• Loading metrics

Alteration in the Culex pipiens transcriptome reveals diverse mechanisms of the mosquito immune system implicated upon Rift Valley fever phlebovirus exposure

  • Ana I. Núñez,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

  • Anna Esteve-Codina,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

  • Jèssica Gómez-Garrido,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

  • Marco Brustolin,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

    Affiliations IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain, Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Sandra Talavera,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

  • Miguel Berdugo,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation Instituto de Biología Evolutiva, Universitat Pompeu i Fabra-CSIC, Dr. Aigüader 88, Barcelona, Spain

  • Marc Dabad,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

  • Tyler Alioto,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, Universitat Pompeu i Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

  • Albert Bensaid ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Albert Bensaid, Núria Busquets

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

  • Núria Busquets

    Contributed equally to this work with: Albert Bensaid, Núria Busquets

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Alteration in the Culex pipiens transcriptome reveals diverse mechanisms of the mosquito immune system implicated upon Rift Valley fever phlebovirus exposure

  • Ana I. Núñez, 
  • Anna Esteve-Codina, 
  • Jèssica Gómez-Garrido, 
  • Marco Brustolin, 
  • Sandra Talavera, 
  • Miguel Berdugo, 
  • Marc Dabad, 
  • Tyler Alioto, 
  • Albert Bensaid, 
  • Núria Busquets


Rift Valley fever phlebovirus (RVFV) causes an emerging zoonotic disease and is mainly transmitted by Culex and Aedes mosquitoes. While Aedes aegypti-dengue virus (DENV) is the most studied model, less is known about the genes involved in infection-responses in other mosquito-arboviruses pairing. The main objective was to investigate the molecular responses of Cx. pipiens to RVFV exposure focusing mainly on genes implicated in innate immune responses. Mosquitoes were fed with blood spiked with RVFV. The fully-engorged females were pooled at 3 different time points: 2 hours post-exposure (hpe), 3- and 14-days post-exposure (dpe). Pools of mosquitoes fed with non-infected blood were also collected for comparisons. Total RNA from each mosquito pool was subjected to RNA-seq analysis and a de novo transcriptome was constructed. A total of 451 differentially expressed genes (DEG) were identified. Most of the transcriptomic alterations were found at an early infection stage after RVFV exposure. Forty-eight DEG related to immune infection-response were characterized. Most of them were related with the RNAi system, Toll and IMD pathways, ubiquitination pathway and apoptosis. Our findings provide for the first time a comprehensive view on Cx. pipiens-RVFV interactions at the molecular level. The early depletion of RNAi pathway genes at the onset of the RVFV infection would allow viral replication in mosquitoes. While genes from the Toll and IMD immune pathways were altered in response to RVFV none of the DEG were related to the JAK/STAT pathway. The fact that most of the DEG involved in the Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP) or apoptosis were found at an early stage of infection would suggest that apoptosis plays a regulatory role in infected Cx. pipiens midguts. This study provides a number of target genes that could be used to identify new molecular targets for vector control.

Author summary

Rift valley fever (RVF) is an emerging zoonotic disease and it is caused by RVFV. This virus is commonly transmitted in endemic areas between wild ruminants and mosquitoes, mainly by mosquitoes of Culex and Aedes genus. Starting from the year 2000, several outbreaks have been reported outside Sub Saharan Africa, in countries facing the Mediterranean Sea (Egypt), or Yemen and Saudi Arabia. Available vaccines for ruminants present limited efficacy or residual pathogenic effects. Consequently, new strategies are urgently required to limit the expansion of this zoonotic virus. The main objective of this work is to investigate transcriptional alterations of Cx. pipiens to RVFV focusing mainly on genes implicated in conventional innate immunity pathways, RNAi mechanisms and the apoptotic process in order to evaluate the involvement of these genes in viral infection. The immune altered genes here described could be potential targets to control RVFV infection in mosquitoes. Some of the genes related to the immune defense response were previously described in others mosquito-arbovirus models, as well as in Drosophila and human. To our knowledge, this study highlights for the first time the Cx. pipiens-RVFV interactions in terms of defense infection-response and provides information for developing in the future new approaches to prevent and control the expansion of the virus.


Rift Valley fever (RVF) is an emerging arthropod-borne zoonotic disease caused by an enveloped RNA segmented phlebovirus, RVFV. Beside wild ruminants, RVFV affects mainly domestic ruminants and humans [1]. It was first described in 1930 in the Rift Valley (Kenya), after observing high abortion and mortality rates in sheep near Lake Naivasha [2]. In 1948, mosquitoes of the Aedes genus were identified as RVFV vectors in Uganda [3]. Since then, the virus has been isolated from at least 53 mosquito species covering 8 genera, mainly Aedes and Culex genus, and belonging to the Culicidae family [4]. After successive outbreaks in eastern and southern Africa, RVFV was detected in Egypt in 1977, causing a major human outbreak involving Cx. pipiens species as the main potential vector [4]. RVFV was identified for the first-time outside Africa in 2000, in Saudi Arabia and Yemen. During this outbreak, the impact on the economy and public health was very high, reaching a total of 882 confirmed cases with 124 deaths [5]. The spread of RVFV outside the African continent and its presence in Egypt, which faces the Mediterranean Sea, highlighted the possibility of RVFV introduction in Europe [6]. Indeed, European autochthonous vectors, such as Cx. pipiens or the invasive Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus have been proven to be competent vectors under laboratory conditions [7,8]. Currently, RVFV is circulating in several African countries causing sporadic outbreaks [9] and according to WHO, it is a prioritized emerging infectious disease.

Mosquitoes within the Cx. pipiens complex are known to be competent vectors for RVFV [8,10,11]. The capacity of the mosquitoes to acquire, replicate and transmit an arbovirus, known as vector competence, depends on: i) extrinsic factors, such as environmental conditions [12] or genetic variations of the pathogens [7], and ii) intrinsic factors, such as the genetics of vector populations [13], and the immune system of each mosquito strain [14]. Multiple immune effector mechanisms in insect are implicated in the defense against microorganisms: apoptosis, encapsulation, melanization, phagocytosis of the pathogens and the production of antimicrobial peptides (AMP) [1518]. Immune effectors are triggered mainly by three innate immunity pathways: Toll, Immune deficiency (IMD) and Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT). All of them are involved in the defense against arbovirus infection [16]. The Toll pathway is activated after the interaction between the antigen and the Toll-like receptors. This eventually induces the expression of antiviral effectors [16]. Several functional assays have shown that the Toll signaling pathway plays a key role for DENV control in infected Ae. aegypti mosquitoes [16,19,20]. Moreover, activation of the Toll pathway in the midgut of Ae. aegypti infected with the Sindbis virus (SINV) and Zika virus (ZIKV) has also been suggested [21,22]. Additionally, there is mounting evidence for the antiviral function of the IMD signaling pathway in mosquitoes [14]. The IMD pathway is triggered upon virus infection recognition by the adaptor IMP protein, resulting in the transcription of IMD effector genes [16]. Upon DENV infection, the salivary glands of Ae. aegypti secrete an IMD dependent antimicrobial peptide (AMP) with antiviral activity against DENV and Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) [23]. The invertebrate JAK/STAT pathway is similar to the mammalian interferon response. The JAK/STAT pathway is also involved in Ae. aegypti defense responses against DENV and ZIKV infection [14,22]. Elements of different immune pathways may act synergistically and interact with components of apoptosis and other metabolic pathways. Apoptosis is a defense mechanism that insects use against viral infections by killing infected or neighboring cells. Programmed cell death is involved, at the midgut level, in the control of DENV and West Nile virus (WNV) infections in Ae. aegypti [24] and Cx. pipiens [25] respectively. On the other hand, Patel et al. [26], reported that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt-TOR signaling pathway promotes viral replication in insect cells during SINV infection and causes inhibition of apoptosis. Although the above-mentioned transduction pathways are relevant for controlling arbovirus infections, the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway is considered to be the major innate immune response against viral infections [24]. The small interfering RNA (siRNA) pathway is the best known regarding its role in restricting arbovirus infections (i.e. DENV, SINV and CHIKV) in Ae. aegypti [2729], but it can also generate virus diversification during WNV infection in Cx. quinquefasciatus [30]. Additionally, the P-element-induced Wimpy testes gene (PIWI)-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway, which is involved in maintaining genomic integrity, has also been suggested to be implicated in antiviral defense [31].

