• Loading metrics

Measuring the global burden of chikungunya and Zika viruses: A systematic review

Measuring the global burden of chikungunya and Zika viruses: A systematic review

  • Christopher J. Puntasecca, 
  • Charles H. King, 
  • Angelle Desiree LaBeaud


Throughout the last decade, chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and Zika virus (ZIKV) infections have spread globally, causing a spectrum of disease that ranges from self-limited febrile illness to permanent severe disability, congenital anomalies, and early death. Nevertheless, estimates of their aggregate health impact are absent from the literature and are currently omitted from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) reports. We systematically reviewed published literature and surveillance records to evaluate the global burden caused by CHIKV and ZIKV between 2010 and 2019, to calculate estimates of their disability-adjusted life year (DALY) impact. Extracted data on acute, chronic, and perinatal outcomes were used to create annualized DALY estimates, following techniques outlined in the GBD framework. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020192502). Of 7,877 studies identified, 916 were screened in detail, and 21 were selected for inclusion. Available data indicate that CHIKV and ZIKV caused the average yearly loss of over 106,000 and 44,000 DALYs, respectively, between 2010 and 2019. Both viruses caused substantially more burden in the Americas than in any other World Health Organization (WHO) region. This unequal distribution is likely due to a combination of limited active surveillance reporting in other regions and the lack of immunity that left the previously unexposed populations of the Americas susceptible to severe outbreaks during the last decade. Long-term rheumatic sequelae provided the largest DALY component for CHIKV, whereas congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) contributed most significantly for ZIKV. Acute symptoms and early mortality accounted for relatively less of the overall burden. Suboptimal reporting and inconsistent diagnostics limit precision when determining arbovirus incidence and frequency of complications. Despite these limitations, it is clear from our assessment that CHIKV and ZIKV represent a significant cause of morbidity that is not included in current disease burden reports. These results suggest that transmission-blocking strategies, including vector control and vaccine development, remain crucial priorities in reducing global disease burden through prevention of potentially devastating arboviral outbreaks.

Author summary

Chikungunya and Zika are 2 mosquito-borne viral diseases that can cause both acute symptoms and long-term, debilitating complications in infected individuals. Chikungunya is best known as a cause of persistent arthritis in otherwise recovered patients and Zika as a cause of cognitive, motor, and sensory anomalies in newborn children. Both diseases emerged in the Americas within the last decade and have since spread rapidly throughout the region. Despite their widespread transmission there and throughout much of the world, chikungunya and Zika remain neglected diseases. One of the most significant obstacles to address their spread is a lack of data involving their burden. We searched the published literature and surveillance reports to collect information about the incidence, mortality, and morbidity associated with each of these diseases to estimate their regional and global burden during the last decade. Our estimates confirm that chikungunya and Zika caused substantial burden throughout this time frame and place them among the most problematic mosquito-borne viral diseases worldwide. We found that the largest proportion of global burden linked to each disease between 2010 and 2019 occurred in the Americas, although this observation is likely due to limited reporting in other regions.


Arthropod-borne viruses, or arboviruses, are exceedingly common causes of disabling fever syndromes worldwide, but the cumulative burden of disease that they cause is not well quantified [1]. Acutely, arboviral infections can range from asymptomatic to debilitating and undifferentiated febrile illnesses. They can also progress to severe secondary conditions or cause congenital maladies, both of which may result in long-term physical disability, cognitive impairment, or early death [24].

Among over 100 arboviruses that cause disease in humans [2], chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and Zika virus (ZIKV) have been particularly problematic in the last decade due to their rapid emergence in the Western Hemisphere [5,6]. CHIKV, an alphavirus of the Togaviridae family, caused several outbreaks throughout the Pacific region in the early 2000s. The virus then spread to the Americas in 2013, when the first reported autochthonous case of CHIKV was reported in Brazil [7]. CHIKV has since infected millions across all 6 World Health Organization (WHO)-defined regions [810].

ZIKV, a flavivirus of the family Flaviviridae, has been known to cause disease in humans since the 1950s [11,12]. The spread of ZIKV, however, remained minimal until 2007, when the first major Zika outbreak occurred in the Federated States of Micronesia [11,12]. ZIKV continued to cause outbreaks in other Pacific and Southeast Asian nations between 2012 and 2014. Similarly to CHIKV, the virus’s spread through the Americas began in Brazil, where the first autochthonous ZIKV infection was reported in 2015. Hundreds of thousands have been infected with the virus since its emergence in the Western Hemisphere, and a number of regions across the globe remain at high risk for future outbreaks [5,10,13].

As with other arboviruses, the disabling sequelae of CHIKV and ZIKV disproportionately affect resource-poor communities, where they frequently cause chronic impairment that can greatly reduce patients’ qualities of life [2,14,15]. Its name being derived from a Makonde word meaning “that which bends up,” chikungunya has been characterized since the 1950s as a cause of persistent polyarthralgias among those infected [16]. Recent studies have revealed other lesser known clinical manifestations of CHIKV that can contribute to otherwise unrecognized burden, including medium- to long-term neurologic symptoms and inflammatory ophthalmic complications like uveitis [17,18]. Intrapartum CHIKV transmission has also been observed and can cause neonatal encephalitis and poor neurodevelopmental outcomes [1921].

While the acute phase symptoms of ZIKV infection are often less severe than those of chikungunya, the virus can cause severe, often life-altering complications in some patients [22]. Several studies have elucidated a link between ZIKV infection and Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), although estimates of progression to GBS vary between reports [2326]. The most concerning feature of ZIKV, however, is its teratogenic effect on fetal neurologic development, which manifests as a complex syndrome characterized by microcephaly at birth, severe motor and cognitive impairment, frequent seizures, ocular defects, and auditory deficits [2730]. Since congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) has only been a recognized complication since 2015, longer-term prospective follow-up will be necessary to further describe the condition and study the progression of symptoms throughout life [31]. While long-term prognosis remains unknown, data examining large CZS cohorts confirm that the syndrome causes considerable burden for both affected children and their caretakers at least through 3 years of age [28,32,33]. As of 2020, a WHO project examining pregnancy and child outcomes among ZIKV cohorts from many regions is currently ongoing [34].

