Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Prediction of the potential global distribution for Biomphalaria straminea, an intermediate host for Schistosoma mansoni

  • Ya Yang,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Tropical Disease Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

  • Wanting Cheng,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Tropical Disease Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

  • Xiaoying Wu,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Tropical Disease Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

  • Shaoyu Huang,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangdong, China

  • Zhuohui Deng,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangdong, China

  • Xin Zeng,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong, China

  • Dongjuan Yuan,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong, China

  • Yu Yang,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Tropical Disease Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

  • Zhongdao Wu,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong, China

  • Yue Chen,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

  • Yibiao Zhou ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    z_yibiao@hotmail.com

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Tropical Disease Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

  • Qingwu Jiang

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Tropical Disease Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Prediction of the potential global distribution for Biomphalaria straminea, an intermediate host for Schistosoma mansoni

  • Ya Yang, 
  • Wanting Cheng, 
  • Xiaoying Wu, 
  • Shaoyu Huang, 
  • Zhuohui Deng, 
  • Xin Zeng, 
  • Dongjuan Yuan, 
  • Yu Yang, 
  • Zhongdao Wu, 
  • Yue Chen
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Schistosomiasis is a snail-borne parasitic disease and is endemic in many tropical and subtropical countries. Biomphalaria straminea, an intermediate host for Schistosoma mansoni, is native to the southeastern part of South America and has established in other regions of South America, Central America and southern China during the last decades. S. mansoni is endemic in Africa, the Middle East, South America and the Caribbean. Knowledge of the potential global distribution of this snail is essential for risk assessment, monitoring, disease prevention and control.

Methods and findings

A comprehensive database of cross-continental occurrence for B. straminea was compiled to construct ecological models. We used several approaches to investigate the distribution of B. straminea, including direct comparison of climatic conditions, principal component analysis and niche overlap analyses to detect niche shifts. We also investigated the impacts of bioclimatic and human factors, and then used the bioclimatic and footprint layers to predict the potential distribution of B. straminea at global scale. We detected niche shifts accompanying the invasions of B. straminea in the Americas and China. The introduced populations had enlarged its habitats to subtropical regions where annual mean temperature is relatively low. Annual mean temperature, isothermality and temperature seasonality were identified as most important climatic features for the occurrence of B. straminea. Additionally, human factors improved the model prediction (P<0.001). Our model showed that under current climate conditions the snail should mostly be confined to the tropic and subtropic regions, including South America, Central America, Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia.

Conclusions

Our results confirmed that niche shifts took place in the invasions of B. straminea, in which bioclimatic and human factors played an important role. Our model predicted the global distribution of B. straminea based on habitat suitability, which would help for prioritizing monitoring and management efforts for B. straminea control in the context of ongoing climate change and human disturbances.

Author summary

Biomphalaria straminea is an intermediate host of Schistosoma mansoni. This snail has not only established in peripheral countries but also survived in different water habitats in Hong Kong and adjacent cities of mainland China. Ecological niche models were used to predict the potential global distribution of B. straminea. Our results showed that there were niche shifts in the process of invasion for B. straminea in the Americas and China. This snail has expanded its habitats to subtropical regions with lower annual mean temperature. Annual mean temperature, isothermality, temperature seasonality and human influence were identified as most important climatic features for the occurrence of B. straminea. Under current climate conditions the distribution of this snail should be mostly confined to the tropic and subtropic regions, including South America, Central America, Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. With the rapid globalization and the continued burden of imported cases of S. mansoni to non-endemic countries, predicting the potential distribution of the intermediate host and its drivers is increasing in importance for designing control strategies and optimizing use of limited public health resources. Prioritizing surveillance and control efforts to high-traffic regions with high habitat suitability may be the most effective approach.

Introduction

Invasive species can often pose threats to the ecosystem functioning and biodiversity at the global scale, especially when they spread diseases[1]. There are a growing number of studies conducted for risk assessment, monitoring and management of invasive species and reduction of negative impacts. For many invasive species, however, once they are established over large areas, their eradication or removal can be an impossible task[2]. The prevention of introduction and establishment is therefore thought to be the most cost-effective way of mitigating future negative consequences[3, 4]. An important approach to prevention is predicting species with invasive tendency and areas vulnerable to their invasion, which then can guide early detection and rapid response efforts against invasive species[47].