The importance of the mosquito innate immune system against different flaviviruses, specifically against DENV has been studied in detail. However, less is known on the interaction of bunyaviruses such as RVFV with the mosquito immune system. In the present study, the effect of the RVFV in exposed Cx. pipiens has been studied using RNA-seq analysis. Culex pipiens was chosen for the present study because of its wide geographical distribution and its capacity to transmit RVFV [8]. Analysis were performed at 2 hours post-exposure (hpe), 3- and 14-days post-exposure (dpe) to observe changes in gene expression induced by signaling pathways just after viral exposure (2 hpe) and at both early (3 dpe) and late (14 dpe) stages of viral infection. Differentially expressed genes related to the mosquito’s immune system response have been identified after RVFV exposure. This is the first study that analyzes the Cx. pipiens transcriptome upon RVFV exposure in order to better understand interactions between Cx. pipiens mosquitoes and RVFV and potential mechanisms involved in the control of RVFV infection.

Materials and methods

Mosquitoes rearing

Culex pipiens hybrid form mosquitoes used for RVFV infection were reared from a laboratory colony originally collected in Gavà in 2012 (Spain). The molecular genetic characterization of the mosquitoes was performed in a previous study [8]. Mosquitoes(generation 43) were reared under environmental conditions simulating those found around their natural breeding sites, at 26°C during the day and 22°C at night at 80% of relative humidity (RH). The photoperiod consisted in 14 h: 10 h (light: dark) with two crepuscular cycles of 30 min to simulate dawn and dusk [8]. Mosquitoes were fed using 10% sucrose solution.

Virus production and titration

A virulent RVFV strain (RVF 56/74), kindly provided by Dr. Alejandro Brun (CISA-INIA) and originally isolated from cattle in 1974 [32], was used for mosquito experimental infection. RVF 56/74 was propagated in C6/36 cells and titrated in Vero cells as previously described [8].

Experimental RVFV infection in Culex pipiens mosquitoes

After adult mosquito emergence, mosquitoes were fed ad libitum on a 10% sucrose solution until 30 hours before blood feeding, when the sucrose solution was removed. Mosquitoes were kept in 0.5 L volume plastic cages with mesh screening during 48 hours before mosquitoes were feed with blood. Three hundred adult females of 7-10- days-old were used for the present study. One hundred fifty adult females were exposed to infectious blood and 150 females were exposed to non-infectious blood. The heparinized bovine blood mixed with adenosine 5’-triphosphate (ATP) (5x10-3 M) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was extracted from bovine (medial caudal vein) and was provided to mosquitoes using the Hemotek artificial system (Discovery Workshop, Accrington, UK) at 37.5°C ± 0.5. Aliquots of RVFV-spiked blood were collected after feeding and used to calculate the viral titer using the TCID50 assay in Vero cell (RVFV titer blood = 7.46 log10 TCID50/mL).

The fully engorged females were anaesthetized using CO2, selected and maintained in individual cardboard cages (Watkins & Doncaster, Leominster, UK) sealed with a net on top and stored inside a climatic chamber under rearing environmental conditions. Throughout the experiment, the mosquitoes were maintained with permanent access to 10% sucrose solution. Twelve fully-engorged females from each group (infectious and non-infectious blood) were removed at 2 hpe, and at 3 and 14 dpe. These females were anaesthetized using CO2 and stored at -80°C until use. The experimental infection was performed in Biosafety Level 3 facilities at the Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (IRTA-CReSA).

Total RNA extraction and RVFV detection

Fully engorged females were pooled in groups of four. Three pools were used for each time point (2 hpe, 3 dpe and 14 dpe) and condition: exposed to infectious (hereafter referred to as RVFV) and non-infectious blood (hereafter referred to as control). In total, 18 pools of four females were obtained. The entire mosquitoes were homogenized with glass beads for 2 min at 30 Hz using TissueLyser II (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and total RNA was extracted from each pool using RNeasy Mini Kit (250) (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Total RNA was eluted using 50 μL of RNase-free water.

RVFV RNA was detected by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) using primers defined previously [33] and AgPath-ID One-Step RT-PCR Reagents (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA, U.S.A.) following the amplification protocol previously described [8]. The limit of sensitivity was 0.09 TCID50 per reaction, which corresponded to a Ct value of 39.19.

RNA library preparation and sequencing

Total RNA from Cx. pipiens samples was assayed for quantity and quality using Qubit RNA HS Assay (Life Technologies) and RNA 6000 Nano Assay on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent).

The RNASeq libraries were prepared from total RNA using the TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit v2 (Illumina Inc., Rev. E, October 2013). Briefly, after poly-A based mRNA enrichment with oligo-dT magnetic beads of at least 0.52 μg of total RNA as input material, the mRNA was fragmented to 80–250 nt, with the major peak at 130 nt. The second strand cDNA synthesis was performed in the presence of dUTP instead of dTTP, to achieve the strand specificity. The blunt-ended double stranded cDNA was 3´adenylated and Illumina indexed adapters were ligated. The ligation product was enriched with 15 PCR cycles and the final library was validated on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with the DNA 7500 assay.

The libraries were sequenced on HiSeq2000 (Illumina, Inc) in paired-end mode with a read length of 2x76 bp using the TruSeq SBS Kit v4 (Illumina). Image analysis, base calling and quality scoring of the run were processed using the manufacturer’s software Real Time Analysis (RTA and followed by generation of FASTQ sequence files by CASAVA.

De novo transcriptome assembly and annotation

Transcriptome assemblies were performed for each time point (2 hpe, 3 dpe or 14 dpe) with Trinity v2.2.0 [34], with read trimming and normalization options activated. Afterwards, the Rapclust [35] approach was followed on each of the Trinity assemblies in order to reduce redundancy before merging the three resulting transcriptomes together with Rapclust. In this process, a pseudoalignment is first performed with Sailfish v0.10.0 [36] and then Rapclust V0.1 is used to cluster the assembled sequences into contained isoforms, in order to reduce redundancy and to cluster together all the isoforms that are likely to belong to the same gene.

After obtaining the reference transcriptome, Open Reading Frames were annotated in the assembled transcripts with Transdecoder [37]. Next, we used Trinotate v3.0.1 [38] to functionally annotate the protein-coding transcripts. First, BLAST [39] searches were performed against the Swiss-prot database (last accessed Nov 2016). Moreover, the program HMMER and Signalp [40] were also used to detect protein domains in the predicted ORFs. Finally, the outputs of all these programs were combined into an SQL database by using Trinotate.

Transcript quantification and differential expression analysis

RNA-seq reads were mapped against the de novo assembled transcriptome with the program rsem-extract-reference from RSEM [41] using STAR [42] indices and the option -transcript-to-gene-map to map transcripts (contigs) to genes (clusters). Genes were quantified with RSEM using our custom gene annotation. As exploratory analysis, a principal component analysis (PCA) with the top 500 most variable genes was performed with the ‘prcomp’ function and ‘ggplot2’ (S1 Fig). Differential expression analysis was performed with the DESeq2 default normalization and multiple test correction provided by the package. [43]. Genes with adjusted P-value <0.05 were considered significant. Gene ontology enrichment of the differentially expressed genes was performed with TopGO [44] with a cut-off of ‘classicFisher’ P-value <0.05. CirGO [45] was used to visualize the GO enrichment results. Gene ontology terms based on statistical significance were summarized with a semantic similarity algorithm based on Revigo [46] and grouped by hierarchical clustering.

The workflow of the experimental infection in Cx. pipiens mosquitoes exposed to RVFV and transcriptome analysis is shown in the Fig 1.

Fig 1. The workflow of the experimental infection in Cx. pipiens mosquitoes exposed to RVFV and transcriptome analysis.

Identification of differentially expressed genes related to immunity

Differentially expressed genes (hereafter DEG) coding for proteins involved in mosquito innate immunity were identified by screening two databases. First, a local database of Cx. quinquefasciatus proteins involved in immunity was created by retrieving the ad hoc entries from the ImmuneDB data base [47] for mosquito species. This database is available under request. BLASTX BioEdit [39,48] was used to compare Cx. quinquefasciatus immunity-related proteins with our database of DEG of Cx. pipiens. Second, Cx. pipiens DEG related to antiviral/immunity responses were retrieved from our Cx. pipiens de novo assembled transcriptome annotated with the Gene Ontology database. All Cx. pipiens DEG identified by both methods were further curated by performing a BLASTX search of the nr protein database at the National Center for Biology Information (NCBI). The online NCBI BLASTX search also provided information on conserved protein domains by screening the CDD and pFAM databases for homologies [49] and UniProt was used to obtain information about the protein characteristics [50].


RVFV infection in Culex pipiens mosquitoes

The three RVFV pools were positive for RVFV by RT-qPCR at the three selected time points (2 hpe, 3 dpe and 14 dpe) of study. As expected, all the control pools were negative by RT-qPCR (Table 1). At 2 hpe, the virus detected in the samples from the RVFV group was derived from the blood meal. These results demonstrated that each pool at 3 and 14 dpe had at least one RVFV infected mosquito female after exposure to infectious blood and that the infection was sustained for the entire 14 days of the experiment, although one mosquito pool (RVFV pool 3) at 14 dpe showed a lower level of infection.

