Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

The diversity, evolution and ecology of Salmonella in venomous snakes

  • Caisey V. Pulford,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Nicolas Wenner,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Martha L. Redway,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Section of Human Nutrition, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

    Affiliation Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Ella V. Rodwell,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Hermione J. Webster,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Roberta Escudero,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Affiliation Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Carsten Kröger,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Department of Microbiology, School of Genetics and Microbiology, Moyne Institute of Preventive Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Affiliation Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Rocío Canals,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Will Rowe,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Scientific Computing Department, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Daresbury, United Kingdom

    Affiliation Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Javier Lopez,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Animal Health Department, Chester Zoo, Cheshire, United Kingdom

  • Neil Hall,

    Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom

  • Paul D. Rowley,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Resources

    Affiliation Centre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Dorina Timofte,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Institute of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Cheshire, United Kingdom, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Robert A. Harrison,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Kate S. Baker,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  •  [ ... ],
  • Jay C. D. Hinton

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    jay.hinton@liverpool.ac.uk

    Affiliation Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

The diversity, evolution and ecology of Salmonella in venomous snakes

  • Caisey V. Pulford, 
  • Nicolas Wenner, 
  • Martha L. Redway, 
  • Ella V. Rodwell, 
  • Hermione J. Webster, 
  • Roberta Escudero, 
  • Carsten Kröger, 
  • Rocío Canals, 
  • Will Rowe, 
  • Javier Lopez
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Reptile-associated Salmonella bacteria are a major, but often neglected cause of both gastrointestinal and bloodstream infection in humans globally. The diversity of Salmonella enterica has not yet been determined in venomous snakes, however other ectothermic animals have been reported to carry a broad range of Salmonella bacteria. We investigated the prevalence and diversity of Salmonella in a collection of venomous snakes and non-venomous reptiles.

Methodology/Principle findings

We used a combination of selective enrichment techniques to establish a unique dataset of reptilian isolates to study Salmonella enterica species-level evolution and ecology and used whole-genome sequencing to investigate the relatedness of phylogenetic groups. We observed that 91% of venomous snakes carried Salmonella, and found that a diverse range of serovars (n = 58) were carried by reptiles. The Salmonella serovars belonged to four of the six Salmonella enterica subspecies: diarizonae, enterica, houtanae and salamae. Subspecies enterica isolates were distributed among two distinct phylogenetic clusters, previously described as clade A (52%) and clade B (48%). We identified metabolic differences between S. diarizonae, S. enterica clade A and clade B involving growth on lactose, tartaric acid, dulcitol, myo-inositol and allantoin.

Significance

We present the first whole genome-based comparative study of the Salmonella bacteria that colonise venomous and non-venomous reptiles and shed new light on Salmonella evolution. Venomous snakes examined in this study carried a broad range of Salmonella, including serovars which have been associated with disease in humans such as S. Enteritidis. The findings raise the possibility that venomous snakes could be a reservoir for Salmonella serovars associated with human salmonellosis.

Author summary

Salmonella enterica is a remarkable bacterial species that causes Neglected Tropical Diseases globally. The burden of disease is greatest in some of the most poverty-afflicted regions of Africa, where salmonellosis frequently causes bloodstream infection with fatal consequences. The bacteria have the ability to colonise the gastrointestinal tract of a wide range of animals including reptiles. Direct or indirect contact between reptiles and humans can cause salmonellosis. In this study, we determined the prevalence and diversity of Salmonella in a collection of African venomous snakes for the first time. We showed that the majority of venomous snakes (91%) in our study carry Salmonella, and used bacterial genomics to assign two thirds of isolates to the S. enterica subspecies enterica which is associated with human salmonellosis. We identified two evolutionary groups of S. enterica subspecies enterica that display distinct metabolic profiles with infection-relevant carbon sources. Our findings could have a broad significance because venomous snakes can move freely around human dwellings in tropical regions of the world such as Africa, and could potentially shed contaminated faecal matter onto surfaces and into water supplies.

Introduction

Salmonella is a clinically relevant bacterial pathogen that poses a significant burden upon public health worldwide [14]. Two groups of Salmonella serovars have clinical relevance with distinct host-specificity and disease manifestations. Typhoidal Salmonella is restricted to human hosts and presents as a systemic infection, resulting in an estimated 223,000 fatalities per annum [5]. In contrast, nontyphoidal Salmonella typically manifests as a self-limiting gastrointestinal disease in otherwise healthy individuals around the world, causing an annual global disease burden of 93.8 million cases and 155,000 deaths [3]. Over the past two decades, an invasive form of nontyphoidal Salmonella (iNTS) has emerged as the most prevalent bacterial species to be isolated from the bloodstream of patients in sub-Saharan Africa [6]. Over 3.4 million cases and 680,000 deaths are estimated to occur worldwide each year as a result of iNTS [4].

The Salmonella genus contains two species; S. bongori and S. enterica. S. enterica is further divided into six subspecies; enterica (I), salamae (II), arizonae (IIIa), diarizonae (IIIb), houtanae (IV) and indica (VI) [7]. The subspecies are classified into approximately 2 600 serovars which are ecologically, phenotypically and genetically diverse [8]. Serovars which belong to S. enterica subspecies enterica cluster phylogenetically into two predominant clades (A and B) [911]. Here, we use the term Salmonella to refer to the S. enterica species and the S. enterica designation to refer to the S. enterica subspecies enterica alone, unless stated otherwise.

Biochemical properties such as carbon utilisation and anaerobic metabolism are often serovar-specific [12]. The ability of Salmonella to grow in a wide range of conditions reflects the adaptation of the bacteria to survive in the environment or in different hosts, as demonstrated by a recent study focused on genome-scale metabolic models for 410 Salmonella isolates spanning 64 serovars in 530 different growth conditions [13].

At the genus level, Salmonella has a broad host-range whilst individual serovars differ in host-specificity [14]. The majority of Salmonella infections in humans (99%) are caused by a small number of serovars belonging to the S. enterica subspecies [15]. Serovars which belong to non-enterica subspecies are associated with carriage in ectothermic animals such as reptiles and amphibians, but are rarely found in humans [14,1618]. Carriage rates of non-enterica serovars in reptiles can be high. A study focused on snakes in a pet shop found that 81% of animals were carrying S. diarizonae [18]. Previous studies demonstrating the diverse range of Salmonella subspecies that colonise various reptilian species in different countries are summarised in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. The distribution of Salmonella subspecies in non-venomous reptiles.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007169.t001

Reptiles represent a significant reservoir for serovars of Salmonella that are associated with human disease. Over 60% of captive-bred reptiles between 1995 and 2006 in Denmark were reported to carry S. enterica subspecies enterica serovars [24]. About 6% of human salmonellosis cases were contracted from reptiles in the USA [25], and in South West England, 27.4% of Salmonella cases in children under five years old were linked to reptile exposure [26]. The latter study demonstrated that reptile-derived salmonellosis was more likely to cause bloodstream infection in humans than non-reptile-derived Salmonella [26]. Reptile-associated Salmonella is therefore considered to be a global threat to public health [27].