B. straminea (Dunker, 1848) is a freshwater snail in the family Planorbidae, originated from the southeastern part of South America[8]. It is a highly invasive and competitive species given its capacity to survive during the periods of drought and its great fertility[810]. During the last decades, free-ranging populations of B. straminea have been reported in peripheral countries including Paraguay[11], Argentina[12], Uruguay in 1987[13], Colombia in 1966[14] and Costa Rica in 1976[15]. In the Caribbean area, its introduction has been documented in several islands of the Lesser Antilles, namely Martinique around 1950[16], Grenada in 1970[17], Guadeloupe in 1985[18] and St Lucia in 1992[19]. Over the same period, the snail has invaded several new states in Brazil and replaced other Biomphalaria species following its introduction[20]. In addition, B. straminea is noted for its long-distance dispersion and establishment in Hong Kong in 1974, on the Pearl River Delta of China[21]. The snail subsequently dispersed to different water habitats in adjacent cities in Guangdong Province of southern China, including Shenzhen, Dongguan and Huizhou[22].

B. straminea is an intermediate host of Schistosoma mansoni[9, 23, 24], and is one of the three species found to be naturally infected with S. mansoni in Brazil[8]. S. mansoni is a snail-bone parasitic disease, prevalent predominantly in Africa, the Middle East, the Caribbean, Brazil, Venezuela and Suriname[25]. China started several aid programs in African countries in the 1970s. Since then, imported cases of S. mansoni from Africa have been increasing, which has captured much attention from public health officials[25]. The existence of imported patients and its intermediate host is the prerequisite of transmission of S. mansoni in China. Moreover, the increasing amount of logistics and human flows induced by the Belt and Road Initiative would put China at a greater risk of the disease[26]. Furthermore, global warming is thought to change the current habitats of B. straminea, thereby affecting the original landscape of schistosomiasis[25]. B. straminea was also found to precede the common snails as a carrier of Angiostrongylus cantonensis, an important neurotropic pathogen of human angiostrongyliasis, under laboratory conditions.[27] The study of potential distribution and suitable habitats of this snail are therefore of particular importance for global health.

Ecological niche modeling is increasingly used to predict the distributions of species and vector-borne diseases[2832]. This modeling method can not only predict distributional ranges, but also identify what particular combination of environmental variables shapes a species’ distribution[4, 29]. Previous studies have utilized ecological models to predict the spatial distribution of B. straminea at state and national scales in Brazil[9, 24]. There is only one study that built the prediction map in China based on the occurrence data in Shenzhen city[33]. However, species distribution models, which do not incorporate data from both the native and introduced ranges, likely misrepresent the potential distribution of invasive species, especially under projected climate change scenarios[34]. The aim of this study was threefold. First, we compared the niches of the native and introduced populations to assess whether niche shifts occurred in the invasion of B. straminea. Second, we investigated the impacts of bioclimatic and human factors in the process of invasion. Third, we used pooled data from both the native and introduced ranges to predict the potential distribution of B. straminea at a global scale.

Methods

Occurrence records

We obtained occurrence records from a comprehensive literature review (S1 Table), the Global Biodiversity Information Facility database (GBIF, http://www.gbif.org/, last accessed December 2016), and results from our own malacological surveys. All available location information was extracted for each occurrence. We georeferenced records from literature and GBIF that had only the administrative region using Google Maps (http://www.google.cn/maps), Google Earth (https://www.google.com/earth/), or simple Google searches. We overlaid the geolocated occurrence points with a raster layer that distinguished land from water. Any records that were positioned outside the land area were subsequently removed from the database.

Malacological surveys were conducted during the period from 2012 to 2016 in the river systems of cities (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan and Huizhou) adjoining Hong Kong, in which the first introduction of B. straminea in China was reported. Sampling was carried out by two trained field investigators using standard snail scoops. At each site, the investigators collected any Biomphalaria snails found in a radius of approximately 2 m over a permitted search time of 30min. The coordinates of each sampling sites were recorded with the help of a handheld geographical positioning systems (GPS) device (Trimble Navigation Co., Ltd.). Collected snails were appropriately labeled, transported to the laboratory and identified using the morphological approach. Key characters were shape of the shells and number of the prostate diverticula as previously described[8].

To minimize the effect of sampling bias, we retained only one occurrence point per 2.5 arc-min resolution grid (a 5×5 km area)[30, 35, 36]. The final data set included 1312 occurrence points (1262 from the native range, 19 from introduced ranges in the Americas and 31 from China) (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Geographical distribution of B. straminea occurrence records.

In panels A, B and C, blue dots indicate occurrence records from the native range, red squares are records from introduced ranges from the America and green triangles from China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006548.g001

Environmental variables

We obtained 19 bioclimatic variables with a spatial resolution of 2.5 arc-min from WorldClim version 1.4[37]. The bioclimatic variables represent annual trends, seasonality and extreme environmental factors. They have been widely applied to model the ecological niche and potential distribution of species[30, 35, 38, 39].