Table 1. Viral load (Ct values) in mosquito pools tested by RT-qPCR specific to RVFV.

Pools were composed of four mosquito females.

Transcriptome de novo assembly

To obtain a good reference transcriptome assembly to be used in further analysis we first assembled the reads that belonged to each time-point independently and then clustered all the transcriptomes. S1 Table shows the total number of raw reads, the uniquely mapped reads and multi-mapped reads among other informative QC metrics. A total of approximately 950 million reads were detected. The final assembly is composed of 355,773 assembled contigs with a contig N50 of 1716 nt. The transcripts clustered into 106,771 clusters, hereafter referred to and treated as “genes”, although the number is inflated due to the usual transcript fragmentation and duplication exhibited by transcriptome assemblies. Finally, 46,635 contigs are considered protein-coding. The gene completeness of the reference transcriptome was estimated with Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) v1.1b1 [51], using an arthropod specific dataset made of 2675 genes. According to BUSCO, our reference transcriptome has 92% of complete genes, 5.1% fragmented genes and only a 2.6% of missing genes. In total, 141,669 transcripts have been annotated as protein coding, of which 113,513 (80%) have been functionally annotated with protein descriptions and 97,283 (69%) with gene ontology (GO) terms.

Comparisons of transcripts accumulation level in RVFV-exposed and non-exposed mosquitoes

The abundance of genes in RVFV- exposed versus non- exposed Cx. pipiens mosquitoes were evaluated for each of the three different time points (2 hpe, 3 dpe and 14 dpe). Genes with adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05 and Fold Change (FC) ≥ + 1.5 or ≤ - 1.5 were considered significantly up-regulated or down-regulated. A total of 451 DEG were identified (Fig 2 and S2 Table). From the 451 DEG, 176 genes were up-regulated and 263 were down-regulated in RVFV exposed mosquitoes. Six DEG were up or down-regulated depending on the time-point. In RVFV exposed mosquitoes, 122, 33 and 27 genes were found to be significantly up-regulated at 2 hpe, 3 dpe and 14 dpe, respectively. Conversely, the exposure to RVFV resulted in the down-regulation of 217, 27 and 31 genes at 2 hpe, 3 dpe and 14 dpe, respectively. When compared to non- RVFV exposed mosquitoes, most of the DEG (336 genes) were transcriptionally altered at the earliest time point (2 hpe) (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Venn diagram of DEG in RVFV infected Cx. pipiens mosquitoes.

The Venn diagram represents the number of DEG in response to RVFV at different time-points (2 hpe, 3 dpe and 14 dpe). In red, the number of down-regulated genes, in green the number of up-regulated genes.

Functional enrichment of the differentially expressed genes

A functional enrichment analysis of the DEG between the RVFV and control groups was performed using TopGO [52] (S3 and S4 Tables) and Revigo [46] was used to make the charts of the most representative GO categories at each time point tested (S2S4 Figs). At all-time points evaluated, the GO categories within biological processes related to cellular and metabolic mechanisms were the most affected categories. Within down-regulated DEG, the subcategories related to cellular process, cellular component organization or biogenesis, cellular metabolic process, immune system, multi-organism process or developmental process were more prominent. However, the response to stimulus, cell death, localization, immune system process and developmental process were the most represented GO subcategories within up-regulated DEG.

Out of the 451 DEG, a total of 297 (65.9%) genes were similar to proteins with a functional annotation in the nr NCBI database, as determined by BLASTX; 22.1% were annotated as conserved or hypothetical protein, and 12% did not match with the nr NCBI database.

Functional prediction of differentially expressed genes related to immunity in response to RVFV exposure

A total of 20 DEG were similar to genes involved in the Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquito immune system as assessed by the ImmunoDB database. Additionally, another 28 DEG involved in immunity processes were identified using the GO database. Thirteen genes were determined by using both methods. In total, 48 DEG related to antiviral and immune system functions were identified and analyzed in depth (Tables 2, 3 and 4).

Table 2. DEG related to the immune infection-defense response at 2 hpe.

Table 3. DEG related to the immune infection-defense response at 3 dpe.

Table 4. DEG related to the immune infection-defense response at 14 dpe.

DEG related to the immune response at 2 hpe to RVFV.

A total of 16 DEG related to immunity were down-regulated at 2 hpe (Table 2). These included genes encoding two antimicrobial peptides (AMP) (Cpip1A009744 and Cpip1A014968), one C-type lectin (CTL) (Cpip1A029893), one leucine-rich repeats (LRR) protein (Cpip1A005512), three small regulatory RNA pathway (SRRPs) members (Cpip1A091918, Cpip1A031059 and Cpip1A025203), two proteins involved in RNAi pathway (Cpip1A088100 and Cpip1A027127), two proteins implicated in the proteasome assembly pathway (Cpip1A057434 and Cpip1A053625), one protein related to the ubiquitination pathway (Cpip1A079710), and one protein involved in apoptotic process (Cpip1A073928). Finally, one nuclear pore complex protein Nup155 (Cpip1A048037) [53], and two CTP synthases (Cpip1A002183 and Cpip1A075565) [54], similar to genes putatively related to antiviral/immune response processes, and with no previous description in insects were identified.

A total of 18 DEG related to immunity were up-regulated at 2 hpe. Four of their putative protein products had homology with three members of myeloid differentiation 2-related lipid recognition (MLs) receptors (MD2-like) (Cpip1A012593, Cpip1A019311 and Cpip1A039204) and one member of fibrinogen-related proteins (FREPs) (Cpip1A010903). Whereas MD2-like proteins are associated with the Toll pathway, FREPs, which are involved in pathogen recognition, have not been linked to any specific immune pathway [22]. Moreover, DEG coding for two fork head (FKH) transcription factors involved in AMP regulation via the TOR pathway (Cpip1A000929 and Cpip1A014760), one lipin-3 (Cpip1A058921) involved in PI3K-Akt-TOR signaling pathway, one protein related to proteasome assembly (Cpip1A101513) and three proteins involved in apoptotic process (Cpip1A000671, Cpip1A035296, and Cpip1A018924) were also up-regulated. The gene Cpip1A018924 had a best match with Cx. quinquefasciatus Croquemort (SCRBQ3), a scavenger receptor B member of a multigene family harboring the CD36 domain. When screening the whole Cx. pipiens transcriptome, six other genes homologous to Cpip1A018924 were found; all coded for the CD36 domain. Three additional up-regulated DEG were identified as trypsins (Cpip1A06169, Cpip1A037043 and Cpip1A083737). Finally, the putative products of Cpip1A054937, Cpip1A065392, Cpip1A059920 and Cpip1A087985, which are homologous to proteins involved in diverse responses to viral and antimicrobial infections were also up-regulated.

DEG related to the immune response at 3 dpe to RVFV.

A total of four DEG involved in insect immunity were down-regulated at 3 dpe (Table 3): one encoding for a protein related to the ubiquitination pathway (Cpip1A095413), one related to alternative antiviral response, with a SH2_Grb2_like protein domain (Cpip1A069141) and two DEG encoding for chymotrypsin-like proteins (Cpip1A089245 and Cpip1A065153). The SH2 domains are implicated in signal transduction and the Grb2 is supposed to play a role in apoptosis [89,90]. In the opposite direction, two DEG implicated in ubiquitination and proteasome assembly pathways were upregulated at 3 dpe (Cpip1A038039 and Cpip1A080538, respectively).

DEG related to the immune response at 14 dpe to RVFV.

A total of six DEG related to immunity were down-regulated at 14 dpe (Table 4). These DEG included genes encoding one CTL protein (Cpip1A086629), one protein involved in the ubiquitination pathway (Cpip1A075447), two proteins related to melanization (Cpip1A099497 and Cpip1A046835), one heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) (Cpip1A097556), which has been described previously in mosquito immune response [95], and finally, one protein (Cpip1A034914) that inhibits a virus sensor described in humans [96]. In the other direction, two DEG related to immunity response were up-regulated at 14 dpe. These genes encode one FREP member (Cpip1A019555) and the nuclear pore complex protein Nup88-like (Cpip1A005797) related to antiviral/immune response process in insects.

Evolution of the immune response upon RVFV exposure in Culex pipiens mosquitoes

All of the above detailed DEG during RVFV-exposed in mosquitoes were involved in the conventional immune Toll/IMD pathways, RNAi mechanism, the ubiquitination pathway, apoptosis and other inducible antiviral immune genes (Fig 3). Most of the transcriptional changes related to immunity occurred at the early RVFV-infection stage (2 hpe) in all the defense mechanisms. It is worth mentioning that all DEG related to the RNAi system were down-regulated at this time point (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Evolution of the immune infection-response upon RVFV exposure in Cx. pipiens mosquitoes.

