Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Vector competence and feeding-excretion behavior of Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) infected with Trypanosoma cruzi TcVI

  • Thaiane Verly,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Stephanie Costa,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Nathanielly Lima,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Vigilância Entomológica em Diptera e Hemiptera, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Jacenir Mallet,

    Roles Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Vigilância Entomológica em Diptera e Hemiptera, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Universidade Iguaçu - UNIG, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Francisco Odêncio,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Ultraestrutura Celular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Mirian Pereira,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Ultraestrutura Celular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Carlos José de Carvalho Moreira,

    Roles Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Constança Britto ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Constança Britto, Márcio G. Pavan

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Márcio G. Pavan

    Contributed equally to this work with: Constança Britto, Márcio G. Pavan

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    mgpavan@ioc.fiocruz.br

    Affiliation Laboratório de Mosquitos Transmissores de Hematozoários, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Background

Several studies addressed changes on the insect vector behavior due to parasite infection, but little is known for triatomine bugs, vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiological agent of Chagas disease. We assessed infection rates and metacyclogenesis of T. cruzi (TcVI) in fifth-instar nymphs of Triatoma rubrovaria comparing with the primary vector Triatoma infestans. Also, biological parameters related to feeding-excretion behavior were evaluated aiming to identify which variables are most influenced by T. cruzi infection.

Methodology/principal findings

Fifth-instar nymphs of T. rubrovaria and T. infestans were fed on mice infected with T. cruzi (TcVI). We compared the presence and the number of parasite evolutive forms in excreta of both triatomine species at 30, 60 and 90 days post-infection (dpi) with traditional statistical analyses. Moreover, both species were analyzed through generalized linear models and multinomial logistic regression hypotheses for seven behavioral parameters related to host-seeking and feeding-excretion. Triatoma rubrovaria and T. infestans had similar overall infection and metacyclogenesis rates of T. cruzi TcVI in laboratory conditions. Regarding vector behavior, we confirmed that the triatomine’s tendency is to move away from the bite region after a blood meal, probably to avoid being noticed by the vertebrate host. Interspecific differences were observed on the volume of blood ingested and on the proportion of individuals that excreted after the blood meal, revealing the higher feeding efficiency and dejection rates of T. infestans. The amount of ingested blood and the bite behavior of T. rubrovaria seems to be influenced by TcVI infection. Infected specimens tended to ingest ~25% more blood and to bite more the head of the host. Noteworthy, in two occasions, kleptohematophagy and coprophagy behaviors were also observed in T. rubrovaria.

Conclusions/significance

Laboratory infections revealed similar rate of T. cruzi TcVI trypomatigotes in excreta of T. rubrovaria and T. infestans, one of the most epidemiological important vectors of T. cruzi. Therefore, TcVI DTU was able to complete its life cycle in T. rubrovaria under laboratory conditions, and this infection changed the feeding behavior of T. rubrovaria. Considering these results, T. rubrovaria must be kept under constant entomological surveillance in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Author summary

Chagas disease is caused by the etiological agent Trypanosoma cruzi and is mainly transmitted through the excreta of triatomine vectors. It is endemic in Latin America and the Caribbean, affecting ~8 million people. Control programs are based on the elimination of domestic vectors through insecticide-spraying indoors, since there is no vaccine or efficient treatment for chronic patients. However, this strategy is not sustainable where native triatomine species are capable of colonizing peridomestic structures and reinvading human dwellings. Since the ‘virtual’ elimination of Triatoma infestans in Brazil (residual foci remain in Rio Grande do Sul and Bahia), specimens of the native Triatoma rubrovaria have been constantly collected inside human dwellings and peridomiciliary ecotopes in Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, which might represent a real risk for human infections. Here we analyzed a unique and large dataset through classical and modern statistical methods to evaluate T. cruzi infection in T. rubrovaria and to identify host-seeking, and also feeding/excretion behavioral traits that could be influenced by the parasite. Our results indicated that the parasite infection caused changes in T. rubrovaria feeding behavior that could increase T. cruzi TcVI transmission. Moreover, this vector species had similar infection rate to one of the main important Chagas disease vectors in South America, T. infestans. Therefore, T. rubrovaria must be kept under constant entomological surveillance in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Introduction

Vector-borne diseases represent nearly 17% of all known infectious diseases and are responsible for ~700,000 deaths annually [1]. Bloodsucking insects play the main role as pathogen transmitters (through their saliva or excreta) to humans. The incidence of a vector-borne disease is determined by several factors, including the density of primary vectors, efficient parasite replication and infectivity in vertebrate and invertebrate hosts, and the presence of susceptible hosts [2, 3].

The dispersion of parasites depends on the behavior of their arthropod vectors [4]. Pathogens can impose a fitness cost in life-history traits of vectors, which can influence parasite transmission [5, 6]. Most of the literature focuses on the costs of parasitism for mosquitoes (e.g. [7, 8]), and very little is known for triatomine bugs (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae), the etiological agent of Chagas disease (ChD).

ChD affects ~8 million people worldwide and is endemic in Latin America and the Caribbean [1]. Most patients during the acute phase are successful in treatment with trypanocidal compounds, but the treatment of chronic cases only reduces parasitic burden and does not prevent cardiac complications [9]. Therefore, control programs are based on the elimination of domestic vectors through insecticide-spraying indoors [10]. When entomological surveillance ceases, native vectors re-invade dwellings, which might cause a re-emergence of the transmission [11, 12].

The ‘virtual’ elimination of the primary vector Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1834) in Brazil (there are only residual foci in Bahia and the northwest of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) largely reduced the incidence and disease burden [12]. However, specimens of the native Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) have constantly been collected inside human dwellings and peridomiciliary ecotopes in southern Brazil [13, 14]. Moreover, this species (i) has eclectic blood-feeding habitats, being capable of feeding on humans [15]; (ii) was already collected naturally-infected with T. cruzi [16]; (iii) excretes trypomastigotes (the infective form of Trypanosoma cruzi to humans) in laboratory conditions [17]; and also (iv) has bionomic characteristics that may be favorable to acquire the infection and to transmit the parasite to humans [18].

Trypanosoma cruzi is transmitted primarily through the urine/feces (excreta) of infected triatomines [19]. Therefore, host-seeking and probing, and feeding/excretion behaviors are some of the key parameters to determine their vectorial capacity [20]. Recent data show that this parasite causes negative impacts on vector fitness [21], such as impairing fertility, development and survival [2226]. However, behavioral phenotypes of infected triatomines can be discrepant, with an increase in the locomotor activity of Triatoma pallidipennis [27] or a reduction in the activity of Rhodnius prolixus [4]. Considering feeding/excretion behavior, it seems that T. cruzi infection does not influence the amount of blood ingested by R. prolixus or the period of time between blood feeding and excretion [28], but it does for T. infestans [29]. Indeed, the impact of T. cruzi infection on the phenotype of insect behavior is understudied, requiring further attention [5].

Changes on vector behavior due to parasite infection may contribute to a better understanding of pathogen transmission dynamics. This study evaluates the infection rate and also the rate of metacyclogenesis of T. cruzi VI (isolated from field-collected T. infestans) in fifth-instar nymphs of T. rubrovaria specimens, comparing with the primary vector T. infestans. Moreover, it accesses the influence of T. cruzi infection on vector behavior parameters related to host-seeking and feeding-excretion.

Methods

Parasite culture

The Trypanosoma cruzi CL strain (TcVI) used in this study has derived from the excreta of a field-collected T. infestans from Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, and was cultivated in Liver-Infusion Tryptose (LIT) medium, containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 28°C [30]. Briefly, metacyclic trypomastigotes, harvested from LIT culture at the stationary phase, were used to infect Vero cells. Trypomastigote forms released from T. cruzi-infected Vero cells at four days post-infection (dpi) were used to infect Swiss Webster mice.

Experimental hosts

Male Swiss Webster mice (18 to 20 g), provided by the Institute of Science and Technology in Bio-Models (ICTB/Fiocruz), were maintained in cages (19.56 x 30.91 x 13.34 cm, with four animals/cage) under controlled humidity and temperature (55% ± 5% and 22 ± 1°C, respectively) and light-dark cycles (12:12 h), with no food restriction. The animals were intraperitoneally infected with tissue-derived trypomastigotes CL strain (1x104 parasites/0.1 mL NaCl 0.9%). The parasitemia was daily evaluated after 4 dpi through the Pizzi-Brener method [31]. When reaching parasitemia levels of 1 x 105 parasites/mL, the animals were used to feed fifth-instar T. rubrovaria and T. infestans specimens.

