Ku80 is involved in telomere maintenance but dispensable for genomic stability in Leishmania mexicana

Ester Poláková; Amanda T. S. Albanaz; Alexandra Zakharova; Tatiana S. Novozhilova; Evgeny S. Gerasimov; Vyacheslav Yurchenko

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041

Abstract

Background

Telomeres are indispensable for genome stability maintenance. They are maintained by the telomere-associated protein complex, which include Ku proteins and a telomerase among others. Here, we investigated a role of Ku80 in Leishmania mexicana. Leishmania is a genus of parasitic protists of the family Trypanosomatidae causing a vector-born disease called leishmaniasis.

Methodology/Principal findings

We used the previously established CRISPR/Cas9 system to mediate ablation of Ku80- and Ku70-encoding genes in L. mexicana. Complete knock-outs of both genes were confirmed by Southern blotting, whole-genome Illumina sequencing, and RT-qPCR. Resulting telomeric phenotypes were subsequently investigated using Southern blotting detection of terminal restriction fragments. The genome integrity in the Ku80- deficient cells was further investigated by whole-genome sequencing.

Our work revealed that telomeres in the ΔKu80 L. mexicana are elongated compared to those of the wild type. This is a surprising finding considering that in another model trypanosomatid, Trypanosoma brucei, they are shortened upon ablation of the same gene. A telomere elongation phenotype has been documented in other species and associated with a presence of telomerase-independent alternative telomere lengthening pathway. Our results also showed that Ku80 appears to be not involved in genome stability maintenance in L. mexicana.

Conclusion/Significance

Ablation of the Ku proteins in L. mexicana triggers telomere elongation, but does not have an adverse impact on genome integrity.

Author summary

Parasites of the genus Leishmania cause leishmaniasis, a neglected tropical disease. Telomeric and sub-telomeric regions of these flagellates are often associated with virulence. That is why studying telomere maintenance is important. Here we demonstrate that deletion of one of the proteins, implicated in telomere maintenance, resulted in elongated telomeres. This is unexpected, because deletion of the same gene in another model organism, Trypanosoma brucei, has an opposite effect. Previous comparative genomic studies suggested that the protein under study might be also involved in genome stability. Nevertheless, we did not detect any trace of genomic instability in L. mexicana after 100 passages. We concluded that Ku80 is involved in telomere maintenance but dispensable for genomic stability in Leishmania mexicana.

Citation: Poláková E, Albanaz ATS, Zakharova A, Novozhilova TS, Gerasimov ES, Yurchenko V (2021) Ku80 is involved in telomere maintenance but dispensable for genomic stability in Leishmania mexicana. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 15(12): e0010041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041

Editor: Hans-Peter Fuehrer, Vienna, AUSTRIA

Received: July 13, 2021; Accepted: November 30, 2021; Published: December 29, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Poláková et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by the European Regional Funds (project "Centre for Research of Pathogenicity and Virulence of Parasites" CZ.02.1.01/16_019/0000759) to VY, EP, and ATSA, the grant SGS/PrF/2021 from the University of Ostrava to EP, AZ, and ATSA, Moravskoslezský kraj research initiative grant RRC/02/2020 and RRC/10/2019 to ATSA and AZ, respectively, and a grant 0493/ZM1822/8 from the City of Ostrava to EP. A part of this work on telomere analyses in Leishmania mexicana ΔKu80 and ΔKu70 was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (grant 19-15-00054) to VY and ESG. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Leishmania is a genus of parasitic protists of the family Trypanosomatidae [1,2]. It causes a vector-born disease called leishmaniasis, which affects vertebrates, including humans [3]. A total of 350 million people is at risk of infection with over 1 million new cases and 20,000–30,000 deaths being documented annually [4]. It is manifested in three different clinical forms–cutaneous, mucosal, and visceral. The majority of the visceral cases are fatal, if left untreated [5].

Ku70 and Ku80 are abundant and conserved DNA binding proteins remarkable for their versatile function [6]. They are best known for their essential role in maintaining genome integrity via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair pathway, one of the two most commonly used pathways to repair double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) [7]. Being part of NHEJ, Ku proteins have far-reaching effects on such processes as V(D)J recombination and class switch recombination [8,9]. In NHEJ, the Ku protein complex is involved in the very initial step recognizing DSBs and binding there in the sequence-independent manner to protect it from the nucleolytic degradation. It later recruits a catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase and other proteins facilitating formation of the repair complex [10,11]. The NHEJ pathway is fairly conserved in all the studied species, yet there is a group of organisms that tend to lose it–parasites [12]. It is generally accepted that iconic parasites, trypanosomatids, do not employ NHEJ, but rather rely on sequence microhomology, to repair DSBs in the Ku heterodimer-independent manner [13]. This notion is further substantiated by the fact that ligase IV (an enzyme involved in the classical NHEJ) is absent from trypanosomatid genomes [14]. Nevertheless, both Ku70 and Ku80 are retained by virtually all (with just one exception) trypanosomatids, arguing that they may be used in other biochemical pathways. That sole exception is Blastocrithidia spp., which lack both Ku70 and Ku80 [15]. Notably, the genomes of these species have accumulated numerous insertions in protein-coding genes raising a question, whether such a level of genome instability may be associated with the loss of Ku proteins [12].

Apart from their indispensable role in DSB repair, the Ku proteins are also involved in other cellular processes, such as transcription, DNA damage response, DNA replication, and telomere maintenance, to name just a few [11,16]. At the chromosomal termini, they form complexes with other telomere-associated proteins protecting the DNA ends from being recognized and processed as DSBs [17] and preventing inappropriate recombination events involving telomeric repeats [18]. Surprisingly, the Ku proteins deficiency has manifested in rather ambiguous telomeric phenotypes in different species [19–24]. In a model trypanosomatid species, Trypanosoma brucei, complete ablation of the Ku80 protein resulted in gradual shortening of the telomeric repeats, a phenotype that was rescued by the expression of an ectopic copy of the gene [20]. The Ku protein knock-outs have been shown to influence the length of telomeres and trigger the alternative telomere lengthening (ALT) pathways that are not active under normal circumstances [25,26]. The canonical way of dealing with the “end replication problem” (an intrinsic inability of DNA polymerases to accomplish complete lagging strand synthesis of linear DNA templates leading to telomere shortening) [27,28] relies on engagement of a ribonucleoprotein enzyme, telomerase (TERT) [29]. The ALT pathways are TERT-independent and involve such molecular mechanisms as break-induced replication, replication using extrachromosomal DNA or a t-loop elongation [30,31]. Telomeres maintained by ALT are typically long and heterogeneous.

Telomeres of kinetoplastids possess the vertebrate canonical sequence (5′-ttaggg-3′), t-loops at their ends, and are maintained by TERT [32–34]. Of note, their genomes encode a conserved set of core proteins implicated in telomere maintenance [15,35].

In this paper, we show that ablation of the LmxM.29.0340 (gene encoding Ku80 in L. mexicana) has resulted in the opposite telomeric phenotype, as compared to that in T. brucei. The telomers of L. mexicana get elongated upon deletion of Ku80. This phenotype was stable over at least 100 passages in vitro and was reversed back to the wild type by expression of the ectopic copy of Ku80. We also demonstrate that genome of L. mexicana ΔKu80 does not display instability traits, suggesting that Ku80 is not involved in its maintenance.