The immune DEG altered at 2 hpe, 3 and 14 dpe are represented in blue, red and green colors, respectively. PRG: Pathogen recognition genes.


The full genome sequence of Cx. pipiens is not available, therefore, in the present study we constructed a de novo transcriptome using adult Cx. pipiens females fed on RVFV infectious or non-infectious blood allowing us to perform an accurate comparative transcriptome analysis between RVFV exposed and unexposed female mosquitoes.

Most of the transcriptomic alterations were found within 2 hpe, at an early stage of infection. Most of the DEG identified at this stage were enriched in GO categories corresponding to metabolic and cellular processes most likely at a time when the mosquito midgut is primed with RVFV. These results are in line with previous findings obtained with ZIKV-infected Ae. aegypti mosquitoes [103], midguts of DENV-infected Ae. aegypti, and midguts of CHIKV- infected Ae. albopictus [104,105], where most of the altered genes were detected at the beginning of the infection. Among all DEG, we focused specifically on genes putatively involved in the mosquito immune system since antiviral mechanisms very often do not entirely clear the virus but allow the establishment of a persistent viral infection in vectors. In the present study, 48 DEG belonging to several infection defense gene families have been identified upon RVFV exposure. These genes are related to Toll, IMD and RNAi pathways as well as infection-responsive pathogen recognition genes (PRG), apoptotic processes, and other alternative inducible antiviral immune genes.

One of the limitations of our study has been to analyze the entire mosquito instead of specific tissues. This could explain why some DEG related to the immune response have been regulated in opposite directions. Moreover, since we pooled mosquitoes without knowing the infection status of each individual, thus introducing heterogeneity and reducing the power to detect DEG, other genes could have been altered after RVFV exposure but were not detected in our study, essentially at 3 and 14 dpe.

Early depletion of the RNAi pathway by RVFV exposure

The RNAi pathway seems suppressed at the onset of the RVFV infection in Cx. pipiens since crucial SRRP members such as Piwi4, Loquacious (Loqs or R3D1), ribonuclease 3 (Drosha), tnf receptor associated factor (zf-TRAF) and Gawky were down-regulated at 2 hpe.

The Piwi4 protein, which belongs to the PIWI family, interacts with key components of the siRNA (Ago2 and Dicer-2 proteins) and piRNA (Ago3, Piwi5 and Piwi6 proteins) pathways, although it has been proposed that its antiviral role is independent of either pathway [72]. Piwi4 has been involved in the control of Semliki Forest virus and Bunyamwera virus in Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus-infected mosquito cells, respectively [106,107]. Moreover, Dietrich et al. (2017) also demonstrated the antiviral activity of Piwi4 in Aag2 cells infected with RVFV since its silencing led to an increase of viral replication [71]. According to these studies, the depletion of Piwi4 mRNA could indicate that RVFV suppresses the piRNA pathway allowing its replication in Cx. pipiens mosquitoes at an early stage of infection. Additionally, the mRNA coding for the Loqs protein, was also down-regulated. Haac et al. (2015) proposed that in dipterans, including mosquitoes, Loqs-PA and Loqs-PB isoforms are involved in the control of the miRNA pathway [58]. Therefore, RVFV may also alter the miRNA pathway in Cx. pipiens via Loqs downregulation early after RVFV exposure.

Other components of the miRNA and RNAi pathways were down-regulated: the Drosha gene, which codes for an enzyme that generate small RNAs in cooperation with Dicer to control viral infections [63], and Gawky, an Argonaute-associating protein whose role in the miRNA pathway repression is still not clear [59]. Finally, ending the list of down-regulated genes at 2 hpe, TRAFs has been implicated in the activation of the Culex Vago protein, which is a secreted peptide with antiviral functions [108] in response to WNV in infected mosquito cells [68].

In summary, the depletion of Piwi4, Loqs, Drosha, Gawky and TRAF, all involved in several RNAi pathways, would suggest a severe alteration of this pathway at the onset of the RVFV infection to allow viral replication in the intestinal barrier. On the other hand, transcription of genes involved in the RNAi pathway were not affected in the later sampled time points (at 3 and 14 dpe), suggesting that, once the initial RVFV infection is established, steady state levels of these genes allows proper dissemination of the virus without causing lethal tissue damages in Cx. pipiens. In addition to the detection and quantification of siRNAs and piRNAs, further functional studies will be required to better understand the role of the RNAi pathway in RVFV-infected Cx. pipiens mosquitoes to evidence the presence or absence of a RVFV potential inhibitor of this pathway. Moreover, studies on how RVFV NSs protein can be considered as a Virus Suppressors of RNAi should be also investigated as for other bunyaviruses [109].

RVFV exposure is associated with changes in Cx. pipiens immune responses, mainly in the expression of Toll and IMD pathways related genes

Genes belonging to the Toll and IMD pathways coding for defensin-A (DEFA), defensin-C (DEFC) and ML proteins (ML6, ML22, ML26) were significantly positively or negatively altered throughout the course of RVFV infection in Cx. pipiens mosquitoes. Conversely, none of the DEG were related to the JAK/STAT pathway, contrary to what has been reported in several studies performed in Ae. aegypti with other arboviruses (ZIKV and DENV) [22,110] or Cx. quinquefasciatus with WNV [111]. However, our results agree with two previous studies performed in Ae. albopictus infected with CHIKV [105] and in Ae. aegypti infected with ZIKV [103] where the JAK/STAT pathway was not involved in virus-mosquito interactions. These apparent contradictory data suggest that the implication of the JAK/STAT pathway in arbovirus defense depends on the pairing combination of mosquito and arbovirus and is influenced by the viral genotype—host genotype interaction, as previously was proposed for different RVFV strains by Pinkham et al. (2017) [112].

The AMPs are induced following activation of Toll, IMD and JAK/STAT pathways. They are potent immune effectors whose ultimate function is to clear pathogens [113]. Their mode of action is better understood for bacteria and fungi, but how they interact with viruses remains unclear. In the present study, two AMPs, defensin-A (DEFA) and defensin-C (DEFC), were under-expressed in RVFV exposed females at the beginning of the infection (at 2 hpe). Defensins are mainly known to disrupt the membrane permeability of Gram- positive bacteria A previous study performed in Ae. aegypti infected with ZIKV or CHIKV showed that DEFA and DEFC were over-expressed at 3 hpe to both viruses. However, at 10 dpe, in comparison with uninfected controls, DEFA and DEFC were significantly down-regulated in CHIKV and up-regulated in ZIKV infected females, respectively [64]. Regulation of defensins seems to vary depending on the virus ingested and the progression of the infection. RVFV probably modifies the expression of both defensins in order to allow initiation of the infection in Cx. pipiens, but returns to steady state levels when the virus crosses the midgut barrier. According to results obtained in Drosophila, up-regulation of the transcription factor FKH, which acts downstream of TOR signaling, inhibits production of defensins while increasing other AMPs mainly diptericin and metchnikowin [84]. However, no other AMP genes were affected in RVFV-exposed females. Furthermore, members of the ML family (ML22, ML6 and ML26 genes) were up-regulated in RVFV-exposed mosquitoes at 2 hpe. ML genes, which encode lipid-binding proteins, have been implicated in host-pathogen interactions. Currently, the role of the ML protein family in mosquito immunity is still not well understood [79,80]. For instance, Jupatanakul et al. (2014) showed that when the ML33 gene is silenced in DENV infected Ae. aegypti females, virus titers in midguts are reduced, indicating that the ML33 gene facilitates viral infection in the mosquito midgut [78]. Our results may also suggest that ML22, ML6 and ML26 could influence the outcome of a RVFV infection in Cx. pipiens females since they were up-regulated at an early stage of infection. Also, a gene coding for a LRR-containing domain protein was down-regulated in RVFV infected females at 2 hpe. A recent study by Zhao et al. (2019) has shown that the expression of AaeLRIM1 and AaeAPL1 (coding for proteins containing LRR) were also down-regulated in ZIKV infected Ae. aegypti at 7 dpi [65], which is in agreement with our results. However, it is unknown how these proteins interact with arboviruses [65] therefore functional studies are required to better understand the role of LRR immune proteins against arboviruses.

Additionally, the nuclear pore complex protein Nup88 seems to promote nuclear retention of immune regulators, such as the transcription factors Dif and Dorsal, contributing to an efficient control of the immune response when the Toll pathway is engaged upon microbial infection [102]. However, at this time point (14 dpe) no other members of the Toll pathway were altered in Cx. pipiens RVFV-infected females.