T. rubrovaria and T. infestans feeding and infection

Recently-merged fifth-instar nymphs of laboratory-colony reared T. rubrovaria (F3 generation) and T. infestans (F20 generation) were obtained from the Laboratório Nacional e Internacional de Referência em Taxonomia de Triatomíneos, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Fiocruz, and maintained under controlled temperature and relative humidity (RH) conditions, at 26 ± 2°C and 70%, respectively. We chose this developmental stage due to low mortality rate [32], high feeding efficiency [33, 34] and easy handling. For the sake of comparison of infection and behavioral parameters obtained for T. rubrovaria, the primary vector T. infestans was included in the analysis, due to its high capacity for T. cruzi infection and transmission (positive control). As a negative control, we used non-infected T. rubrovaria specimens. Non-infected T. infestans with TcVI was not included in the analysis, since its bionomy and behavior are well established in the literature (cf. [5] and references there in [29]).

Ten days after molting to the 5th instar, insects were fed on anaesthetized Swiss Webster mice (combined ketamine hydrochloride 100 mg/kg and xylazine chloridrate 10 mg/kg), infected or not with T. cruzi CL strain (TcVI). Thirty days post-infection (30 dpi), starved triatomines exposed or not to TcVI were fed again on non-infected anaesthetized mice for behavioral analysis. For each experimental round, a single Swiss Webster mouse was laterally positioned in the presence of five triatomines in a rounded plastic container (12 cm diameter x 4 cm high) covered on the bottom with paper towels. Triatomine nymphs were centered in front of the Swiss Webster mouse’s abdomen 7 cm apart, and the blood source was offered for 30 minutes, including the adaptation time of the triatomine to the environment (i.e. the first 10-min period inside the container to recognize the host and start the blood meal, with no separation between the insects and the host). Specimens were replaced when not feeding after this period; notwithstanding, some experimental groups had less than five triatomines feeding on the mouse. The experiment was performed twice, under low artificial and indirect illumination at zeitgeber-time (ZT) 11, which corresponds to near the dusk, the peak of activity of triatomines for foraging [35]. The non-infective blood source was offered again at 60 and 90 dpi. One-hundred and twenty-seven T. rubrovaria specimens were used in behavioral analyses, which 58 were infected with T. cruzi (N1 = 25 and N2 = 33 for the first and second experiments, respectively) and 69 were not infected (N1 = 40 and N2 = 29), besides the 52 T. cruzi-infected T. infestans (N1 = 25 and N2 = 27).

Survived mice were euthanized after the experiments by peritoneal injection of ketamine hydrochloride (300 mg/kg) and xylazine chloridrate (30 mg/kg) in a final volume of 0.5 mL. Dead animals were frozen in a biological discard bag and sterilized at 121°C for 20 min for final disposal.

Ethics statement

All animal procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA) of Institute Oswaldo Cruz (IOC)/ Fiocruz (Licenses L015/17, LW-28/15 and L028/18).

Detection of TcVI-infected T. rubrovaria and T. infestans

Non-infected (T. rubrovaria) and infected (T. infestans, as a positive control, and T. rubrovaria) groups were blood-fed at 30, 60 and 90 dpi. Triatomines’ excreta were individually-collected after blood feeding and spontaneous dejection in up to 4h. Twenty microliters of the excreta were then diluted in 100 μL of 1x phosphate-buffered saline solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) for parasite counting in Neubauer chamber, using optical microscope Primo Star (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with a 400-X magnification. The morphological classification of T. cruzi evolutive forms as epimastigotes or trypomastigotes was based on cell shape, size, width, and motility (cf. [36] for further details). We defined as “transitory” all parasites that did not morphologically fit as either forms (sensu [37]). In the case of dubious morphology, we changed to a 1000-X magnification and classified according to the position of the kinetoplast in relation to the cell´s nucleus and by the emergence of the flagellum [36], whenever these structures were visible. In total, we analyzed the T. cruzi infection of 24 T. rubrovaria and 27 T. infestans specimens.

Behavioral parameters

Specimens of negative control and TcVI-infected triatomine groups were analyzed individually at 30 dpi for the following parameters: (i) feeding time (min), which is the period between the first insertion of the proboscis into the mouse skin and its final removal (i.e. when insect moves away from the bite site); (ii) excretion time (up to 10 min) after feeding (min); (iii) excreta distance from the bite site (cm); (iv) volume of ingested blood (μL); (v) feeding efficiency (volume of ingested blood / feeding time; μL/min); (vi) excretion efficiency (feeding time / excreta distance; min/cm); and (vii) bite site on Swiss-mouse (head, dorse, tail, abdomen and legs). The amount of ingested blood was calculated through weighing specimens before and after the blood meal on a five-digit precision scale (AY220 model, Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Kyoto, Japan) and converted to volume with a proportion of 1mg of additional weight after blood feeding ~ 1μL blood, since the mass of mouse blood is nearly equal to distilled water [38]. We also compared the proportion of individuals that excreted during the experiment between species (T. rubrovaria and T. infestans), with their status of infection (infected and non-infected), and also with the number of feeding attempts. We have considered a single attempt event when the vector inserted the proboscis into the mouse skin and then removed and walked away from the bite site.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted in R environment [39] with proper packages. Infection and behavior data were not normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk tests, p < 0.001) and, therefore, we used statistical tests that do not assume this probability distribution. The experimental replicates were not significantly different (non-significative Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson's Chi-squared Test for Count Data) and, therefore, were analyzed together.

Infection.

Infections of T. rubrovaria and T. infestans with T. cruzi TcVI were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. For each species, the presence/absence of infected triatomines at 30, 60 and 90 dpi, as well as the presence of trypomastigote, epimastigote and transitory T. cruzi forms in triatomine-infected excreta, were treated as dummy variables with binary data (qualitative analyses). Pairwise comparisons between T. infestans and T. rubrovaria were performed with Pearson's Chi-squared Test for Count Data (X2), including overall infection (i.e. regardless dpi and T. cruzi forms), and differences in the proportion of specimens with distinct parasite forms at the three dpi parameters analyzed.

Parasitic loads (quantitative analyses) were compared with the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis (H) test, followed by Dunn’s multiple tests between 30, 60 and 90 dpi. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney W-test was also used to compare the parasite loads in T. rubrovaria and T. infestans for each timepoint. The Wilcoxon effect size of comparisons (r) was calculated with Rosenthal's formula [40]. The r value varies from 0 to 1, which 0–0.14 is considered as a small effect, 0.15–0.29 as moderate and 0.30 or higher as a large effect. Significance level was adjusted for multiple comparisons with the false discovery rate (FDR) method [41].

Generalized linear models (GLMs) with binomial distribution were performed with the “GGally” package [42] to identify significant effects of species and dpi (independent variables or predictors) on the presence of each of the different T. cruzi forms (dependent variable). The redundancy between predictor variables was accessed through the computation of the variance inflation factor (VIF) with the “car” package [43]. This factor measures how much the variance of a regression coefficient is inflated due to multicollinearity among predictors. Multicollinearity problems consist of including, in the same model, variables with similar predictive relationships with the outcome. VIF values are integer and always positive, and VIF < 5 represents absence of multicollinearity [44, 45]. Therefore, predictors with VIF > 5 were excluded from the analysis, as they would represent redundancy and may compromise model accuracy [44, 46]. Model selection was done through the calculation of second order Akaike’s information criterion scores (AICc) with the logit link function in the “AICcmodavg v.2.2” package [47]. Models were ranked and then compared with delta AICc (ΔAICc), for which ΔAICc > 2 indicated a clear model choice. Moreover, we calculated AICc model weights (Wt), which can be interpreted as the relative likelihood of a model, where Wt near 1.0 means most likely [48]. The strength of the association between each independent variable was expressed by the Odds Ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Behavior.

The proportion of individuals that excreted during behavioral experiments was compared between species (T. rubrovaria and T. infestans) and infection status (infected and non-infected T. rubrovaria) through Pearson's Chi-squared Test for Count Data (X2). The same statistical method was used to compare the number of feeding attempts. Pairwise comparisons were performed with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney W-tests to analyze six behavioral parameters (i to vi, see Behavioral parameters section). Two different tests were performed: W1 –infected T. rubrovaria vs. infected T. infestans, to infer possible species differences; and W2 –non-infected and infected T. rubrovaria, to observe if T. cruzi TcVI infection altered any feeding-excretion parameter of this vector. Significance level was adjusted for multiple comparisons with the FDR method [41]. Also, we used the same statistical method to infer if the ingested blood volume was different for specimens that excreted and not excreted after the blood meal.