Methods

Leishmania mexicana axenic cultivation and analysis of growth kinetics

Leishmania mexicana (isolate MNYC/BZ/62/M379) promastigotes were grown in M199 medium supplemented with 2 μg/ml biopterin, 2 μg/ml hemin (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), 25 mM HEPES (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland), 50 units/ml of Penicillin/Streptomycin (Life Technologies/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, USA) and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (BioSera Europe, Nuaillé, France) at 23°C.

Throughout the long-term experiment, WT and ΔKu80 cell cultures were passaged 2 times a week for a total of 100 passages. Cells were sampled from passage numbers 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100.

Growth kinetics in vitro was analyzed as described previously [36]. The statistical significance was evaluated using unpaired t test in Prism v. 8.0.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA).

CRISPR-Cas9-mediated ablation of LmxM.29.0340 (Ku80) and LmxM.08_29.1050 (Ku70) in Leishmania mexicana

The CRISPR-Cas9 L. mexicana strain was established using the plasmid pTB007 [37]. To ablate LmxM.29.0340 and LmxM.08_29.1050, guide RNAs (gRNAs) with a 20 nt seed sequence targeting upstream and downstream regions of the genes of interest were amplified using corresponding 5´gRNA and 3´gRNA primers (hereafter all primer sequences are listed in S1 Table). Donor DNA was PCR amplified from the pTNeo_v1 plasmid [38] with 5´ and 3´ primers, containing 30 nt homology regions, flanking corresponding gRNA targeting sites. The Cas9/T7 RNA polymerase-expressing promastigotes were cultivated in the M199 medium supplemented with 100 μg/ml Hygromycin B (VWR/ Avantor, Radnor, USA). The cells in mid-log phase were co-transfected with 5 μg of both 5´ and 3´gRNAs, along with 5 μg of donor DNA using the BTX ECM 630 electroporator (Harvard Apparatus Inc., Holliston, USA). Positive transfectants were selected on complete M199 medium supplemented with 100 μg/ml Hygromycin B and 50–100 μg/ml Neomycin G418 Sulfate (VWR/Avantor). Successful ablation of LmxM.29.0340 was confirmed by the whole-genome sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq platform, Macrogen Europe B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands and the Institute of Applied Biotechnology, Prague, Czech Republic), RT-qPCR analysis, and Southern blotting. Successful ablation of LmxM.08_29.1050 was confirmed by RT-qPCR. The resulting strains are hereafter referred to as L. mexicana ΔKu80 (LmxM.29.0340^-/-) and ΔKu70 (LmxM.08_29.1050^-/-).

For next-generation sequencing confirmation of complete ΔKu80 strain, the paired-end Illumina reads were trimmed with Trimmomatic v. 0.39 [39], mapped to the reference genome of L. mexicana isolate M379 [40] using Bowtie2 v. 2.3.5.1 [41], and the region corresponding to the gene of interest was visually inspected. The genome was also assembled de novo by SPAdes genome assembler v. 3.13.0 [42] and visualized with Tablet v. 1.19.09.03 [43].

To confirm complete LmxM.29.0340 ablation in L. mexicana we also employed Southern blotting as previously described [44] using ApaI-digested total genomic DNA from the mid-log phase grown cells.

Finally, the expression of LmxM.29.0340 and LmxM.08_29.1050 was examined by RT-qPCR. Total RNA was isolated and transcript levels of the proteins of interest in L. mexicana were measured as described previously [45,46] in three biological and technical replicates. Expression values were normalized to those of the 18S rRNA.

Ectopic expression of Ku80 in L. mexicana ΔKu80

The modified pLEXSY_IE-egfp-red-neo4 (Jena Bioscience GmbH, Jena, Germany) vector was used to express an ectopic copy of LmxM.29.0340. Firstly, the neomycin resistance gene of the pLEXSY_IE-egfp-red-neo4 was replaced by a gene encoding streptothricin acetyltransferase (Sat, allowing selection with Nourseothricin) to generate pLEXSY_IE-egfp-red-sat. The Sat ORF was amplified from the plasmid pLEXSY-Sat2 (Jena Bioscience) and cloned into the pLEXSY_IE-egfp-red-neo4 with BamHI and SpeI (both from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). The LmxM.29.0340 ORF was amplified from the L. mexicana total genomic DNA and cloned into pLEXSY_IE-egfp-red-sat with BglII and NotI (Thermo Fisher Scientific), replacing EGFP-DsRed fusion gene. The resultant pLEXSY_IE-Ku80-sat plasmid was used for ectopic expression of LmxM.29.0340.

The L. mexicana ΔKu80 promastigotes were grown in the complete M199 medium supplemented with 100 μg/ml Hygromycin B and Neomycin G418 Sulfate. The mid-log phase cells were transfected with 5 μg of pLEXSY_IE-Ku80-sat plasmid as described above. Positive transfectants were selected on complete M199 medium supplemented with 100 μg/ml Hygromycin B and 50–100 μg/ml Nourseothricin (Jena Bioscience). Ectopic expression of LmxM.29.0340 was confirmed by RT-qPCR and Southern blotting as described above. The resulting strain is hereafter referred to as L. mexicana Ku80_add.

De novo sequencing and genome assembly

Leishmania mexicana (isolate MNYC/BZ/62/M379) genome was also assembled de novo with Flye v. 2.8.3 [47] using only PacBio reads reported previously [48] and genome size parameter 32 Mb, which is the size of reference L. mexicana MHOM/GT/2001/U1103 assembly [49] from the TriTrypDB release 52 [50]. This has been done in order to assemble longer contigs needed for genome instability analyses. The PacBio read N₅₀ and average genome coverage estimated by Flye were 9,022 bp and 130×, respectively. The initial Flye assembly with contig N₅₀ of 1,043 kbp and 73 total number of fragments was polished twice (Racon polishing) with TGS-GapCloser v. 1.1.1 [51], and then with Pilon v. 1.23 [52] using 30 million of high-quality Illumina read pairs (read length 150 bp). At this stage, the assembled scaffolds were broken into contigs, which were re-scaffolded with RaGOO v. 1.1 [53] using TriTrypDB L. mexicana assembly as a reference. The resulting assembly was again treated with TGS-GapCloser and no genome rearrangements (relative to L. mexicana MHOM/GT/2001/U1103) were detected at this step. The final assembly was quality-checked using QUAST v. 5.0.2 [54] and BUSCO v. 5.0.0 [55] tools.

Genome instability analysis

Leishmania mexicana genomes (ΔKu80 and wild type: 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 passages; 10 samples in total) were sequenced using Illumina NovaSeq platform at the Institute of Applied Biotechnology. Sequencing reads data obtained in frame of this work are deposed into NCBI SRA under BioProject PRJNA746247. Random subsamples of ~17–18 million of read pairs were prepared with a custom Python script from each sequenced sample after their quality check and adapter trimming with Trimmomatic v. 0.39 [39]. Each subsample was mapped on the genome assembly using the BWA mem v. 0.7.17 [56] and alignments were processed with SAMtools v. 1.9 [57]. The SNP and short indel calling was performed with the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) v. 4.2 using the ‘HaplotypeCaller’ tool [58] with default settings and with ‘-ploidy’ set to 10 to capture possible variants with low frequency, as possible SNPs or indels caused by the Ku80 ablation could potentially be restricted to a fraction of cells only. The SNP and indel sets were compared using a custom Python script. Chimeric and split alignments, secondary alignments and read alignments with soft-clipped bases were counted in SAM files with custom shell scripts, using specific SAM tags and alignment CIGAR strings. General read mapping analyses were focused on counting the fractions of reads with specific properties, which can point to various recombination or mutation processes in genomes: number of unmapped, soft-clipped, chimeric alignments. SA:Z and XA:Z tags were used by BWA short read aligner for chimeric/split read alignments. Each subsample’s sorted BAM file was analyzed for assembly identity using the ALE tool [59].

