupium for up to 70 days [3032]. Within the marsupium, joey development can be split into two time periods; the mother-dependent stage (50 to 65 days post-parturition), where the joeys are completely dependent on the mother and cannot freely exit the marsupium, and the weaned stage, where the joeys can freely exit the marsupium and enter the external environment independent from the mother [3032]. While the joeys are dependent on their mother, the marsupium largely isolates them from the external environment which provides the opportunity to identify vertical transmission as the most parsimonious explanation for their infection. Even though T. cruzi is known to be transmitted vertically in mammals, little is known about how this mode of transmission impacts wildlife populations [8,3335]. By identifying vertical transmission, we also gain insight into how the multiple modalities of T. cruzi transmission may maintain or amplify prevalence of the parasite within this reservoir host species.

Despite the known status of the Virginia opossum as a T. cruzi reservoir host, there are still questions that surround the epidemiological and ecological role opossums play in the transmission cycle of T. cruzi. The objectives of this study investigated the role of Virginia opossums in the transmission cycle of T. cruzi in Florida by determining: (a) if the anal gland secretions of opossum are infected with T. cruzi and (b) if vertical transmission is taking place between infected mother and her joeys. We also confirmed the association between opossums and the T. cruzi Discrete Typing Unit, DTU1 (TcI). In addition, we determined the pathogen prevalence across 3 epidemiologically relevant sample types collected from Virginia opossums.


Ethics statement

Scientific collecting permits were obtained from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and permission was obtained from the appropriate land managing agencies or private landowners to gain access to the locations where live trapping took place. All animal trapping, handling, and sample collection methods were approved by the University of Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Study #202011195) and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.

Locations of sample collections

Virginia opossums were live trapped at 10 locations across 5 north central Florida counties between January 2021 to October 2021 (Fig 1). Each trapping location was selected based on the identification of triatomine intrusion into or domiciliation of households, triatomines observed in close proximity to a home (e.g., stacked building lumber), or locations in close (<2km) proximity to a housing location where triatomines were identified. Locations consisted of multiple land uses including private property and state managed lands across multiple habitat types in the Gulf Coast Forest ecosystem: hardwood hammock, hardwood swamp, mixed hardwood-pine forests, natural pine forests, and human modified peridomestic habitats.

Fig 1. Identification of the locations where Virginia opossums were sampled.

Identification of the 5 counties, sampled location, and nearest city to the sampled location in north central Florida where opossums were live trapped. Map was created using QGIS Geographic Information System version 3.22.5-Białowieża, County layers map (TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2016, state, Florida, Current County Subdivision State-based) and city locations (TIGER/Line Shapefile, Current, State, Florida, Places) were accessed from the United States Census Bureau,

Animal handling and processing

At each sampling site we conducted 8 to 12 nights of trapping using 20 or 21 Tomahawk live traps (series 106 and 207) (Tomahawk Live Trap, Tomahawk, WI). Traps were opened each evening approximately one hour before sunset and baited using both wet and dry cat food. Each set trap was checked the following morning. All traps were closed and unavailable for trapping during daylight hours. Opossums were chemically immobilized using a combination of 10mg/kg Ketamine and 2mg/kg Xylazine [36]. Each animal was temporarily marked using hair dye, and any recaptured individuals were immediately released at the location of capture. Any individual that was chemical immobilized was allowed to fully recover prior to release at the original location of capture. Body mass, body condition, and all external injuries were recorded and each animal was inspected for ectoparasites and anal gland self-expression. Each adult female opossum’s marsupium was completely searched to identify the number of joeys held by each female.