We also included the global human footprint layer version 2 (Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), & Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)) in our model to evaluate the correlation between anthropogenic influences and the distribution of the introduced occurrences. The human footprint layer measures the human influence on global surface, combining data sets representing human population density, land transformation, human access, and presence of infrastructures[38, 40]. We used the same resolution for this layer as for the bioclimatic variables.

To reduce the effects of overparameterization and multicollinearity of predictors, we calculated the Pearson’s correlation coefficient for each pairwise comparison for all 19 bioclimatic variables and the human footprint, and excluded variables with a high intercorrelation (r > 0.90) (S1 Fig). The final environmental data set included 13 variables (S2 Table).

Comparisons of native and invaded ecological niches

We applied three different methods to test the differences in the variables of bioclimatic environments at the occurrences between the native and introduced regions. First, we extracted the values of predictors for each occurrence and used the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare the pairwise differences in the distribution of each variable between the three distributional records. P-values were Bonferroni-corrected to avoid false significant differences. Second, we employed principal component analysis (PCA) to compare the position of occurrences from the native and invaded ranges in the bioclimatic space[30, 41]. Third, we calculated the Schoener’s index for niche overlap (D) for each pair of occurrences of B. straminea snails. D ranges from 0 (no overlap) to 1 (identical). We then used niche equivalence and similarity tests that rely on the metric D to detect niche shifts[42, 43]. We used a buffer of 500 km around each known occurrence, which would provide better model predictions[44]. Computations of D, niche similarity and equivalence were performed using the ENMTools package in R.

Ecological modeling and evaluation

Modeling was conducted using Maxent (3.3.3k, http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/), which is a widely used machine learning algorithm that estimates the species’ probability distribution of maximum entropy, constrained by incomplete information about the species’ distribution and the environmental factors[29]. Maxent generally has a better performance for presence-only data sets and is particularly robust at small sample sizes in comparison with other species distribution models[28, 45, 46].

To test the contribution of human impacts on the distribution of B. straminea, we built two models for all occurrences using twelve bioclimatic layers with and without the human footprint layer. Default settings were used when not otherwise stated. Each model was replicated ten times so that results were summarized as an average of the ten models. Occurrence data were randomly split into a training subset (75%) and a test one (25%). Subsequently, model averages were projected on a global scale under current climatic conditions. Prediction maps were generated using the tmap package in R.

We used two metrics to evaluate the model prediction performances: the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) and the sample size corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc). The AUC uses presence and absence records to assess model predictive performance across a range of thresholds. The AUC ranges from 0 to 1, where a score of 0.7–0.8 is thought to be an acceptable prediction, 0.8–0.9 is good and >0.9 is excellent[28]. The AICc can outperform AUC as a model selection criteria, particularly when sample sizes are small[47]. A lower AICc value indicates better model fits. We then compared the means of the AUC and AICc values using t-test to assess whether the human footprint could increase the predictive ability significantly. We also evaluated the relative contribution of each variable to the model.

Results

Comparisons of bioclimatic conditions between the native and introduced occurrences

Fig 2 summarizes the pairwise comparisons of bioclimatic conditions for B. straminea. For the native and introduced occurrences in the Americas, only annual mean temperature (bio1) was lower in the introduced range than in the native range whereas differences of the other temperature-related variables were not significant. The introduced range had higher annual precipitation (bio12), precipitation of driest period (bio14), precipitation of warmest quarter (bio18) and human influence than the native range but lower precipitation seasonality (bio15).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Comparison of bioclimatic variables between native ranges of native occurrences (blue), introduced occurrences in the Americas (red) and introduced occurrences in China (green).

Asterisks (*) indicate significant pairwise Kruskal-Wallis test differences between the three ranges (ns: not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006548.g002

Annual mean temperature (bio1) was lower in the introduced range in China than in the native range with lower isothermality (bio3) and mean diurnal temperature range (bio2). The introduced range in China had higher temperature seasonality (bio4) and higher temperatures in the warmest period (bio5) and in the wettest quarter (bio8) than the native range. Anthropogenic impacts on the environment were higher in the introduced region in China with higher annual precipitation (bio12) and precipitations in all seasons except the coldest quarter (bio13, bio14, bio18).

Annual mean temperature (bio1) and isothermality were lower in the introduced range in China than in the introduced range in the Americas. The introduced range in China had higher temperature seasonality (bio4) and higher temperatures in the warmest period (bio5) and in the wettest quarter (bio8) than the introduced range in the Americas. The introduced ranges in China and the Americas also differed in all the precipitation requirements (bio12-15, bio18 and bio19), but seemed similar in human impacts on the environment.