Plotting chimeric reads density

As a control dataset, a sample of L. mexicana M379, sequenced by The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in 2013 and deposed in NCBI SRA under accession ERR307335, was downloaded and processed as above. Reads were mapped on the M379 genome assembly with BWA mem v. 0.7.17. Chromosome sequence was binned in 24 kbps-long fragments, bin number was assigned to each mapped read or read fragment. Read counts were stored in 2D-matrix in such a way that the row in this matrix corresponds to the bin number, assigned to the first read in pair (or the ‘leftmost’ mapped read fragment) and the column is the bin number assigned to the second read in read pair (or ‘rightmost’ mapped read fragment). The read pairs mapped close to each other were counted in cells near diagonal of such matrix, while chimeric reads of putative “translocations” were counted in cells far from diagonal. Read counts in the matrix were first normalized over the total number of mapped reads, then diagonal elements of the matrices were replaced with zeros and all other values were scaled to (0, 1) range. As the entries of matrices are symmetrical across main diagonal, matrices for two different samples were joined.

Southern blotting and quantification of transcripts encoding telomere-associated proteins using RT-qPCR

Telomere lengths were analyzed by the terminal restriction fragment length analysis as in [15,20]. For the loading and integrity control, the membranes were stripped and re-probed against a fragment of an 18S rRNA gene. Statistics of the telomere lengths were obtained with an online tool WALTER (Web-based Analyser of the Length of TElomeRes) [60].

Transcripts encoding telomere-associated proteins were quantified by RT-qPCR in five biological replicates as in [15].

Results

Establishment of the ΔKu80 (LmxM.29.0340^-/-) and add-back L. mexicana lines

In order to investigate function of the Ku proteins in Leishmania biology, we first ablated the Ku80-encoding gene (LmxM.29.0340) in L. mexicana. The clonal cultures, deficient in both LmxM.29.0340 alleles (L. mexicana ΔKu80), were obtained using CRISPR/Cas9 system [38] (Fig 1A). The complete knock-out was confirmed by Southern blotting (Fig 1B), whole-genome Illumina sequencing (Fig 1C), and RT–qPCR (Fig 1D). In addition, we also established the add-back cultures, in which Ku80 was overexpressed episomally on the LmxM.29.0340-null background (Fig 1A) and verified it by Southern blotting (Fig 1B) and RT–qPCR (Fig 1D). Of note, the expression level of LmxM.29.0340 in the add-back cells was higher compared to that of the wild type, but these numbers were not as dramatically different as often observed in the add-back experiments [61,62].

Download:

Fig 1. Establishment of the ΔKu80 (LmxM.29.0340^-/-) and add-back L. mexicana and analysis of telomeres in these lines.

A) Strategy for LmxM.29.0340 ablation and add-back confirmation by Southern blotting. Annealing positions of probes and expected fragment sizes are shown. B) Southern blotting analysis of the ApaI digested L. mexicana genomic DNA of the WT, ΔKu80 and Ku80_add strains with 5´UTR and CDS probes. C) Illumina sequencing reads mapping to the LmxM.29.0340 locus of chromosome 29 in L. mexicana ΔKu80 genome. D) Quantitative RT–PCR analysis of LmxM.29.0340 expression in WT, ΔKu80 and Ku80_add L. mexicana strains. E) Southern blotting analysis of the telomere repeats in WT, ΔKu80 and Ku80_add L. mexicana strains. Membranes were hybridized with a telomeric probe (upper panel) and a probe against 18S gene (lower panel, DNA integrity control). Sizes of DNA fragments in kb (GeneRuler 1 kb DNA ladder, Thermo Fisher Scientific) are indicated on the left in B and E.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041.g001

To exclude the clonal bias in data interpretation, we have selected four and three random clones of ΔKu80 and Ku80_add L. mexicana, respectively. As an additional control, we have also established a clonal line with ablated gene LmxM.08_29.1050 encoding Ku70 (S1 Fig).

Telomeres in L. mexicana ΔKu80 are elongated and this phenotype is stable over 100 passages

Leishmania mexicana is a model species with extremely short telomeres, as compared to other trypanosomatids [15]. Contrary to our expectations (based on the previously reported studies from another model trypanosomatid T. brucei [20]), the L. mexicana ΔKu80 telomeres were considerably extended upon LmxM.29.0340 ablation (median telomere length 389 and 564 bp for the wild type and ΔKu80 cells, respectively). This phenotype was reversed in the add-back cells (median telomere length 431 bp), confirming that the observed effect is not an artefact of the genetic manipulations (Fig 1E and S2 Table). Of note, the results were similar in all analyzed randomly selected ΔKu80 and add-back clonal lines. Remarkably, the ablation of another Ku protein, Ku70, also manifested in elongated telomeres (S2 Fig and S2 Table).

We also investigated whether the observed telomeric phenotype is stable and confirmed that it is not altered for over 100 passages in culture (Fig 2). The L. mexicana cells with ablated Ku80 divide slightly slower compared to their wild type counterparts; this effect is reversed in the add-back lines (S3 Fig).

Download:

Fig 2. Elongated telomers in L. mexicana ΔKu80 are stable over 100 passages in vitro.

Southern blotting analysis of the telomere repeats in WT, ΔKu80 L. mexicana strains passaged for 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 passages. Membranes were hybridized with a telomeric probe (upper panel) and a probe against 18S gene (lower panel, DNA integrity control). Sizes of DNA fragments in kb (GeneRuler 1 kb DNA ladder) are indicated on the left.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041.g002

Expression patterns of some telomere–associated proteins and Ku80 correlate in L. mexicana

We have recently shown that the majority of proteins associated with telomeres in T. brucei are conserved across Trypanosomatidae [15]. To investigate the potential correlation between expression of the LmxM.29.0340 and other genes encoding proteins implicated in telomere maintenance in trypanosomatids [15,35], we analyzed their transcription level in the WT, ΔKu80, and Ku80_add L. mexicana cells. Our results show that expression pattern (at the level of RNA) of most of these proteins (13 out of 19) correlated with that of LmxM.29.0340 (Fig 3, boxed). Compared to the wild type, their expression was statistically significant down and up regulated in the ΔKu80 and Ku80_add L. mexicana, respectively. Some notable entries on this list are TERT, ttaggg binding factor (TRF), and repressor activator protein 1 (RAP1), which confirm previous observations of their interactions with Ku proteins in other species [21,22,25,63–65]. This is not a genome-wide phenomenon, as some of the analyzed genes do not follow the same pattern (Fig 3).

Download:

Fig 3. Transcript levels of telomere-associated proteins in WT, ΔKu80, and Ku80_add strains of L. mexicana.