The majority of reptile-associated salmonellosis cases reported in humans are caused by Salmonella from non-venomous reptiles [27], probably because these animals are frequently kept as pets. Therefore, non-venomous reptiles have been the focus of numerous studies whilst the prevalence and diversity of Salmonella in venomous snakes has remained unknown. The recent inclusion of snakebite as a neglected tropical disease demonstrates that these reptiles frequently interact with humans in tropical and sub-tropical countries. The proximity of venomous snakes to humans may lead to contaminated faecal matter being shed on the surfaces and in water sources used for human homes and to irrigate salad crops [2830]. Research to improve snakebite treatment at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM) has resulted in the creation of the most extensive collection of venomous snakes in the UK (195). The LSTM herpetarium houses venomous snakes from a diverse range of species and geographical origins, representing an ideal source of samples to assess Salmonella in this under-studied group of reptiles.

The aims of this study were three-fold. Firstly, to determine the period prevalence of Salmonella in a collection of captive venomous snakes and investigate whether this group of reptiles could act as reservoirs for human salmonellosis. Secondly, to assess the serological and phylogenetic diversity of Salmonella amongst reptiles. Thirdly, to use the diversity of reptile-associated Salmonella to determine clade-specific differences that could reflect adaptation to survival in the environment or to different hosts. Here, we present the first whole genome-based comparative study of the Salmonella bacteria that colonise venomous and non-venomous reptiles.

Methods

Source of Salmonella isolates

The Salmonella isolates were derived from faecal samples from two collections of reptiles. One hundred and six faecal samples were collected from venomous snakes at LSTM from May 2015 to January 2017, with an emphasis on snakes originating from Africa (S1 Table), and investigated for the presence of Salmonella. All venomous snakes were housed in individual enclosures and fed with frozen mice. Sixty-nine of the samples (71%) were sourced from wild-caught snakes originating from: Togo, Nigeria, Cameroon, Egypt, Tanzania, Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda. A further 28 Salmonella isolates (29%) came from venomous snakes bred in captivity. The LSTM herpetarium is a UK Home Office licensed and inspected animal holding facility. A second collection of 27 Salmonella isolates from non-venomous reptiles and 1 Salmonella isolate from a venomous reptile were sourced from the veterinary diagnostics laboratory based at the University of Liverpool’s Leahurst campus (reptilian species described in S1 Table). These isolates were collected from June 2011 to July 2016 from specimens submitted as part of Salmonella surveillance for import/export, in addition to veterinary faecal samples and tissues from post mortem investigations. The provenance of the isolates is described in S1 Table. The majority of the non-venomous reptiles were sourced from a zoological collection, however two animals were privately owned and three were sourced from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA). The LSTM isolates are henceforth referred to as venomous snake isolates and the Leahurst isolates are referred to as non-venomous reptile isolates unless otherwise stated.

Isolation of Salmonella

All media were prepared and used in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines unless otherwise stated. Salmonella was isolated using a modified version of the protocol described in the national Standard Operating Procedure for detection of Salmonella issued by Public Health England [31].

Faecal droppings were collected from reptiles and stored in 15 mL plastic centrifuge tubes at 4°C. Two different methods were used for the enrichment of Salmonella from faecal samples due to reagent availability at the time of isolation. S1 Table provides information on isolate specific methods. In enrichment method 1, faecal samples were added to 10 mL of buffered peptone water (Fluka Analytical, UK, 08105-500G-F) and incubated overnight at 37°C with shaking at 220 rpm. Following overnight incubation, 100 μL of the faeces mixture was added to 10 mL of Selenite Broth (19 g/L Selenite Broth Base, Merck, UK, 70153-500G and 4 g/L Sodium Hydrogen Selenite, Merck 1.06340-50G) and incubated overnight at 37°C with shaking at 220 rpm. In enrichment method 2, faecal samples were added to 10 mL of Buffered Peptone Water (Fluka Analytical, 08105-500G-F) supplemented with 10 μg/mL Novobiocin (Merck, N1628), and incubated overnight at 37°C with shaking at 220 rpm. Following overnight incubation, 100 μL of the faeces mixture was added to 10 mL of Rappaport-Vassilliadis Medium (Lab M, UK, LAB086) and incubated for 24 hours at 42°C with shaking at 220 rpm.

Following enrichment, 10 μL of overnight broth was spread onto Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate (XLD) (Oxoid, UK, CM0469) agar plates which were incubated overnight at 37°C. Putative Salmonella colonies were selected by black appearance on XLD plates and confirmed by pink and white colony formation on Brilliant Green Agar (Merck, 70134-500G) supplemented with 0.35 g/L Mandelic Acid (Merck, M2101) and 1 g/L Sodium Sulfacetamide (Merck, S8647).

To identify S. enterica species, colony PCR of the Salmonella specific ttr locus, which is required for tetrathionate respiration [32], was performed. PCR reagents included MyTaq Red Mix 1x (Bioline, UK, BIO-25043), ttr-4 reverse primer (5'-AGCTCAGACCAAAAGTGACCATC-3') and ttr-6 forward primer (5'-CTCACCAGGAGATTACAACATGG-3') on colonies suspected to be Salmonella. PCR reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C 2 min, 35 x (95°C 15 s, 60°C 30 s, 72°C 10 s), 72°C 5 min. PCR products were visualised using agarose gel (3.5%) (Bioline, BIO-41025) electrophoresis in TAE buffer. Midori Green DNA stain (3 μL/100 mL) (Nippon Genetics, Germany, MG 04) was used to visualise DNA bands under UV light. Throughout the isolation procedure, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) strain LT2 [33,34] was used as a positive control, and Escherichia coli MG1655 [35] was used as a negative control (S1 Table).

Whole-genome sequencing of Salmonella from venomous and non-venomous reptiles

All non-venomous reptile isolates, one venomous reptile isolate and 87 of 97 venomous snake isolates were sent for whole-genome sequencing. Isolates were sent to either MicrobesNG, UK or the Earlham Institute, UK for whole-genome sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq platform (Illumina, California, USA). Isolates which were sequenced by MicrobesNG were prepared for sequencing in accordance with the company’s preparation protocol for single colony-derived bacterial cultures (http://www.microbesng.uk).

Isolates which were sequenced by the Earlham Institute were prepared by inoculating a single colony of Salmonella into a FluidX 2D Sequencing Tube (FluidX Ltd, UK) containing 100 μL of Lysogeny Broth (LB, Lennox) and incubating overnight at 37°C, with shaking at 220 rpm. LB was made using 10 g/L Bacto Tryptone (BD Biosciences, UK, 211705), 5 g/L Bacto Yeast Extract (BD, 212750) and 5 g/L Sodium Chloride (Merck, S3014-1kg). Following overnight growth, the FluidX 2D Tubes were placed in a 95°C oven for 20 minutes to heat-kill the isolates.

DNA extractions and Illumina library preparations were conducted using automated robots at MicrobesNG or the Earlham Institute. At the Earlham Institute, the Illumina Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, FC-131-1096) was used for library preparation. High throughput sequencing was performed using an Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencing machine to generate 150 bp paired-end reads. Sequencing was multiplexed with 768 unique barcode combinations per sequencing lane. The insert size was approximately 180 bp, and the median depth of coverage was 30x.

At MicrobesNG (https://microbesng.uk), genomic DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT Library Prep Kit (Illumina, FC-131-1096) with two nanograms of DNA used as input and double the elongation time that was described by the manufacturer. Libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 using a 250 bp protocol.