Principal component analysis

Principal component analysis of the predictors revealed two significant axes of climatic variation, which explained 54.32% of the total variance. The first principal component (PCA1) was closely related to both temperature and precipitation while the second one was mostly associated with precipitation (Fig 3, Table 1). The environmental space occupied by the introduced population of B. straminea in the Americas (red triangles) largely overlapped with that of the native occurrences (blue dots) (Fig 3). The niche shift of the introduced American population (red triangles) occurred principally along axis 1, indicating different component weights of each variable as the underlying gradient of niche differentiation. The pattern of the introduced population in China was more obvious, as they (green squares) clustered together and appeared isolated from both the native and nonnative American occurrences (Fig 3). Human impacts appeared to be an important factor for the occurrences in China, as the China cluster shifted roughly along the direction of human footprint variable (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Biplot showing the bioclimatic spaces for the three groups of occurrence records of B. straminea.

The line length indicates the importance of each variable on the two axes of the principal component analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006548.g003

thumbnail
Table 1. Principal component weights of each bioclimatic variable assigned by the principal component analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006548.t001

Niche similarity tests

All occurrence pairs showed very limited levels of niche overlap (Schoener’s D between 0.03–0.17), with the highest overlap found between the native range and the introduced range in the Americas (Table 2). The null hypotheses of niche equivalency and similarity were rejected for all occurrence pairs (P<0.05).

thumbnail
Table 2. Analyses of niche overlap, equivalency and similarity of climatic niches based on the distributions of B. straminea.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006548.t002

Ecological modeling and variable contributions

The ecological models performed reasonably well, with all AUC values >0.9. The predictive capability was significantly higher for models with the human footprint layer (full model) than those without (P < 0.001). The AICc of the full model was significantly lower than the model with bioclimatic variables only (P < 0.001), indicating that the human footprint layer improved the model performance significantly (Table 3). The prediction map of the full model also showed less medium suitable areas (light blue) than the model without the human footprint layer (Fig 4). In China, the two models differed most in the southern regions, including Guangxi and Guangdong Provinces. In addition to southern China, the most suitable regions for the establishment of B. straminea were identified in the eastern regions of South America, Central America, western and eastern regions of Africa and Southeast Asia (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Table 3. Model performances and results of t-tests.

Data are shown as means (SD) of ten runs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006548.t003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Global potential distributions of B. straminea in America, Africa (A&B) and China (C&D).

Panels A and C were outputs without the human footprint layer while B and D were built with this layer. The scores indicate the environmental suitability.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006548.g004

The inclusion of the human footprint layer influenced the relative contributions and permutation importance of the bioclimatic variables (Table 4). The human footprint, isothermality (bio3) and temperature seasonality (bio4) had higher relative contribution in predicting the distribution of B. straminea. Annual mean temperature (bio1), isothermality (bio3) and the human footprint were the most important judging by the metric of permutation importance.

thumbnail
Table 4. Relative contributions and permutation importance of bioclimatic variables and human footprint to the current predicted distribution of B. straminea.

Data are shown as means (SD) of ten runs (%).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006548.t004

Discussion

Considering the distribution of B. straminea in its native range and invaded peripheral regions in the Americas, it has a broad geographical and climatic range (Figs 1, 2 and 3). Like other invasive species, B. straminea snails have developed a variety of survival strategies to adapt to variable environments[9]. Our study has demonstrated that the B. straminea occupies significantly different ecological niches in the native region and invaded regions in the Americas and China, providing empirical evidence of the ability of this type of invasive snails to repeatedly acclimate to new environmental conditions. Such capability may be a fundamental basis for a successful invasion of exotic species[30]. The shifts were significant for the two groups of invaded occurrences in the Americas and China. Although for these two ranges, there were lack of evidence for niche identity and similarity, the climatic niche shifted towards a similar direction (Fig 2).

There are potential mechanisms for the observed niche shifts in our study, which include: 1) snail breeding conditions in the invaded range that are not accessible in the native range due to geographical dispersal limitations; 2) a biotic release from native predators, competitors and pathogens or diseases in the novel habitats; and 3) a rapid evolution accompanied the invasion, which may allow them to colonize new environments[4850]. Unfortunately, disentangling the relative roles of these mechanisms is not possible based on our data. Further field and experimental studies are required to clarify the mechanisms behind the climatic niche shifts for B. straminea invasions.