The most recent Global Burden of Disease (GBD) estimates published by WHO and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) include assessments of only 3 arboviral diseases: dengue, yellow fever, and Zika [35]. For other arboviruses, including CHIKV, all cause-specific mortality and long-term infection-related morbidity represent substantial health deficits omitted in international disease burden reports and are consequently not included in top-level discussions of disease control priorities [36]. Although estimates for 2019 ZIKV-related burden are included in the most recent GBD report, data from other years remain absent. With evidence from the past decade indicating the high incidence and frequency of disabling sequelae due to CHIKV and ZIKV, it is important to address this gap in knowledge and to quantify the impacts of the 2 viruses. In the present study, we reviewed the available data detailing CHIKV and ZIKV infections and their impact in order to estimate the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost globally as a result of their spread over the last decade.


Search strategy

We systematically reviewed the available published literature and official reports on CHIKV and ZIKV. Searching was initiated with the use of the arbovirus name and the terms “outbreak(s),” “complication(s),” “disability,” “quality of life,” “morbidity,” “mortality,” “DALY,” and “QALY” in PubMed, Google Scholar, LILACS, African Journals Online, SciELO, and Web of Science. The specific search algorithms used in each database are included in S1 Text. Bibliographies of selected publications were also searched for additional reports. English, Spanish, French, and Portuguese reports were screened. A complete listing of included primary research articles can be found in S1 Table. Additional epidemiologic surveillance data from national, regional, and global reporting bodies were referenced to generate case count estimates. These reports include those published by both the United States and European Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO, Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), ProMed, and national ministries of health and detail the incidence of CHIKV and ZIKV throughout their respective regions between 2010 and 2019. A complete listing of included surveillance reports can be found in S2 Table.

Study selection

Publications were required to meet 3 inclusion criteria: (1) discussion of complications that lead to mortality or prolonged morbidity; (2) focus on population-based information; and (3) reported data collected between 2010 and 2019. In order to assess the population-level impacts of endemic disease, studies involving travelers from non-endemic areas and all case reports were excluded from the analysis. Reviews and other sources that reported secondary data were excluded from the analysis. Studies and surveillance reports that satisfied preliminary screening were evaluated to ensure that data were not duplicated in other included studies.

Data analysis

In order to derive DALY estimates for CHIKV and ZIKV, we extracted from the included reports estimates of incidence, mortality, average age at death, and, for nonlethal cases, information on the duration and severity of acute and chronic symptoms. Study populations and dates were carefully reviewed to ensure that any duplicate data were not included more than once.

DALY estimates for each disease were calculated according to standard methods outlined in the GBD guidelines [37] using spreadsheets developed by the authors. These spreadsheets, included as S3S6 Tables, are programmed to generate DALY estimates using the formulae listed below. DALY scores for each condition represent the sum of 2 components: (a) for cases of mortality, the years of healthy life lost (YLL) from a standard expected years of life lost (SEYLL), plus (b) for individuals having nonlethal, disease-specific disability, the years lived with disability (YLD) multiplied by a disability weight (DW) reflecting the proportion of impairment caused by that health condition [37]. Because of limitations in the available data, our summary estimates were calculated for both sexes together and not distributed according to age group, as ideally presented in DALY tables [35,37]. We report our DALY estimates in 2 formats: discrete approximations calculated using inputs derived from weighted averaging of the variables extracted from included publications and ranges based on the variability of credible input values contained in those reports.

DWs for acute ZIKV disease, subsequent GBS, and CZS were taken from James and colleagues (Table 1) [38]. For acute CHIKV infection, the range of DWs was based on published values for the analogous febrile syndromes caused by dengue and yellow fever [38]. The range of DW for chronic sequelae following CHIKV infection was the published DWs for mild to severe rheumatoid arthritis, conditions analogous to persistent post-chikungunya rheumatic symptoms. In order to generate comprehensive burden assessments, the pervasive psychological sequelae reported among mothers and caretakers of children with CZS were also included in the analysis [33,34]. To calculate this burden, DWs for depression and anxiety were taken from James and colleagues [38], while the DW for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), not listed in the GBD framework, was taken from Lim and colleagues [39]. To calculate YLD, DWs were multiplied by the relevant duration of symptoms, as reported in the literature for each condition.

To estimate the incidence of clinical CHIKV and ZIKV infections in affected countries, we used the cumulative case counts reported in available surveillance records and published reports (see S2 Table for complete listing of surveillance documents referenced). Lab-confirmed infections with the arboviruses served as the lower bounds for our case count estimates. These infections, combined with those documented as “suspected” or “likely” by the respective reporting bodies, served as the upper bound. In light of the recognized trends of underreporting [4042], these larger case count values were used as the inputs for our calculations of discrete estimates. Approximate incidence rates were annualized by dividing cumulative cases from 2010 to 2019 by 10.

Per the GBD framework guidelines, final DALYs were calculated as follows:

  1. DALY = YLL + YLDacute + YLDchronic, where
  2. YLL = (Incident deaths) × (standard expected years of life lost at median age of death)
  3. YLDacute = (Incident cases with acute disease only) × DWacute × (duration acute disease)
  4. YLDchronic = (Incident cases progressing to chronic disease) × DWchronic × (duration of chronic disease).

The combined DW for CZS was obtained using the multiplicative equation defined in the revised GBD framework from 2010, which recognizes the increased disability associated with comorbid conditions while precluding disabilities in excess of 1:

DWa and DWb are the DWs for 2 distinct conditions occurring simultaneously.

As of 2010, the GBD framework calls for the use of 92 years as the standard for life expectancy, a value based on the frontier national life expectancy for 2050 among Japanese and Korean women [37].


Out of 7,877 studies identified, 916 were screened, and 21 were selected for inclusion (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Study selection.