Obtaining contextual reference sequences

The Salmonella In Silico Typing Resource (SISTR) v1.0.2 was used for serovar prediction [36]. Enterobase [37] was used to assign a Multi Locus Sequence Type (MLST) to each isolate, based on sequence conservation of seven housekeeping genes [37]. Where available, reference isolates representing previously sequenced Salmonella isolates for all subspecies and serovars identified were included in the analysis. Reference sequence assemblies were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Accession numbers are available in S2 Table.

Quality control checks

Fastqc v0.11.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) and multiqc v1.0 (http://multiqc.info) were used to assess read quality. Kraken v0.10.5-beta [38] was run to ensure reads were free from contamination using the MiniKraken 8gb database and a Salmonella abundance cut-off of 70%. Trimmomatic v0.36 [39] was then used on the paired end reads to trim low-quality regions using a sliding widow of 4:200. ILLUMINACLIP was used to remove adapter sequences.

Phylogenetics- core genome alignment tree

Genomes were assembled using SPADES v3.90 [40]. QUAST v4.6.3 [41] was used to assess the quality of assemblies, the results of which can be found in S3 Table. Assemblies which comprised of greater than 500 contiguous sequences were deemed too fragmented for downstream analysis. All assemblies which passed QC were annotated using Prokka v1.12 [42]. Roary v3.11.0 [43] was used to generate a core genome alignment. SNP-sites v2.3.3 [44] was used to extract SNPs. A maximum likelihood tree was built from the core genome SNP alignment of all isolates using RAxML-NG v0.4.1 BETA [45] with the general time reversible GTR model and gamma distribution for site specific variation and 100 bootstrap replicates to assess support. The tree was rooted using the Salmonella species S. bongori. Interactive Tree Of Life v4.2 [46] was used for tree visualisation. We confirmed that there was no bias in phylogenetic signal between the two different sequencing platforms used by assessing clustering patterns within the phylogenies. S1 Table contains details of the sequencing facility. Monophyletic clustering of isolates was used to assign subspecies to newly sequenced Salmonella from venomous and non-venomous reptilian hosts. The level of association between venom status and phylogenetic clade was determined using odds ratios and χ2 statistics using the OpenEpi website (http://www.openepi.com).

Identification of clade-specific genomic regions

Genes involved in the utilisation of each carbon source were identified using KEGG [47] and relevant literature [9,32,4859] (see S4 Table). Genes involved in the uptake of carbon sources were prioritised. Sequences were downloaded using the online tool SalComMac [60], which allows the download of fasta sequences of the genes in S. Typhimurium strain 4/74. In the case of lac genes, the sequences were taken from the E. coli reference sequence MG1655. The sequences can be found in S1 Text.

The software tool MEGABLAST v2.2.17 [61] was used to perform a BLAST search of genes in the reptile-derived genomes against a custom-made database of genes diagnostic of Salmonella Pathogenicity Islands and genes involved in carbon utilisation. To confirm all MEGABLAST results, the short reads were mapped against each gene using BWA v0.7.10 [62] and SAMtools v0.1.19 [63]. The resulting bam files were manually assessed for gene presence and absence using Integrative Genomics Viewer v2.4.15 [64]. The results were plotted against the maximum likelihood phylogeny using Interactive Tree Of Life v4.2 [46].

Carbon source utilisation

Differential carbon source utilisation of 39 reptile-derived Salmonella isolates from S. diarizonae, S. enterica clade A and S. enterica clade B was assessed. Filter-sterilised carbon sugar solutions were added into M9 (Merck, M6030-1kg) agar at concentrations detailed in S5 Table. Isolated colonies were transferred from LB agar plates onto M9 carbon source plates using a sterile 48-pronged replica plate stamp and incubated at 37°C under aerobic conditions. An LB control plate was used to validate successful bacterial transfer and all experiments were performed in duplicate. If no growth was seen under aerobic conditions for a particular carbon source, the procedure was repeated under anaerobic conditions (approx. 0.35% oxygen) with 20 mM Trimethylamine N-oxide dihydrate (TMAO) (Merck, 92277) as a terminal electron acceptor. Anaerobic conditions were achieved by incubating plates in an anaerobic jar with 3x AnaeroGen 2.5 L sachets (Thermo Scientific, UK, AN0025A) to generate anaerobic gas. Oxygen levels were measured using SP-PSt7-NAU Sensor Spots and the Microx 4 oxygen detection system (PreSens, Regensburg, Germany). Salmonella growth was determined at 18, 90 and 162 hours in aerobic growth conditions and at 162 hours in anaerobic growth conditions. A sub-set of growth positive isolates were assessed for single colony formation to validate the results of the replica plating.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella isolated from venomous and non-venomous reptiles

Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using a modified version of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) disk diffusion method [65] using Mueller Hinton (Lab M, LAB039) agar plates and a DISKMASTER dispenser (Mast Group, UK, MDD64). Inhibition zone diameters were measured and compared to EUCAST zone diameter breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae [66]. Isolates were first tested with six commonly used antibiotics (Ampicillin 10 μg, Chloramphenicol 30 μg, Nalidixic Acid 30 μg, Tetracycline 30 μg, Ceftriaxone 30 μg, and Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole 25 μg) and were then tested with five additional antibiotics (Meropenem 10 μg, Gentamicin 10 μg, Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid 30 μg, Azithromycin 15 μg, and Ciprofloxacin 5 μg) if any resistance was seen to the primary antibiotics (all disks from Mast Group). If resistance was observed phenotypically, then the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes were investigated using the Resfinder software tool [67]. Antimicrobial resistance was defined as resistance to one antimicrobial to which isolates would normally be susceptible [68]. Multidrug resistance was defined as an isolate which showed resistance to three or more antimicrobials to which it would normally be susceptible [68].

Results and discussion

Similarities in Salmonella prevalence between captive venomous snakes and non-venomous reptiles

Salmonella carriage is well documented amongst reptiles (Table 1), however, to our knowledge no published study reports the incidence of Salmonella in venomous snakes. The period prevalence of Salmonella was assessed in a collection of 106 venomous snakes housed at the LSTM venom unit between May 2015 and January 2017. A remarkably high proportion (91%; 97/106) of the faecal samples contained Salmonella (S1 Table), which should be seen in the context of the significant carriage rate of Salmonella by other non-venomous reptiles described in the literature [27]. Variable rates of Salmonella carriage have been observed in collections of reptiles (Table 1), and the large proportion of venomous snakes carrying Salmonella in our study sits at the higher end of the reported spectrum. Our findings pose important public health considerations for individuals who work with venomous snakes housed in captivity, which may previously have been overlooked.

The diversity of Salmonella highlights the possibility of local transmission events and the role of long-term shedding

To assess diversity, 87 venomous snake-derived Salmonella isolates, 27 non-venomous reptile-derived Salmonella isolates and one venomous reptile-derived Salmonella isolate were whole-genome sequenced. In silico serotyping revealed 58 different Salmonella serovars (Fig 1). A wide range of serovars was found in each of the venomous and non-venomous snake collections. Given that many of the serovars identified have a very broad host specificity, we suggest that the presence of particular serovars is not linked to the venom status of the reptile.

thumbnail
Fig 1. The distribution of the 58 Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from venomous and non-venomous reptiles.