Generalized linear models (GLMs) assuming Gamma distribution were performed with the “GGally” package [42]. We tested the influence of the variables "species" (T. rubrovaria or T. infestans) and "infection" (infected or non-infected) on each estimated behavioral parameter (cf. Behavioral parameters section), which resulted in GLMs with seven different dependent variables. Moreover, behavioral traits were also included as independent variables in GLMs to test their effects on dependent variables (Table 1). Only behavioral traits that occurred before or during the dependent variable were included in the analyses as independent variables to avoid spurious associations between traits. For example, feeding time could explain the dependent variable blood volume as they occurred at the same time, but excreta distance could not explain the dependent variable "ingested blood volume", since the former variable is measured after the blood ingestion. All predictors were evaluated for multicollinearity through VIF, calculated with the “car” package [43]. Only non-redundant variables were maintained for model selection using second-order Akaike’s information criterion scores (AICc), as described above. Models were ranked and compared with ΔAICc and Wt. The strength of each parameter tested was expressed by the Odds Ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

thumbnail
Table 1. Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) with Gamma distribution tested with different behavioral traits as dependent variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.t001

The bite site on Swiss mouse of negative control (non-infected T. rubrovaria), tested (infected-T. rubrovaria) and positive control (infected T. infestans) groups were computed as categorical variables divided in five groups: head, tail, legs, dorse and abdomen. Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) was performed with the “nnet” package [49] to estimate the impact of predictor variables (bite sites) on infected and non-infected conditions. The significance of the regression coefficients was accessed after 2-tailed z-tests.

Results

T. cruzi infection

Infection results revealed that both triatomine species had similar rates of T. cruzi TcVI infection, irrespective of the dpi or parasite form (X2 = 3.5 x 10−31, df = 1, p > 0.05). Twenty out of the 24 T. rubrovaria specimens fed on infected mice have excreted the parasite (83.3%), as well as 22 out of the 27 T. infestans (81.5%). The number of infected triatomines and the parasite load in the excreta were similar between species when trypomastigote and transitory forms of T. cruzi TcVI were considered (trypomastigote forms: X2 = 0.09, p = 0.77, and W = 0.03, p = 0.86; transitory forms: X2 = 3.27, p = 0.051, and W = 3.08, p = 0.054). However, the number of insects with metacyclic trypomastigotes increased in later days post infection, regardless the vector species (GLM: Trypomastigote ~ dpi, AICc = -91.57, with 72% probability of being the best model; S1 Table). The increasing number of trypomastigotes in infected excreta had strong positive association with time at 60 and 90 dpi (OR = 4.73 and 9.73, respectively; Table 2). The highest loads of metacyclic trypomastigote forms in triatomines' excreta were also found at these time points (H = 18.66, p < 0.0001; Dunn’s post-hoc 30-60dpi with p = 0.021 and 30-90dpi with p < 0.0001; Fig 1A).

thumbnail
Fig 1.

T. cruzi TcVI metacyclic trypomastigote (A) and epimastigote (B) loads in the excreta of T. rubrovaria and T. infestans. The number of infected and the total number of specimens analyzed for each condition are shown above each dotplot column. Different lowercase letters on the top indicate statistically significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis-test; A: p (a and b) < 0.05; Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney W-tests B: p (a and b) = 0.002 and p (c and d) = 0.02). dpi = days post infection.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.g001

thumbnail
Table 2. Generalized linear model for the presence of metacyclic trypomastigote forms of T. cruzi TcVI in the excreta of T. rubrovaria and T. infestans at different days post infection (dpi).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.t002

Regarding the epimastigote forms, even though the GLM did not indicate differences between species or dpi for excreta infection rate (S2 Table), the amount of T. cruzi TcVI parasites in T. infestans excreta was higher than observed in T. rubrovaria at 30 and 60 dpi (W = 173 and 106, r = 0.56 and 0.41, with p = 0.002 and p = 0.02, respectively) (Fig 1B).

Vector behavior

Pairwise comparisons.

The weight of specimens before the experiments had non-significant differences when infection status (non-infected and infected T. rubrovaria) and species (T. rubrovaria and T. infestans) were compared (W-rank sum tests, p > 0.1). Therefore, there was no need to normalize the ingested blood volume data (median ± standard error 84.0±24.2, 102.5±14.7 and 109±16.39 mg, for non-infected and infected T. rubrovaria and infected T. infestans, respectively).

The number of T. infestans individuals that excreted during behavioral experiments were proportionally higher than observed for T. rubrovaria nymphs (34/49 = 69.4% and 43/114 = 37.7%, respectively; X2 = 12.55, df = 1, p < 0.001). The infection status did not influence on the proportion of T. rubrovaria individuals that excreted up to 10-min after blood ingestion (24/58 = 41.4% and 19/56 = 33.9% for non-infected and infected specimens, respectively; X2 = 0.39, df = 1, p = 0.53). For T. cruzi-infected T. infestans and non-infected T. rubrovaria, there was no difference in the amount of blood ingested between individuals of the same species who excreted or not after the blood meal (W = 304.5, p = 0.29 and W = 332.5, p = 0.24); however, T. cruzi- infected T. rubrovaria individuals that have excreted after the blood meal ingested more blood than those that have not excreted (W = 133, p < 0.001; Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Ingested blood volume and excretion status (0: Not excreted, 1: Excreted) of non-infected T. rubrovaria (NINF), and infected- T. rubrovaria (INF) and T. infestans (INF).

The number of samples analyzed for each condition is shown above each dotplot column. Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney W-test < 0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.g002

The number of feeding attempts was non-significant when species (X2 = 2.49, df = 1, p = 0.11) or infection status (X2 = 4.25, df = 2, p = 0.12) was compared, since the great majority of nymphs made a single attempt to feed on the blood of Swiss-mice (98.3%, 89.9% and 92.3% for non-infected and infected T. rubrovaria, and infected-T. infestans, respectively). The six feeding-excretion parameters were contrasted to assess possible behavioral differences between T. rubrovaria and T. infestans and to define what behavior aspects changed due to T. cruzi TcVI infection in T. rubrovaria (Table 3). Infected and non-infected T. rubrovaria, and also infected T. infestans had similar feeding time (median 95% CI: 15-28 min; W-tests, p > 0.05), excreted at a similar period after blood feeding (median 95% CI: 1-13 min; W-tests, p > 0.05) and at a similar distance from the bite (median 95% CI: 1-6cm; W-tests, p > 0.05), resulting in similar excretion efficiency (median 95% CI: 0.3–8.8 min/cm). Two behavioral parameters were different for the two triatomine species (Table 3 and Fig 3). Infected-T. infestans specimens ingested more blood than infected-T. rubrovaria (median 95% CIs: 239.4–301.3 μL and 113.8–198.8 μL, respectively; W = 733.5, p < 0.0001), and thus had higher feeding efficiency (median 95% CIs: 12.8–18.8 μL/min and 3.9–9.8 μL/min, respectively; W = 595, p < 0.0001). Although the median of feeding efficiency for infected-T. rubrovaria was slightly higher than for non-infected T. rubrovaria (6.8 against 4.7 μL/min), this difference was not statistically significant (W = 1388, p = 0.18). Interestingly, the ingestion of blood seemed to be influenced by T. cruzi TcVI infection, with higher ingestion of blood for T. cruzi-infected than for non-infected T. rubrovaria specimens (median 95% CIs: 113.8–198.8 μL and 75.0–105.3 μL, respectively; W = 1208, p = 0.016).

thumbnail
Fig 3.

Feeding parameters of non-infected T. rubrovaria (NINF), and infected T. rubrovaria (INF) and T. infestans (INF)–ingested blood volume (A) and feeding efficiency (B). The number of samples analyzed for each condition is shown above each dotplot column. Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney W-test; A: p (ab) < 0.05, p (bc and ac) < 0.0001; B: p (ab) < 0.0001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.g003

thumbnail
Table 3. Summary statistics and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney (W) tests between T. cruzi TcVI non-infected and infected T. rubrovaria, and infected-T. infestans.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.t003

Generalized linear models.