Breakdown of initial search results returned, reports screened, and sources included in the analysis.

Tables 1 and 2 summarize the findings of the studies included in our analysis. CHIKV has historically been associated with relatively low mortality, and recent data gathered in the Americas have indicated that the case fatality rate (CFR) is likely slightly lower than 1 per 1,000 infections [42,43]. Surveillance data released by WHO in 2019, however, point to a significantly higher CFR among the Sudanese population, setting the value of 18 per 1,000 clinical infections as the credible upper bound for CFR [44]. Although the fever, rash, and joint pain associated with acute infection are usually self-limited and last only 1 to 2 weeks [45], CHIKV can result in neurologic [17], renal [46], cardiac [47], respiratory [48], and hematologic [49] complications that may result in death or necessitate aggressive medical interventions. Moreover, the acute symptoms of CHIKV often progress to long-term rheumatism, including severe arthritis that can persist for several years. A large proportion of patients who progress to these chronic symptoms seek medical treatment during the course of their disease, with variable success in symptom management [50].

Estimates of the rate of progression to chronic post-chikungunya rheumatism vary widely based on criteria used and the populations examined, with data indicating that, on average, about 42.5% of patients experience chronic, post-chikungunya arthritis [5056]. Such symptoms can substantially diminish a patient’s quality of life, and formal studies have confirmed that post-chikungunya arthritis can severely impair activities of daily living [14,53].

The symptoms of acute ZIKV infection are similar to, but usually milder than those of CHIKV [22,38]. As with CHIKV, most patients acutely infected with ZIKV recover within 1 to 2 weeks [57]. The CFR associated with acute ZIKV infection in adults is also extremely low, with the majority of deaths occurring in older patients with preexisting comorbidities [64,65]. Nevertheless, acute ZIKV infection has been found to cause cardiovascular and other complications, with some otherwise healthy individuals requiring hospitalization and respiratory support during infection [68,69]. ZIKV has also been linked to GBS, a rare, paralyzing neurologic condition that can leave up to 45% of patients unable to walk without assistance 6 months after symptom onset. Studies indicate that the incidence of post-ZIKV GBS is about 2 per 10,000 ZIKV infections, making the arbovirus a leading cause of the condition among affected populations during outbreaks [2326]. In addition to the acute febrile symptoms, mortality, and GBS associated with adult infections, ZIKV can also have severe teratogenic effects on fetal development, causing CZS.

CZS is associated with a complex constellation of symptoms that cause substantial morbidity and mortality among affected populations. Due to the ZIKV’s tropism for fetal neural progenitor cells, as many as 1 in 7 neonates whose mothers were infected with ZIKV during pregnancy develop neurologic, optic, or aural malformations [2731]. CZS is classically characterized by microcephaly at birth, and this finding is a requirement for diagnosis in most settings [66,67]. However, the neurologic complications of CZS have also been documented in some normocephalic children, indicating that current surveillance may omit many cases of CZS [70]. Although research is limited, studies have demonstrated that the motor and cognitive impairments experienced by many children with CZS persist at least throughout infancy, with recent studies documenting substantial developmental delays at 3 years of age [28]. Longer-term follow-up is needed to characterize the progression of CZS symptoms beyond this age, although the severity of the related neurologic malformations make it likely that patients with CZS will experience lifelong symptoms [28,30,31,66,67]. Between 27.3% and 64.4% of CZS cases result in early pregnancy loss (EPL) or perinatal death [27,61]. While CZS-related morbidity most directly affects patients with the condition, a large amount of burden also arises from the disease’s impact on mothers and caretakers. The psychological sequelae experienced by the caretakers of children with CZS are extremely pervasive, with about half of surveyed caretakers, usually mothers, reporting moderate or severe depression and a similar proportion reporting anxiety [32,33]. Studies have also shown that over a third of mothers who experience EPL report depression, anxiety, or PTSD for months following the loss [62]. These psychological symptoms can all negatively impact quality of life and one’s ability to perform activities of daily living and so were consequently included in our ZIKV-related DALY estimates.

Using the values listed in Tables 1 and 2, we estimate that from 2010 to 2019, CHIKV caused an average annual global loss of over 106,000 DALYs, while ZIKV caused the average annual loss of over 44,000 DALYs. Both arboviruses caused significantly more burden in WHO’s Region of the Americas (AMRO) than in any other region, reflecting their rapid expansion there. We estimate that CHIKV and ZIKV caused the respective annualized loss of 94,995 and 42,690 DALYs in the Americas when averaged over the 10 years studied. However, these estimates increase substantially when only the years since each virus’s emergence in AMRO are considered. When only data from 2014 through 2019 are analyzed, CHIKV caused an annual average burden of over 158,000 DALYs in AMRO. Likewise, if only the 5 years since ZIKV’s emergence in the Americas are considered, the virus’s associated burden in the region effectively doubles to an annualized average of over 85,000 DALYs.

Tables 3 and 4 summarize the DALY estimates for CHIKV and ZIKV, detailing the relative contributions of acute disease, chronic complications, and early mortality. YLD due to chronic complications contribute substantially more to the overall DALY burden of CHIKV than the symptoms and mortality associated with acute infection. CZS cases, although representing a small proportion of the total number of Zika cases, account for the majority of ZIKV-related burden.

Although their related burden is unevenly distributed, both of the studied arboviruses affect populations across much of the globe. CHIKV was found to have spread more widely than ZIKV, with autochthonous transmission occurring in 114 countries and independent territories [8]. ZIKV was significantly less prevalent throughout the last decade, but reported autochthonous cases still occurred in 86 countries and territories [10]. As a result, over three quarters of the world’s populations now live in countries reporting endemic spread of CHIKV, and about half live in those reporting transmission of ZIKV. Figs 2 and 3 and Table 5 summarize the global distribution of the 2 viruses and the populations at risk for their continued spread.

Fig 2. Global distribution of CHIKV.

Countries having transmission of chikungunya, with gradient indicating average number of reported cases per year from 2010 to 2019. Map created using an open-access world map from Wikimedia Commons ( CHIKV, chikungunya virus.