Each bar represents the total number of isolates which belonged to each serovar. Serovars containing isolates that had multiple serovar designations from SISTR are indicated with asterisks. Human pictographs are displayed on serovars which are amongst the top 20 isolated from humans in Africa. Data is based on the global monitoring of Salmonella serovar distribution from the WHO global foodborne infections network data [69].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007169.g001

Similar levels of Salmonella carriage were seen in wild-caught and captive-bred reptiles. It is likely that the difference in serovar distribution reflects the sourcing of the reptiles from two independent housing facilities, and represents a limitation of our study. Nevertheless, an unprecedented level of Salmonella diversity was identified amongst both venomous and non-venomous reptiles. Following whole-genome sequencing, multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was used for sub-serovar genetic characterisation of Salmonella [37]. In all cases, isolates falling within the same serovar had identical sequence types (S1 Table), reflecting the intra-serovar homogeneity of the Salmonella isolated in this study.

The most common serovar to be identified amongst the venomous snake isolates was S. Souhanina (n = 12). All S. Souhanina isolates clustered locally on the phylogeny (Fig 2) falling within a 5 SNP cluster characteristic of a clonal expansion event [70]. Four of these isolates were found in captive-bred reptiles, whilst 11 isolates came from venomous snakes which originated in Cameroon, Uganda, Tanzania, Nigeria, Togo and Egypt. The close phylogenetic relationship between the S. Souhanina isolates that belong to the same MLST type (ST488) from imported animals with a range of origins and from captive animals suggests that local Salmonella transmission may be occurring. Local transmission of near-identical salmonellae could occur between snakes or as a result of a single contaminated food source such as frozen mice [71,72].

thumbnail
Fig 2. The diversity of Salmonella isolated from a collection of venomous snakes and non-venomous reptiles.

Core genome maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree. The tree was rooted using S. bongori (S1 Fig). 25 contextual reference genomes representing previously sequenced isolates from each Salmonella subgroup are indicated in red. A cluster of S. Souhanina isolates which demonstrate a high level of genetic similarity are indicated. Colour strips showing metadata are as follows; Subspecies–Subspecies of isolate, Origin—The country of origin of the snake from which the isolate was taken, V or NV—Depicts whether the reptile host was venomous (V) or non-venomous (NV), AMR phenotype—Isolates shown in red were resistant to one or more antimicrobial agent. Metadata for the contextual reference genomes appear as white. Tree was visualised using ITOL (https://itol.embl.de).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007169.g002

Although our data suggest that S. Souhanina was locally transmitted within the herpetarium, a single source of Salmonella would not explain the wide variety of serovars and MLST types carried by this collection of venomous snakes. Significant Salmonella diversity was reported in a study that involved 166 faecal samples from wild-caught reptiles in Spain, identifying 27 unique serovars [73]. An assessment of Salmonella diversity in wildlife in New South Wales, Australia identified 20 unique serovars amongst 60 wild-reptiles [74]. We speculate that the majority of the diversity of Salmonella identified here originated from wild-caught reptiles and reflect their varied habitats.

Underpinning our strategy for sampling Salmonella was the assumption that venomous snakes can carry and shed Salmonella for long periods of time. The longitudinal shedding of Salmonella has been reported in 12 captive non-venomous snakes from 7 different species. Over 10 consecutive weeks, 58% of the snakes shed Salmonella intermittently [75]. Chronic Salmonella carriage has been reported in many other animals, including laying hens which shed the bacteria continually for up to 10 weeks [76]. To assess the continuity of Salmonella shedding from venomous snakes in this study we collected three faecal samples from a Western Green Mamba from Togo over a three-month period between 31st October 2016 and 31st January 2017. All three faecal samples contained Salmonella which belonged to sequence type ST488, showing that individual snakes have the capacity to shed the same sequence type of Salmonella over a 90-day period in this study.

We propose that the majority of the reptile-derived Salmonella described in this study were acquired by reptiles prior to captivity, whilst some isolates were transmitted locally within the herpetarium.

Venomous reptiles carry multidrug resistant Salmonella serovars of clinical relevance

Because the majority of venomous snakes examined in this study were of African origin or belonged to a species of snake native to the African continent (Fig 2), we compared the Salmonella serovars isolated from all reptiles in this study with those most frequently associated with human disease in Africa. The Salmonella serovar distribution has been reported by the WHO global foodborne infections network data bank based on data from quality assured laboratories in Cameroon, Senegal and Tunisia [69] (Fig 1). Eleven snake-derived isolates belonged to serovars commonly pathogenic in humans. This finding prompted us to determine the proportion of all venomous snakes and non-venomous reptiles that carried antimicrobial resistant Salmonella (Table 2). In Salmonella collected from venomous snakes, 4.1% of isolates (4/97) were resistant to at least one antimicrobial and two isolates were multidrug resistant (Table 2). Three resistant isolates from venomous snakes belonged to the serovar Enteritidis and were closely related to the global S. Enteritidis epidemic clade which causes human disease in Africa [77]. These findings demonstrate that venomous snakes are capable of carrying and shedding Salmonella that have the potential to cause disease in humans.

Phylogenetic diversity and molecular epidemiology of Salmonella in venomous snakes and non-venomous reptiles demonstrated for the first time

Here we have shown that venomous snakes can shed Salmonella. The vast diversity of Salmonella has long been acknowledged in the literature [37]. To study the diversity of reptile-associated Salmonella from an evolutionary perspective, we obtained 87 high quality whole-genome sequences for a phylogenetic comparison that involved 24 contextual Salmonella genomes (methods). The 87 genomes represented 60 isolates from venomous snakes, 26 Salmonella isolates from non-venomous reptiles and 1 Salmonella isolate from a venomous reptile. Following a comprehensive comparative genomic analysis, we identified a total of 405,231 core genome SNPs that differentiated the 87 isolates, and were used to infer a maximum likelihood phylogeny (Fig 2). SNPs are a valuable marker of genetic diversity [70], and the identification of hundreds of thousands of core-genome SNPs reflects a high level of genetic diversity among the reptile associated Salmonella isolates. The collection of reptile-derived Salmonella represented most of the known diversity of the Salmonella genus [7], spanning four of the six Salmonella enterica subspecies: diarizonae, enterica, houtanae and salamae. Reptile-derived S. enterica subspecies enterica isolates were approximately equally distributed among two distinct phylogenetic clusters, known as clade A (58%) and clade B (48%) [911] (Fig 2). No significant association was found between venom status and phylogenetic group (OR = 1.1, CI = 0.3–3.0, χ2 = 0.02, P = 0.4).

Genotypic and phenotypic conservation of infection-relevant carbon source utilisation and virulence-associated genomic regions sheds new light on Salmonella ecology

The unique collection of diverse Salmonella isolates was used to determine the phenotypic and genotypic conservation of infection-relevant properties and genomic elements. Whilst the reptile-associated Salmonella belonged to five evolutionary groups, the majority of isolates were classified as S. diarizonae or S. enterica. The clustering of S. enterica into two clades (A and B) has previously been inferred phylogenetically based on the alignment of 92 core loci [9,10]. The biological significance of S. enterica clade A and clade B has been established as the two clades differ in host specificity, virulence-associated genes and metabolic properties such as carbon utilisation [11]. The genome sequences were used to expand upon pre-existing knowledge and determine phenotypic and genotypic conservation of metabolic and virulence factors across S. diarizonae and S. enterica (clades A and B).