Field sample collection

After immobilization, peripheral blood, fecal swab, and anal gland secretion samples were collected. Blood samples were collected by puncturing the skin between the middle digits of the forepaw with a medical lancet and blood was captured on a Nobuto strip (Sterlitech Cooperation, Auburn, WA, USA). Blood samples were also collected from joey opossums found within the marsupium or attached to the mother opossum, and their age class was determined as mother-dependent or weaned. Mother-dependent joeys were held within the marsupium, their eyes were still underdeveloped and firmly closed, and they were still firmly attached to the mothers teat with no sign of independence from the mother [30,32]. Weaned joeys had fully developed eyes, ears, and hair, they were able to freely detach from the teat, and could exit the marsupium under their own power [30,32]. The number of joeys within the mother’s marsupium were recorded, and blood samples were collected from one half of the tallied individuals to reduce any impact that handling may have had on the litter. Joey blood was collected by puncturing the paw pad using a fetal lancet and captured on a Nobuto strip. Nobuto strips were air dried and stored at room temperature until DNA could be extracted.

Only peripheral blood was collected from joeys; from subadults and adults, fecal and anal gland samples were taken in addition to peripheral blood. Fecal swabs were collected from adult opossums by gently inserting a fecal loop and FLOQ swab into and past the anus to the colon (COPAN Diagnostics, Murrieta, CA, USA). The FLOQ was then used to gently swab the colon of each opossum for 10 seconds, and then placed in 600 uL of Gentra PureGene cell lysis solution (Qiagen Puregene, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Anal gland secretions of each adult opossum were expressed by applying light pressure to the perianal region of anus. The expressed secretion was collected using a FLOQ swab and placed into 600 uL of Gentra PureGene cell lysis solution. These secretions were always expressed after the fecal sample was collected so these secretions did not contaminate the fecal swab taken. Care was taken to exclude fecal contamination from the anal gland secretion by only collecting the expressed green secretion that directly came from the anal gland of the sampled opossum. Both the fecal swab and anal gland secretions were stored at room temperature until the DNA from each sample was extracted. Finally, it was recorded when any individual became agitated and expressed their anal glands in a defensive behavior as the trap was approached. Anal gland expression was identified visually by presence of the green anal gland secretion in the perianal region of sampled opossums.

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood, fecal swab, and anal gland secretion samples collected using a Gentra PureGene extraction kit following the manufacturer’s protocol with slight modifications for each sample type (Qiagen Puregene, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Peripheral blood, collected using a Nobuto strip, was subject to 30-minute incubation period in 300 uL of red blood cell lysis solution to remove the red blood cells still bound to the Nobuto strip. Each Nobuto strip was then incubated for 24 hours in 600 uL of cell lysis solution at 56°C to lyse the buffy coat cells bound to the Nobuto strip. Finally, 10 uL of Proteinase K (ProtK) was added to each sample containing cell lysis solution and Nobuto strip. The sample was then incubated at 56°C for 24 hours to digest the proteins within the extraction solution (Themo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Following ProtK digestion, total DNA from the peripheral blood sample was extracted following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Pelleted DNA was resuspended in 50 uL in AE buffer and stored at -20°C until amplification. For the fecal swab and anal gland secretions samples, 200 uL of the original 600 uL field collected sample solution was placed in 400 uL of cell lysis solution. These samples were incubated in the cell lysis solution containing the sample at 56°C for 48 hours, and further digested at 56°C for 48 hours with 10 uL of ProtK added each 24-hour period during the stage. Total DNA was extracted similarly to the blood sample. Pelleted DNA was suspended in 100 uL of AE buffer. All extracted DNA was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 (Themo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and diluted to 20ng/uL and stored at -20°C.