We fitted 96 GLMs to evaluate which feeding-excretion variables better explain the observed behavior phenotypes of T. infestans and T. rubrovaria (S3 Table). Three to four different models were comparable (ΔAICc < 2; cumulative Wt = 0.53–0.91) to explain most of the dependent variables, with the exception of “excretion efficiency”, in which two models were chosen (“species + blood volume” and “species” only, as independent variables; ΔAICc = 0.62; cumulative Wt = 0.53) and “feeding efficiency”, for which a single model was selected (“species + excreta distance” as independent variables; ΔAICc = 2.33, when compared to the second best model; Wt = 0.73). Hence, for the sake of clarity, we decided to show only GLM results for the model with the highest relative likelihood (Wt).

The response variable “feeding time” could be explained by three different GLMs using as explanatory variables “species”, “infection” and “ingested blood volume”; however, none of the GLM coefficients were statistically significant (p > 0.05). When the dependent variable “excretion time” was analyzed, the independent variable “excreta distance” appeared in three out of the four GLMs with higher Wt (S3 Table) and was positively correlated (GLM coefficient 95% CI: 0.03, 0.21; p = 0.009) with mild causal influence (OR = 1.13; Table 4 and Fig 4). The opposite was also observed, with a significant correlation between the independent variable “excretion time” and the dependent variable “excreta distance” (GLM coefficient 95% CI: -0.02, -0.002; p = 0.017). However, since the GLM coefficient was near zero (i.e. between -0.1 and 0.1), there was no apparent causal influence on the dependent variable (OR = 0.99).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Model-averaged coefficients (± 95% CI) of the independent variables (white dots) and the intercepts (black dots) of generalized linear models.

Excretion time after a blood meal (A), excreta distance from the bite (B), ingested blood volume (C), feeding efficiency (D) and excretion efficiency (E). Dashed line shows y-axis = 0. Colon marks between variable names mean “interacting with”.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.g004

thumbnail
Table 4. Behavioral parameter results of the best generalized linear models with different dependent variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.t004

Triatoma rubrovaria ingested less blood than T. infestans (GLM coefficient 95% CI: -0.83, -0.19; p = 0.001; OR = 0.59) and, consequently, had lower efficiency on blood feeding (GLM coefficient 95% CI: -1.04, -0.23; p = 0.002; OR = 0.52), besides having lower efficiency on excretion (GLM coefficient 95% CI: -1.23, -0.05; p = 0.037; OR = 0.53). Indeed, a negative impact of “species” (T. rubrovaria) on “excretion time” was observed (OR = 0.71), but GLM coefficient was not significant (95% CI: -0.85, 0.17; p = 0.194).

A positive impact of T. rubrovaria infection on blood volume was observed (OR = 1.20), which would mean that infected specimens of this species ingested more blood than non-infected ones. It is noteworthy, however, that the GLM coefficient was also not significant (95% CI: -0.12, 0.49, p = 0.238).

Multinomial logistic regression.

Non-infected T. rubrovaria (N = 58) bit more frequent in the mice’s abdomen (31.6%), followed by the head (23.5%) and the dorse (18.4%). Infected-T. rubrovaria (N = 69) had a different behavior, biting more the head (36.4%) than the dorse (30.1%) or the abdomen (17.6%) (Fig 5).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Radar chart exhibiting the percentage of bites of non-infected (NINF) and infected (INF) T. rubrovaria on different parts of mice’s body (head, dorse, tail, abdomen and legs).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.g005

The variables “species” and “infection” were tested in four different MLR models aiming to explain the dependent variable “bite site” (S4 Table). The best model considered only infection as an important predictor (MLR: bite site ~ infection; ΔAIC = 5.93 when compared to the second model; Wt = 90%). A strong and positive association was observed between T. cruzi infection and triatomine behavior of biting the head (OR = 2.94) and the dorse (OR = 2.80), but only the former was considered statistically significant in the model (MLR coefficient 1.08 ± 0.55, p = 0.03; Table 5). These results suggest that the bite behavior of T. rubrovaria specimens changed due to T. cruzi TcVI infection. Noteworthy, in two occasions, kleptohematophagy (an unfed individual ingesting 100.2 uL of blood and possibly hemolymph from another mouse-fed individual) and coprophagy behaviors (S1 Fig) were observed in T. rubrovaria fifth-instar nymphs.

thumbnail
Table 5. Parameter coefficients for multinomial logistic regression of bite sites.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.t005

Discussion

The Brazilian triatomine vector control campaign (1983–1988) and the successful Southern Cone Initiative involving other countries of South America (1991–2000) aimed the eradication of T. infestans through mapping and insecticide-spraying infested peridomiciles and dwellings [50, 51]. In southern Brazil, these strategies coupled with community-based vigilance achieved a sharp decline on domestic populations of this species, but also followed by an increase capture of T. rubrovaria nymphs and adults in anthropic ecotopes, suggesting that this species in fact begun to establish peridomestic and domestic populations only after the reduction of T. infestans populations [13, 14].

In this study, we aimed to evaluate some parameters related to vector competence of T. rubrovaria and to identify behavioral traits that could be influenced by T. cruzi infection. The results were compared with T. infestans, one of the primary vectors of T. cruzi in the Southern Cone of South America [52]. Trypanosoma cruzi infection (TcVI isolated from T. infestans in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) and metacyclogenesis rates, and also feeding-excretion parameters were evaluated in fifth-instar nymphs. We found compelling evidence that T. infestans and T. rubrovaria had similar T. cruzi infection rates, and also non-significant differences in most feeding-dejection parameters (feeding time, excretion time after blood meal, excreta distance from bite wound and, thus, excretion efficiency). Specimens of T. infestans, however, ingested more than twice the amount of blood that did T. rubrovaria, thus confirming higher feeding efficiency, as well as higher excretion rates after a blood meal. Our findings also suggested that T. rubrovaria individuals infected with T. cruzi TcVI ingested more blood than non-infected conspecifics (~25%) and also changed their biting behavior.

Metacyclogenesis is an T. cruzi adaptive differentiation due to nutritional and oxidative stress in the triatomine gut [53]. Therefore, it is unsurprising that vectors and parasites circulating at a same biotope may have a better interaction due to coevolution [54], including higher metacyclogenesis rates [55]. For triatomines and T. cruzi, this coevolution would result in successful infections and transmission cycles (i.e. presence of trypomastigote forms in insects’ excreta). Experimental infections of Mepraia pallidipennis from Morelos, Mexico, with two different strains of TcI–one from Morelos and another from Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico, revealed that the parasite from the different geographic area (Chilpancingo) caused more debilitating effects on the vector, such as affecting their size and causing high parasitemia and low survival rate [24], thus evidencing possible role of genotype-by-genotype interactions [54] on triatomine populations and T. cruzi strains of the same geographical area. Hence, here we used a parasite (CL strain, TcVI) isolated from the excreta of field-captured T. infestans in Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, same location where T. infestans and T. rubrovaria were collected, to ensure that the outcomes observed here were not caused by genotype impairments between vector population and parasite strain.

In this work, laboratory-infections of these species with T. cruzi TcVI revealed non-significant interspecific differences on the number of infected triatomines or on the parasite load in the excreta when trypomastigote and transitory forms were considered (Fig 1A). The number of triatomines with metacyclic trypomastigotes was significantly higher, as well as trypomastigote loads in the excreta in later days post infection (60 and 90 dpi), regardless the vector species (Table 2 and Fig 1). Therefore, our results warn about the great potential of T. rubrovaria to transmit T. cruzi TcVI. Interspecific differences were observed in Bolivia for three different vector species infected with T. cruzi TcVI (Tulahuén strain). Although the percentage of excreta with trypomastigote forms was similar for T. infestans, T. sordida and T. guasayana (sylvatic/peridomestic species in Bolivia), T. infestans had higher loads of trypomastigotes [56]. Regarding the epimastigote form, T. infestans presented here a higher number of this evolutive form at 30 and 60 dpi (Fig 1B). This result is possibly because that T. infestans ingested more blood than T. rubrovaria (Tables 3 and 4 and Fig 4) and heme (a pro-oxidant molecule released in large amounts upon hemoglobin degradation during blood digestion) seems to be responsible for epimastigote proliferation in a dose-dependent manner [57].

The effects of T. cruzi infection on triatomine behavior are scarcely investigated and the few studies available focused on fitness parameters, feeding-excretion behavior, aggregation/geotaxis and dispersion/locomotion (reviewed in [21],[58],[24],[29]). Feeding and excretion are behavioral parameters of paramount importance, since they determine the efficiency of T. cruzi transmission to vertebrate hosts [20]. In our study, non-infected and infected T. rubrovaria, and also infected T. infestans spent a similar period of time for feeding and excreting after the blood meal, and also they defecated at a similar distance from the bite. Previously, no difference was observed on the first two parameters between non-infected and infected R. prolixus collected in Venezuela with a T. cruzi TcI strain from the Amazon Basin. Nonetheless, discrepant results were observed for non-infected and infected T. infestans from Chaco, Argentina, with a strain of T. cruzi TcVI from Tulahuén, Chile. Infected specimens defecated earlier and in greater quantity than non-infected ones [29]. Earlier excretion was also observed for Mepraia spinolai (species responsible for T. cruzi transmission in arid and semiarid Chile) from Las Chinchillas National Reserve, Chile, infected with T. cruzi isolated from the same locality [59].