Fig 3. Global distribution of ZIKV.

Countries having transmission of Zika, with gradient indicating average number of reported cases per year from 2010 to 2019. Map created using an open-access world map from Wikimedia Commons ( ZIKV, Zika virus.

Table 5. Populations of areas with endemic CHIKV and ZIKV transmission by WHO region.


Arboviral infections are known to cause a wide spectrum of acute disease, chronic complication, and mortality in many tropical and subtropical locales [16]. Among these diseases, chikungunya and Zika have been particularly notable for their rapid emergence and spread throughout several regions over the last decade, including the densely populated Americas [510]. Having infected millions of people since 2010, the 2 viruses have created a considerable disease burden, yet this burden has been largely understudied, and as a consequence, it has been omitted from most reports of international disability estimates [39,41,44,65]. Despite early evidence from 2014 suggesting that CHIKV could cause more burden than any other arbovirus in the Americas, quantified DALY estimates have been strikingly absent from the literature [71]. The most recent GBD report published by the IHME includes data for only 3 arboviral diseases: dengue, yellow fever, and Zika [39]. This report excludes chikungunya and exclusively assesses Zika-related burden in 2019, missing the years during which the most significant outbreaks occurred globally. To address this gap in awareness, we now report what are, to our knowledge, the first multiyear global DALY estimates for ZIKV and the first updated estimates for CHIKV in the last decade. Our systematic review and subsequent calculations of CHIKV- and ZIKV-related burden indicate that the 2 arboviruses cause significant health burdens at both regional and global levels. The burden caused by these viruses should be included in routine reports and regularly acknowledged in discussions of policy and containment priorities.

Our DALY estimates for CHIKV align with those reported by Cardona-Ospina and colleagues, who analyzed chronic CHIKV-linked burden in Latin America in 2014 and noted that DALYs attributable to CHIKV likely outweighed those of any other arbovirus in the region that year [71]. In our current analysis, we estimated that the virus has caused the annualized loss of over 158,000 DALYs in AMRO since its emergence. This value confirms that CHIKV is among the most problematic arboviruses in the region, causing a burden second only to that of dengue virus (DENV), which WHO estimated to cause the loss of 203,000 DALYs in its 2016 GBD report [38]. We estimate that ZIKV has caused an annualized DALY burden of 85,000 in AMRO since its emergence there in 2015. This estimate aligns with those previously published for Latin America and far exceeds the 23,000 DALYs associated with yellow fever in AMRO [38,72]. Although our CHIKV and ZIKV burden estimates for other regions are smaller in comparison, the differences may be partially explained by irregular surveillance and reporting in other regions. Since our calculations are based on nationally or regionally reported case counts, burden is inevitably underestimated in areas with limited surveillance, as is the case in many countries with continuing endemic and epidemic transmission outside the Americas [40,42,73,74]. Despite likely underestimation, our annualized value of 44,310 DALYs for global ZIKV burden still far exceeds the 2019 DALY estimate published by WHO and IHME of 347 DALYs [35]. This large discrepancy results mostly from the time periods analyzed. ZIKV infection rates were substantially higher from 2015 to 2018 than in 2019. These years of peak infection rates are not reflected in the estimate published by WHO and IHME. Further, a large portion of the ZIKV-associated burden we report is linked to the psychological symptoms experienced by mothers and caretakers of children affected by CZS, which is omitted from the 2019 GBD estimate.

The wide ranges of our estimated burden values, presented in Tables 4 and 5, reflect the current uncertainty in predicting the short- and long-term outcomes of infections, inconsistencies in published findings, and inherent challenges in generating yearly DALY estimates for arboviral diseases. DALY calculations require the use of annualized mortality rates and incidence rates of both acute and chronic manifestations of disease. Like most tropical diseases, CHIKV and ZIKV disproportionately affect resource-poor areas where healthcare and public health surveillance are often limited [2,15,40,41]. Due to inconsistencies in diagnostics and likely underreporting in endemic areas, it is impossible at this time to know precisely the number of symptomatic infections globally or their associated cause-specific deaths. Likewise, due to limited long-term data, it is currently unclear how many chronic cases either virus has caused, or the duration for which patients generally experience long-term complications. In particular, more follow-up will be needed to ascertain the lifetime prognosis of CZS, a condition which has only been studied since its discovery in 2015 [23,26]. Although it does so less frequently than ZIKV, CHIKV can also cause life-threatening complications in neonates via intrapartum infection and subsequent encephalitis. Such findings were well documented during the Réunion Island outbreak in 2005 and 2006, yet little information on nonfatal outcomes from neonatal CHIKV has been reported during outbreaks in the last decade [1921]. As a result, any chronic sequelae due to neonatal infection represent sources of burden absent from our CHIKV DALY estimates.

The transmission patterns of arboviral infections further complicate the determination of their associated burden. Arboviruses are typically spread in epidemics, and information on interepidemic transmission is often unavailable. This tendency can, in part, explain the lack of sufficient data from regions outside AMRO that detail CHIKV and ZIKV incidence during the past decade. As evidenced by seroprevalence and case study data, several countries in Africa, Asia, and the Pacific had autochthonous spread of the 2 viruses between 2010 and 2019 [7580]. For many of these nations, however, nearly no routine surveillance data are available. Given the findings of various seroprevalence studies and detected outbreaks in countries like Sudan, Yemen, India, and Thailand, it is very likely that a large number of infections occur across the world each year that are missed in global burden assessments [14,44,48,75,80,81]. Unequal distribution of disease burden is a potential limitation of a DALY-based approach, which requires a standardized methodology across regions. For example, the 92-year standard life expectancy used in the current GBD framework may not accurately reflect the life expectancy of individuals in the tropical areas affected most heavily by arboviral disease.