Trypanosoma cruzi detection and DTU determination

To identify T. cruzi infected individuals, we used a quantitative-PCR (q-PCR) assay which detects the nucleic acid of the parasite. A 166bp segment of T. cruzi satellite DNA (satDNA) was amplified with a q-PCR using a 2x Roche Fast Start universal master mix with the primers Cruzi1, Cruzi2, and Cruzi3 PrimeTime 5’ 6-FAMTM/ZENTM/3’ IBFQ (IDT, Coralville, Iowa) following previously described methods [37,38]. The 166bp satDNA segment was from the 195bp tandem repeating satDNA unit that has been used as a molecular diagnostic tool to identify T. cruzi in infected wildlife and triatomines [22,3941]. In each reaction, 2 uL of host template (20 ng/uL) was added to the master mix with a separate exogenous amplification control which used the fluorophore VIC (10x Exo IPC Mix, 50 IPC Exo, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The exogenous amplification control was used in individual assays to identify host template DNA dilutions that contained amplification inhibitors and could create false negatives. Each plate of assays was performed with a negative control (blanked with molecular grade water) to determine if contamination occurred in the laboratory, an exogenous amplification positive control (containing molecular grade water and exogenous amplification control), and a positive control dilutions series from a cell culture isolate of TcI. Precautions were taken to exclude contamination by the positive control by storing positive controls and master mix reagents separate from opossum gDNA samples. Amplification did not occur in any negative controls. All amplifications were performed on an ABI 7500 FAST Real Time PCR machine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).

A sample was classified as T. cruzi positive when the Ct value was ≤ 38 [42]. Any sample that amplified between the Ct values of 38 to 40 was labeled as suspect positive, and these samples were rescreened [42]. For those samples where the exogenous amplification control did not amplify, they were rescreened at a template DNA dilution series of 1:5 and 1:10 to reduce amplification inhibition within the sample. T. cruzi positive samples were typed for DTU’s (TcI-TcIV) via a multi-stepped q-PCR approach following previously described methods [43]. We modified the DTU identification protocol as follows: FAM was used to identify TcI (0.15uM) (Affinity Plus Affinity Plus 5’ 6-FAMTM / 3’ BHQ-1), Cy5 to identify TcIII (0.1uM) (Affinity Plus 5’ Cy5 / 3’ IBRQ), Cy3 was used as the florescent probe for TcIV (0.3uM) (PrimeTime 5’ Cy3TM / 3’ IBRQ), and Yak-yellow was used to identify TcIII/TcV/TcVI (0.1uM) (Affinity Plus 5’ YAK / 3’ IBFQ). DTU identification was discontinued after 3 unsuccessful amplification attempts.

We inferred that the presence of nucleic acid of T. cruzi was indicative of an infected individual [22,3941]; however we were unable to infer whether or not that biological material was infectious. We inferred vertical transmission when an infected joey opossum was both dependent on their mother and their mother was infected with the parasite. To be considered a mother-dependent litter each individual in the litter had to meet the following criterion: the joeys’ eyes were still underdeveloped and firmly closed, their ears, hair and whiskers had not yet fully developed, and they were still firmly attached to the mothers teat with no sign of independence from the mother. A violation of any one of these criteria excluded them as a mother-dependent litter. An individual was considered T. cruzi infected when any one of the three independently collected sample types (peripheral blood, fecal swab, or anal gland secretions) contained T. cruzi nucleic acid. To calculate apparent prevalence, the number of T. cruzi infected individuals was divided by the total number of individuals sampled. A Wilson 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated using EPI tools as a categorical variable and was reported for each prevalence [44,45].


In total, samples were collected from 198 Virginia opossums (n = 112 adults; n = 86 joeys). Triplet samples of peripheral blood, fecal swabs, and anal gland secretion were collected from each adult, and from the adults sampled, 58 had at least one independent sample type infected with T. cruzi (51.8%, 95% CI [42.6%– 60.8%]) (Tables 1 and 2). Infected adults were found in each county where opossums were sampled (Table 1). The apparent prevalence varied between counties where the highest prevalence was in Columbia County (n = 13) (84.6%, 95% CI [57.8–95.7%]) and the lowest was in Putnam County (n = 23) (39.1%, 95% CI [22.2–59.2%]) (Table 1). Each county varied in the number of adults sampled, the smallest adult sample size was in Columbia County (n = 13) and the largest was from Alachua County (n = 41) (Table 1).