Gene expression is presented as normalized means with SEM derived from five independent biological replicates. T. brucei IDs of telomeric proteins are used for consistency with previously published results. Data for transcripts, whose expression pattern correlates with that of Ku80, are boxed. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: * < 0.05; ** <0.01; *** <0.001; ns–not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041.g003

Deeper sequencing and genome instability analyses

In order to investigate possible influence of the Ku80 ablation on genome stability, we first performed high-quality chromosome-level genome assembly of L. mexicana MNYC/BZ/62/M379 (hereafter referred as “M379 assembly”) and compared it to that of the L. mexicana MHOM/GT/2001/U1103 assembly from the TriTrypDB (“reference assembly”). The final M379 assembly has 34 nuclear chromosomes (31,72 Mbps in total) along with a completely assembled circular contig of the mitochondrial maxicircle. The QUAST report indicated that 97.8% of the Illumina reads were mapped back onto the assembly, 99.99% of bases had non-zero coverage, and 99.98% of the reference L. mexicana assembly was covered by the M379 assembly contigs. The M379 assembly had averaged 10 Ns per 100 kb. In total, 594 sequence discrepancies were detected between the M379 and the reference L. mexicana assemblies. Most of these variants are rather short (under 1 kb) insertions or deletions (400 cases) or tandem repeat expansions/contractions (96 cases); both types can be frequently observed in trypanosomatid genomes. No miss-assemblies were detected by Pilon, TGS-GapCloser, or read mapping of either long PacBio or paired-end Illumina reads. The BUSCO completeness of the M379 assembly for ‘eukaryota’ dataset is 53.8% (137 out of 255 complete BUSCOs). This is the value comparable to the best available chromosome-level assemblies for trypanosomatids (Leishmania tarentolae: 53.8%, L. mexicana: 53.8%, L. major: 53.8%, Leptomonas pyrrhocoris: 55.3%, T. brucei: 55.7%). Altogether, this indicates that vast majority of the L. mexicana MNYC/BZ/62/M379 genome was properly assembled.

Next, we investigated genome stability by mapping the paired-end Illumina reads (150 bp) obtained from the WT and ΔKu80 L. mexicana collected after 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 passages in vitro. Read mappings were analyzed with various tools that detect SNPs, short indels, longer structural variants indicated by the chimeric read alignments or misaligned read pairs, locus coverage variations, and overall likelihood of the assembly (ALE method). As genomic variations, caused by malfunction of the DNA repair system, can arise randomly in cells, the ‘allele frequency’ of each individual variant can be rather low. We accounted for that in the GATK haplotype calling by adjusting the ploidy parameter. We also analyzed the possible variants present at extremely low frequencies by counting overall number of mis-aligned, chimeric or soft-clipped reads in each sample (these read alignments indicate the sequence difference between the read and the reference and can capture events supported even by a single read sequence). The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to conduct pairwise comparisons between the WT and ΔKu80 samples and no differences were found in any test (p-value < 0.05). Results and statistics of the analyses are summarized in the S3 Table. This is illustrated in the Fig 4 for chromosome 20 of L. mexicana. In both cell lines (ΔKu80 and WT), the observed frequency of putative translocations slightly increases over time (compare panels A and B), but this increasement is similar. Notably, we detected a higher translocation frequency when we compared genomic data for the same strain produced in 2013 and 2021 (panel C). This can be easily explained by the plasticity of Leishmania genomes–recombination events accumulate over time [66–68].

Download:

Fig 4. Chimeric reads density for the 20^th chromosome of different Leishmania mexicana strains.

ΔKu80 and WT are samples from the current study, shown at the beginning of cultivation experiment (A) and on the 100^th passage (B). Panel C) compares the whole-genome dataset sequenced by The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in 2013 (labeled M379, 2013) to the ΔKu80 strain after 100 passages. Normalized read density is plotted.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041.g004

To conclude, we did not detect any statistically significant difference between the WT and ΔKu80 samples in any performed test. These results imply that ablation of LmxM.29.0340 does not result in genome instability; although they do not exclude a possibility that the effect of this knock-out is delayed and manifests itself after more rounds of cell division.

Discussion

In this work we investigated the role of Ku80 in Leishmania mexicana biology and demonstrated that its ablation affects telomere length. Unlike situation in another model trypanosomatid species, Trypanosoma brucei [20], a complete knock-out of the Ku80 encoding gene (LmxM.29.0340) resulted in telomere elongation (Fig 1). Of note, and, again, different from T. brucei, elongated telomeres in L. mexicana are stable for at least 100 passages in culture (Fig 2). A similar phenotype (telomere elongation upon Ku protein ablation) was previously observed in C. albicans and A. thaliana [21,22]. In these species, telomere elongation in the Ku deficient mutants was linked to alternative TERT-independent ways of telomere maintaining [21,25,69]. Notably, alternative mechanisms of telomer maintenance have been recently documented in Leishmania spp. [70]. The Ku 80 protein in L. mexicana appears to be central for the network of factors involved in telomere maintenance, as its expression at RNA level correlates with that of 13 out of 19 genes previously implicated in this process (Fig 3). On the other hand, we did not corroborate a recently proposed hypothesis that Ku proteins might direct genome stability in trypanosomatids [12].

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primers used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041.s001

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Telomere lengths (weighted median, minimum–maximum) in analyzed clonal lines of L. mexicana.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Genome instability analyses summary.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041.s003

(XLSX)

S1 Fig.

Establishment of the ΔKu70 L. mexicana. A) Strategy for LmxM.08_29.1050 ablation. B) Quantitative RT–PCR analysis of LmxM.08_29.1050 expression in WT and ΔKu70 L. mexicana strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041.s004

(JPG)

S2 Fig. Southern blotting analysis of the telomere repeats in WT, ΔKu70 (1 clonal line), ΔKu80 (4 clonal lines) and Ku80_add (3 clonal lines) L. mexicana strains. Sizes of DNA fragments in kb are indicated on the left.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041.s005

(JPG)

S3 Fig. Growth curves of the wild type, ΔKu80 (3 clonal lines) and Ku80_add (3 clonal lines) L. mexicana strains. Statistical significance: ** <0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010041.s006

(JPG)

Acknowledgments

We thank members of our laboratories for stimulating discussions and Dr. C. Janzen (University of Würzburg) for sharing the plasmid pSP73 bearing the telomeric probe.