Even within the Americas, reporting guidelines differ greatly between countries. This inconsistency is perhaps most prominent in CZS diagnosis, for which surveillance in clinical settings can vary widely. By the end of 2017, over 85% of all CZS cases in the Americas were reported in Brazil, Guatemala, and the Dominican Republic, yet only about 47% of all ZIKV infections in the Americas were reported in these 3 nations [65]. This discrepancy between statistics indicates that many CZS cases were likely missed in areas that did not implement such proactive screening protocols. As illustrated in Table 5, even the relatively few known CZS cases contribute substantially more to overall global burden than all reported adult infections. Importantly, CZS-related burden is carried not only by affected children, but also by mothers and caretakers. The well-documented psychological symptoms experienced by mothers and caretakers are a unique effect of CZS, and the severity and frequency of these sequelae mean they must be considered when approximating the total burden caused by ZIKV [32,33]. Although nearly all diagnosed CZS cases have been in the Americas, confirmed cases have been reported in continental Africa and the Pacific [82,83]. Such findings suggest that CZS is in fact a global problem for which public health education and surveillance must be improved.

DALY estimates can provide a quantitative means by which to assess burden over a chosen period, but they fail to convey perhaps the most important characteristic of arboviral infections: outbreak potential. As a tool used by policymakers to assess burden during times of both average and peak demand, DALYs are traditionally calculated over a multiyear period. To derive estimates that can be readily compared to those available for other diseases, we analyzed CHIKV- and ZIKV-associated burden over the course of a decade rather than on a year-by-year basis. When averaged over the course of years, the burden associated with CHIKV, ZIKV, and other arboviruses can seem small relative to those caused by other pathogens. What is not conveyed by DALY estimates, however, is the often explosive spread of these diseases in epidemics that can overwhelm health systems and devastate local communities through supply chain dysfunction, economic downturn, and political disruption. As the rapid spread of CHIKV and ZIKV throughout the Americas illustrates, the introduction of arboviruses into new populations can result in spikes in cases that exceed the capacity of local health systems [84]. These surges in utilization during epidemics can indirectly result in additional burden, as patients with other medical conditions have reduced access to optimal treatment while health systems are overwhelmed.

The majority of the world’s populations now live in areas with evidence of arboviral transmission [8,10]. With climatic and social changes further driving the spread of Aedes mosquitoes to new regions, it is exceedingly likely that CHIKV, ZIKV, and other arboviruses will continue to cause explosive outbreaks in the near future [85,86]. Consequently, improved surveillance and preventative measures are important. Better estimates of the global burden and economic losses caused by arboviral epidemics point to the potential long-term cost-effectiveness of transmission-blocking strategies, including vector control and novel vaccine implementation.

Supporting information

S1 PRISMA Checklist. 2009 PRISMA checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.


S1 Table. Listing of all included research articles.


S2 Table. Listing of all included surveillance reports.


S3 Table. Multi-way table showing CHIKV DALY range calculations.

CHIKV, chikungunya virus; DALY, disability-adjusted life year.


S4 Table. Multi-way table showing CHIKV DALY discrete calculations.

CHIKV, chikungunya virus; DALY, disability-adjusted life year.


S5 Table. Multi-way table showing ZIKV DALY range calculations.

DALY, disability-adjusted life year; ZIKV, Zika virus.


S6 Table. Multi-way table showing ZIKV DALY discrete calculations.

DALY, disability-adjusted life year; ZIKV, Zika virus.


S1 Text. Search algorithms used in systematic review.