Although the majority of Salmonella serovars of public health significance belong to clade A, certain clade B serovars such as Salmonella Panama have been associated with invasive disease [78,79]. The clade B S. enterica generally carry a combination of two Salmonella genomic islands. The Salmonella Pathogenicity Island-18 encodes an intracellularly expressed pore forming hemolysin hlyE and the cytolethal distending toxin islet which includes the gene cdtB [2,9]. It has been suggested that the two islands are associated with invasive disease, as previously they had only been identified in S. enterica serovar Typhi and Paratyphi A, which cause bloodstream infections [2,9]. The combination of hlyE and cdtB genes were present in all S. diarizonae and S. enterica clade B isolates in this study, but absent from all but one S. enterica clade A isolate (14L-2174). We propose that the significant proportion of reptiles which carried S. enterica clade B could partially explain the increased likelihood of reptile-associated salmonellosis involving invasive disease, compared to non-reptile-acquired salmonellosis [26].

To assess metabolic differences that distinguish S. enterica clade A, S. enterica clade B and S. diarizonae, we phenotypically screened 39 reptile isolates for the ability to catabolise a number of infection-relevant carbon sources [48,77,80,81] (S4 Table and S5 Table). A summary of the results for phenotypic carbon utilisation and the presence of genes associated with the cognate metabolic pathway is shown in Fig 3.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Phylogenetic context of carbon-source utilisation by reptile-derived-Salmonella isolates.

Carbon source utilisation data were mapped against the core genome phylogenetic tree. The maximum likelihood tree includes all reptile-derived Salmonella isolates which were assessed for carbon utilisation and had high quality genome sequences (see S4 Table, S5 Table and S1 Text). Reference sequences for the majority of carbon utilisation and acquisition genes were taken from S. Typhimurium strain 4/74, and the lac gene sequences were from E. coli MG1655. Carbon sources which required anaerobic conditions are indicated with asterisk.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007169.g003

In general, the genotype accurately reflected phenotype in terms of carbon source utilisation; however, this was not always the case (Fig 3). Discrepancies between phenotypic growth and genotype suggests that mechanisms of Salmonella metabolism remain to be elucidated. For example, S. diarizonae isolate LSS-18 grew well on myo-inositol as a sole carbon source (Fig 3) but showed zero percent homology with any of the iol genes from the well-characterised Salmonella strain 4/74. The ability to utilise lactose was a property of most S. diarizonae isolates, consistent with previous reports that 85% of S. diarizonae are Lac+ [82]. It is estimated that less than 1% of all Salmonella ferment lactose due to the loss of the lac operon from the S. enterica subspecies [83]. It was interesting to discover that one non-venomous snake isolate (13L-2837) which belongs to S. enterica clade B was capable of utilising lactose as a sole carbon source. Isolate 13L-2337 belongs to the serovar S. Johannesburg and to our knowledge this is the first published occurrence of a Lac+ S. Johannesburg isolate. The 13L-2837 pan-genome had zero percent homology to the lac genes from reference strain E. coli MG1655 (sequence in S1 Text) (results in Fig 3), suggesting an alternative method for lactose utilisation. The 13L-2837 S. Johannesburg isolate also lacked the ability to grow on dulcitol, despite possessing all of the relevant gat genes, raising the possibility of an inverse relationship between the ability of Salmonella to utilise dulcitol and lactose as a sole carbon source. These findings require further investigation which is beyond the scope of the current study.

The majority of S. enterica clade A and clade B isolates utilised dulcitol, whereas dulcitol was rarely used as a sole carbon source by S. diarizonae. These findings are consistent with a study of Salmonella derived from Australian sleepy lizards, which demonstrated that dulcitol utilisation was observed in almost all S. enterica and S. salamae isolates but only 10% of S. diarizonae isolates [84]. Over 50% of the S. enterica clade A isolates lacked the gatY gene but grew well on dulcitol as a sole carbon source, suggesting that GatY is not required for dulcitol catabolism. A variety of repertoires of dulcitol catabolic genes have been described across Salmonella, with individual serovars carrying one of two gat gene clusters [59]. Both of these clusters carry the gatY gene. Our findings may indicate that a third gat gene cluster is carried by some Salmonella serovars.

In the majority of cases, allantoin was only utilised as a sole carbon source by S. enterica clade A isolates, consistent with a previous report that described an association of clade A with the allantoin catabolism island [9]. The majority of clade B isolates lacked the allantoin catabolism island and thus were unable to utilise allantoin as a sole carbon source. However, we identified one clade B isolate as an exception, isolate 11L-2351 which was sampled from a non-venomous reptile. This isolate belongs to the serovar Montevideo, which is frequently associated with outbreaks of human salmonellosis [8587]. In reptiles, the end product of the purine catabolic pathway is not allantoin, but uric acid [9]. The consequent absence of allantoin from the snake gastrointestinal tract could explain why a substantial number of S. enterica clade B were found in snakes.

It is possible that the gain and loss of allantoin catabolic genes is relevant to host specificity. A relationship between the pseudogenization of the allantoin metabolic genes and niche adaptation has also been proposed for the invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella (iNTS) reference isolate for S. Typhimurium: D23580 [49,88]. Compared with S. Typhimurium isolate 4/74, which shows a broad host range, D23580 is unable to utilise allantoin as a sole carbon source, consistent with the adaptation of invasive Salmonella in Africa towards non-allantoin producing hosts [49,88]. Furthermore, accumulation of pseudogenes in the allantoin degradation pathway has been reported in host-restricted Salmonella serovars which cause invasive disease, suggesting that the ability to grow on allantoin is a marker of a switch from enteric to invasive disease [89]. These findings may reflect the clinical observation that snake-acquired salmonellosis is frequently an invasive disease that commonly results in hospitalisation, compared to disease caused by Salmonella derived from allantoin-producing hosts.

Perspective

Although reptiles are known to harbour a diverse range of Salmonella bacteria, until now Salmonella carriage has not been examined in many key reptilian species. Here, we have shown that venomous snakes harbour and shed a wide variety of Salmonella serovars that represent much of the spectrum of the Salmonella genus and are phylogenetically distributed in a similar way to Salmonella found in non-venomous reptiles. We demonstrated that venomous snakes can carry and excrete Salmonella serovars which cause human disease. One of the Salmonella isolates was resistant to first-line antimicrobial agents. It is possible that venomous snakes represent a previously uncharacterised reservoir for Salmonella both in captive settings and in the wider environment. Further study is required to investigate the relationship between clinical cases and reptile-derived Salmonella in tropical regions inhabited by venomous reptiles such as Africa. We believe that our study provides a good baseline for this future work.

Reptiles are an ideal population of animals for the study of genus-level evolution of Salmonella because they carry phylogenetically diverse isolates that belong to the majority of Salmonella subspecies. By demonstrating the phenotypic and genotypic conservation of metabolic properties across three phylogenetic groups of Salmonella we have shed new light on the evolution of Salmonella serotypes.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Reptile-associated-Salmonella strain metadata and control strain metadata.

The table includes all metadata associated with the venomous snake, non-venomous reptile and control strains used throughout this research including details on accessing raw reads where applicable.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007169.s001

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Contextual reference genomes metadata and accession numbers.

The table lists the strains used in phylogenetic analysis to put the study strains into wider context and includes some basic information in addition to accession numbers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007169.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Table. QUAST assembly statistics.

The table provides details on assembly statistics for each sequenced genome and highlights those strains which failed quality control in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007169.s003

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Carbon source utilisation gene information.