The amount of ingested blood seems to be positively influenced by T. cruzi TcVI infection, with a higher volume ingested by infected-T. rubrovaria (median 126.5 μL) than by uninfected specimens (median 100 μL) (Table 3). Moreover, T. rubrovaria specimens infected with T. cruzi that excreted during the experiments ingested twice the volume of blood when compared to non-infected T. rubrovaria or infected T. rubrovaria that did not defecate (Fig 2). The effect of infection on ingested blood volume was marginally observed in GLM, which even though the coefficient of infection was not significant, the odds ratio revealed a mild effect (Table 4). Trypanosoma cruzi did not affect the feeding time and probing in R. prolixus [28]. Botto-Mahan et al. [59] observed an increased biting rate in M. spinolai infected with T. cruzi compared to non-infected specimens, although the parasite did not interfere on the time interval until the first feeding attempt [59], or in the volume of ingested blood [60]. Estay-Olea et al. [61] observed for the same triatomine species that nutritional status of uninfected triatomines was higher than that from infected ones, strengthening the hypothesis that triatomines infected with T. cruzi need more blood for molting and excreting during/after a blood meal than uninfected individuals, probably to compensate the nutrients consumed by trypanosomes [61].

In close proximity, triatomines are capable of recognizing and being attracted by different host cues, such as host odorants and carbon dioxide, besides their extreme heat sensitivity due to the perception of heat and host-emitted infrared radiation (revised in [5]). In a recent study, third instar T. pallidipennis and T. longipennis infected with T. cruzi Chilpancingo isolate (TcI) were more attracted to compounds that mimic the odor released by the human face than non-infected insects [27]. These data are in agreement with our findings that infected T. rubrovaria sting more often in the head (36.4%) than in other body regions of the mice, whereas non-infected specimens bit more frequent in the mice’s abdomen (31.6%) (Fig 5). Different multinomial models were assayed for testing the variables “species” and “infection” as predictors of the bite site and the model that considers only infection as an important predictor was the most informative (S4 Table). Despite the multinomial logistic regression has showed a strong association between T. cruzi infection and triatomine behavior of biting the head (OR = 2.93) and the dorse (OR = 2.80), only the former was statistically significant in the model (Table 5). The resulting analyses suggest a change on the bite behavior of T. rubrovaria caused by T. cruzi TcVI infection.

Interspecific differences were observed regarding the proportion of individuals that excreted during the experiment, for which it was higher for T. infestans (Fig 2), and the volume of blood ingested, for which this species ingested more than twice of the blood volume of that observed for T. rubrovaria (Fig 3A). Consequently, the former species revealed higher feeding efficiency (Fig 3B). Indeed, the negative correlations between T. rubrovaria and the amount of blood ingested and blood uptake efficiency were considerable (Table 4 and Fig 4). Structural and physiological features were already associated with the feeding efficiency of triatomines. Blood suction, for instance, depends on the cibarial pump (a chamber structure with muscles in the head) that promotes a negative pressure, drawing blood up from inside the vessel. It is already observed that T. infestans is capable of ingesting higher amounts of blood per contraction of the cibarial pump when compared to Triatoma brasiliensis and Triatoma pseudomaculata [62]. Moreover, differences in the activity of vasodilatory and apyrase (platelet aggregation inhibitor) enzymes present in salivary glands [63, 64], and in hemagglutination and anticoagulant activities in the intestinal contents during feeding [65, 66] also influence blood meal size and thus the feeding efficiency of triatomines on vertebrate hosts. The higher ingestion rate of blood probably explains the shorter molting time of T. infestans over T. rubrovaria fifth-instar nymphs (64–83 and 110–131 days, respectively) [67, 68] and also a high population density of T. infestans inside human dwellings [69]. Since the amount of blood ingested is positively correlated with the volume of the excreta [70], it is also highly probable that T. infestans releases more parasites than T. rubrovaria during excretion.

The positive association observed in the GLM between the excreta distance from the bite wound and time of excretion after a blood meal (Table 4) is a commonsense feeding-excretion behavior of triatomines, but seldom tested. Our results here confirm that the triatomine’s tendency is to move away from the bite region after a blood meal, probably to avoid being noticed/predated by the vertebrate host, which reinforces the low probability estimates of direct transmission of T. cruzi from triatomines to humans [71]. Triatoma rubrovaria tended to excrete later than T. infestans; however, GLM coefficient was not statistically significant, probably due to the wide variance of measurements for this behavioral parameter. Another discrepant result between species was observed for the excretion efficiency parameter, which GLM results showed that T. rubrovaria is significantly less efficient (OR = 0.53), but W-tests were not significant (Tables 3 and 4). Our results differed from a previous work [56] which showed that T. infestans defecated during the blood meal at about five minutes before ending the blood ingestion. However, some differences in experimental settings should be highlighted, as follows: (i) we analyzed T. infestans infected with T. cruzi, while Loza-Murguia and Noireau [56] analyzed only non-infected specimens; and (ii) five triatomines were fed at the same time on a single host in this study (leading to some interruptions on blood feeding), while in the other work they individualized the vectors to feed on mice. Therefore, we raise the importance of including an epidemiologically-relevant species in experiments when analyzing a non-model species for comparison purposes.

Triatomines require numerous blood meals to complete their life cycle. Despite being rare [68, 72], coprophagy (the ingestion of stools), kleptohematophagy (blood draw from the gut of another triatomine) and hemolymphagy (to ingest hemolymph from other arthropods) have long been reported by several authors [73]. It has been observed Triatoma circummaculata and T. rubrovaria drawing hemolymph from wild cockroaches (Blaptia dubia) in natural rock piles [74, 75]. It remains unclear, however, if hemolymph as the only food source available is enough to complete their development cycle. In our work it is important to highlight in two occasions, an unfed nymph piercing the intestine of a recently fed nymph to obtain blood, besides having been observed in a single time a nymph feeding on the excreta of another individual. These behaviors were seen while the food source (Swiss mice) was being offered to the insects (S1 Fig). As far as we know, these are the first reports of coprophagy and kleptohematophagy in T. rubrovaria. Even with the availability of food source, the fifth-instar nymphs fed on the blood content of an engorged nymph. A recent hypothesis for this cannibalistic behavior is that the rapid intake of warm blood of the vertebrate host by the triatomine raises the insect's body temperature and consequently, leading to the attraction of unfed individuals to obtain food [76]. In an epidemiological context, the cannibalism could increase the possibility of ingesting the parasite and its further transmission from bug to bug [77].

This work has some caveats that must be bear in mind when interpreting our results. First, there will always be limitations in what the data generated in laboratory conditions can reveal about insect behavior in the field. Insects are submitted in the field to daily environmental oscillations of light, humidity and temperature, as well as vector aggregation that might shape different activity patterns from those observed in laboratory settings [58, 78, 79]. Moreover, laboratory-reared insects can lose the genetic variability observed in the field, probably due to inbreeding and stochastic processes such as founder effects and, thus, do not completely represent field populations [80]. Convincing evidence with experimental data supporting the impacts on behavior of rearing insects in laboratory conditions for many generations is scarce. Although there is a reduction in both body size and sexual dimorphism of laboratory-reared triatomines, which may reflect the high density of vectors in small containers and limited supply of blood meal [81], laboratory-reared populations of insects seem to exhibit similar performance to field populations. Ross et al. [82] observed only negligible changes in the development time, survival to adulthood, fecundity and egg hatch proportion when comparing Aedes aegypti populations from 2nd and 22nd generations. In triatomines, Ortiz et al. [83] observed that R. prolixus specimens maintained for over 30 years fed on chicken blood were attracted by human skin extracts in a similar way that F1 insects did. Experiments involving field (or recently field-caught) T. rubrovaria in natural or semi-natural conditions should be conducted to evaluate the impact of laboratory conditions on behavioral data.