Our results indicated that the annual mean temperature, isothermality and temperature seasonality were the most important climatic features for the occurrence of B. straminea. The snail can be found in a wide variety of shallow aquatic habitats with little water velocity, such as small pools, lakes, streams, irrigation channels and flooded areas[8]. Fluctuations of water temperature may have a direct effect on the growth of juvenile snails as well as the reproduction and survival of adults[8, 51]. They keep active at a temperature of 18–32 °C while the optimum temperature for their development is 20–26 °C[51]. In some permanent habitats with compatible temperature, B. straminea reproduces throughout the year; in others with short window of suitable temperature, only a single generation is produced each year[51]. In addition, temperature is associated with the production and release of schistosome cercariae[8]. The climate of the native and the invaded Caribbean area and Colombia is tropical but the other invaded regions, including Paraguay, Argentina, Uruguay, Hong Kong and coastal mainland China, have a subtropical climate characterized by humid, hot summers and relatively dry and mild winters. Evidently, B. straminea has expanded its domain to regions with lower annual temperature partially facilitated by its ability to survive adverse environmental conditions, e.g. lower or higher temperature and desiccation, in the mud[51]. Annual precipitation also played a role in the occurring of B. straminea, which was consistent with a recent survey that found a positive correlation between precipitation and B. straminea abundance[52].

Inclusion of the human footprint layer enhanced the accuracy of the ecological niche model, indicating that human activities can contribute to the spreading of introduced B. straminea. Our finding supported the association between human-intervened environmental changes and distribution of schistosomiasis and its intermediate hosts[53, 54]. The development and management of water resources is thought to be an important risk factor for schistosomiasis transmission[55]. Human activities can affect the biological invasions by changing the spreading routes of the species and creating suitable microclimates in regions with suboptimal climates[56]. Non-native species tend to colonize man-made suitable habitats first and move on to natural environments[57]. The first introduction of B. straminea into Hong Kong was thought to be associated with imported tropical aquarium plants or fish from South America[22, 58], which was reconfirmed by a recent phylogenetic analysis[59]. Subsequent colonization occurred in large outdoor concrete breeding ponds for tropical aquarium fish near the border with mainland China[60]. This snail was first found in several ponds, ditches and rivers in Shenzhen of China, and spread further in the Shenzhen River system[58]. Shenzhen was one of the fastest-growing cities in the world and has undergone magnificent landscape reconstructions, which may lead to dispersion of the snails to surrounding cities[61]. A survey conducted in 2012–2013 noted that this snail had established in several waterways in Dongguan and Huizhou[61]. Therefore, environmental assessment is advised for infrastructure projects, especially water conservancy schemes, that might transport B. straminea to novel habitats.

According to our model, B. straminea showed a variable range of suitable areas in the tropical and subtropical regions including continental and coastal areas and islands. The most suitable regions for invasion covered Central America, Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia (Fig 4). B. straminea is present in several countries in Central America, but its role as the intermediate host of S. mansoni has never been confirmed in these countries[11]. Africa is home to other intermediate hosts of S. mansoni, including B. pfeifferi, B. alexandrina and B. sudanica[62]. Although this continent has no evidence so far for the presence of B. straminea snails, our predicted suitable habitats largely overlap with the distribution of S. mansoni in Africa[63]. Once the B. straminea was introduced and successfully established in these regions, it might complicate the life cycle of S. mansoni and increase the burden of schistosomiasis control for African countries. Therefore, in African regions efforts should be mainly directed to monitoring water bodies for early signs of an invasion by global trade and transport.

Identified suitable areas in China were constrained to tropical and subtropical regions. However, the low suitability of some areas does not mean that B. straminea can be introduced without any risk of invasion since these snails could breed in suitable artificial microhabitats. Moreover, the ongoing global climate change, in particular global warming, can modify the suitability and cause an expansion of suitable areas towards higher latitude[25]. The outbreak of urogenital schistosomiasis in Corsica, France, sounded the alarm and suggested that the transmission cycle of schistosomiasis can be completed upon the encounter between the intermediate host snails and imported individuals infected the parasite[64]. Since the 1970s, imported cases of S. mansoni or S. haematobium has been repeatedly reported among migrant workers, who are at high risk of African schistosome infections because of frequent contact with infested water. Few of the individuals infected with S. mansoni, usually characterized by only mild or no symptoms, seek medical help and they may be misdiagnosed for the reason that Chinese clinicians lack knowledge of the diagnosis of this disease. The priorities of China’s health authorities are to monitor and block further spread of B. straminea as well as to develop strategies to reduce the imported cases of S. mansoni from endemic areas.