RVFV alters Cx. pipiens infection-responsive pathogen recognition genes

The FREPs and CTLs have not been directly classified within any of the conventional immune pathways but are described as infection-responsive pathogen recognition proteins and as such play a role in mosquito immunity response [22,81]. A study performed in Ae. aegypti mosquitoes infected with ZIKV showed that the FREP37 gene was down-regulated at 7 dpe [22]. Our study indicates over-expression of FREP46 and FREP18 genes at 2 hpe and 14 dpe, respectively. However, we cannot assess whether the regulation of FREP genes is affected one week after infection since no intermediary time point was performed between 3 dpe and 14 dpe. In addition, the CTL24 and CTL27 transcripts were depleted in RVFV-infected females at 2 hpe and at 14 dpe. The CTLs play an essential role as pattern recognition receptors to mediate immune responses, such as phagocytosis and melanization [55,114]. A previous study demonstrated that Ae. aegypti (mosGCTL-1) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (Culex mosGCTL-1) CTLs were overexpressed and facilitated WNV infection in adult mosquitoes at six days post-inoculation (dpi) [56]. The same results were obtained on DENV infected Ae. aegypti mosquitoes [57]. Accordingly, our results suggest that CTL24 and CTL27 may mitigate the RVFV replication in Cx. pipiens mosquitoes at different stages of the infection.

RVFV infection alters expression of genes related to the ubiquitination pathway and apoptosis

The UPP, which recognizes and degrades polyubiquitylated proteins modified via ubiquitination, contributes to multiple biological processes including apoptosis [69], an important immune mechanism that modulates viral infections in vertebrates and invertebrates [115]. Furthermore, it was observed that in vivo, silencing of some proteasome catalytic β sub-units reduced the number of DENV infected mosquitoes, and upregulation of UPP-related genes were required in Ae. aegypti midguts for the production of infectious DENV [61]. Therefore, it appears that a functional proteasome is required to generate viral particles [61].

In the present study, deprivation of the proteasome subunit alpha and reduced dimerization of precursor complexes containing β subunits, mediated by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis (UMP1a) [60], combined with a deficiency of ubiquitin-activating enzymes (UBX/UBA or E1), which initiate the ubiquitination pathway cascade [62], would alter the formation and function of proteasomes in Cx. pipiens infected by RVFV. However, the up-regulation of a gene coding for UMP1b could counterbalance the effect of UMP1a. At the present state of knowledge, it is difficult to assess if UMP1a and UMP1b are two isoforms of the same gene or the products of duplicated genes. The fact that they are oppositely regulated argues for the existence in Cx. pipiens of two distinct UMP1 genes. The involvement of E1 enzymes in infectious processes has also been previously described for DENV infected Ae. aegypti midguts, but in this case, up-regulation of these genes probably exerted a beneficial role for the development of the virus [61].

At 3 dpe one DEG coding for one ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (UBC) or E2, belonging to the ubiquitination pathway in Drosophila [69,91], was depleted. At this time point, the ubiquitin ligase containing the UBR box (zf-UBR) or E3 [93,101], and the proteasome activator complex subunit 3 (PA28) were enriched in RVFV infected females. As far as we know, neither of these two proteins have thus far been implicated in arbovirus infectious processes in dipterans. However, in mammals, PA28, a regulatory complex protein induced by IFN-γ [94], has been shown to interfere with the replication of coxsackievirus B3 in human and murine cells by suppressing viral replication [94]. Overall, results obtained in this study suggest that the UPP and the proteasome could affect the developmental cycle of RVFV. Six DEG would inhibit virus replication while one up-regulated DEG (the ubiquitin ligase of the E3 family) could enhance it. However, experimental proof is needed to ascertain the role of the above-mentioned genes during RVFV infection.

As mentioned above, the UPP and proteasome are tightly related to the apoptotic process. The role of apoptosis in arboviral infections is still subject to debate. For example, apoptosis occurring in the midgut epithelium and salivary glands of Cx. pipiens and Cx. quinquefasciatus respectively, induced resistance to WNV infection [25] and reduced transmissibility of WNV [116] while silencing the apoptosis inhibitor IAP1 in Ae. aegypti resulted in an increment of SINV infection [35].

In the present study, we detected a certain number of genes related to apoptosis up or down-regulated and exerting opposite effects. However, we do not know if apoptosis takes place; this will require specific experiments in different organs or tissues, such as midgut, fat body or salivary glands of RVFV infected females. However, the fact that most of the DEG implicated here in apoptosis or UPP were found at an early stage of infection would suggest, that if apoptosis does occur, then it will take place in Cx. pipiens midguts. It is important to highlight the lack of understanding about the effect of apoptosis during arboviral infections. Further experiments will be necessary to clarify how apoptosis contributes to RVFV infection in Cx. pipiens mosquitoes.

Alternative inducible antiviral immune genes

In the present study, some DEG with no conventional immune pathway attribution but which are involved in immune responses against pathogens were identified. Trypsins, Hsp70 and lamin belong in this last category. The trypsins, which are blood-digestive enzymes, were overexpressed within the first hours of infection and were down-regulated at 3 dpe. Our results suggest that blood digestion and probably RVFV proteolytic processing via midgut trypsins may facilitate RVFV infection as previously reported by Molina-Cruz et al. (2005) in DENV-2 infected Ae. aegypti [87]. At a stage when the RVFV infection is already established in Cx. pipiens mosquitoes (at 14 dpe), a gene coding for Hsp70 was under-expressed. The chaperone protein Hsp70 facilitates infection of multiple viruses in mammalian cells, such as DENV [97], Japanese encephalitis virus [98] or ZIKV [95]. Moreover, Pujhari et al. (2018) have recently demonstrated that the Hsp70 protein has an important role in the cell cycle during infection, as well as viral entry, replication and egress. Additionally, they showed that the inhibition of Hsp70 led to decreased ZIKV titer in infected Huh7.5 human cells [95]. By analogy, our results indicate that lower levels of Hsp70 might limit but not abolish RVFV production to increase mosquito viability. Finally, two lamin genes were under-expressed at 14 dpe in RVFV infected mosquitoes. The lamin genes have been beforehand identified as involved in melanization in Drosophila [99], but their potential antimicrobial activity in mosquitoes and arboviral infections need to be confirmed.

Transcriptomic studies are crucial for detecting genes implicated in mosquito vector competence for arboviruses, since new control strategies can be drawn. To date, no comprehensive transcriptomic analysis had been performed in mosquitoes with this particular zoonotic virus. Other mosquito species shown to be RVFV vectors combined with other RVFV strains from different genetic and geographic lineages and broader range of time intervals should also be analyzed for transcriptomic analysis to enlarge the knowledge on RVFV-mosquito vector interaction. The present study significantly expands our understanding of Cx. pipiens and RVFV interactions, proposing possible roles of conventional immune pathways (Toll, IMD, RNAi, UPP and apoptosis) in the control or exacerbation of the infection. Moreover, other inducible antiviral genes were modulated upon RVFV exposure in Cx. pipiens females. At an early stage of infection, some crucial defense effectors are inhibited, providing an opportunity for RVFV to disseminate. Thus, the present work provides a number of target genes and hypotheses on which to base future functional studies of the mechanisms inducing viral replication and resistance to RVFV infection.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Representation of the PCA results.


S2 Fig. Representation of Gene Ontology categories assigned to DEG at 2 hpe during RVFV infection in Cx. pipiens.

A) Main GO categories of down-regulated DEG at 2 hpe. The legend shows the GO categories (GO1 to GO5). The most represented were cellular process and cellular component organization or biogenesis. B) Principal GO categories of up-regulated DEG at 2 hpe. In the legend the GO categories (GO1 to GO7) are shown. The most represented corresponded to cellular process, response to stimulus, metabolic process and cell death.


S3 Fig. Representation of Gene Ontology categories assigned to DEG at 3 dpe during RVFV infection in Cx. pipiens.

C) Main GO categories of down-regulated DEG at 3 dpe. The legend shows the GO categories (GO1 to GO4). The most represented corresponded to multi-organism process, cellular response to stimulus, cellular metabolic process and developmental process. D) Principal GO categories of up-regulated DEG at 3 hpe. In the legend the GO categories (GO1 to GO3) are shown. The most represented categories were cellular metabolic process, localization and multicellular organismal process.


S4 Fig. Representation of Gene Ontology categories assigned to DEG at 14 dpe during RVFV infection in Cx. pipiens.

E) Principal GO categories of down-regulated DEG at 14 dpe. The legend shows the GO categories (GO1 to GO4). The most represented corresponded to immune system process, cellular component organization or biogenesis, development process and localization. F) Main GO categories of the up-regulated DEG at 14 dpe. In the legend the GO categories (GO1 to GO6) are shown. The most represented were cellular component organization or biogenesis, metabolic process, cellular metabolic process, immune system process and developmental process.


S1 Table. Results of the QC mapping metrics.


S2 Table. DEG during RVFV infection in Cx. pipiens mosquitoes.