Second, infections were confirmed and quantified through direct observations of trypanosomes in the excreta, and not through sensitive tools such as qPCR. Therefore, it is possible that we have detected as positive only triatomines with high infections. Although we believe that this limitation did not interfere the comparisons between T. rubrovaria and T. infestans, we probably excluded from the analyses individuals with low infections that could have different behavioral outcomes. Third, although we used a T. cruzi strain isolated from a T. infestans individual collected in the same locality of T. rubrovaria specimens used in this study, there is no evidence that T. cruzi TcVI lineage is infecting T. rubrovaria in the field. So far, only T. rubrovaria individuals infected with T. cruzi TcIII have been captured in the region [16, 84]. Entomological surveillance studies coupled with laboratory infections of T. rubrovaria with T. cruzi TcIII are needed to identify the T. cruzi strains circulating in this vector species and the possible effects of this parasite strain on feeding-excretion behavior.

Fourth, we analyzed feeding and excretion parameters in triatomines only at 30 dpi, when the number of vectors with trypomastigote forms in their excreta was significantly lower than observed at 60 and 90 dpi. Therefore, if behavioral changes observed here were a phenotypic outcome of the infection or a manipulation of triatomines by T. cruzi [27], we would expect to observe more significant behavior changes at 60 or 90 dpi. Molecular and histological studies are useful and needed approaches to understand the underlying mechanisms of possible behavioral manipulation [85]. Lastly, contradictory results regarding parasite infection influence on the triatomine behavior probably are associated to the variation in T. cruzi strain or genetic lineage used in infection assays and in vector species tested [86]. Moreover, differences in the experimental designs also may have an important contribution [29]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to standardize methodological conditions in future studies on behavioral traits of parasitized bugs to better understand the role of each type of T. cruzi on changes of vector behavior traits.

Epidemiological relevance and concluding remarks

In conclusion, these results based on a unique and large dataset analyzed through classical statistical methods coupled with exhaustive generalized linear model and multinomial logistic regression hypotheses indicate that laboratory T. cruzi TcVI infection changed the T. rubrovaria feeding behavior. Infected individuals were capable of ingesting more blood than non-infected specimens and bit more often the host’s head. Despite the lower percentage of T. rubrovaria defecating after the blood meal and the lower volume of ingested blood when compared with one of the main important Chagas disease vectors in South America, T. infestans, these vector species shared similar overall infection and metacyclic trypomastigote rates of T. cruzi TcVI in their excreta under laboratory conditions, and also shared similar scores for most of the feeding-excretion parameters.

Lent and Wygodzinsky [20] highlighted that although most triatomines are potential vectors of T. cruzi, some conditions must be fulfilled to incriminate a species as ‘effective vector’ to humans, as follows: (i) wide geographical distribution, (ii) being capable of living in human habitations, (iii) anthropophilic behavior, and (iv) short interval between feeding and excretion. Triatoma rubrovaria is restricted to northern Argentina, Uruguay and southern Brazil [20] and although an increasing domiciliary and peridomiciliary invasion of T. rubrovaria [13, 14], there is no consistent evidence of intradomiciliary colonization, since only few nymphs have been captured inside dwellings [13]. This species has eclectic blood feeding habits, and a low percentage of its individuals was found with human blood content in the gut (1.3–8.0% [15, 87]). Together, these bionomic aspects emphasize the epidemiological findings that T. infestans had established larger colonies in southern Brazil and probably displaced T. rubrovaria from peridomiciles. However, the similarity between these species related to the overall infection and metacyclogenesis rates of T. cruzi TcVI in laboratory conditions and to the feeding-excretion time interval raises epidemiological concerns. The ‘virtual’ elimination of T. infestans probably triggered a recolonization process of human-modified habitats by the native species [14], as observed for other autochthonous species, such as T. brasiliensis and Panstrongylus megistus in northeastern and southeastern Brazil [69] and, thus, T. rubrovaria must be kept under constant entomological surveillance in Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Coprophagy.

Fifth-instar nymphs of Triatoma rubrovaria feeding on another triatomine’s excreta.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.s001

(TIF)

S1 Table. Competitive generalized linear models for the presence of metacyclic trypomastigote forms of T. cruzi TcVI in the excreta of T. rubrovaria and T. infestans at different days post infection (dpi).

K: number of parameters; AICc: Akaike Information Criterion corrected; ΔAICc: difference between the AICc of a given model and the highest AICc, which ΔAICc > 2 means high support for a given model; Wt: model probability based on Akaike weight. Cum Wt: cumulative model probability based on Akaike weight.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.s002

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Generalized linear model for the presence of epimastigote forms of T. cruzi TcVI in the excreta of T. rubrovaria and T. infestans at different days post infection (dpi).

Note that 30 dpi is not shown, since it was used as the baseline condition. The colon mark (:) means interaction between variables. CI: Confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; SE: standard error. * 0.01 < p < 0.05; ** 0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.s003

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Competitive generalized linear models for six predicted feeding-excretion variables.

AICc: Akaike Information Criterion corrected; ΔAICc: difference between the AICc of a given model and the highest AICc, which ΔAICc > 2 means high support for a given model; Wt: model probability based on Akaike weight; Cum Wt: cumulative model probability based on Akaike weight; LL: Log-likelihood of a given model. The models which ΔAICc < 2 are highlighted in bold.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.s004

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Competitive multinomial logistic regression models for bite site parameters.

AIC: Akaike Information Criterion; ΔAIC: difference between the AIC of a given model and the highest AIC, which ΔAIC > 2 means high support for a given model; Wt: model probability based on Akaike weight; Cum Wt: cumulative model probability based on Akaike weight.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008712.s005

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Rio Grande do Sul State Center for Health Surveillance for contributions to the fieldwork and to the Laboratório Nacional e Internacional de Referência em Taxonomia de Triatomíneos and Laboratório de Triatomíneos e Epidemiologia de Doença de Chagas, Fiocruz, for the supply of the triatomines and parasites, respectively, used in this study. We also thank Mariana R. David for insightful comments and suggestions in statistical analyses.