In conclusion, our study showed that the environmental spaces of the introduced B. straminea populations in the Americas and China shifted compared to that of their native counterparts. This snail has acclimated to parts of the subtropics with lower annual mean temperature. Incorporation of anthropogenic factors improved niche model prediction in areas of high human disturbance. Our final model predicted large suitable areas in the tropics and subtropics, indicating that B. straminea snail has a significant potential to spread further as nonnative species. Therefore, it is important to impose strict monitoring and surveillance of new invasion of B. straminea in areas at high risk.

Supporting information

S1 Table. List of studies used to compile the occurrence database for B. straminea.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006548.s001

(DOC)

S2 Table. Bioclimatic variables used in the ecological niche modeling.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006548.s002

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Pearson’s correlation matrix of all variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006548.s003

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Ronaldo G.C. Scholte and Prof. Jürg Utzinger from Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute for their help in collecting occurrence records used in this study.

References

  1. 1. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl. 2000;10: 689–710.
  2. 2. Myers JH, Simberloff D, Kuris AM, Carey JR. Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000;15: 316–320. pmid:10884695
  3. 3. Byers JE, Mcdowell WG, Dodd SR, Haynie RS, Pintor LM, Wilde SB. Climate and pH Predict the Potential Range of the Invasive Apple Snail (Pomacea insularum) in the Southeastern United States. Plos One. 2013;8: e56812. pmid:23451090
  4. 4. Roura-Pascual N, Hui C, Ikeda T, Leday G, Richardson DM, Carpintero S, et al. Relative roles of climatic suitability and anthropogenic influence in determining the pattern of spread in a global invader. PNAS. 2011;108: 220–225. pmid:21173219
  5. 5. O'Donnell J, Gallagher RV, Wilson PD, Downey PO, Hughes L, Leishman MR. Invasion hotspots for non-native plants in Australia under current and future climates. Global Change Biol. 2012;18: 617–629.
  6. 6. Ficetola GF, Thuiller W, Miaud C. Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic alien invasive species—the American bullfrog. Divers Distrib. 2007;13: 476–485.
  7. 7. Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS, Lawler JJ, Olden JD, Blumenthal DM, et al. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat Commun. 2016;7: 12485. pmid:27549569
  8. 8. Toledo R, Fried B. Biomphalaria Snails and Larval Trematodes. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2010.
  9. 9. Barbosa VNS, de Paula Souza E Guimar Es RJ, Loyo RM, Barbosa CASE. Modelling of the distribution of Biomphalaria glabrata and Biomphalaria straminea in the metropolitan region of Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. Geospatial Health. 2016;11: 362–367.
  10. 10. Barboza DM, Zhang C, Santos NC, Silva MMBL, Rollemberg CVV, de Amorim FJR, et al. Biomphalaria species distribution and its effect on human Schistosoma mansoni infection in an irrigated area used for rice cultivation in northeast Brazil. Geospatial Health. 2012;6: S103. pmid:23032275
  11. 11. Pointier JP, David P, Jarne P. Biological invasions: the case of planorbid snails. J Helminthol. 2005;79: 249–256. pmid:16153319
  12. 12. Rumi A, Hamann MI. Potential schistosome-vector snails and associated trematodes in ricefields of Corrients province, Argentina. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1990;85: 321–328. pmid:2134706
  13. 13. Paraense WL, Correa LR. A potential vector of Schistosoma mansoni in Uruguay. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1989;84: 281–288. pmid:2520826
  14. 14. Barbosa FS. Biomphalaria straminea (Dunker) en Colombia. Antioquia Med. 1968;18: 753–758.
  15. 15. Paraense WL. A bird's eye survey of Central American planorbid molluscs. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003;98: 51–67. pmid:12700862
  16. 16. Gretillat S. Malacological survey of the French Antilles. Observations on the ecology and the laboratory cultivation of Lymnaea cubensis Pfeiffer. Rev Délevage Médecine Vét Pays Trop. 1967;20: 279–289.
  17. 17. Ferguson FF, Buckmire KW. Notes on the fresh water molluscs of Grenada, British West Indies. Caribb J Sci. 1974;14: 147–148.