The transcripts differentially expressed at 2 hpe, 3 dpe and 14 dpe were listed with corresponding best matches in the protein nr database at NCBI. Sequences of the transcripts were subjected to BLASTX with a cut-off of P value < 0.0001. Open Reading Frame (ORF) annotations (*) were obtained by combining a search performed with the Pfam, Conserved Domain and Swiss-prot databases. The DEG highlighted in green colour corresponds to the immune related DEG identified in the present study.FC = fold change; nr = non-redundant;— = no significant.


S3 Table. Down-regulated DEG at 2 hpe and at 3 and 14 dpe with their respective GO categories in RVFV infected Cx. pipiens.

DEG were assigned to GO functional categories for biological process using TopGO software with Fisher’s exact test. The cut-off for ‘classicFisher’ was P-value <0.05.


S4 Table. Up-regulated DEG at 2 hpe and at 3 and 14 dpe with their respective GO categories in RVFV infected Cx. pipiens.

DEG were assigned to GO functional categories for biological process using TopGO software with Fisher’s exact test. The cut-off for ‘classicFisher’ was P-value <0.05



The authors are very grateful to Dr. Francesc Xavier Abad for his exceptional BSL3 facilities management and to BSL3 facilities staff for their brilliant technical contribution at IRTA-CReSA. Additionally, we are very grateful for the excellent technical contribution of Marta Verdún, Núria Pujol and Raquel Rivas from IRTA-CReSA.