References

  1. 1. WHO. Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) 2020 [cited 2020 02 January]. Available from: https://www.who.int/chagas/en/.
  2. 2. Colley DG. Parasitic diseases: opportunities and challenges in the 21st century. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2000;95 Suppl 1:79–87. pmid:11142732.
  3. 3. Jansen AM, Xavier SCDC, Roque ALR. Trypanosoma cruzi transmission in the wild and its most important reservoir hosts in Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):502. Epub 2018/09/06. pmid:30189896; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6127949.
  4. 4. Marliére NP, Latorre-Estivalis JM, Lorenzo MG, Carrasco D, Alves-Silva J, Rodrigues JO, et al. Trypanosomes Modify the Behavior of Their Insect Hosts: Effects on Locomotion and on the Expression of a Related Gene. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(8):e0003973. Epub 2015/08/20. pmid:26291723; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4546274.
  5. 5. Lazzari CR, Pereira MH, Lorenzo MG. Behavioural biology of Chagas disease vectors. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013;108 Suppl 1:34–47. pmid:24473801; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4109178.
  6. 6. Kramer LD, Ciota AT. Dissecting vectorial capacity for mosquito-borne viruses. Curr Opin Virol. 2015;15:112–8. Epub 2015/12/06. pmid:26569343; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4688158.
  7. 7. Nyasembe VO, Teal PE, Sawa P, Tumlinson JH, Borgemeister C, Torto B. Plasmodium falciparum infection increases Anopheles gambiae attraction to nectar sources and sugar uptake. Curr Biol. 2014;24(2):217–21. Epub 2014/01/09. pmid:24412210; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3935215.
  8. 8. da Silveira ID, Petersen MT, Sylvestre G, Garcia GA, David MR, Pavan MG, et al. Zika Virus Infection Produces a Reduction on Aedes aegypti Lifespan but No Effects on Mosquito Fecundity and Oviposition Success. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3011. Epub 2018/12/18. pmid:30619118; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6305470.
  9. 9. Morillo CA, Marin-Neto JA, Avezum A, Sosa-Estani S, Rassi A, Rosas F, et al. Randomized Trial of Benznidazole for Chronic Chagas' Cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(14):1295–306. Epub 2015/09/01. pmid:26323937.
  10. 10. Abad-Franch F, Ferraz G, Campos C, Palomeque FS, Grijalva MJ, Aguilar MH, et al. Modeling disease vector occurrence when detection is imperfect: infestation of Amazonian palm trees by triatomine bugs at three spatial scales. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e620. pmid:20209149
  11. 11. Gürtler RE, Kitron U, Cecere MC, Segura EL, Cohen JE. Sustainable vector control and management of Chagas disease in the Gran Chaco, Argentina. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(41):16194–9. Epub 2007/10/03. pmid:17913895; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2042184.
  12. 12. Abad-Franch F, Pavan MG, Jaramillo-O N, Palomeque FS, Dale C, Chaverra D, et al. Rhodnius barretti, a new species of Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from western Amazonia. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013;108 Suppl 1:92–9. pmid:24473808; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4109185.
  13. 13. Almeida CE, Vinhaes MC, de Almeida JR, Silveira AC, Costa J. Monitoring the domiciliary and peridomiciliary invasion process of Triatoma rubrovaria in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2000;95(6):761–8. pmid:11080758.
  14. 14. Silveira AC, Martins E. Histórico do controle da transmissão vetorial e situação epidemiológica atual. In: Galvão C, editor. Vetores da doença de chagas no Brasil. Zoologia: guias e manuais de identificação series. Curitiba: Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia; 2014. p. 10–25.
  15. 15. Almeida CE, Duarte R, do Nascimento RG, Pacheco RS, Costa J. Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) II: trophic resources and ecological observations of five populations collected in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002;97(8):1127–31. pmid:12563478.
  16. 16. Martins LP, Marcili A, Castanho RE, Therezo AL, de Oliveira JC, Suzuki RB, et al. Rural Triatoma rubrovaria from southern Brazil harbors Trypanosoma cruzi of lineage IIc. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79(3):427–34. pmid:18784237.
  17. 17. Perlowagora-Szumlewicz A, Moreira CJC. In vivo differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi-1. Experimental evidence of the influence of vector species on metacyclogenesis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1994;89(4):603–18. pmid:8524063.
  18. 18. Almeida CE, Folly-Ramos E, Agapito-Souza R, Magno-Esperança G, Pacheco RS, Costa J. Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) (Hemiptera-Reduviidae-Triatominae) IV: bionomic aspects on the vector capacity of nymphs. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005;100(3):231–5. pmid:16113859.
  19. 19. Coura JR. Chagas disease: what is known and what is needed-a background article. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102 Suppl 1:113–22. pmid:17992371.
  20. 20. Lent H, Wygodzinsk PW. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) and their significance as vectors of Chagas disease. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 1979;163:125–520.
  21. 21. Guarneri AA, Lorenzo MG. Triatomine physiology in the context of trypanosome infection. J Insect Physiol. 2017;97:66–76. Epub 2016/07/09. pmid:27401496.
  22. 22. Oliveira TG, Carvalho-Costa FA, Gomes TF, Sarquis O, Sposina R, Lima MM. Developmental and reproductive patterns of Triatoma brasiliensis infected with Trypanosoma cruzi under laboratory conditions. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2010;105(8):1057–60. pmid:21225206.
  23. 23. Nouvellet P, Ramirez-Sierra MJ, Dumonteil E, Gourbière S. Effects of genetic factors and infection status on wing morphology of Triatoma dimidiata species complex in the Yucatán peninsula, Mexico. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11(6):1243–9. Epub 2011/04/14. pmid:21515410.
  24. 24. Cordero-Montoya G, Flores-Villegas AL, Salazar-Schettino PM, Vences-Blanco MO, Rocha-Ortega M, Gutiérrez-Cabrera AE, et al. The cost of being a killer's accomplice: Trypanosoma cruzi impairs the fitness of kissing bugs. Parasitol Res. 2019;118(9):2523–9. Epub 2019/08/05. pmid:31385028.
  25. 25. Elliot SL, Rodrigues JeO, Lorenzo MG, Martins-Filho OA, Guarneri AA. Trypanosoma cruzi, etiological agent of Chagas disease, is virulent to its triatomine vector Rhodnius prolixus in a temperature-dependent manner. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(3):e0003646. Epub 2015/03/20. pmid:25793495; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4368190.
  26. 26. Fellet MR, Lorenzo MG, Elliot SL, Carrasco D, Guarneri AA. Effects of infection by Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli on the reproductive performance of the vector Rhodnius prolixus. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105255. Epub 2014/08/19. pmid:25136800; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4138117.
  27. 27. Ramírez-González MG, Flores-Villegas AL, Salazar-Schettino PM, Gutiérrez-Cabrera AE, Rojas-Ortega E, Córdoba-Aguilar A. Zombie bugs? Manipulation of kissing bug behavior by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Acta Trop. 2019;200:105177. Epub 2019/09/17. pmid:31539526.
  28. 28. Takano-Lee M, Edman JD. Lack of manipulation of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) vector competence by Trypanosoma cruzi. J Med Entomol. 2002;39(1):44–51. pmid:11931271.
  29. 29. Pereyra N, Lobbia PA, Mougabure-Cueto G. Effects of the infection with with Trypanosoma cruzi on the feeding and excretion/defecation patterns of Triatoma infestans. Bull Entomol Res. 2020;110(1):169–76. Epub 2019/07/24. pmid:31337451.
  30. 30. Camargo EP. Growth and differentiation in Trypanosoma cruzi. I. Origin of metacyclic trypanosomes in liquid media. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1964;6:93–100. pmid:14177814.
  31. 31. Brener Z. Therapeutic activity and criterion of cure on mice experimentally infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1962;4:389–96. pmid:14015230.
  32. 32. Oscherov EB, Bar ME, Damborsky MP, Milano AM. [Population statistics of Triatoma rubrovaria in laboratory]. Rev Saude Publica. 2005;39(2):211–6. Epub 2005/05/09. pmid:15895140.
  33. 33. Bar ME, Milano AMF, Damborsky MP, Oscherov EB, Avalos G. Patrones de alimentación y de defecación de Triatoma rubrovaria (Heteroptera: Reduviidae) bajo condiciones de laboratorio. Rev Soc Entomol. 2003;62:107–13.
  34. 34. Almeida CE, Francischetti CN, Pacheco RS, Costa J. Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) (Hemiptera-Reduviidae-Triatominae) III: patterns of feeding, defecation and resistance to starvation. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003;98(3):367–71. Epub 2003/07/18. pmid:12886416.
  35. 35. Lazzari CR. Circadian organization of locomotion activity in the hematophagous bug Triatoma infestans. J Insect Physiol 1992;38: 895–903.
  36. 36. Hoare CA. The trypanosomes of mammals: a zoological monograph: Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1972. 749 p.
  37. 37. Kollien AH, Schaub GA. The development of Trypanosoma cruzi in triatominae. Parasitol Today. 2000;16(9):381–7. pmid:10951597.
  38. 38. Vitello DJ, Ripper RM, Fettiplace MR, Weinberg GL, Vitello JM. Blood Density Is Nearly Equal to Water Density: A Validation Study of the Gravimetric Method of Measuring Intraoperative Blood Loss. J Vet Med. 2015;2015:152730. Epub 2015/01/29. pmid:26464949; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4590883.
  39. 39. Team RC. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Open Journal of Statistics. 2017;7.
  40. 40. Rosenthal R. Parametric measures of effect size. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, editors. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.; 1994. p. 231–44.
  41. 41. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Statist. 2001;29:1165–88.