The table provides a list of the carbon utilisation genes together with rationale for why each gene was chosen. A list of the carbon source, gene name and gene product is provided along with the LT2 Locus ID (STM number), the SL1344 Locus ID (SL1344 number), a link to the KEGG pathway and a citation demonstrating the activity of the gene in Salmonella.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007169.s004

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Carbon source specific requirements.

The table contains a list of the carbon sources used to determine the metabolic capacity of reptile-associated Salmonella. Specific conditions, concentrations and references are given for each.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007169.s005

(XLSX)

S1 Text. Carbon source utilisation gene sequences.

A full list of the sequences used to determine the presence or absence of genes involved in carbon source utilisation in reptile associated Salmonella.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007169.s006

(FASTA)

S1 Fig. The diversity of Salmonella isolated from a collection of venomous snakes and non-venomous reptiles including the S. bongori outgroup.

Core genome maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree. The tree was rooted using S. bongori shown here. 25 contextual reference genomes representing previously sequenced isolates from each Salmonella subgroup are indicated in purple.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007169.s007

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to present and former members of the Hinton lab and Lab H at the Institute of Integrative Biology for helpful discussions. In particular we would like to thank Alex V Predeus and Evelien M Adriaenssens for their ongoing bioinformatic advice and support. We are also grateful to Blanca Perez-Sepulveda for managing the 10 000 Salmonella genomes project, without whom sequencing of these isolates would not have been possible. We would like to express our gratitude to Nicholas Feasey for his advice on Salmonella isolation. We thank the Centre for Snakebite Research and Interventions at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine for access to faecal samples from venomous snakes, and to the Leahurst diagnostics unit at the University of Liverpool for providing access to the collection of Salmonella isolates from reptiles housed at Chester Zoo.