Table 1. Infection prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi by county for adult Virginia opossums.

A total of 112 Virginia opossums were sampled.

Table 2. Number of individuals infected and prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi by sample type.

Average CT value, maximum and minimum CT value for rtPCR assays are given in parentheses for each tissue type.

In total, 86 joey opossums were sampled from 25 litters in this study: from 20 litters, 73 joeys were sampled that were dependent on their mother (mother-dependent), and from 5 litters, 13 joeys were sampled that had been weaned from the mother. The largest number of joeys sampled was in Alachua County (n = 41) and no joeys were sampled in Gilchrist or Putnam County. Two of 73 mother-dependent joeys (2.7%, 95% CI [0.8% - 9.5%]) (CT values = 33.644, 35.327) from 1 of 20 litters (5.0%, 95% CI [0.9–23.6%]) were infected with T. cruzi, both of whom were from the same T. cruzi infected mother. Also, 2 weaned joeys (15.4%, 95% CI [4.3%– 42.2%]) (CT values = 30.853, 34.834) from 1 litter (20.0%, 95% CI [3.6–62.4%]) were infected with T. cruzi and both were from the same mother who was also infected with T. cruzi. Each pair of infected sibling joeys came from different infected mother opossums. From the sampled marsupial pouches, there was no observations of triatomine intrusion into or triatomine fecal matter within the marsupium.

Across the triplet of sample types collected, there were individuals that had only one T. cruzi infected sample type and individuals that had a combination of T. cruzi infected sample types (Table 2). Of the 58 infected opossums, 57 had T. cruzi DNA detected in peripheral blood; the remaining individual was positive for T. cruzi in the anal gland secretion but in no other sample type. In the field, we observed anal gland secretions contaminating opossum feces in the trap, due to anal gland expression during defecation (Fig 2). Also, as the trap was approached, 30 of the 112 adults expressed their anal gland secretions (26.8%), and of this 30, 3 of those individuals had T. cruzi infected anal gland secretions (10%); however, none of those individuals had T. cruzi positive fecal swabs. TcI was the only DTU identified in any of the samples; of the 57 positive blood samples, 55 were typed as TcI (96.5%), of the 21 positive anal gland secretions 7 were typed as TcI (33.3%), and of the 7 individuals with positive fecal swabs 6 were typed as TcI (85.7%). One joey opossum was positive for TcI (1/4, 25%). All other samples were unable to be DTU typed.

Fig 2. Opossum feces and anal gland secretion.

Image depicting opossum feces (yellow arrow) contaminated with anal gland secretion (red arrow). Opossum anal gland secretion (blue arrow) can be seen in close association with the fecal bolus that is sitting on the trigger pan of the Tomahawk livetrap. This individual was sampled but negative for T. cruzi. The tail of the Virginia opossum can be seen in the background of the image. (Photo credit: C. W. Torhorst).


In Florida, 51.8% of Virginia opossums were infected with T. cruzi across 5 Florida counties (Table 1) (Fig 1). The prevalence observed in this study was consistent with a previous study from Florida that found a 52% prevalence of exposure to T. cruzi using serological methods [7,9]. In this study, we sampled a total of 198 Virginia opossums, which included 112 adult and 86 joeys (Table 1). The only DTU identified in the infected population was TcI which supports the previously hypothesized association between Virginia opossums and this genotype [22,4650]. In total 57 of the 112 adult opossums sampled had T. cruzi infected peripheral blood samples (50.9%), 7 had infected fecal swabs (6.3%), and 21 had infected anal gland secretions (18.8%) (Table 2). Each infected sample type has an epidemiological consequence. Infected peripheral blood likely indicates that the individual was actively circulating the parasite thereby creating the opportunity for a vector to ingest a T. cruzi trypomastigote upon taking a blood meal from the infected host and continuing the transmission cycle in the triatomine vector [28]. Fecal swabs were also found to be infected with T. cruzi which indicates expulsion of the parasite from the digestive tract. T. cruzi is known to infect the epithelial layers of the large intestine and colon and is shed along with the epithelial cells in feces [22,50]. Alternatively, T. cruzi from feces may have come from ingested and infected triatomine bugs. Virginia opossum anal gland secretions were also infected with T. cruzi, and opossums were observed self-expressing their anal glands which would also introduce these potentially infectious secretions to the surrounding environment.