References

1. Kostygov AY, Karnkowska A, Votýpka J, Tashyreva D, Maciszewski K, Yurchenko V, et al. Euglenozoa: taxonomy, diversity and ecology, symbioses and viruses. Open Biol. 2021;11: 200407. pmid:33715388
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Maslov DA, Opperdoes FR, Kostygov AY, Hashimi H, Lukeš J, Yurchenko V. Recent advances in trypanosomatid research: genome organization, expression, metabolism, taxonomy and evolution. Parasitology. 2019;146: 1–27. pmid:29898792
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Bruschi F, Gradoni L. The leishmaniases: old neglected tropical diseases. Springer. 2018.
4. WHO. Leishmaniasis. 2020 (Cited November 19 2021). Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis
5. Stuart K, Brun R, Croft S, Fairlamb A, Gurtler RE, McKerrow J, et al. Kinetoplastids: related protozoan pathogens, different diseases. J Clin Invest. 2008;118: 1301–1310. pmid:18382742
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Aravind L, Koonin EV. Prokaryotic homologs of the eukaryotic DNA-end-binding protein Ku, novel domains in the Ku protein and prediction of a prokaryotic double-strand break repair system. Genome Res. 2001;11: 1365–1374. pmid:11483577
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Chang HHY, Pannunzio NR, Adachi N, Lieber MR. Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18: 495–506. pmid:28512351
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Williams GJ, Hammel M, Radhakrishnan SK, Ramsden D, Lees-Miller SP, Tainer JA. Structural insights into NHEJ: building up an integrated picture of the dynamic DSB repair super complex, one component and interaction at a time. DNA Repair. 2014;17: 110–120. pmid:24656613
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Zan H, Tat C, Qiu Z, Taylor JR, Guerrero JA, Shen T, et al. Rad52 competes with Ku70/Ku86 for binding to S-region DSB ends to modulate antibody class-switch DNA recombination. Nat Commun. 2017;8: 14244. pmid:28176781
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Abbasi S, Schild-Poulter C. Mapping the Ku interactome using proximity-dependent biotin identification in human cells. J Proteome Res. 2019;18: 1064–1077. pmid:30585729
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Fell VL, Schild-Poulter C. The Ku heterodimer: function in DNA repair and beyond. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2015;763: 15–29. pmid:25795113
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Nenarokova A, Záhonová K, Krasilnikova M, Gahura O, McCulloch R, Ziková A, et al. Causes and effects of loss of classical nonhomologous end joining pathway in parasitic eukaryotes. mBio. 2019;10: e01541–01519. pmid:31311886
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Burton P, McBride DJ, Wilkes JM, Barry JD, McCulloch R. Ku heterodimer-independent end joining in Trypanosoma brucei cell extracts relies upon sequence microhomology. Eukaryot Cell. 2007;6: 1773–1781. pmid:17693593
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Genois MM, Paquet ER, Laffitte MC, Maity R, Rodrigue A, Ouellette M, et al. DNA repair pathways in trypanosomatids: from DNA repair to drug resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2014;78: 40–73. pmid:24600040
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Poláková E, Záhonová K, Albanaz ATS, Butenko A, Lukeš J, Yurchenko V. Diverse telomeres in trypanosomatids. Parasitology. 2021;148: 1254–1270. pmid:33612129
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Abbasi S, Parmar G, Kelly RD, Balasuriya N, Schild-Poulter C. The Ku complex: recent advances and emerging roles outside of non-homologous end-joining. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78: 4589–4613. pmid:33855626
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Indiviglio SM, Bertuch AA. Ku’s essential role in keeping telomeres intact. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106: 12217–12218. pmid:19622731
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Fisher TS, Zakian VA. Ku: a multifunctional protein involved in telomere maintenance. DNA Repair. 2005;4: 1215–1226. pmid:15979949
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. Components of the Ku-dependent non-homologous end-joining pathway are involved in telomeric length maintenance and telomeric silencing. EMBO J. 1998;17: 1819–1828. pmid:9501103
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Janzen CJ, Lander F, Dreesen O, Cross GA. Telomere length regulation and transcriptional silencing in Ku80-deficient Trypanosoma brucei. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: 6575–6584. pmid:15602000
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Chico L, Ciudad T, Hsu M, Lue NF, Larriba G. The Candida albicans Ku70 modulates telomere length and structure by regulating both telomerase and recombination. PLoS One. 2011;6: e23732. pmid:21886818
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Riha K, Shippen DE. Ku is required for telomeric C-rich strand maintenance but not for end-to-end chromosome fusions in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 611–615. pmid:12511598
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Espejel S, Franco S, Rodriguez-Perales S, Bouffler SD, Cigudosa JC, Blasco MA. Mammalian Ku86 mediates chromosomal fusions and apoptosis caused by critically short telomeres. EMBO J. 2002;21: 2207–2219. pmid:11980718
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Samper E, Goytisolo FA, Slijepcevic P, van Buul PP, Blasco MA. Mammalian Ku86 protein prevents telomeric fusions independently of the length of TTAGGG repeats and the G-strand overhang. EMBO Rep. 2000;1: 244–252. pmid:11256607
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Zellinger B, Akimcheva S, Puizina J, Schirato M, Riha K. Ku suppresses formation of telomeric circles and alternative telomere lengthening in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell. 2007;27: 163–169. pmid:17612498
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Sui J, Zhang S, Chen BPC. DNA-dependent protein kinase in telomere maintenance and protection. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2020;25: 2. pmid:31988640
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Olovnikov AM. A theory of marginotomy. The incomplete copying of template margin in enzymic synthesis of polynucleotides and biological significance of the phenomenon. J Theor Biol. 1973;41: 181–190. pmid:4754905
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Greider CW. Telomere length regulation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65: 337–365. pmid:8811183
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Greider CW. Telomeres, telomerase and senescence. Bioessays. 1990;12: 363–369. pmid:2241933
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Lundblad V. Telomere maintenance without telomerase. Oncogene. 2002;21: 522–531. pmid:11850777
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. McEachern MJ, Blackburn EH. Cap-prevented recombination between terminal telomeric repeat arrays (telomere CPR) maintains telomeres in Kluyveromyces lactis lacking telomerase. Genes Dev. 1996;10: 1822–1834. pmid:8698241
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Muñoz-Jordán JL, Cross GA. Telomere shortening and cell cycle arrest in Trypanosoma brucei expressing human telomeric repeat factor TRF1. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2001;114: 169–181. pmid:11378197
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Conte FF, Cano MI. Genomic organization of telomeric and subtelomeric sequences of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35: 1435–1443. pmid:16126212
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Fulnečková J, Ševčíková T, Fajkus J, Lukešová A, Lukeš M, Vlček Č, et al. A broad phylogenetic survey unveils the diversity and evolution of telomeres in eukaryotes. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5: 468–483. pmid:23395982
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Reis H, Schwebs M, Dietz S, Janzen CJ, Butter F. TelAP1 links telomere complexes with developmental expression site silencing in African trypanosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46: 2820–2833. pmid:29385523
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Ishemgulova A, Kraeva N, Hlaváčová J, Zimmer SL, Butenko A, Podešvová L, et al. A putative ATP/GTP binding protein affects Leishmania mexicana growth in insect vectors and vertebrate hosts. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: e0005782. pmid:28742133
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Beneke T, Madden R, Makin L, Valli J, Sunter J, Gluenz E. A CRISPR Cas9 high-throughput genome editing toolkit for kinetoplastids. R Soc Open Sci. 2017;4: 170095. pmid:28573017
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Beneke T, Gluenz E. LeishGEdit: a method for rapid gene knockout and tagging using CRISPR-Cas9. In: Clos J, editor. Leishmania. New York, NY: Humana Press; 2019. pp. 189–210.
39. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 2114–2120. pmid:24695404
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Ishemgulova A, Hlaváčová J, Majerová K, Butenko A, Lukeš J, Votýpka J, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 in Leishmania mexicana: a case study of LmxBTN1. PLoS One. 2018;13: e0192723. pmid:29438445
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 357–359. pmid:22388286
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19: 455–477. pmid:22506599
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Milne I, Bayer M, Stephen G, Cardle L, Marshall D. Tablet: visualizing next-generation sequence assemblies and mappings. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1374: 253–268. pmid:26519411
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Kraeva N, Leštinová T, Ishemgulova A, Majerová K, Butenko A, Vaselek S, et al. LmxM.22.0250-encoded dual specificity protein/lipid phosphatase impairs Leishmania mexicana virulence in vitro. Pathogens. 2019;8: 241. pmid:31744234
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Záhonová K, Hadariová L, Vacula R, Yurchenko V, Eliáš M, Krajčovič J, et al. A small portion of plastid transcripts is polyadenylated in the flagellate Euglena gracilis. FEBS Lett. 2014;588: 783–788. pmid:24492004
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Ishemgulova A, Kraeva N, Faktorová D, Podešvová L, Lukeš J, Yurchenko V. T7 polymerase-driven transcription is downregulated in metacyclic promastigotes and amastigotes of Leishmania mexicana. Folia Parasitol. 2016;63: 016. pmid:27311571
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37: 540–546. pmid:30936562
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Sádlová J, Podešvová L, Bečvář T, Bianchi C, Gerasimov ES, Saura A, et al. Catalase impairs Leishmania mexicana development and virulence. Virulence. 2021;12: 852–867. pmid:33724149
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Rogers MB, Hilley JD, Dickens NJ, Wilkes J, Bates PA, Depledge DP, et al. Chromosome and gene copy number variation allow major structural change between species and strains of Leishmania. Genome Res. 2011;21: 2129–2142. pmid:22038252
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Aslett M, Aurrecoechea C, Berriman M, Brestelli J, Brunk BP, Carrington M, et al. TriTrypDB: a functional genomic resource for the Trypanosomatidae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38: D457–D462. pmid:19843604
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Xu M, Guo L, Gu S, Wang O, Zhang R, Peters BA, et al. TGS-GapCloser: a fast and accurate gap closer for large genomes with low coverage of error-prone long reads. Gigascience. 2020;9: giaa094. pmid:32893860
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One. 2014;9: e112963. pmid:25409509
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Alonge M, Soyk S, Ramakrishnan S, Wang X, Goodwin S, Sedlazeck FJ, et al. RaGOO: fast and accurate reference-guided scaffolding of draft genomes. Genome Biol. 2019;20: 224. pmid:31661016
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29: 1072–1075. pmid:23422339
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Seppey M, Manni M, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. In: Kollmar M, editor. Gene prediction: methods and protocols. New York, NY: Humana; 2019. pp. 227–245.
56. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25: 1754–1760. pmid:19451168
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Bonnal R, Caccamo M, Maclean D. Bio-SAMtools: Ruby bindings for SAMtools, a library for accessing BAM files containing high-throughput sequence alignments. Source Code Biol Med. 2012;7: 6. pmid:22640879
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20: 1297–1303. pmid:20644199
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
59. Clark SC, Egan R, Frazier PI, Wang Z. ALE: a generic assembly likelihood evaluation framework for assessing the accuracy of genome and metagenome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29: 435–443. pmid:23303509
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
60. Lyčka M, Peška V, Demko M, Spyroglou I, Kilar A, Fajkus J, et al. WALTER: an easy way to online evaluate telomere lengths from terminal restriction fragment analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2021;22: 145. pmid:33752601
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
61. Duncan SM, Jones NG, Mottram JC. Recent advances in Leishmania reverse genetics: manipulating a manipulative parasite. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2017;216: 30–38. pmid:28629934
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
62. Boitz JM, Gilroy CA, Olenyik TD, Paradis D, Perdeh J, Dearman K, et al. Arginase is essential for survival of Leishmania donovani promastigotes but not intracellular amastigotes. Infect Immun. 2017;85: e00554–00516. pmid:27795357
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
63. Song K, Jung D, Jung Y, Lee SG, Lee I. Interaction of human Ku70 with TRF2. FEBS Lett. 2000;481: 81–85. pmid:10984620
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
64. Li B, Espinal A, Cross GA. Trypanosome telomeres are protected by a homologue of mammalian TRF2. Mol Cell Biol. 2005:25: 5011–5021. pmid:15923618
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
65. O’Connor MS, Safari A, Liu D, Qin J, Songyang Z. The human Rap1 protein complex and modulation of telomere length. J Biol Chem. 2004;279: 28585–28591. pmid:15100233
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
66. Laffitte MN, Leprohon P, Papadopoulou B, Ouellette M. Plasticity of the Leishmania genome leading to gene copy number variations and drug resistance. F1000Res. 2016;5: 2350. pmid:27703673
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
67. Sinha R, MM C, Raghwan , Das S, Das S, Shadab M, et al. Genome plasticity in cultured Leishmania donovani: comparison of early and late passages. Front Microbiol. 2018;9: 1279. pmid:30018594
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
68. Rogozin IB, Charyyeva A, Sidorenko IA, Babenko VN, Yurchenko V. Frequent recombination events in Leishmania donovani: mining population data. Pathogens. 2020;9: 572. pmid:32679679
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
69. Kockler ZW, Comeron JM, Malkova A. A unified alternative telomere-lengthening pathway in yeast survivor cells. Mol Cell. 2021;81: 1816–1829. pmid:33639094
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
70. Bussotti G, Gouzelou E, Cortes Boite M, Kherachi I, Harrat Z, Eddaikra N, et al. Leishmania genome dynamics during environmental adaptation reveal strain-specific differences in gene copy number variation, karyotype instability, and telomeric amplification. mBio. 2018;9: e01399–01318. pmid:30401775
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Kostygov AY, Karnkowska A, Votýpka J, Tashyreva D, Maciszewski K, Yurchenko V, et al. Euglenozoa: taxonomy, diversity and ecology, symbioses and viruses. Open Biol. 2021;11: 200407. pmid:33715388
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Maslov DA, Opperdoes FR, Kostygov AY, Hashimi H, Lukeš J, Yurchenko V. Recent advances in trypanosomatid research: genome organization, expression, metabolism, taxonomy and evolution. Parasitology. 2019;146: 1–27. pmid:29898792
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Bruschi F, Gradoni L. The leishmaniases: old neglected tropical diseases. Springer. 2018.