  18. 18. Pointier JP, Paraense WL, Mazille V. Introduction and spreading of Biomphalaria Straminea (Dunker, 1848) (Mollusca, Pulmonata, Planorbidae) in Guadeloupe, French-West-Indies. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1993;88: 449–455.
  19. 19. Pointier JP. The introduction of Melanoides tuberculata (Mollusca: Thiaridae) to the island of Saint Lucia (West Indies) and its role in the decline of Biomphalaria glabrata, the snail intermediate host of Schistosoma mansoni. Acta Trop. 1993;54: 13–18. pmid:8103624
  20. 20. Barbosa CS, Barbosa VS, Nascimento WC, Pieri OS, Araujo KC. Study of the snail intermediate hosts for Schistosoma mansoni on Itamaraca Island in northeast Brazil: spatial displacement of Biomphalaria glabrata by Biomphalaria straminea. Geospat Health. 2014;8: 345–351. pmid:24893012
  21. 21. Meier-Brook C. A snail intermediate host of Schistosoma mansoni introduced into Hong Kong. Bull World Health Organ. 1974;51: 661. pmid:4549615
  22. 22. Huang SY, Zhang QM, Li XH, Deng ZH. Distribution and schistosomiasis transmission risks of Biomphalaria straminea in inland China. Chin J Schisto Control. 2014;26: 235–237.
  23. 23. Colley DG, Bustinduy AL, Secor WE, King CH. Human Schistosomiasis. Lancet. 2014;383: 2253–2264. pmid:24698483
  24. 24. Scholte RG, Carvalho OS, Malone JB, Utzinger J, Vounatsou P. Spatial distribution of Biomphalaria spp., the intermediate host snails of Schistosoma mansoni, in Brazil. Geospat Health. 2012;6: S95–S101. pmid:23032289
  25. 25. Wang W, Liang YS, Hong QB, Dai JR. African schistosomiasis in mainland China: risk of transmission and countermeasures to tackle the risk. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6: 249. pmid:23985040
  26. 26. Hu R, Liu R, Hu N. China's Belt and Road Initiative from a global health perspective. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5: e752–e753. pmid:28716345
  27. 27. Xie H, Yuan D, Luo S, Zeng X, Zeng X, He P, et al. Angiostrongylus cantonensis: An optimized cultivation of this parasitic nematode under laboratory conditions. Parasitol Res. 2017;116: 2231–2237. pmid:28616635
  28. 28. Jane E, Catherine HG, Robert PA, Dudík M, Simon F. Novel Methods Improve Prediction of Species' Distributions from Occurrence Data. Ecography. 2006;2: 129–151.
  29. 29. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 2006;190: 231–259.
  30. 30. Guo WY, Lambertini C, Li XZ, Meyerson LA, Brix H. Invasion of Old World Phragmites australis in the New World: precipitation and temperature patterns combined with human influences redesign the invasive niche. Glob Chang Biol. 2013;19: 3406–3422. pmid:23765641
  31. 31. Carlson CJ, Dougherty ER, Getz W. An Ecological Assessment of the Pandemic Threat of Zika Virus. Plos Neglect Trop D. 2016;10: e0004968.
  32. 32. Barro AS, Fegan M, Moloney B, Porter K, Muller J, Warner S, et al. Redefining the Australian Anthrax Belt: Modeling the Ecological Niche and Predicting the Geographic Distribution of Bacillus anthracis. Plos Neglect Trop D. 2016;10: e0004689.
  33. 33. Habib MR, Guo Y, Lv S, Gu W, Li X, Zhou X. Predicting the spatial distribution of Biomphalaria straminea, a potential intermediate host for Schistosoma mansoni, in China. Geospatial Health. 2016;11: 453. pmid:27903067
  34. 34. Sánchez-Fernández D, Lobo JM, Hernández-Manrique OL. Species distribution models that do not incorporate global data misrepresent potential distributions: a case study using Iberian diving beetles. Divers Distrib. 2011;17: 163–171.
  35. 35. Mainali KP, Warren DL, Dhileepan K, Mcconnachie A, Strathie L, Hassan G, et al. Projecting future expansion of invasive species: comparing and improving methodologies for species distribution modeling. Glob Chang Biol. 2015;21: 4464–4480. pmid:26185104
  36. 36. Phillips SJ, Dudik M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, Leathwick J, et al. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol Appl. 2009;19: 181–197. pmid:19323182
  37. 37. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2005;25: 1965–1978.
  38. 38. Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G. The Human Footprint and the Last of the Wild. Bioscience. 2002;52: 891–904.
  39. 39. Rödder D, Lötters S. Niche shift versus niche conservatism? Climatic characteristics of the native and invasive ranges of the Mediterranean house gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus). Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2009;18: 674–687.
  40. 40. Wildlife CSW, Center FIES. Last of the Wild Project, Version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): Global Human Footprint Dataset (IGHP). Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC); 2005.