In total, 2 of the 73 sampled mother-dependent joeys (2.7%) were infected with T. cruzi which occurred in 1 of the 20 sampled litters of mother-dependent joeys. The likely transmission of T. cruzi vertically to joey opossums adds to the growing list of pathways through which T. cruzi is maintained on the landscape in wildlife reservoirs. Because the apparent prevalence among neonates was low, we infer that vertical transmission is not solely maintaining the high prevalence seen in adults (51.8%); rather, vertical transmission is likely amplifying the prevalence of vector-infected individuals thus increasing the number of infected adult opossums on the landscape independent from vector-borne transmission. The observed prevalence of vertical transmission in mother-dependent joeys is consistent with prevalence observed in human cases of congenital transmitted T. cruzi (~5%) [34].

The role of the marsupium is to isolate neonate joeys from the external environment and therefore likely excludes triatomines from the marsupium as joeys progress through their stages of fetal development (Fig 3) [30]. We did not observe triatomines or their fecal matter in the marsupium of the sampled adult females, however, we cannot exclude the possibility that a triatomine entered the marsupium and infected a neonate, as triatomines were observed in the sampled locations. Neonates were too young, however, to ingest a triatomine bug (Fig 3). These observations and inferences support vertical transmission as the most parsimonious explanation for the infection status of the mother-dependent joeys (Fig 3). Whether vertical transmission is taking place in other placental reservoirs like raccoons and armadillos, as it does in humans, is still unknown but could occur.

Fig 3. Female Virginia opossum and joeys.

A depiction of the marsupium from two adult female Virginia opossums. From the first female, her marsupium, which is expanded to show that it does not contain joeys, and to further detail the cleanliness of the feature and the expanse of the pouch that holds the joeys within (A). From a second female her marsupium gently expanded to expose the mother-dependent joeys held within (B), and from a third female, a mother-dependent joeys with its categorically important features: developing hair, ears, eye openings, while still attached to the mother’s teat (C) (Photo credit: C.W. Torhorst).

The anal gland secretions of opossums were found to be infected with T. cruzi (18.8%) (Table 2). This infection is consequential because there is strong evidence in other opossum species that this secretion contains the infective life stage of T. cruzi, the metacyclic trypomastigote [2224,27]. These secretions were also observed contaminating the perianal region and deposited fecal matter of opossums in our study (Fig 2). Fecal swabs also tested positive for the presence of T. cruzi (6.3%) (Table 2) but it is not clear if T. cruzi nucleic acid in feces came from the sloughing of infected host epithelial tissue in the feces or from the consumption of infected vectors. Regardless, it is important to consider that fecal deposits and anal gland spraints are a potential source for environmental transmission. Indeed, it is clear that T. cruzi can persist in the environment as shown from investigations into fruits and fruit juices contaminated with infected triatomine feces leading to mass transmission outbreaks in South and Central America [13,51]. Further investigation is needed to confirm opossum excretions as hazards for transmission.