[ref4] 4. WHO. Leishmaniasis. 2020 (Cited November 19 2021). Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis

[ref5] 5. Stuart K, Brun R, Croft S, Fairlamb A, Gurtler RE, McKerrow J, et al. Kinetoplastids: related protozoan pathogens, different diseases. J Clin Invest. 2008;118: 1301–1310. pmid:18382742
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] PubMed/NCBI

[14] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Aravind L, Koonin EV. Prokaryotic homologs of the eukaryotic DNA-end-binding protein Ku, novel domains in the Ku protein and prediction of a prokaryotic double-strand break repair system. Genome Res. 2001;11: 1365–1374. pmid:11483577
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] PubMed/NCBI

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Chang HHY, Pannunzio NR, Adachi N, Lieber MR. Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18: 495–506. pmid:28512351
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] PubMed/NCBI

[22] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Williams GJ, Hammel M, Radhakrishnan SK, Ramsden D, Lees-Miller SP, Tainer JA. Structural insights into NHEJ: building up an integrated picture of the dynamic DSB repair super complex, one component and interaction at a time. DNA Repair. 2014;17: 110–120. pmid:24656613
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] PubMed/NCBI

[26] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Zan H, Tat C, Qiu Z, Taylor JR, Guerrero JA, Shen T, et al. Rad52 competes with Ku70/Ku86 for binding to S-region DSB ends to modulate antibody class-switch DNA recombination. Nat Commun. 2017;8: 14244. pmid:28176781
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[28] View Article

[29] PubMed/NCBI

[30] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Abbasi S, Schild-Poulter C. Mapping the Ku interactome using proximity-dependent biotin identification in human cells. J Proteome Res. 2019;18: 1064–1077. pmid:30585729
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] PubMed/NCBI

[34] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Fell VL, Schild-Poulter C. The Ku heterodimer: function in DNA repair and beyond. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2015;763: 15–29. pmid:25795113
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] PubMed/NCBI

[38] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Nenarokova A, Záhonová K, Krasilnikova M, Gahura O, McCulloch R, Ziková A, et al. Causes and effects of loss of classical nonhomologous end joining pathway in parasitic eukaryotes. mBio. 2019;10: e01541–01519. pmid:31311886
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] PubMed/NCBI