References

  1. 1. Kirk MD, Pires SM, Black RE, Caipo M, Crump JA, Devleesschauwer B, et al. World Health Organization Estimates of the Global and Regional Disease Burden of 22 Foodborne Bacterial, Protozoal, and Viral Diseases, 2010: A Data Synthesis. PLOS Med. Public Library of Science; 2015;12: e1001921. Available: pmid:26633831
  2. 2. Crump JA, Luby SP, Mintz ED. The global burden of typhoid fever. Bull World Health Organ. Switzerland; 2004;82: 346–353. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2622843/ pmid:15298225
  3. 3. Majowicz SE, Musto J, Scallan E, Angulo FJ, Kirk M, O’Brien SJ, et al. The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin Infect Dis. United States; 2010;50: 882–889. pmid:20158401
  4. 4. Ao TT, Feasey NA, Gordon MA, Keddy KH, Angulo FJ, Crump JA. Global burden of invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella disease, 2010(1). Emerg Infect Dis. United States; 2015;21. pmid:25860298
  5. 5. Mogasale V, Maskery B, Ochiai RL, Lee JS, Mogasale V V, Ramani E, et al. Burden of typhoid fever in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic, literature-based update with risk-factor adjustment. Lancet Glob Heal. England; 2014;2: e570–80.
  6. 6. Gordon MA. Salmonella infections in immunocompromised adults. J Infect. England; 2008;56: 413–422. pmid:18474400
  7. 7. Brenner FW, Villar RG, Angulo FJ, Tauxe R, Swaminathan B. Salmonella nomenclature. J Clin Microbiol. United States; 2000;38: 2465–2467. Available: http://jcm.asm.org/content/38/7/2465.full pmid:10878026
  8. 8. Winfield MD, Groisman EA. Evolution and Ecology of Salmonella. EcoSal Plus. United States; 2004;1. pmid:26443365
  9. 9. den Bakker HC, Moreno Switt AI, Govoni G, Cummings CA, Ranieri ML, Degoricija L, et al. Genome sequencing reveals diversification of virulence factor content and possible host adaptation in distinct subpopulations of Salmonella enterica. BMC Genomics. England; 2011;12: 425. pmid:21859443
  10. 10. Falush D, Torpdahl M, Didelot X, Conrad DF, Wilson DJ, Achtman M. Mismatch induced speciation in Salmonella: model and data. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. England; 2006;361: 2045–2053. pmid:17062419
  11. 11. Parsons SK, Bull CM, Gordon DM. Substructure within Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolates from Australian wildlife. Appl Environ Microbiol. United States; 2011;77: 3151–3153. pmid:21378038
  12. 12. Nuccio S-P, Bäumler AJ. Comparative Analysis of Salmonella Genomes Identifies a Metabolic Network for Escalating Growth in the Inflamed Gut. Finlay BB, editor. MBio. 2014;5: e00929–14. pmid:24643865
  13. 13. Seif Y, Kavvas E, Lachance J-C, Yurkovich JT, Nuccio S-P, Fang X, et al. Genome-scale metabolic reconstructions of multiple Salmonella strains reveal serovar-specific metabolic traits. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 3771. pmid:30218022
  14. 14. Baumler A, Fang FC. Host specificity of bacterial pathogens. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. United States; 2013;3: a010041. pmid:24296346
  15. 15. Eng S-K, Pusparajah P, Ab Mutalib N-S, Ser H-L, Chan K-G, Lee L-H. Salmonella: A review on pathogenesis, epidemiology and antibiotic resistance. Front Life Sci. Taylor & Francis; 2015;8: 284–293.
  16. 16. Clancy MM, Davis M, Valitutto MT, Nelson K, Sykes JM 4th. Salmonella infection and carriage in reptiles in a zoological collection. J Am Vet Med Assoc. United States; 2016;248: 1050–1059. pmid:27074614
  17. 17. Nair S, Wain J, Connell S, de Pinna E, Peters T. Salmonella enterica subspecies II infections in England and Wales—the use of multilocus sequence typing to assist serovar identification. J Med Microbiol. England; 2014;63: 831–834. pmid:24696514
  18. 18. Schroter M, Roggentin P, Hofmann J, Speicher A, Laufs R, Mack D. Pet snakes as a reservoir for Salmonella enterica subsp. diarizonae (Serogroup IIIb): a prospective study. Appl Environ Microbiol. United States; 2004;70: 613–615. pmid:14711697
  19. 19. Piasecki T, Chrząstek K, Wieliczko A. Salmonella serovar spectrum associated with reptiles in Poland. Acta Vet Brno. 2014;83: 287–294. Available: https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201483040287
  20. 20. Lukac M, Pedersen K, Prukner-Radovcic E. PREVALENCE OF SALMONELLA IN CAPTIVE REPTILES FROM CROATIA. J Zoo Wildl Med. United States; 2015;46: 234–240. pmid:26056873
  21. 21. Nakadai A, Kuroki T, Kato Y, Suzuki R, Yamai S, Yaginuma C, et al. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in pet reptiles in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. Japan; 2005;67: 97–101. Available: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jvms/67/1/67_1_97/_article pmid:15699603
  22. 22. Geue L, Loschner U. Salmonella enterica in reptiles of German and Austrian origin. Vet Microbiol. Netherlands; 2002;84: 79–91. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378113501004370?via%3Dihub
  23. 23. Sá IVA de Solari CA. Salmonella in Brazilian and imported pet reptiles [Internet]. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. scielo; 2001. pp. 293–297. Available: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822001000400007&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
  24. 24. Pedersen K, Lassen-Nielsen A-M, Nordentoft S, Hammer AS. Serovars of Salmonella from captive reptiles. Zoonoses Public Health. Germany; 2009;56: 238–242. pmid:19175571
  25. 25. Mermin J, Hutwagner L, Vugia D, Shallow S, Daily P, Bender J, et al. Reptiles, amphibians, and human Salmonella infection: a population-based, case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. United States; 2004;38 Suppl 3: S253–61. pmid:15095197
  26. 26. Murphy D, Oshin F. Reptile-associated salmonellosis in children aged under 5 years in South West England. Arch Dis Child. England; 2015;100: 364–365. pmid:25538189
  27. 27. Whiley H, Gardner MG, Ross K. A Review of Salmonella and Squamates (Lizards, Snakes and Amphisbians): Implications for Public Health. Pathog (Basel, Switzerland). Switzerland; 2017;6. pmid:28829352
  28. 28. Harrison RA. Snake Envenoming: A Disease of Poverty. 2009. pmid:20027216
  29. 29. Warrell DA, Greenwood BM, Davidson NM, Ormerod LD, Prentice CR. Necrosis, haemorrhage and complement depletion following bites by the spitting cobra (Naja nigricollis). Q J Med. England; 1976;45: 1–22. pmid:943796
  30. 30. Ogunfowokan O. Bite-to-hospital time and morbidity in victims of viper bite in a rural hospital in Nigeria. African J Prim Heal Care Fam Med. AOSIS OpenJournals; 2012;4: 371.
  31. 31. Public Health England. Detection of Salmonella species. Microbiology Services. Food, Water & Environmental Microbiology Standard Method FNES16 (F13). Version 2 [Internet]. Version 2. Methods Working Group, editor. London: Public Health England; 2014. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/330682/National_SOP_FNES16_F13_Detection_of_Salmonella_Species.pdf
  32. 32. Malorny B, Paccassoni E, Fach P, Bunge C, Martin A, Helmuth R. Diagnostic real-time PCR for detection of Salmonella in food. Appl Environ Microbiol. United States; 2004;70: 7046–7052. pmid:15574899
  33. 33. Beltran P, Musser JM, Helmuth R, Farmer JJ 3rd, Frerichs WM, Wachsmuth IK, et al. Toward a population genetic analysis of Salmonella: genetic diversity and relationships among strains of serotypes S. choleraesuis, S. derby, S. dublin, S. enteritidis, S. heidelberg, S. infantis, S. newport, and S. typhimurium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. United States; 1988;85: 7753–7757. pmid:3051004
  34. 34. Beltran P, Plock SA, Smith NH, Whittam TS, Old DC, Selander RK. Reference collection of strains of the Salmonella typhimurium complex from natural populations. J Gen Microbiol. England; 1991;137: 601–606. pmid:2033380
  35. 35. Blattner FR, Plunkett G 3rd, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. United States; 1997;277: 1453–1462. pmid:9278503
  36. 36. Yoshida CE, Kruczkiewicz P, Laing CR, Lingohr EJ, Gannon VPJ, Nash JHE, et al. The Salmonella In Silico Typing Resource (SISTR): An Open Web-Accessible Tool for Rapidly Typing and Subtyping Draft Salmonella Genome Assemblies. PLoS One. United States; 2016;11: e0147101. pmid:26800248
  37. 37. Alikhan N-F, Zhou Z, Sergeant MJ, Achtman M. A genomic overview of the population structure of Salmonella. PLoS Genet. United States; 2018;14: e1007261. pmid:29621240
  38. 38. Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. England; 2014;15: R46. pmid:24580807
  39. 39. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. England; 2014;30: 2114–2120. pmid:24695404
  40. 40. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. United States; 2012;19: 455–477. pmid:22506599
  41. 41. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. England; 2013;29: 1072–1075. pmid:23422339
  42. 42. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. England; 2014;30: 2068–2069. pmid:24642063
  43. 43. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. England; 2015;31: 3691–3693. pmid:26198102
  44. 44. Page AJ, Taylor B, Delaney AJ, Soares J, Seemann T, Keane JA, et al. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb genomics. England; 2016;2: e000056. pmid:28348851
  45. 45. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. England; 2014;30: 1312–1313. pmid:24451623
  46. 46. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. England; 2016;44: W242–5. pmid:27095192
  47. 47. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. England; 2014;42: D199–205. pmid:24214961
  48. 48. Kroger C, Fuchs TM. Characterization of the myo-inositol utilization island of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol. United States; 2009;191: 545–554. pmid:19011032
  49. 49. Okoro CK, Barquist L, Connor TR, Harris SR, Clare S, Stevens MP, et al. Signatures of adaptation in human invasive Salmonella Typhimurium ST313 populations from sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. United States; 2015;9: e0003611. pmid:25803844