In this study we provide evidence that the Virginia opossum is an amplifying reservoir for T. cruzi due to its complex relationship with the parasite. This relationship impacts the way in which the parasite is maintained on the landscape and provides potentially novel and underappreciated routes of transmission. In Florida, we found that the Virginia opossum is infected with T. cruzi across a variety of habitats and is likely capable of shedding the parasite into the environment. Given the synanthropic habits of opossums and their close proximity to human dwellings, their fecal latrines and anal spraints could serve as a transmission hazard to people. Vertical transmission of T. cruzi likely amplifies the prevalence of the parasite separate from the vector in Virginia opossums. Vertical transmission is not well understood in wildlife but should be considered as an amplifying factor for transmission among reservoir species. In conclusion, vertical transmission in coordination with the infective anal gland secretions of Virginia opossum increases the complexity and adds to our knowledge around how opossums maintain T. cruzi infection in Florida.


The authors would like to thank S. Cottingham, S. Katircioglu, and R. Dorleans for their efforts in the field and laboratory, in data collection and data entry. Also, we would like to acknowledge all the private landowners that granted permission to use their land to capture and collect samples. Finally, we would like to acknowledge the following wildlife and land management agencies for permits that allowed us to collect samples and handle the animals in this study: the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the Florida Forestry Service, The Florida State Parks–Paynes Prairie, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.