[42] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Burton P, McBride DJ, Wilkes JM, Barry JD, McCulloch R. Ku heterodimer-independent end joining in Trypanosoma brucei cell extracts relies upon sequence microhomology. Eukaryot Cell. 2007;6: 1773–1781. pmid:17693593
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] PubMed/NCBI

[46] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Genois MM, Paquet ER, Laffitte MC, Maity R, Rodrigue A, Ouellette M, et al. DNA repair pathways in trypanosomatids: from DNA repair to drug resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2014;78: 40–73. pmid:24600040
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] PubMed/NCBI

[50] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Poláková E, Záhonová K, Albanaz ATS, Butenko A, Lukeš J, Yurchenko V. Diverse telomeres in trypanosomatids. Parasitology. 2021;148: 1254–1270. pmid:33612129
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] PubMed/NCBI

[54] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Abbasi S, Parmar G, Kelly RD, Balasuriya N, Schild-Poulter C. The Ku complex: recent advances and emerging roles outside of non-homologous end-joining. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78: 4589–4613. pmid:33855626
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] PubMed/NCBI

[58] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Indiviglio SM, Bertuch AA. Ku’s essential role in keeping telomeres intact. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106: 12217–12218. pmid:19622731
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Fisher TS, Zakian VA. Ku: a multifunctional protein involved in telomere maintenance. DNA Repair. 2005;4: 1215–1226. pmid:15979949
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] PubMed/NCBI

[66] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. Components of the Ku-dependent non-homologous end-joining pathway are involved in telomeric length maintenance and telomeric silencing. EMBO J. 1998;17: 1819–1828. pmid:9501103
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] PubMed/NCBI

[70] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Janzen CJ, Lander F, Dreesen O, Cross GA. Telomere length regulation and transcriptional silencing in Ku80-deficient Trypanosoma brucei. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: 6575–6584. pmid:15602000
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] PubMed/NCBI

[74] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Chico L, Ciudad T, Hsu M, Lue NF, Larriba G. The Candida albicans Ku70 modulates telomere length and structure by regulating both telomerase and recombination. PLoS One. 2011;6: e23732. pmid:21886818
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] PubMed/NCBI

[78] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Riha K, Shippen DE. Ku is required for telomeric C-rich strand maintenance but not for end-to-end chromosome fusions in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 611–615. pmid:12511598
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] PubMed/NCBI

[82] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Espejel S, Franco S, Rodriguez-Perales S, Bouffler SD, Cigudosa JC, Blasco MA. Mammalian Ku86 mediates chromosomal fusions and apoptosis caused by critically short telomeres. EMBO J. 2002;21: 2207–2219. pmid:11980718
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] PubMed/NCBI

[86] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Samper E, Goytisolo FA, Slijepcevic P, van Buul PP, Blasco MA. Mammalian Ku86 protein prevents telomeric fusions independently of the length of TTAGGG repeats and the G-strand overhang. EMBO Rep. 2000;1: 244–252. pmid:11256607
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] PubMed/NCBI

[90] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Zellinger B, Akimcheva S, Puizina J, Schirato M, Riha K. Ku suppresses formation of telomeric circles and alternative telomere lengthening in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell. 2007;27: 163–169. pmid:17612498
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Sui J, Zhang S, Chen BPC. DNA-dependent protein kinase in telomere maintenance and protection. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2020;25: 2. pmid:31988640
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Olovnikov AM. A theory of marginotomy. The incomplete copying of template margin in enzymic synthesis of polynucleotides and biological significance of the phenomenon. J Theor Biol. 1973;41: 181–190. pmid:4754905
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Greider CW. Telomere length regulation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65: 337–365. pmid:8811183
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Greider CW. Telomeres, telomerase and senescence. Bioessays. 1990;12: 363–369. pmid:2241933
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Lundblad V. Telomere maintenance without telomerase. Oncogene. 2002;21: 522–531. pmid:11850777
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. McEachern MJ, Blackburn EH. Cap-prevented recombination between terminal telomeric repeat arrays (telomere CPR) maintains telomeres in Kluyveromyces lactis lacking telomerase. Genes Dev. 1996;10: 1822–1834. pmid:8698241
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Muñoz-Jordán JL, Cross GA. Telomere shortening and cell cycle arrest in Trypanosoma brucei expressing human telomeric repeat factor TRF1. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2001;114: 169–181. pmid:11378197
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Conte FF, Cano MI. Genomic organization of telomeric and subtelomeric sequences of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35: 1435–1443. pmid:16126212
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Fulnečková J, Ševčíková T, Fajkus J, Lukešová A, Lukeš M, Vlček Č, et al. A broad phylogenetic survey unveils the diversity and evolution of telomeres in eukaryotes. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5: 468–483. pmid:23395982
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Reis H, Schwebs M, Dietz S, Janzen CJ, Butter F. TelAP1 links telomere complexes with developmental expression site silencing in African trypanosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46: 2820–2833. pmid:29385523
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Ishemgulova A, Kraeva N, Hlaváčová J, Zimmer SL, Butenko A, Podešvová L, et al. A putative ATP/GTP binding protein affects Leishmania mexicana growth in insect vectors and vertebrate hosts. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: e0005782. pmid:28742133
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Beneke T, Madden R, Makin L, Valli J, Sunter J, Gluenz E. A CRISPR Cas9 high-throughput genome editing toolkit for kinetoplastids. R Soc Open Sci. 2017;4: 170095. pmid:28573017
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Beneke T, Gluenz E. LeishGEdit: a method for rapid gene knockout and tagging using CRISPR-Cas9. In: Clos J, editor. Leishmania. New York, NY: Humana Press; 2019. pp. 189–210.

[ref39] 39. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 2114–2120. pmid:24695404
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Ishemgulova A, Hlaváčová J, Majerová K, Butenko A, Lukeš J, Votýpka J, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 in Leishmania mexicana: a case study of LmxBTN1. PLoS One. 2018;13: e0192723. pmid:29438445
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 357–359. pmid:22388286
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19: 455–477. pmid:22506599
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] PubMed/NCBI

[159] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Milne I, Bayer M, Stephen G, Cardle L, Marshall D. Tablet: visualizing next-generation sequence assemblies and mappings. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1374: 253–268. pmid:26519411
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[161] View Article

[162] PubMed/NCBI

[163] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Kraeva N, Leštinová T, Ishemgulova A, Majerová K, Butenko A, Vaselek S, et al. LmxM.22.0250-encoded dual specificity protein/lipid phosphatase impairs Leishmania mexicana virulence in vitro. Pathogens. 2019;8: 241. pmid:31744234
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] PubMed/NCBI

[167] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Záhonová K, Hadariová L, Vacula R, Yurchenko V, Eliáš M, Krajčovič J, et al. A small portion of plastid transcripts is polyadenylated in the flagellate Euglena gracilis. FEBS Lett. 2014;588: 783–788. pmid:24492004
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] PubMed/NCBI

[171] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Ishemgulova A, Kraeva N, Faktorová D, Podešvová L, Lukeš J, Yurchenko V. T7 polymerase-driven transcription is downregulated in metacyclic promastigotes and amastigotes of Leishmania mexicana. Folia Parasitol. 2016;63: 016. pmid:27311571
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[173] View Article

[174] PubMed/NCBI

[175] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37: 540–546. pmid:30936562
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] PubMed/NCBI