  1. 1. Wilder-Smith A, Gubler DJ, Weaver SC, Monath TP, Heymann DL, Scott TW. Epidemic arboviral diseases: priorities for research and public health. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:e101–6. pmid:28011234
  2. 2. LaBeaud A, Bashir F, King CH. Measuring the burden of arboviral diseases: the spectrum of morbidity and mortality from four prevalent infections. Popul Health Metr. 2011;9:1. pmid:21219615
  3. 3. Chan JFW, Choi GKY, Yip CCY, Cheng VCC, Yuen K-Y. Zika fever and congenital Zika syndrome: An unexpected emerging arboviral disease. J Infect. 2016;72:507–24. pmid:26940504
  4. 4. Huits R, De Kort J, Van Den Berg R, Chong L, Tsoumanis A, Eggermont K, et al. Chikungunya virus infection in Aruba: Diagnosis, clinical features and predictors of post-chikungunya chronic polyarthralgia. Ansari AA, editor. PLoS ONE. 2018;e0196630:13. pmid:29709007
  5. 5. Pierson TC, Diamond MS. The emergence of Zika virus and its new clinical syndromes. Nature. 2018;560:573–81. pmid:30158602
  6. 6. Merle H, Donnio A, Jean-Charles A, Guyomarch J, Hage R, Najioullah F, et al. Ocular manifestations of emerging arboviruses: Dengue fever, Chikungunya, Zika virus, West Nile virus, and yellow fever. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2018;41:e235–43. pmid:29929827
  7. 7. Faria NR, Lourenço J, Marques de Cerqueira E, Maia de Lima M, Carlos Junior Alcantara L. Epidemiology of Chikungunya Virus in Bahia, Brazil, 2014–2015. PLoS Curr. 2016;8. pmid:27330849
  8. 8. Chikungunya virus | CDC. 19 Sep 2019 [cited 27 Jul 2020]. Available from:
  9. 9. PAHO/WHO Data—Weekly Report | PAHO/WHO. In: Pan American Health Organization / World Health Organization [Internet]. 17 Jan 2019 [cited 27 Jul 2020]. Available from:
  10. 10. Zika Virus. In: CDC [Internet]. 5 Nov 2014 [cited 27 Jul 2020]. Available from:
  11. 11. Kindhauser MK, Allen T, Frank V, Santhana RS, Dye C. Zika: the origin and spread of a mosquito-borne virus. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94:675–686C. pmid:27708473
  12. 12. Messina JP, Kraemer MU, Brady OJ, Pigott DM, Shearer FM, Weiss DJ, et al. Mapping global environmental suitability for Zika virus. eLife. 2016;5:e15272. pmid:27090089
  13. 13. Samy AM, Thomas SM, Wahed AAE, Cohoon KP, Peterson AT. Mapping the global geographic potential of Zika virus spread. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2016;111:559–60. pmid:27653360
  14. 14. Ramachandran V, Malaisamy M, Ponnaiah M, Kaliaperuaml K, Vadivoo S, Gupte MD. Impact of Chikungunya on Health Related Quality of Life Chennai, South India. Preux P-M, editor. PLoS ONE. 2012;e51519:7. pmid:23251562
  15. 15. LaBeaud AD. Why Arboviruses Can Be Neglected Tropical Diseases. Unnasch TR, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2: e247. pmid:18575597
  16. 16. Robinson MC. An epidemic of virus disease in Southern Province, Tanganyika Territory, in 1952–53. I. Clinical features. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1955;49:28–32. pmid:14373834
  17. 17. Mehta R, Soares CN, Medialdea-Carrera R, Ellul M, da Silva MTT, Rosala-Hallas A, et al. The spectrum of neurological disease associated with Zika and chikungunya viruses in adults in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: A case series. Beasley DWC, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0006212. pmid:29432457
  18. 18. Mahendradas P, Avadhani K, Shetty R. Chikungunya and the eye: a review. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2013;3:35. pmid:23514031
  19. 19. Gérardin P, Barau G, Michault A, Bintner M, Randrianaivo H, Choker G, et al. Multidisciplinary Prospective Study of Mother-to-Child Chikungunya Virus Infections on the Island of La Réunion. Chretien J-P, editor. PLoS Med. 2008;e60:5. pmid:18351797
  20. 20. Gérardin P, Sampériz S, Ramful D, Boumahni B, Bintner M, Alessandri J-L, et al. Neurocognitive outcome of children exposed to perinatal mother-to-child Chikungunya virus infection: the CHIMERE cohort study on Reunion Island. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;e2996:8. pmid:25033077
  21. 21. Contopoulos-Ioannidis D, Newman-Lindsay S, Chow C, LaBeaud AD. Mother-to-child transmission of Chikungunya virus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lacerda MVG, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;e0006510:12. pmid:29897898
  22. 22. Sebastián UU, Ricardo AVA, Alvarez BC, Cubides A, Luna AF, Arroyo-Parejo M, et al. Zika virus-induced neurological critical illness in Latin America: Severe Guillain-Barre Syndrome and encephalitis. J Crit Care. 2017;42:275–81. pmid:28806562
  23. 23. Cao-Lormeau V-M, Blake A, Mons S, Lastère S, Roche C, Vanhomwegen J, et al. Guillain-Barré Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: a case-control study. Lancet. 2016;387:1531–9. pmid:26948433
  24. 24. Dirlikov E, Major CG, Medina NA, Lugo-Robles R, Matos D, Muñoz-Jordan JL, et al. Clinical Features of Guillain-Barré Syndrome With vs Without Zika Virus Infection, Puerto Rico, 2016. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:1089–97. pmid:29799940
  25. 25. Kucharski AJ, Funk S, Eggo RM, Mallet H-P, Edmunds WJ, Nilles EJ. Transmission Dynamics of Zika Virus in Island Populations: A Modelling Analysis of the 2013–14 French Polynesia Outbreak. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004726. pmid:27186984
  26. 26. Mier-Y-Teran-Romero L, Delorey MJ, Sejvar JJ, Johansson MA. Guillain-Barré syndrome risk among individuals infected with Zika virus: a multi-country assessment. BMC Med. 2018;16:67. pmid:29759069
  27. 27. Neto NNM, Maia J, Queiroz IT, Zacarkim MR, Lins MG, Labeaud AD, et al. 693. Congenital Zika Syndrome: Assessing the Fatality Rate Since the 2015 Zika Outbreak. Open Forum. Infect Dis. 2018;5:S250.
  28. 28. Wheeler AC, Toth D, Ridenour T, Lima Nóbrega L, Borba FR, Marques da Silva C, et al. Developmental Outcomes Among Young Children With Congenital Zika Syndrome in Brazil. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e204096. pmid:32369180
  29. 29. Tsui I, Moreira MEL, Rossetto JD, Vasconcelos Z, Gaw SL, Neves LM, et al. Eye Findings in Infants With Suspected or Confirmed Antenatal Zika Virus Exposure. Pediatrics. 2018;e20181104:142. pmid:30213843
  30. 30. Nielsen-Saines K, Brasil P, Kerin T, Vasconcelos Z, Gabaglia CR, Damasceno L, et al. Delayed childhood neurodevelopment and neurosensory alterations in the second year of life in a prospective cohort of ZIKV-exposed children. Nat Med. 2019;25:1213–7. pmid:31285631