  1. 1. Bern C, Messenger LA, Whitman JD, Maguire JH. Chagas disease in the United States: A public health approach. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;33. pmid:31776135
  2. 2. Pérez-Molina JA, Molina I. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2018;391: 82–94. pmid:28673423
  3. 3. Klotz SA, Dorn PL, Mosbacher M, Schmidt JO. Kissing bugs in the United States: risk for vector-borne disease in humans. Environ Health Insights. 2014;8: 49–59. pmid:25574143
  4. 4. Montgomery SP, Parise ME, Dotson EM, Bialek SR. What do we know about Chagas disease in the United States? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95: 1225–1227. pmid:27402515
  5. 5. Beatty NL, Klotz SA. Autochthonous Chagas disease in the United States: How are people getting infected? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103: 967–969. pmid:32602437
  6. 6. Lynn MK, Bossak BH, Sandifer PA, Watson A, Nolan MS. Contemporary autochthonous human Chagas disease in the USA. Acta Trop. 2020;205: 105361. pmid:32006523
  7. 7. Brown EL, Roellig DM, Gompper ME, Monello RJ, Wenning KM, Gabriel MW, et al. Seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi among eleven potential reservoir species from six states across the southern United States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10: 757–763. pmid:20020815
  8. 8. Bern C, Kjos S, Yabsley MJ, Montgomery SP. Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas’ disease in the United States. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24: 655–681. pmid:21976603
  9. 9. Hodo CL, Hamer SA. Toward an Ecological Framework for Assessing Reservoirs of Vector-Borne Pathogens: Wildlife Reservoirs of Trypanosoma cruzi across the Southern United States. ILAR J. 2017;58: 379–392. pmid:29106561
  10. 10. Flores-Ferrer A, Marcou O, Waleckx E, Dumonteil E, Gourbière S. Evolutionary ecology of Chagas disease; what do we know and what do we need? Evol Appl. 2018;11: 470–487. pmid:29636800
  11. 11. Flores-Ferrer A, Waleckx E, Rascalou G, Dumonteil E, Gourbière S. Trypanosoma cruzi transmission dynamics in a synanthropic and domesticated host community. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13: e0007902. pmid:31834879
  12. 12. Rodríguez-Morales O, Ballinas-Verdugo MA, Alejandre-Aguilar R, Reyes PA, Arce-Fonseca M. Trypanosoma cruzi connatal transmission in dogs with Chagas disease: experimental case report. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11: 1365–1370. pmid:21973028
  13. 13. Franco-Paredes C, Villamil-Gómez WE, Schultz J, Henao-Martínez AF, Parra-Henao G, Rassi A Jr, et al. A deadly feast: Elucidating the burden of orally acquired acute Chagas disease in Latin America—Public health and travel medicine importance. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;36: 101565. Available: pmid:32004732
  14. 14. Yoshida N. Trypanosoma cruzi infection by oral route: how the interplay between parasite and host components modulates infectivity. Parasitol Int. 2008;57: 105–109. pmid:18234547
  15. 15. Nóbrega AA, Garcia MH, Tatto E, Obara MT, Costa E, Sobel J, et al. Oral transmission of Chagas disease by consumption of açaí palm fruit, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15: 653–655. pmid:19331764
  16. 16. Noya BA de, Díaz-Bello Z, Colmenares C, Ruiz-Guevara R, Mauriello L, Muñoz-Calderón A, et al. Update on oral Chagas disease outbreaks in Venezuela: epidemiological, clinical and diagnostic approaches. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110: 377–386. pmid:25946155
  17. 17. Filigheddu MT, Górgolas M, Ramos JM. Orally-transmitted Chagas disease. Med Clin. 2017;148: 125–131. pmid:27993415
  18. 18. Yaeger RG. Transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi infection to opossums via the oral route. J Parasitol. 1971;57: 1375–1376. Available: pmid:4945445
  19. 19. Roellig DM, Ellis AE, Yabsley MJ. Oral transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi with opposing evidence for the theory of carnivory. J Parasitol. 2009;95: 360–364. pmid:18763853
  20. 20. de Noya BA, González ON. An ecological overview on the factors that drives to Trypanosoma cruzi oral transmission. Acta Trop. 2015;151: 94–102. pmid:26066984
  21. 21. Coura JR. The main sceneries of Chagas disease transmission. The vectors, blood and oral transmissions—a comprehensive review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110: 277–282. pmid:25466622
  22. 22. Zecca IB, Hodo CL, Slack S, Auckland L, Hamer SA. Trypanosoma cruzi infections and associated pathology in urban-dwelling Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana). Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2020;11: 287–293. pmid:32215248
  23. 23. Deane MP, Lenzi HL, Jansen AM. Double development cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi in the opossum. Parasitol Today. 1986;2: 146–147. pmid:15462805
  24. 24. Urdaneta-Morales S, Nironi I. Trypanosoma cruzi in the anal glands of urban opossums. I—Isolation and experimental infections. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1996;91: 399–403. pmid:9070398
  25. 25. Lenzi HL, Jansen AM, Deane MP. The recent discovery of what might be a primordial escape mechanism for Trypanosoma cruzi. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1984;79: 13–18. Available:
  26. 26. Deane MP, Lenzi HL, Jansen A. Trypanosoma cruzi: vertebrate and invertebrate cycles in the same mammal host, the opossum Didelphis marsupialis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1984;79: 513–515. pmid:6442753
  27. 27. Carreira JC, Jansen AM, de Nazareth Meirelles M, Costa e Silva F, Lenzi HL. Trypanosoma cruzi in the scent glands of Didelphis marsupialis: the kinetics of colonization. Exp Parasitol. 2001;97: 129–140. pmid:11312575
  28. 28. Tyler KM, Engman DM. The life cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi revisited. Int J Parasitol. 2001;31: 472–481. pmid:11334932
  29. 29. Bezerra-Santos MA, Ramos RAN, Campos AK, Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Didelphis spp. opossums and their parasites in the Americas: A One Health perspective. Parasitol Res. 2021;120: 4091–4111. pmid:33788021
  30. 30. McManus JJ. Didelphis virginiana. Mammalian Species. 1974; 1–6.
  31. 31. McManus JJ. Activity of captive Didelphis marsupialis. J Mammal. 1971;52: 846–848. Available: pmid:5130581
  32. 32. Johnson-Delaney CA. Reproductive medicine of companion marsupials. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2002;5: 537–53, vi. pmid:12442714
  33. 33. Cencig S, Coltel N, Truyens C, Carlier Y. Fertility, gestation outcome and parasite congenital transmissibility in mice infected with TcI, TcII and TcVI genotypes of Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2271. pmid:23785533
  34. 34. Howard EJ, Xiong X, Carlier Y, Sosa-Estani S, Buekens P. Frequency of the congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2014;121: 22–33. pmid:23924273
  35. 35. Carlier Y, Truyens C. Congenital Chagas disease as an ecological model of interactions between Trypanosoma cruzi parasites, pregnant women, placenta and fetuses. Acta Trop. 2015;151: 103–115. pmid:26293886
  36. 36. Terry J. Kreeger and Jon M. Arnemo. Handbook of Wildlife Chemical Immobilization. Kreeger TJ, editor. 2012.
  37. 37. Duffy T, Cura CI, Ramirez JC, Abate T, Cayo NM, Parrado R, et al. Analytical performance of a multiplex Real-Time PCR assay using TaqMan probes for quantification of Trypanosoma cruzi satellite DNA in blood samples. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2000. pmid:23350002
  38. 38. Ramírez JC, Parrado R, Sulleiro E, de la Barra A, Rodríguez M, Villarroel S, et al. First external quality assurance program for bloodstream Real-Time PCR monitoring of treatment response in clinical trials of Chagas disease. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0188550. pmid:29176887
  39. 39. Curtis-Robles R, Snowden KF, Dominguez B, Dinges L, Rodgers S, Mays G, et al. Epidemiology and Molecular Typing of Trypanosoma cruzi in Naturally-Infected Hound Dogs and Associated Triatomine Vectors in Texas, USA. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: e0005298. pmid:28095511
  40. 40. Curtis-Robles R, Auckland LD, Snowden KF, Hamer GL, Hamer SA. Analysis of over 1500 triatomine vectors from across the US, predominantly Texas, for Trypanosoma cruzi infection and discrete typing units. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;58: 171–180. pmid:29269323
  42. 42. Beatty NL, White ZS, Bhosale CR, Wilson K, Cannella AP, Stenn T, et al. Anaphylactic Reactions Due to Triatoma protracta (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) and Invasion into a Home in Northern California, USA. Insects. 2021;12. pmid:34821818
  43. 43. Cura CI, Duffy T, Lucero RH, Bisio M, Péneau J, Jimenez-Coello M, et al. Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay Using TaqMan Probes for the Identification of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs in Biological and Clinical Samples. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9: e0003765. pmid:25993316
  44. 44. Brown LD, Tony Cai T, DasGupta A. Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd. 2001;16: 101–133.
  45. 45. Epitools—Calculate confidence limits for a sample prop. [cited 27 Apr 2022]. Available:
  46. 46. Barnabé C, Yaeger R, Pung O, Tibayrenc M. Trypanosoma cruzi: a considerable phylogenetic divergence indicates that the agent of Chagas disease is indigenous to the native fauna of the United States. Exp Parasitol. 2001;99: 73–79. pmid:11748960
  47. 47. Roellig DM, Brown EL, Barnabé C, Tibayrenc M, Steurer FJ, Yabsley MJ. Molecular typing of Trypanosoma cruzi isolates, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14: 1123–1125. pmid:18598637
  48. 48. Zingales B, Miles MA, Campbell DA, Tibayrenc M, Macedo AM, Teixeira MMG, et al. The revised Trypanosoma cruzi subspecific nomenclature: rationale, epidemiological relevance and research applications. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12: 240–253. pmid:22226704
  49. 49. Zingales B. Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity: Something new for something known about Chagas disease manifestations, serodiagnosis and drug sensitivity. Acta Trop. 2018;184: 38–52. pmid:28941731
  50. 50. Roellig DM, Ellis AE, Yabsley MJ. Genetically different isolates of Trypanosoma cruzi elicit different infection dynamics in raccoons (Procyon lotor) and Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana). Int J Parasitol. 2009;39: 1603–1610. pmid:19607833
  51. 51. Robertson LJ, Devleesschauwer B, Alarcón de Noya B, Noya González O, Torgerson PR. Trypanosoma cruzi: Time for International Recognition as a Foodborne Parasite. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10: e0004656. pmid:27253136