  42. 42. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag. 2016.
  43. 43. Fox J, Weisberg S. An R Companion to Applied Regression. 3 ed: Sage Publications; 2019.
  44. 44. Yoo W, Mayberry R, Bae S, Singh K, Peter He Q, Lillard JW. A Study of Effects of MultiCollinearity in the Multivariable Analysis. Int J Appl Sci Technol. 2014;4(5):9–19. pmid:25664257; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4318006.
  45. 45. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshiran R. An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R. Springer Publishing Company. 2014.
  46. 46. Bruce P, Bruce A. Practical Statistics for Data Scientists: O'Reilly Media; 2017.
  47. 47. Mazerolle MJ. AICcmodavg: Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). 2019. R package version 2.-.]. Available from: ttps://cran.r-project.org/package = AICcmodavg.
  48. 48. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2 ed. New York2002.
  49. 49. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4 ed. New York: Springer; 2002.
  50. 50. Dias JC, Silveira AC, Schofield CJ. The impact of Chagas disease control in Latin America: a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002;97(5):603–12. pmid:12219120.
  51. 51. Schofield CJ, Dias JC. The Southern Cone Initiative against Chagas disease. Adv Parasitol. 1999;42:1–27. pmid:10050271.
  52. 52. Schofield CJ, Jannin J, Salvatella R. The future of Chagas disease control. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22(12):583–8. Epub 2006/10/16. pmid:17049308.
  53. 53. Figueiredo RC, Rosa DS, Soares MJ. Differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes: metacyclogenesis and adhesion to substrate are triggered by nutritional stress. The Journal of parasitology. 2000;86(6):1213–8. pmid:11191893.
  54. 54. Lambrechts L, Fellous S, Koella JC. Coevolutionary interactions between host and parasite genotypes. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22(1):12–6. Epub 2005/11/23. pmid:16310412.
  55. 55. Dworak ES, Araújo SM, Gomes ML, Massago M, Ferreira É, Toledo MJO. Sympatry influence in the interaction of Trypanosoma cruzi with triatomine. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017;50(5):629–37. pmid:29160509.
  56. 56. Loza-Murguía M, Noireau F. Vectorial capacity of Triatoma guasayana (Wygodzinsky & Abalos) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) compared with two other species of epidemic importance. Neotrop Entomol. 2010;39(5):799–809. pmid:21120391.
  57. 57. Lara FA, Sant'anna C, Lemos D, Laranja GA, Coelho MG, Reis Salles I, et al. Heme requirement and intracellular trafficking in Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;355(1):16–22. Epub 2007/01/23. pmid:17292866.
  58. 58. Depickère S, Ramírez-Ávila GM, Deneubourg JL. Alteration of the aggregation and spatial organization of the vector of Chagas disease, Triatoma infestans, by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):17432. Epub 2019/11/22. pmid:31758071; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6874570.
  59. 59. Botto-Mahan C, Cattan PE, Medel R. Chagas disease parasite induces behavioural changes in the kissing bug Mepraia spinolai. Acta Trop. 2006;98(3):219–23. Epub 2006/06/15. pmid:16780784.
  60. 60. Botto-Mahan C. Trypanosoma cruzi induces life-history trait changes in the wild kissing bug Mepraia spinolai: implications for parasite transmission. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009;9(5):505–10. pmid:19128032.
  61. 61. Estay-Olea D, Correa JP, de Bona S, Bacigalupo A, Quiroga N, San Juan E, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi could affect wild triatomine approaching behaviour to humans by altering vector nutritional status: A field test. Acta Trop. 2020;210:105574. Epub 2020/06/03. pmid:32504588.
  62. 62. Guarneri AA, Diotaiuti L, Gontijo NF, Gontijo AF, Pereira MH. Comparison of feeding behaviour of Triatoma infestans, Triatoma brasiliensis and Triatoma pseudomaculata in different hosts by electronic monitoring of the cibarial pump. J Insect Physiol. 2000;46(7):1121–7. pmid:10817838.
  63. 63. Araujo RN, Soares AC, Paim RM, Gontijo NF, Gontijo AF, Lehane MJ, et al. The role of salivary nitrophorins in the ingestion of blood by the triatomine bug Rhodnius prolixus (Reduviidae: Triatominae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;39(2):83–9. pmid:18992340.
  64. 64. Ribeiro JM, Schneider M, Isaias T, Jurberg J, Galvão C, Guimarães JA. Role of salivary antihemostatic components in blood feeding by triatomine bugs (Heteroptera). J Med Entomol. 1998;35(4):599–610. pmid:9701952.
  65. 65. Araujo RN, Pereira MH, Soares AC, Pereira ID, Diotaiuti L, Gontijo NF, et al. Effect of intestinal erythrocyte agglutination on the feeding performance of Triatoma brasiliensis (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). J Insect Physiol. 2009;55(9):862–8. pmid:19524588.
  66. 66. Paim RM, Araújo RN, Soares AC, Lemos LC, Tanaka AS, Gontijo NF, et al. Influence of the intestinal anticoagulant in the feeding performance of triatomine bugs (Hemiptera; Reduviidae). Int J Parasitol. 2011;41(7):765–73. pmid:21447340.
  67. 67. Damborsky MP, Bar ME, Gorla D. Life cycle and reproductive patterns of Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) under constant and fluctuating conditions of temperature and humidity. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2005;38(5):433–7. Epub 2005/09/12. pmid:16172762.
  68. 68. Durán P, Siñani E, Depickère S. On triatomines, cockroaches and haemolymphagy under laboratory conditions: new discoveries. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2016;111(10):605–13. Epub 2016/10/03. pmid:27706376; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5066326.
  69. 69. Pereira MH, Gontijo NF, Guarneri AA, Sant'Anna MR, Diotaiuti L. Competitive displacement in Triatominae: the Triatoma infestans success. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22(11):516–20. pmid:16971183.
  70. 70. Piesman J, Sherlock IA. Factors controlling the volume of feces produced by triatomine vectors of Chagas' disease. Acta Trop. 1983;40(4):351–8. pmid:6142633.
  71. 71. Nouvellet P, Dumonteil E, Gourbière S. The improbable transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi to human: the missing link in the dynamics and control of Chagas disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(11):e2505. Epub 2013/11/07. pmid:24244766; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3820721.
  72. 72. Ryckman RE. Recent observations of cannibalism in Triatoma (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). J Parasitol. 1951;37(5 1):433–4. pmid:14889379.
  73. 73. Jurberg J, Galvão C. Biology, ecology and systematics of Triatominae (Heteroptera, Reduviidae) vectors of Chagas’disease and implications for human health. Denisia. 2006;19:1096–116.
  74. 74. Lorosa ES, Jurberg J, Souza ALA, Vinhaes MC, Nunes IM. Hemolinfa de Dyctyoptera na manutenção do ciclo biológico silvestre de Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) e Triatoma circummaculata (Stal,1859) Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae. Entomologia y Vectores 2000;7:287–96.
  75. 75. Ruas-Neto AL, Corseuil E, Cavalleri A. Development of rupestrian Triatomines (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) following hemolymphagy on Blaberids (Blattodea: Blaberidae) in Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. Entomologia y Vectores 2001;8:205–16.
  76. 76. Lazzari CR, Fauquet A, Lahondère C. Keeping cool: Kissing bugs avoid cannibalism by thermoregulating. J Insect Physiol. 2018;107:29–33. Epub 2018/02/12. pmid:29447846.
  77. 77. Schaub GA. Direct transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi between vectors of Chagas' disease. Acta Trop. 1988;45(1):11–9. pmid:2896441.
  78. 78. Vanin S, Bhutani S, Montelli S, Menegazzi P, Green EW, Pegoraro M, et al. Unexpected features of Drosophila circadian behavioural rhythms under natural conditions. Nature. 2012;484(7394):371–5. pmid:22495312.
  79. 79. Rivas GBS, Teles-de-Freitas R, Pavan MG, Lima JBP, Peixoto AA, Bruno RV. Effects of Light and Temperature on Daily Activity and Clock Gene Expression in Two Mosquito Disease Vectors. J Biol Rhythms. 2018;33(3):272–88. pmid:29761749.
  80. 80. Gómez-Sucerquia LJ, Triana-Chávez O, Jaramillo-Ocampo N. Quantification of the genetic change in the transition of Rhodnius pallescens Barber, 1932 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from field to laboratory. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(6):871–7. pmid:19876559.
  81. 81. Dujardin JP, Panzera P, Schofield CJ. Triatominae as a model of morphological plasticity under ecological pressure. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1999;94 Suppl 1:223–8. pmid:10677722.
  82. 82. Ross PA, Endersby-Harshman NM, Hoffmann AA. A comprehensive assessment of inbreeding and laboratory adaptation in. Evol Appl. 2019;12(3):572–86. Epub 2018/12/17. pmid:30828375; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6383739.
  83. 83. Ortiz MI, Suárez-Rivillas A, Molina J. Behavioural responses to human skin extracts and antennal phenotypes of sylvatic first filial generation and long rearing laboratory colony Rhodnius prolixus. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011;106(4):461–6. pmid:21739035.
  84. 84. Brenière SF, Waleckx E, Barnabé C. Over Six Thousand Trypanosoma cruzi Strains Classified into Discrete Typing Units (DTUs): Attempt at an Inventory. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(8):e0004792. Epub 2016/08/29. pmid:27571035; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5003387.
  85. 85. Hughes DP, Libersat F. Parasite manipulation of host behavior. Current Biology. 2019;29:R45–R7. pmid:30668944
  86. 86. Garcia ES, Azambuja P. Development and interactions of Trypanosoma cruzi within the insect vector. Parasitol Today. 1991;7(9):240–4. pmid:15463507.
  87. 87. Salvatella R, Calegari L, Puime A, Basmadjian Y, Rosa R, Guerrero J, et al. [Feeding pattern of Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) (Hemiptera, Triatominae) in peridomiciliary habitats, of a rural area of Uruguay]. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1994;36(4):311–20. pmid:7732261.