  1. 1. Pepin M, Bouloy M, Bird BH, Kemp A, Paweska J. Rift Valley fever virus (Bunyaviridae: Phlebovirus): an update on pathogenesis, molecular epidemiology, vectors, diagnostics and prevention. Vet Res. 2010;41:61. pmid:21188836
  2. 2. Daubney R, Hudson JR, Garnham PC. Enzootic hepatitis or rift valley fever. An undescribed virus disease of sheep cattle and man from east africa. J Pathol Bacteriol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 1931;34:545–579.
  3. 3. Smithburn KC, Haddow AJ, Gillett JD. Rift Valley fever; isolation of the virus from wild mosquitoes. Br J Exp Pathol. 1948;29:107–21. Available from: pmid:18868961
  4. 4. Linthicum KJ, Britch SC, Anyamba A. Rift Valley Fever: An Emerging Mosquito-Borne Disease. Annu Rev Entomol. 2016;61:395–415. pmid:26982443
  5. 5. Balkhy HH, Memish ZA. Rift Valley fever: an uninvited zoonosis in the Arabian peninsula. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003;21:153–157. pmid:12615379
  6. 6. Mansfield KL, Banyard AC, McElhinney L, Johnson N, Horton DL, Hernández-Triana LM, et al. Rift Valley fever virus: A review of diagnosis and vaccination, and implications for emergence in Europe. Vaccine. Elsevier Ltd; 2015;33:5520–5531. pmid:26296499
  7. 7. Moutailler S, Krida G, Schaffner F, Vazeille M, Failloux A-B. Potential Vectors of Rift Valley Fever Virus in the Mediterranean Region. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:749–754. pmid:18620510
  8. 8. Brustolin M, Talavera S, Nuñez A, Santamaría C, Rivas R, Pujol N, et al. Rift Valley fever virus and European mosquitoes: vector competence of Culex pipiens and Stegomyia albopicta (= Aedes albopictus). Med Vet Entomol. 2017;31:365–372. pmid:28782121
  9. 9. WHO. World Animal Health Information Database (WAHIS) Interface. 2013. Available from:
  10. 10. Turell MJ, Linthicum KJ, Patrican LA, Davies FG, Kairo A, Bailey CL. Vector Competence of Selected African Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) Species for Rift Valley Fever Virus. J Med Entomol. 2008;45:102–108. pmid:18283949
  11. 11. Turell MJ, Dohm DJ, Fonseca DM. Comparison of the Potential for Different Genetic Forms in the Culex pipiens Complex in North America to Transmit Rift Valley Fever Virus 1. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2014;30:253–259. pmid:25843130
  12. 12. Brubaker JF, Turell MJ. Effect of environmental temperature on the susceptibility of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) to Rift Valley fever virus. J Med Entomol. England; 1998;35:918–21. Available from:
  13. 13. Chouin-Carneiro T, Vega-Rua A, Vazeille M, Yebakima A, Girod R, Goindin D, et al. Differential Susceptibilities of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from the Americas to Zika Virus. Turell MJ, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004543. pmid:26938868
  14. 14. Sim S, Jupatanakul N, Ramirez JL, Kang S, Romero-Vivas CM, Mohammed H, et al. Transcriptomic Profiling of Diverse Aedes aegypti Strains Reveals Increased Basal-level Immune Activation in Dengue Virus-refractory Populations and Identifies Novel Virus-vector Molecular Interactions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7. pmid:23861987
  15. 15. Lemaitre B, Hoffmann J. The Host Defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:697–743. pmid:17201680
  16. 16. Sim S, Jupatanakul N, Dimopoulos G. Mosquito Immunity against Arboviruses. Viruses. 2014;6:4479–4504. pmid:25415198
  17. 17. Mussabekova A, Daeffler L, Imler J-L. Innate and intrinsic antiviral immunity in Drosophila. Cell Mol Life Sci. Springer International Publishing; 2017;74:2039–2054. pmid:28102430
  18. 18. Dimopoulos G. Insect immunity and its implication in mosquito-malaria interactions. Cell Microbiol. 2003;5:3–14. pmid:12542466
  19. 19. Xi Z, Ramirez JL, Dimopoulos G. The Aedes aegypti Toll Pathway Controls Dengue Virus Infection. Schneider DS, editor. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000098. pmid:18604274
  20. 20. Ramirez JL, Dimopoulos G. The Toll immune signaling pathway control conserved anti-dengue defenses across diverse Ae. aegypti strains and against multiple dengue virus serotypes. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010;34:625–629. pmid:20079370
  21. 21. Sanders HR, Foy BD, Evans AM, Ross LS, Beaty BJ, Olson KE, et al. Sindbis virus induces transport processes and alters expression of innate immunity pathway genes in the midgut of the disease vector, Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;35:1293–1307. pmid:16203210
  22. 22. Angleró-Rodríguez YI, MacLeod HJ, Kang S, Carlson JS, Jupatanakul N, Dimopoulos G. Aedes aegypti Molecular Responses to Zika Virus: Modulation of Infection by the Toll and Jak/Stat Immune Pathways and Virus Host Factors. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1–12. pmid:28197127
  23. 23. Luplertlop N, Surasombatpattana P, Patramool S, Dumas E, Wasinpiyamongkol L, Saune L, et al. Induction of a Peptide with Activity against a Broad Spectrum of Pathogens in the Aedes aegypti Salivary Gland, following Infection with Dengue Virus. Diamond MS, editor. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1001252. pmid:21249175
  24. 24. Olson KE, Blair CD. Arbovirus–mosquito interactions: RNAi pathway. Curr Opin Virol. 2015;15:119–126. pmid:26629932
  25. 25. Vaidyanathan R, Scott TW. Apoptosis in mosquito midgut epithelia associated with West Nile virus infection. Apoptosis. 2006;11:1643–1651. pmid:16820968
  26. 26. Patel RK, Hardy RW. Role for the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Akt-TOR Pathway during Sindbis Virus Replication in Arthropods. J Virol. 2012;86:3595–3604. pmid:22258238
  27. 27. Sánchez-Vargas I, Scott JC, B. Katherine Poole-Smith AWEF, Valérie Barbosa-Solomieu JW, Olson KE, Blair CD. Dengue Virus Type 2 Infections of Aedes aegypti Are Modulated by the Mosquito’s RNA Interference Pathway. 2009;5. pmid:19214215
  28. 28. Campbell CL, Keene KM, Brackney DE, Olson KE, Blair CD, Wilusz J, et al. Aedes aegypti uses RNA interference in defense against Sindbis virus infection. BMC Microbiol. 2008;12:1–12. pmid:18366655
  29. 29. McFarlane M, Arias-Goeta C, Martin E, O’Hara Z, Lulla A, Mousson L, et al. Characterization of Aedes aegypti Innate-Immune Pathways that Limit Chikungunya Virus Replication. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8. pmid:25058001
  30. 30. Brackney DE, Beane JE, Ebel GD. RNAi Targeting of West Nile Virus in Mosquito Midguts Promotes Virus Diversification. Holmes EC, editor. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000502. pmid:19578437
  31. 31. Vodovar N, Bronkhorst AW, van Cleef KWR, Miesen P, Blanc H, van Rij RP, et al. Arbovirus-Derived piRNAs Exhibit a Ping-Pong Signature in Mosquito Cells. Pfeffer S, editor. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30861. pmid:22292064
  32. 32. Barnard BJ, Botha MJ. An inactivated rift valley fever vaccine. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1977;48:45–48. pmid:874947
  33. 33. Drosten C, Göttig S, Schilling S, Asper M, Panning M, Schmitz H, et al. Rapid detection and quantification of RNA of Ebola and Marburg viruses, Lassa virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, Rift Valley fever virus, dengue virus, and yellow fever virus by real-time reverse transcription-PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2323–30. pmid:12089242
  34. 34. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:644–652. pmid:21572440
  35. 35. Trapnell C, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, Goff L, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:46–53. pmid:23222703
  36. 36. Li B, Ruotti V, Stewart RM, Thomson JA, Dewey CN. RNA-Seq gene expression estimation with read mapping uncertainty. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:493–500. pmid:20022975
  37. 37. Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:1494–1512. pmid:23845962
  38. 38. Bryant DM, Johnson K, DiTommaso T, Tickle T, Couger MB, Payzin-Dogru D, et al. A Tissue-Mapped Axolotl De Novo Transcriptome Enables Identification of Limb Regeneration Factors. Cell Rep. 2017;18:762–776. pmid:28099853
  39. 39. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. pmid:2231712
  40. 40. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8:785–786. pmid:21959131
  41. 41. Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323. pmid:21816040
  42. 42. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. pmid:23104886
  43. 43. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. pmid:25516281
  44. 44. Alexa A RJ. TopGO: Enrichment Analysis for Gene Ontology. R package version 2.36.0. 2019;
  45. 45. Kuznetsova I, Lugmayr A, Siira SJ, Rackham O, Filipovska A. CirGO: an alternative circular way of visualising gene ontology terms. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019;20:84. pmid:30777018
  46. 46. Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. REVIGO Summarizes and Visualizes Long Lists of Gene Ontology Terms. Gibas C, editor. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21800. pmid:21789182
  47. 47. Waterhouse RM, Kriventseva E V., Meister S, Xi Z, Alvarez KS, Bartholomay LC, et al. Evolutionary Dynamics of Immune-Related Genes and Pathways in Disease-Vector Mosquitoes. Science. 2007;316:1738–1743. pmid:17588928
  48. 48. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–98.
  49. 49. Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL, et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D279–D285. pmid:26673716
  50. 50. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D158–D169. pmid:27899622
  51. 51. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva E V., Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–3212. pmid:26059717
  52. 52. Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, et al. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:3420–3435. pmid:18445632
  53. 53. Le Sage V, Mouland AJ. Viral subversion of the nuclear pore complex. Viruses. 2013;5:2019–2042. pmid:23959328
  54. 54. Martin E, Palmic N, Sanquer S, Lenoir C, Hauck F, Mongellaz C, et al. CTP synthase 1 deficiency in humans reveals its central role in lymphocyte proliferation. Nature. 2014;510:288–292. pmid:24870241
  55. 55. Xia X, You M, Rao X-J, Yu X-Q. Insect C-type lectins in innate immunity. Dev Comp Immunol. Elsevier Ltd; 2017; pmid:29198776
  56. 56. Cheng G, Cox J, Wang P, Krishnan MN, Dai J, Qian F, et al. A C-Type Lectin Collaborates with a CD45 Phosphatase Homolog to Facilitate West Nile Virus Infection of Mosquitoes. Cell. 2010;142:714–725. pmid:20797779
  57. 57. Liu Y, Zhang F, Liu J, Xiao X, Zhang S, Qin C, et al. Transmission-Blocking Antibodies against Mosquito C-Type Lectins for Dengue Prevention. Diamond MS, editor. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003931. pmid:24550728
  58. 58. Haac ME, Anderson MAE, Eggleston H, Myles KM, Adelman ZN. The hub protein loquacious connects the microRNA and short interfering RNA pathways in mosquitoes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:3688–3700. pmid:25765650
  59. 59. Li J, Hobman TC, Simmonds AJ. Gawky (GW) is the Drosophila melanogaster GW182 Homologue. In: Chan EKL, Fritzler MJ, editors. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2013. pp. 127–145. pmid:21153312
  60. 60. Matias AC, Ramos PC, Jürgen Dohmen R. Chaperone-assisted assembly of the proteasome core particle. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010;38:29–33. pmid:20074030
  61. 61. Choy MM, Sessions OM, Gubler DJ, Ooi EE. Production of Infectious Dengue Virus in Aedes aegypti Is Dependent on the Ubiquitin Proteasome Pathway. Harris E, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004227. pmid:26566123
  62. 62. Buchberger A. From UBA to UBX: new words in the ubiquitin vocabulary. Trends Cell Biol. 2002;12:216–221. pmid:12062168
  63. 63. Shapiro JS, Schmid S, Aguado LC, Sabin LR, Yasunaga A, Shim J V., et al. Drosha as an interferon-independent antiviral factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:7108–7113. pmid:24778219