[179] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Sádlová J, Podešvová L, Bečvář T, Bianchi C, Gerasimov ES, Saura A, et al. Catalase impairs Leishmania mexicana development and virulence. Virulence. 2021;12: 852–867. pmid:33724149
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[181] View Article

[182] PubMed/NCBI

[183] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Rogers MB, Hilley JD, Dickens NJ, Wilkes J, Bates PA, Depledge DP, et al. Chromosome and gene copy number variation allow major structural change between species and strains of Leishmania. Genome Res. 2011;21: 2129–2142. pmid:22038252
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] PubMed/NCBI

[187] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Aslett M, Aurrecoechea C, Berriman M, Brestelli J, Brunk BP, Carrington M, et al. TriTrypDB: a functional genomic resource for the Trypanosomatidae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38: D457–D462. pmid:19843604
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] PubMed/NCBI

[191] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Xu M, Guo L, Gu S, Wang O, Zhang R, Peters BA, et al. TGS-GapCloser: a fast and accurate gap closer for large genomes with low coverage of error-prone long reads. Gigascience. 2020;9: giaa094. pmid:32893860
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] PubMed/NCBI

[195] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One. 2014;9: e112963. pmid:25409509
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[197] View Article

[198] PubMed/NCBI

[199] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Alonge M, Soyk S, Ramakrishnan S, Wang X, Goodwin S, Sedlazeck FJ, et al. RaGOO: fast and accurate reference-guided scaffolding of draft genomes. Genome Biol. 2019;20: 224. pmid:31661016
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[201] View Article

[202] PubMed/NCBI

[203] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29: 1072–1075. pmid:23422339
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[205] View Article

[206] PubMed/NCBI

[207] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Seppey M, Manni M, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. In: Kollmar M, editor. Gene prediction: methods and protocols. New York, NY: Humana; 2019. pp. 227–245.

[ref56] 56. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25: 1754–1760. pmid:19451168
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[210] View Article

[211] PubMed/NCBI

[212] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Bonnal R, Caccamo M, Maclean D. Bio-SAMtools: Ruby bindings for SAMtools, a library for accessing BAM files containing high-throughput sequence alignments. Source Code Biol Med. 2012;7: 6. pmid:22640879
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[214] View Article

[215] PubMed/NCBI

[216] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20: 1297–1303. pmid:20644199
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[218] View Article

[219] PubMed/NCBI

[220] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Clark SC, Egan R, Frazier PI, Wang Z. ALE: a generic assembly likelihood evaluation framework for assessing the accuracy of genome and metagenome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29: 435–443. pmid:23303509
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[222] View Article

[223] PubMed/NCBI

[224] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Lyčka M, Peška V, Demko M, Spyroglou I, Kilar A, Fajkus J, et al. WALTER: an easy way to online evaluate telomere lengths from terminal restriction fragment analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2021;22: 145. pmid:33752601
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[226] View Article

[227] PubMed/NCBI

[228] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Duncan SM, Jones NG, Mottram JC. Recent advances in Leishmania reverse genetics: manipulating a manipulative parasite. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2017;216: 30–38. pmid:28629934
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[230] View Article

[231] PubMed/NCBI

[232] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Boitz JM, Gilroy CA, Olenyik TD, Paradis D, Perdeh J, Dearman K, et al. Arginase is essential for survival of Leishmania donovani promastigotes but not intracellular amastigotes. Infect Immun. 2017;85: e00554–00516. pmid:27795357
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[234] View Article

[235] PubMed/NCBI

[236] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Song K, Jung D, Jung Y, Lee SG, Lee I. Interaction of human Ku70 with TRF2. FEBS Lett. 2000;481: 81–85. pmid:10984620
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[238] View Article

[239] PubMed/NCBI

[240] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Li B, Espinal A, Cross GA. Trypanosome telomeres are protected by a homologue of mammalian TRF2. Mol Cell Biol. 2005:25: 5011–5021. pmid:15923618
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[242] View Article

[243] PubMed/NCBI

[244] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. O’Connor MS, Safari A, Liu D, Qin J, Songyang Z. The human Rap1 protein complex and modulation of telomere length. J Biol Chem. 2004;279: 28585–28591. pmid:15100233
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[246] View Article

[247] PubMed/NCBI

[248] Google Scholar

[ref66] 66. Laffitte MN, Leprohon P, Papadopoulou B, Ouellette M. Plasticity of the Leishmania genome leading to gene copy number variations and drug resistance. F1000Res. 2016;5: 2350. pmid:27703673
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[250] View Article

[251] PubMed/NCBI

[252] Google Scholar

[ref67] 67. Sinha R, MM C, Raghwan , Das S, Das S, Shadab M, et al. Genome plasticity in cultured Leishmania donovani: comparison of early and late passages. Front Microbiol. 2018;9: 1279. pmid:30018594
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[254] View Article

[255] PubMed/NCBI

[256] Google Scholar

[ref68] 68. Rogozin IB, Charyyeva A, Sidorenko IA, Babenko VN, Yurchenko V. Frequent recombination events in Leishmania donovani: mining population data. Pathogens. 2020;9: 572. pmid:32679679
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[258] View Article

[259] PubMed/NCBI

[260] Google Scholar

[ref69] 69. Kockler ZW, Comeron JM, Malkova A. A unified alternative telomere-lengthening pathway in yeast survivor cells. Mol Cell. 2021;81: 1816–1829. pmid:33639094
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[262] View Article

[263] PubMed/NCBI

[264] Google Scholar

[ref70] 70. Bussotti G, Gouzelou E, Cortes Boite M, Kherachi I, Harrat Z, Eddaikra N, et al. Leishmania genome dynamics during environmental adaptation reveal strain-specific differences in gene copy number variation, karyotype instability, and telomeric amplification. mBio. 2018;9: e01399–01318. pmid:30401775
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[266] View Article

[267] PubMed/NCBI

[268] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Background

Methodology/Principal findings

Conclusion/Significance

Author summary

Introduction

Methods

Leishmania mexicana axenic cultivation and analysis of growth kinetics

CRISPR-Cas9-mediated ablation of LmxM.29.0340 (Ku80) and LmxM.08_29.1050 (Ku70) in Leishmania mexicana

Ectopic expression of Ku80 in L. mexicana ΔKu80

De novo sequencing and genome assembly

Genome instability analysis

Plotting chimeric reads density

Southern blotting and quantification of transcripts encoding telomere-associated proteins using RT-qPCR

Results

Establishment of the ΔKu80 (LmxM.29.0340-/-) and add-back L. mexicana lines

Telomeres in L. mexicana ΔKu80 are elongated and this phenotype is stable over 100 passages

Expression patterns of some telomere–associated proteins and Ku80 correlate in L. mexicana

Deeper sequencing and genome instability analyses

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primers used in this study.

S2 Table. Telomere lengths (weighted median, minimum–maximum) in analyzed clonal lines of L. mexicana.

S3 Table. Genome instability analyses summary.

S1 Fig.

S2 Fig. Southern blotting analysis of the telomere repeats in WT, ΔKu70 (1 clonal line), ΔKu80 (4 clonal lines) and Ku80_add (3 clonal lines) L. mexicana strains. Sizes of DNA fragments in kb are indicated on the left.

S3 Fig. Growth curves of the wild type, ΔKu80 (3 clonal lines) and Ku80_add (3 clonal lines) L. mexicana strains. Statistical significance: ** <0.01.

Acknowledgments

References

Establishment of the ΔKu80 (LmxM.29.0340^-/-) and add-back L. mexicana lines