  41. 41. Broennimann O, Treier UA, Mueller-Schaerer H, Thuiller W, Peterson AT, Guisan A. Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol Lett. 2007;10: 701–709. pmid:17594425
  42. 42. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatis: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution. 2008;62: 2868–2883. pmid:18752605
  43. 43. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography. 2010;33: 607–611.
  44. 44. Vanderwal J, Shoo LP, Graham C, Williams SE. Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: How far should you stray from what you know? Ecol Model. 2009;220: 589–594.
  45. 45. Wisz MS, Hijmans RJ, Li J, Peterson AT, Graham CH, Guisan A. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers Distrib. 2008;14: 763–773.
  46. 46. Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography. 2006;29: 773–785.
  47. 47. Warren DL, Seifert SN. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecol Appl. 2011;21: 335–342. pmid:21563566
  48. 48. Petitpierre B, Kueffer C, Broennimann O, Randin C, Daehler C, Guisan A. Climatic Niche Shifts Are Rare Among Terrestrial Plant Invaders. Science. 2012;335: 1344–1348. pmid:22422981
  49. 49. Webber BL, Le Maitre DC, Kriticos DJ. Comment on "Climatic Niche Shifts Are Rare Among Terrestrial Plant Invaders". Science. 2012;338: 193–193.
  50. 50. Lauzeral C, Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Duron Q, Oberdorff T, Brosse S. Identifying climatic niche shifts using coarse-grained occurrence data: a test with non-native freshwater fish. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2011;20: 407–414.
  51. 51. Barbosa FS, Barbosa CS. The bioecology of snail vectors for schitosomiasis in Brazil. Cadernos De Saúde Pública. 1994;10: 200–209. pmid:14762561
  52. 52. David NF, Cantanhede SPD, Monroe NB, Pereira LPLA, Silva-Souza N, Abreu-Silva AL, et al. Spatial distribution and seasonality of Biomphalaria spp. in São Luís (Maranhão, Brazil). Parasitol Res. 2018;5: 1495–1502.
  53. 53. de Souza Gomes EC, Leal-Neto OB, Albuquerque J, Pereira Da Silva H, Barbosa CASE. Schistosomiasis transmission and environmental change: a spatio-temporal analysis in Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco-Brazil. 2012;11: 51.
  54. 54. Patz JA, Graczyk TK, Geller N, Vittor AY. Effects of environmental change on emerging parasitic diseases. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30: 1395–1405. pmid:11113264
  55. 55. Steinmann P, Keiser J, Bos R, Tanner M, Utzinger J. Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6: 411–25. pmid:16790382
  56. 56. Beans CM, Kilkenny FF, Galloway LF. Climate suitability and human influences combined explain the range expansion of an invasive horticultural plant. Biol Invasions. 2012;14: 2067–2078.
  57. 57. Zhu G, Li H, Zhao L. Incorporating anthropogenic variables into ecological niche modeling to predict areas of invasion of Popillia japonica. J Pest Sci. 2017;90: 151–160.
  58. 58. Attwood SW, Huo G, Qiu J. Update on the distribution and phylogenetics of Biomphalaria (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) populations in Guangdong Province, China. Acta Trop. 2015;141: 258–270. pmid:24811366
  59. 59. Zeng X, Yiu WC, Cheung KH, Yip HY, Nong W, He P, et al. Distribution and current infection status of Biomphalaria straminea in Hong Kong. Parasite Vector. 2017;10: 351.
  60. 60. Woodruff DS, Mulvey M, Yipp MW. The continued introduction of intermediate host snails of Schistosoma mansoni into Hong Kong. Bull World Health Organ. 1985;63: 621–622. pmid:3930083
  61. 61. Huang SY, Deng ZH, Chen PJ, Gao ST, Li XH, Zhang Y, et al. Discovery and spread of Biomphalaria straminea of schistosomiasis mansoni intermediate host in mainland of China. South China J Prev Med. 2014;40: 521–525.
  62. 62. Morgan JA, Dejong RJ, Snyder SD, Mkoji GM, Loker ES. Schistosoma mansoni and Biomphalaria: past history and future trends. Parasitology. 2001;123 Suppl: S211–28.
  63. 63. Lai Y, Biedermann P, Ekpo UF, Garba A, Mathieu E, Midzi N, et al. Spatial distribution of schistosomiasis and treatment needs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and geostatistical analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15: 927–940. pmid:26004859
  64. 64. Boissier J, Grech-Angelini S, Webster BL, Allienne JF, Huyse T, Mas-Coma S, et al. Outbreak of urogenital schistosomiasis in Corsica (France): an epidemiological case study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16: 971–979. pmid:27197551