  64. 64. Zhao L, Alto BW, Smartt CT, Shin D. Transcription Profiling for Defensins of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) during Development and in Response to Infection with Chikungunya and Zika Viruses. J Med Entomol. 2018;55:78–89. pmid:28968775
  65. 65. Zhao L, Alto B, Shin D. Transcriptional Profile of Aedes aegypti Leucine-Rich Repeat Proteins in Response to Zika and Chikungunya Viruses. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:615. pmid:30708982
  66. 66. Cirimotich CM, Dong Y, Garver LS, Sim S, Dimopoulos G. Mosquito immune defenses against Plasmodium infection. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010;34:387–395. pmid:20026176
  67. 67. Dhillon B, Aleithan F, Abdul-Sater Z, Abdul-Sater AA. The Evolving Role of TRAFs in Mediating Inflammatory Responses. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1–8. pmid:30723466
  68. 68. Paradkar PN, Duchemin J-B, Voysey R, Walker PJ. Dicer-2-Dependent Activation of Culex Vago Occurs via the TRAF-Rel2 Signaling Pathway. Olson KE, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2823. pmid:24762775
  69. 69. Gupta I, Singh K, Varshney NK, Khan S. Delineating Crosstalk Mechanisms of the Ubiquitin Proteasome System That Regulate Apoptosis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2018;6:11. pmid:29479529
  70. 70. Mayank AK, Sharma S, Nailwal H, Lal SK. Nucleoprotein of influenza A virus negatively impacts antiapoptotic protein API5 to enhance E2F1-dependent apoptosis and virus replication. Cell Death Dis. Nature Publishing Group; 2015;6:e2018. pmid:26673663
  71. 71. Dietrich I, Jansen S, Fall G, Lorenzen S, Rudolf M, Huber K, et al. RNA Interference Restricts Rift Valley Fever Virus in Multiple Insect Systems. Duprex WP, editor. mSphere. 2017;2:e00090–17. pmid:28497117
  72. 72. Varjak M, Maringer K, Watson M, Sreenu VB, Fredericks AC, Pondeville E, et al. Aedes aegypti Piwi4 Is a Noncanonical PIWI Protein Involved in Antiviral Responses. Duprex WP, editor. mSphere. 2017;2:e00144–17. pmid:28497119
  73. 73. Pakpour N, Camp L, Smithers HM, Wang B, Tu Z, Nadler SA, et al. Protein Kinase C-Dependent Signaling Controls the Midgut Epithelial Barrier to Malaria Parasite Infection in Anopheline Mosquitoes. PLoS One. 2013;8. pmid:24146884
  74. 74. Schmitt S, Ugrankar R, Greene SE, Prajapati M, Lehmann M. Drosophila Lipin interacts with insulin and TOR signaling pathways in the control of growth and lipid metabolism. J Cell Sci. 2015;128:4395–4406. pmid:26490996
  75. 75. Chen TH, Wu YJ, Hou JN, Chiu CH, Chen WJ. The p53 gene with emphasis on its paralogues in mosquitoes. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. Elsevier Taiwan LLC; 2017;50:747–754. pmid:28690024
  76. 76. Popova TG, Turell MJ, Espina V, Kehn-Hall K, Kidd J, Narayanan A, et al. Reverse-Phase Phosphoproteome Analysis of Signaling Pathways Induced by Rift Valley Fever Virus in Human Small Airway Epithelial Cells. Park M-S, editor. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13805. pmid:21072193
  77. 77. Inohara N, Nuez G. ML—A conserved domain involved in innate immunity and lipid metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci. 2002;27:219–221. pmid:12076526
  78. 78. Jupatanakul N, Sim S, Dimopoulos G. Aedes aegypti ML and Niemann-Pick type C family members are agonists of dengue virus infection. Dev Comp Immunol. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;43:1–9. pmid:24135719
  79. 79. Dong Y, Aguilar R, Xi Z, Warr E, Mongin E, Dimopoulos G. Anopheles gambiae Immune Responses to Human and Rodent Plasmodium Parasite Species. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e52. pmid:16789837
  80. 80. Shi X-Z, Zhong X, Yu X-Q. Drosophila melanogaster NPC2 proteins bind bacterial cell wall components and may function in immune signal pathways. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2012;42:545–556. pmid:22580186
  81. 81. Dong Y, Dimopoulos G. Anopheles Fibrinogen-related Proteins Provide Expanded Pattern Recognition Capacity against Bacteria and Malaria Parasites. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:9835–9844. pmid:19193639
  82. 82. Zhang J, Han Q, Song Y, Chen Q, Xia X. Analysis of subcellular prefoldin 1 redistribution during rabies virus infection. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8:1–7. pmid:26421138
  83. 83. Kucerova L, Broz V, Arefin B, Maaroufi HO, Hurychova J, Strnad H, et al. The Drosophila Chitinase-Like Protein IDGF3 Is Involved in Protection against Nematodes and in Wound Healing. J Innate Immun. 2016;8:199–210. pmid:26694862
  84. 84. Varma D, Bülow MH, Pesch Y-Y, Loch G, Hoch M. Forkhead, a new cross regulator of metabolism and innate immunity downstream of TOR in Drosophila. J Insect Physiol. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;69:80–88. pmid:24842780
  85. 85. Luo S, He M, Cao Y, Xia Y. The tetraspanin gene MaPls1 contributes to virulence by affecting germination, appressorial function and enzymes for cuticle degradation in the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium acridum. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:2966–2979. pmid:23809263
  86. 86. Yang C-F, Tu C-H, Lo Y-P, Cheng C-C, Chen W-J. Involvement of Tetraspanin C189 in Cell-to-Cell Spreading of the Dengue Virus in C6/36 Cells. Olson KE, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003885. pmid:26132143
  87. 87. Molina-Cruz A, Gupta L, Richardson J, Bennett K, Black W, Barillas-Mury C. Effect of mosquito midgut trypsin activity on dengue-2 virus infection and dissemination in Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;72:631–637. pmid:15891140
  88. 88. González-Lázaro M, Dinglasan RR, Hernández-Hernández F de la C, Rodríguez MH, Laclaustra M, Jacobs-Lorena M, et al. Anopheles gambiae Croquemort SCRBQ2, expression profile in the mosquito and its potential interaction with the malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;39:395–402. pmid:19366631
  89. 89. Marchler-Bauer A, Bo Y, Han L, He J, Lanczycki CJ, Lu S, et al. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. In: Nucleic Acids Research. 4 Jan 2017 [cited 12 Aug 2019] pp. D200–D203. pmid:27899674
  90. 90. Oda Y, Matsumoto H, Kurakake M, Ochiai M, Ohnishi A, Hayakawa Y. Adaptor protein is essential for insect cytokine signaling in hemocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:15862–15867. pmid:20798052
  91. 91. Hoffmann K. The UBA domain: a SEQUENCE. J Cell Biol. 1996;0004:172–173.
  92. 92. Bergmann A, Steller H. Apoptosis, Stem Cells, and Tissue Regeneration. Sci Signal. 2010;3:re8–re8. pmid:20978240
  93. 93. Choy A, Severo MS, Sun R, Girke T, Gillespie JJ, Pedra JHF. Decoding the Ubiquitin-Mediated Pathway of Arthropod Disease Vectors. PLoS One. 2013;8:1–12. pmid:24205097
  94. 94. Respondek D, Voss M, Kühlewindt I, Klingel K, Krüger E, Beling A. PA28 modulates antigen processing and viral replication during coxsackievirus B3 infection. Gomes A V., editor. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0173259. pmid:28278207
  95. 95. Pujhari S, Brustolin M, Macias VM, Nissly RH, Nomura M, Kuchipudi S V., et al. Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) mediates Zika virus entry, replication, and egress from host cells. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8:8–16. pmid:30866755
  96. 96. Ubol S, Phuklia W, Kalayanarooj S, Modhiran N. Mechanisms of Immune Evasion Induced by a Complex of Dengue Virus and Preexisting Enhancing Antibodies. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:923–935. pmid:20158392
  97. 97. Taguwa S, Maringer K, Li X, Bernal-Rubio D, Rauch JN, Gestwicki JE, et al. Defining Hsp70 Subnetworks in Dengue Virus Replication Reveals Key Vulnerability in Flavivirus Infection. Cell. 2015;163:1108–1123. pmid:26582131
  98. 98. Das S, Laxminarayana SV, Chandra N, Ravi V, Desai A. Heat shock protein 70 on Neuro2a cells is a putative receptor for Japanese encephalitis virus. Virology. 2009;385:47–57. pmid:19068261
  99. 99. Markovic MP, Kylsten P, Dushay MS. Drosophila lamin mutations cause melanotic mass formation and lamellocyte differentiation. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:3245–3250. pmid:19716177
  100. 100. Paradkar PN, Duchemin JB, Rodriguez-Andres J, Trinidad L, Walker PJ. Cullin4 Is Pro-Viral during West Nile Virus Infection of Culex Mosquitoes. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:1–21. pmid:26325027
  101. 101. Bergmann A. The role of ubiquitylation for the control of cell death in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:61–67. pmid:19498442
  102. 102. Wiermer M, Germain H, Cheng YT, García A V., Parker JE, Li X. Nucleoporin MOS7/Nup88 contributes to plant immunity and nuclear accumulation of defense regulators. Nucleus. 2010;1:332–336. pmid:21327081
  103. 103. Etebari K, Hegde S, Saldaña MA, Widen SG, Wood TG, Asgari S, et al. Global Transcriptome Analysis of Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes in Response to Zika Virus Infection. Fernandez-Sesma A, editor. mSphere. 2017;2:1648–1659. pmid:29202041
  104. 104. Chauhan C, Behura SK, DeBruyn B, Lovin DD, Harker BW, Gomez-Machorro C, et al. Comparative Expression Profiles of Midgut Genes in Dengue Virus Refractory and Susceptible Aedes aegypti across Critical Period for Virus Infection. Dimopoulos G, editor. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47350. pmid:23077596
  105. 105. Vedururu R kiran , Neave MJ, Tachedjian M, Klein MJ, Gorry PR, Duchemin J-B, et al. RNASeq Analysis of Aedes albopictus Mosquito Midguts after Chikungunya Virus Infection. Viruses. 2019;11:513. pmid:31167461
  106. 106. Schnettler E, Donald CL, Human S, Watson M, Siu RWC, McFarlane M, et al. Knockdown of piRNA pathway proteins results in enhanced Semliki Forest virus production in mosquito cells. J Gen Virol. 2013;94:1680–1689. pmid:23559478
  107. 107. Dietrich I, Shi X, McFarlane M, Watson M, Blomström A-L, Skelton JK, et al. The Antiviral RNAi Response in Vector and Non-vector Cells against Orthobunyaviruses. Bausch DG, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005272. pmid:28060823
  108. 108. Deddouche S, Matt N, Budd A, Mueller S, Kemp C, Galiana-Arnoux D, et al. The DExD/H-box helicase Dicer-2 mediates the induction of antiviral activity in drosophila. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:1425–1432. pmid:18953338
  109. 109. Hedil M, Kormelink R. Viral RNA Silencing Suppression: The Enigma of Bunyavirus NSs Proteins. Viruses. 2016;8:208. pmid:27455310
  110. 110. Souza-Neto JA, Sim S, Dimopoulos G. An evolutionary conserved function of the JAK-STAT pathway in anti-dengue defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17841–6. pmid:19805194
  111. 111. Paradkar PN, Trinidad L, Voysey R, Duchemin J-B, Walker PJ. Secreted Vago restricts West Nile virus infection in Culex mosquito cells by activating the Jak-STAT pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:18915–18920. pmid:23027947
  112. 112. Pinkham C, Dahal B, de la Fuente CL, Bracci N, Beitzel B, Lindquist M, et al. Alterations in the host transcriptome in vitro following Rift Valley fever virus infection. Sci Rep. Springer US; 2017;7:14385. pmid:29085037
  113. 113. Lee W-S, Webster JA, Madzokere ET, Stephenson EB, Herrero LJ. Mosquito antiviral defense mechanisms: a delicate balance between innate immunity and persistent viral infection. Parasit Vectors. BioMed Central; 2019;12:165. pmid:30975197
  114. 114. Mayer S, Raulf M-K, Lepenies B. C-type lectins: their network and roles in pathogen recognition and immunity. Histochem Cell Biol. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017;147:223–237. pmid:27999992
  115. 115. Clem RJ. Arboviruses and apoptosis: the role of cell death in determining vector competence. J Gen Virol. 2016;97:1033–1036. pmid:26872460
  116. 116. Girard YA, Schneider BS, McGee CE, Wen J, Han VC, Popov V, et al. Salivary gland morphology and virus transmission during long-term cytopathologic west nile virus infection in Culex mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. n76:118–128. 76/1/118 [pii] pmid:17255239