  31. 31. França GVA, Schuler-Faccini L, Oliveira WK, Henriques CMP, Carmo EH, Pedi VD, et al. Congenital Zika virus syndrome in Brazil: a case series of the first 1501 livebirths with complete investigation. Lancet. 2016;388:891–7. pmid:27372398
  32. 32. Kuper H, Lopes Moreira ME. Barreto de Araújo TV, Valongueiro S, Fernandes S, Pinto M, et al. The association of depression, anxiety, and stress with caring for a child with Congenital Zika Syndrome in Brazil; Results of a cross-sectional study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007768. pmid:31568478
  33. 33. Freitas PSS, Soares GB, Mocelin HJS, Lamonato LCXL, Sales CMM, Linde-Arias AR, et al. How do mothers feel? Life with children with congenital Zika syndrome. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;148:20–8. pmid:31975400
  34. 34. Wilder-Smith A, Wei Y, de Araújo TVB, VanKerkhove M, Turchi Martelli CM, Turchi MD, et al. Understanding the relation between Zika virus infection during pregnancy and adverse fetal, infant and child outcomes: a protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of longitudinal studies of pregnant women and their infants and children. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e026092. pmid:31217315
  35. 35. GBD 2019. Cause and Risk Summaries. In: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation [Internet]. [cited 8 Dec 2020]. Available from:
  36. 36. Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DB, et al., editors. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2006. Available from:
  37. 37. Mathers C. WHO methods and data sources for global burden of disease estimates 2000–2016. WHO; 2018 Jun. Available from:
  38. 38. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–858. pmid:30496104
  39. 39. Lim D, Lee WK, Park H. Disability-adjusted Life Years (DALYs) for Mental and Substance Use Disorders in the Korean Burden of Disease Study 2012. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31:S191–9. pmid:27775257
  40. 40. Riou J, Poletto C, Boëlle P-Y. A comparative analysis of Chikungunya and Zika transmission. Epidemics. 2017;19:43–52. pmid:28139388
  41. 41. Shutt D, Manore C, Pankavich S, Porter A, Del Valle S. Estimating the reproductive number, total outbreak size, and reporting rates for Zika epidemics in South and Central America. Epidemics. 2017;21: 63–79. pmid:28803069
  42. 42. Cardona-Ospina JA, Henao-SanMartin V, Paniz-Mondolfi AE, Rodríguez-Morales AJ. Mortality and fatality due to Chikungunya virus infection in Colombia. J Clin Virol. 2015;70:14–5. pmid:26305812
  43. 43. PAHO/WHO Data—Chikungunya. [cited 28 Jul 2020]. Available from:
  44. 44. WHO EMRO | Outbreak update–Chikungunya in Sudan, 21 December 2019 | Chikungunya | Epidemic and pandemic diseases. [cited 28 Jul 2020]. Available from:
  45. 45. Cunha RV da, Trinta KS. Chikungunya virus: clinical aspects and treatment—A Review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2017;112: 523–531. pmid:28767976
  46. 46. Mercado M, Acosta-Reyes J, Parra E, Guzmán L, Beltrán M, Gasque P, et al. Renal involvement in fatal cases of chikungunya virus infection. J Clin Virol. 2018;103:16–8. pmid:29604514
  47. 47. Samra JA, Hagood NL, Summer A, Medina MT, Holden KR. Clinical Features and Neurologic Complications of Children Hospitalized With Chikungunya Virus in Honduras. J Child Neurol. 2017;32:712–6. pmid:28459170
  48. 48. Sharma PK, Kumar M, Aggarwal GK, Kumar V, Srivastava RD, Sahani A, et al. Severe Manifestations of Chikungunya Fever in Children, India, 2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:1737–9. pmid:30124414
  49. 49. Langsjoen RM, Rubinstein RJ, Kautz TF, Auguste AJ, Erasmus JH, Kiaty-Figueroa L, et al. Molecular Virologic and Clinical Characteristics of a Chikungunya Fever Outbreak in La Romana, Dominican Republic, 2014. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;e0005189:10. pmid:28030537
  50. 50. Rodríguez-Morales AJ, Calvache-Benavides CE, Giraldo-Gómez J, Hurtado-Hurtado N, Yepes-Echeverri MC, García-Loaiza CJ, et al. Post-chikungunya chronic arthralgia: Results from a retrospective follow-up study of 131 cases in Tolima, Colombia. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016;14:58–9. pmid:26419952
  51. 51. Genderen FT, Krishnadath I, Sno R, Grunberg MG, Zijlmans W, Adhin MR First Chikungunya Outbreak in Suriname; Clinical and Epidemiological Features. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10: e0004625. pmid:27082985
  52. 52. Consuegra-Rodríguez MP, Hidalgo-Zambrano DM, Vásquez-Serna H, Jimenez-Canizales CE, Parra-Valencia E, Rodriguez-Morales AJ. Post-chikungunya chronic inflammatory rheumatism: Follow-up of cases after 1 year of infection in Tolima. Colombia Travel Med Infect Dis. 2018;21:62–8. pmid:29203304
  53. 53. Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Restrepo-Posada VM, Acevedo-Escalante N, Rodríguez-Muñoz ED, Valencia-Marín M, Castrillón-Spitia JD, et al. Impaired quality of life after chikungunya virus infection: a 12-month follow-up study of its chronic inflammatory rheumatism in La Virginia, Risaralda, Colombia. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37:1757–8. pmid:28828632
  54. 54. Chang AY, Encinales L, Porras A, Pacheco N, Reid SP, Martins KAO, et al. Frequency of Chronic Joint Pain Following Chikungunya Virus Infection: A Colombian Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:578–84. pmid:29266783
  55. 55. Tritsch SR, Encinales L, Pacheco N, Cadena A, Cure C, McMahon E, et al. Chronic Joint Pain 3 Years after Chikungunya Virus Infection Largely Characterized by Relapsing-remitting Symptoms. J Rheumatol. 2020;47:1267–74. pmid:31263071
  56. 56. Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Villamil-Gomez W, Merlano-Espinosa M, Simone-Kleber L. Post-chikungunya chronic arthralgia: a first retrospective follow-up study of 39 cases in Colombia. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35:831–2. pmid:26242471
  57. 57. Plourde AR, Bloch EM. A Literature Review of Zika Virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1185–92. pmid:27070380
  58. 58. Almeida KJ, Martins ACB. Almendra ICCG e, Meneses GMS de, Sampaio TD de O, Campêlo J da CM, et al. Clinical aspects of congenital microcephaly syndrome by Zika virus in a rehabilitation center for patients with microcephaly. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2019;65:1249–53. pmid:31721956
  59. 59. van der Linden H, Carvalho MD, van der Linden V, Lacerda KM, Pessoa A, Carneiro ML, et al. Epilepsy Profile in Infants with Congenital Zika Virus Infection. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:891–2. pmid:30157396