  50. 50. Feldheim DA, Chin AM, Nierva CT, Feucht BU, Cao YW, Xu YF, et al. Physiological consequences of the complete loss of phosphoryl-transfer proteins HPr and FPr of the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system and analysis of fructose (fru) operon expression in Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. United States; 1990;172: 5459–5469.
  51. 51. Starai VJ, Garrity J, Escalante-Semerena JC. Acetate excretion during growth of Salmonella enterica on ethanolamine requires phosphotransacetylase (EutD) activity, and acetate recapture requires acetyl-CoA synthetase (Acs) and phosphotransacetylase (Pta) activities. Microbiology. England; 2005;151: 3793–3801. pmid:16272400
  52. 52. Steeb B, Claudi B, Burton NA, Tienz P, Schmidt A, Farhan H, et al. Parallel Exploitation of Diverse Host Nutrients Enhances Salmonella Virulence. PLOS Pathog. Public Library of Science; 2013;9: e1003301. Available: pmid:23633950
  53. 53. Lewis JA, Horswill AR, Schwem BE, Escalante-Semerena JC. The Tricarballylate utilization (tcuRABC) genes of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. J Bacteriol. United States; 2004;186: 1629–1637. pmid:14996793
  54. 54. Lewis JA, Escalante-Semerena JC. The FAD-dependent tricarballylate dehydrogenase (TcuA) enzyme of Salmonella enterica converts tricarballylate into cis-aconitate. J Bacteriol. United States; 2006;188: 5479–5486. pmid:16855237
  55. 55. Daus ML, Berendt S, Wuttge S, Schneider E. Maltose binding protein (MalE) interacts with periplasmic loops P2 and P1 respectively of the MalFG subunits of the maltose ATP binding cassette transporter (MalFGK(2)) from Escherichia coli/Salmonella during the transport cycle. Mol Microbiol. England; 2007;66: 1107–1122. pmid:17961142
  56. 56. Fox DK, Roseman S. Isolation and characterization of homogeneous acetate kinase from Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. United States; 1986;261: 13487–13497. pmid:3020034
  57. 57. Canals R, Hammarlof DL, Kroger C, Owen S V, Fong WY, Lacharme-Lora L, et al. Adding function to the genome of African Salmonella Typhimurium ST313 strain D23580. PLoS Biol. United States; 2019;17: e3000059. pmid:30645593
  58. 58. Leonard SR, Lacher DW, Lampel KA. Acquisition of the lac operon by Salmonella enterica. BMC Microbiol. England; 2015;15: 173. pmid:26303940
  59. 59. Nolle N, Felsl A, Heermann R, Fuchs TM. Genetic Characterization of the Galactitol Utilization Pathway of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Becker A, editor. Journal of Bacteriology. 1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC; 2017. pmid:27956522
  60. 60. Srikumar S, Kröger C, Hébrard M, Colgan A, Owen S V, Sivasankaran SK, et al. RNA-seq Brings New Insights to the Intra-Macrophage Transcriptome of Salmonella Typhimurium. PLOS Pathog. Public Library of Science; 2015;11: e1005262. Available: pmid:26561851
  61. 61. Morgulis A, Coulouris G, Raytselis Y, Madden TL, Agarwala R, Schaffer AA. Database indexing for production MegaBLAST searches. Bioinformatics. England; 2008;24: 1757–1764. pmid:18567917
  62. 62. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. England; 2009;25: 1754–1760. pmid:19451168
  63. 63. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. England; 2009;25: 2078–2079. pmid:19505943
  64. 64. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nature biotechnology. United States; 2011. pp. 24–26. pmid:21221095
  65. 65. Matuschek E, Brown DFJ, Kahlmeter G. Development of the EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method and its implementation in routine microbiology laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect. England; 2014;20: O255–66. pmid:24131428
  66. 66. Andrews JM, Howe RA. BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 10). J Antimicrob Chemother. England; 2011;66: 2726–2757. pmid:21921076
  67. 67. Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. England; 2012;67: 2640–2644. pmid:22782487
  68. 68. Magiorakos A-P, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. England; 2012;18: 268–281. pmid:21793988
  69. 69. Hendriksen RS, Vieira AR, Karlsmose S, Lo Fo Wong DMA, Jensen AB, Wegener HC, et al. Global monitoring of Salmonella serovar distribution from the World Health Organization Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Data Bank: results of quality assured laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodborne Pathog Dis. United States; 2011;8: 887–900. pmid:21492021
  70. 70. Dallman T, Ashton P, Schafer U, Jironkin A, Painset A, Shaaban S, et al. SnapperDB: A database solution for routine sequencing analysis of bacterial isolates. Bioinformatics. England; 2018; pmid:29659710
  71. 71. Fuller CC, Jawahir SL, Leano FT, Bidol SA, Signs K, Davis C, et al. A multi-state Salmonella Typhimurium outbreak associated with frozen vacuum-packed rodents used to feed snakes. Zoonoses Public Health. Germany; 2008;55: 481–487.
  72. 72. Kanagarajah S, Waldram A, Dolan G, Jenkins C, Ashton PM, Carrion Martin AI, et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals an outbreak of Salmonella Enteritidis associated with reptile feeder mice in the United Kingdom, 2012–2015. Food Microbiol. England; 2018;71: 32–38. pmid:29366466
  73. 73. Briones V, Tellez S, Goyache J, Ballesteros C, del Pilar Lanzarot M, Dominguez L, et al. Salmonella diversity associated with wild reptiles and amphibians in Spain. Environ Microbiol. England; 2004;6: 868–871. pmid:15250889
  74. 74. Simpson KMJ, Hill-Cawthorne GA, Ward MP, Mor SM. Diversity of Salmonella serotypes from humans, food, domestic animals and wildlife in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18: 623. pmid:30518339
  75. 75. Goupil BA, Trent AM, Bender Jeff B, Olsen Karen E, Morningstar BR, Wuenschmann A. A Longitudinal Study of Salmonella from Snakes Used in a Public Outreach Program. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2012;43: 836–841. pmid:23272351
  76. 76. Gast RK, Guraya R, Jones DR, Anderson KE, Karcher DM. Frequency and Duration of Fecal Shedding of Salmonella Enteritidis by Experimentally Infected Laying Hens Housed in Enriched Colony Cages at Different Stocking Densities [Internet]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2017. p. 47. Available: pmid:28443289
  77. 77. Feasey NA, Hadfield J, Keddy KH, Dallman TJ, Jacobs J, Deng X, et al. Distinct Salmonella Enteritidis lineages associated with enterocolitis in high-income settings and invasive disease in low-income settings. Nat Genet. United States; 2016;48: 1211–1217. pmid:27548315
  78. 78. Chaudhuri RR, Morgan E, Peters SE, Pleasance SJ, Hudson DL, Davies HM, et al. Comprehensive assignment of roles for Salmonella typhimurium genes in intestinal colonization of food-producing animals. PLoS Genet. United States; 2013;9: e1003456. pmid:23637626
  79. 79. Kostiala AA, Westerstrahle M, Muttilainen M. Neonatal Salmonella panama infection with meningitis. Acta Paediatr. Norway; 1992;81: 856–858. Available: https://actavet.vfu.cz/83/4/0287/ pmid:1421900
  80. 80. Nichols RJ, Sen S, Choo YJ, Beltrao P, Zietek M, Chaba R, et al. Phenotypic landscape of a bacterial cell. Cell. United States; 2011;144: 143–156. pmid:21185072
  81. 81. Gutnick D, Calvo JM, Klopotowski T, Ames BN. Compounds which serve as the sole source of carbon or nitrogen for Salmonella typhimurium LT-2. J Bacteriol. United States; 1969;100: 215–219. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC315380/pdf/jbacter00586-0249.pdf pmid:4898986
  82. 82. Lamas A, Miranda JM, Regal P, Vázquez B, Franco CM, Cepeda A. A comprehensive review of non-enterica subspecies of Salmonella enterica. Microbiol Res. 2018;206: 60–73. pmid:29146261
  83. 83. McDonough PL, Shin SJ, Lein DH. Diagnostic and public health dilemma of lactose-fermenting Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in cattle in the Northeastern United States. J Clin Microbiol. United States; 2000;38: 1221–1226. Available: http://jcm.asm.org/content/38/3/1221.full.pdf+html pmid:10699026
  84. 84. Parsons SK, Bull CM, Gordon DM. Spatial Variation and Survival of Salmonella enterica Subspecies in a Population of Australian Sleepy Lizards (Tiliqua rugosa). Appl Environ Microbiol. United States; 2015;81: 5804–5811. pmid:26092451
  85. 85. Gieraltowski L, Julian E, Pringle J, Macdonald K, Quilliam D, Marsden-Haug N, et al. Nationwide outbreak of Salmonella Montevideo infections associated with contaminated imported black and red pepper: warehouse membership cards provide critical clues to identify the source. Epidemiol Infect. England; 2013;141: 1244–1252. pmid:23200262
  86. 86. Gaffga NH, Barton Behravesh C, Ettestad PJ, Smelser CB, Rhorer AR, Cronquist AB, et al. Outbreak of salmonellosis linked to live poultry from a mail-order hatchery. N Engl J Med. United States; 2012;366: 2065–2073. pmid:22646629
  87. 87. Stocker P, Rosner B, Werber D, Kirchner M, Reinecke A, Wichmann-Schauer H, et al. Outbreak of Salmonella Montevideo associated with a dietary food supplement flagged in the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) in Germany, 2010. Euro Surveill Bull Eur sur les Mal Transm = Eur Commun Dis Bull. Sweden; 2011;16: 20040.
  88. 88. Kingsley RA, Msefula CL, Thomson NR, Kariuki S, Holt KE, Gordon MA, et al. Epidemic multiple drug resistant Salmonella Typhimurium causing invasive disease in sub-Saharan Africa have a distinct genotype. Genome Res. United States; 2009;19: 2279–2287. pmid:19901036
  89. 89. Langridge GC, Fookes M, Connor TR, Feltwell T, Feasey N, Parsons BN, et al. Patterns of genome evolution that have accompanied host adaptation in Salmonella. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. United States; 2015;112: 863–868. pmid:25535353