  60. 60. Pomar L, Vouga M, Lambert V, Pomar C, Hcini N, Jolivet A, et al. Maternal-fetal transmission and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women infected with Zika virus: prospective cohort study in French Guiana. BMJ. 2018:k4431. pmid:30381296
  61. 61. Brasil P, Pereira JP, Moreira ME, Ribeiro Nogueira RM, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, et al. Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women in Rio de Janeiro. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2321–34. pmid:26943629
  62. 62. Farren J, Jalmbrant M, Ameye L, Joash K, Mitchell-Jones N, Tapp S, et al. Post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression following miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016;e011864:6. pmid:27807081
  63. 63. Santos-Pinto CDB, de Almeida S-MD, Ferrari FP, Ajalla MEA, Venancio FA, da Rosa TS, et al. Health demands and care of children with congenital Zika syndrome and their mothers in a Brazilian state. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:762. pmid:32448272
  64. 64. Van Dyne EA, Neaterour P, Rivera A, Bello-Pagan M, Adams L, Munoz-Jordan J, et al. Incidence and Outcome of Severe and Nonsevere Thrombocytopenia Associated With Zika Virus Infection-Puerto Rico, 2016. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6:ofy325. pmid:30631791
  65. 65. PAHO/WHO | Zika Cumulative Cases. In: Pan American Health Organization / World Health Organization [Internet]. 18 Aug 2016 [cited 28 Jul 2020]. Available from:
  66. 66. Melo AS de O, Aguiar RS, Amorim MMR, Arruda MB, Melo F de O, Ribeiro STC, et al. Congenital Zika Virus Infection: Beyond Neonatal Microcephaly. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:1407–16. pmid:27695855
  67. 67. Moore CA, Staples JE, Dobyns WB, Pessoa A, Ventura CV, da Fonseca EB, et al. Characterizing the Pattern of Anomalies in Congenital Zika Syndrome for Pediatric Clinicians. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:288–95. pmid:27812690
  68. 68. Krittanawong C, Zhang H, Sun T. Cardiovascular complications after Zika virus infection. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:859. pmid:27434361
  69. 69. Ramos-Rossy J, Flores J, Otero-Domínguez Y, Torres-Palacios J, Rodríguez-Cintrón W. Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Secondary to Zika Virus Infection. P R Health Sci J. 2018;37:S99–S101. pmid:30576587
  70. 70. van der Linden V. Description of 13 Infants Born During October 2015–January 2016 With Congenital Zika Virus Infection Without Microcephaly at Birth—Brazil. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016:65. pmid:27906905
  71. 71. Cardona-Ospina JA, Diaz-Quijano FA, Rodríguez-Morales AJ. Burden of chikungunya in Latin American countries: estimates of disability-adjusted life-years (DALY) lost in the 2014 epidemic. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;38:60–1. pmid:26216764
  72. 72. Alfaro-Murillo JA, Parpia AS, Fitzpatrick MC, Tamagnan JA, Medlock J, Ndeffo-Mbah ML, et al. A Cost-Effectiveness Tool for Informing Policies on Zika Virus Control. Carabin H, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;e0004743:10. pmid:27205899
  73. 73. WHO | Chikungunya–Congo. In: WHO [Internet]. [cited 28 Jul 2020]. Available from:
  74. 74. Zika Epidemiology Update. WHO; 2019. Available from:
  75. 75. Gurav YK, Gopalkrishna V, Shah PS, Patil DR, Mishra M, Paingankar MS, et al. An outbreak of chikungunya in Jamshedpur, Jharkhand in 2011. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136:886–9. pmid:23287142
  76. 76. Konongoi SL, Nyunja A, Ofula V, Owaka S, Koka H, Koskei E, et al. Human and entomologic investigations of chikungunya outbreak in Mandera, Northeastern Kenya, 2016. PLoS ONE. 2018;e0205058:13. pmid:30308064
  77. 77. Willcox AC, Collins MH, Jadi R, Keeler C, Parr JB, Mumba D, et al. Seroepidemiology of Dengue, Zika, and Yellow Fever Viruses among Children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;99:756–63. pmid:29988000
  78. 78. Malik MR, Mnzava A, Mohareb E, Zayed A, Al Kohlani A, Thabet AAK, et al. Chikungunya outbreak in Al-Hudaydah, Yemen, 2011: epidemiological characterization and key lessons learned for early detection and control. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2014;4:203–11. pmid:25107656
  79. 79. Ngwe Tun MM, Kyaw AK, Hmone SW, Inoue S, Buerano CC, Soe AM, et al. Detection of Zika Virus Infection in Myanmar. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98:868–71. pmid:29363460
  80. 80. Yoon I-K, Alera MT, Lago CB, Tac-An IA, Villa D, Fernandez S, et al. High rate of subclinical chikungunya virus infection and association of neutralizing antibody with protection in a prospective cohort in the Philippines. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003764. pmid:25951202
  81. 81. Suwanmanee S, Surasombatpattana P, Soonthornworasiri N, Hamel R, Maneekan P, Missé D, et al. Monitoring arbovirus in Thailand: Surveillance of dengue, chikungunya and zika virus, with a focus on coinfections. Acta Trop. 2018;188:244–50. pmid:30248317
  82. 82. Sassetti M, Zé-Zé L, Franco J, da Cunha J, Gomes A, Tomé A, et al. First case of confirmed congenital Zika syndrome in continental Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018;112:458–62. pmid:30053235
  83. 83. Costello A, Dua T, Duran P, Gülmezoglu M, Oladapo OT, Perea W, et al. Defining the syndrome associated with congenital Zika virus infection. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94:406–406A. pmid:27274588
  84. 84. Feldstein LR, Ellis EM, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Hennessey MJ, Staples JE, Halloran ME, et al. Estimating the cost of illness and burden of disease associated with the 2014–2015 chikungunya outbreak in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Maheu-Giroux M, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;e0007563:13. pmid:31323020
  85. 85. Ali S, Gugliemini O, Harber S, Harrison A, Houle L, Ivory J, et al. Environmental and Social Change Drive the Explosive Emergence of Zika Virus in the Americas. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;e0005135:11. pmid:28182667
  86. 86. Filho WL, Scheday S, Boenecke J, Gogoi A, Maharaj A, Korovou S. Climate Change, Health and Mosquito-Borne Diseases: Trends and Implications to the Pacific Region. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:5114. pmid:31847373