Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Common occurrence of Cryptosporidium hominis in asymptomatic and symptomatic calves in France

  • Romy Razakandrainibe,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3800, CNR laboratoire expert Cryptosporidiose, Rouen, France

  • El Hadji Ibrahima Diawara,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3800, CNR laboratoire expert Cryptosporidiose, Rouen, France

  • Damien Costa,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Project administration

    Affiliation Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3800, CNR laboratoire expert Cryptosporidiose, Rouen, France

  • Laetitia Le Goff,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3800, CNR laboratoire expert Cryptosporidiose, Rouen, France

  • Denis Lemeteil,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3800, CNR laboratoire expert Cryptosporidiose, Rouen, France

  • Jean Jacques Ballet,

    Roles Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3800, CNR laboratoire expert Cryptosporidiose, Rouen, France

  • Gilles Gargala,

    Roles Investigation, Project administration, Validation

    Affiliation Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3800, CNR laboratoire expert Cryptosporidiose, Rouen, France

  • Loïc Favennec

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    loic.favennec@chu-rouen.fr

    Affiliation Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3800, CNR laboratoire expert Cryptosporidiose, Rouen, France

Common occurrence of Cryptosporidium hominis in asymptomatic and symptomatic calves in France

  • Romy Razakandrainibe, 
  • El Hadji Ibrahima Diawara, 
  • Damien Costa, 
  • Laetitia Le Goff, 
  • Denis Lemeteil, 
  • Jean Jacques Ballet, 
  • Gilles Gargala, 
  • Loïc Favennec
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Cryptosporidium spp. infections are the most frequent parasitic cause of diarrhea in humans and cattle. However, asymptomatic cases are less often documented than symptomatic cases or cases with experimentally infected animals. Cryptosporidium (C.) hominis infection accounts for the majority of pediatric cases in several countries, while C. parvum is a major cause of diarrhea in neonatal calves. In cattle Cryptosporidium spp. infection can be caused by C. parvum, C. bovis, C.andersoni and C. ryanae, and recently, reports of cattle cases of C. hominis cryptosporidiosis cases suggest that the presence of C. hominis in calves was previously underestimated.

Methodology/Principal findings

From February to November 2015, Cryptosporidium spp. infected calves were detected in 29/44 randomly included farms from 5 geographic regions of France. C. hominis and C. parvum were found in 12/44 and 26/44 farms, respectively with higher C. hominis prevalence in the western region. In 9 farms, both C. parvum and C. hominis were detected. Eighty-six of 412 (73/342 asymptomatic and 13/70 symptomatic) one to nine-week-old calves shed C. hominis or C. parvum oocysts (15 and 71 calves, respectively), with no mixed infection detected. The predominant C. hominis IbA9G3 genotype was present in all regions, and more frequent in the western region. An incompletely characterized Ib, and the IbA13G3, IbA9G2 and IbA14G2 genotypes were present only in the western region. For C. parvum, the most frequent genotype was IIaA16G3R1 with no geographic clustering. Most C. hominis infected calves were asymptomatic, with some exceptions of IbA9G2 and IbA9G3 isolates, while C. parvum IIaA16G3R1 was associated with symptoms.

Conclusions/Significance

Present results indicate for the first time that in several geographic regions of France, C. hominis was present in about one fifth of both asymptomatic and symptomatic infected calves, with isolated genotypes likely associated with human infection. Further investigations are aimed at documenting direct or indirect transmissions between livestock and humans.

Author summary

Symptomatic infection by the Apicomplexan Cryptosporidium spp. is presently considered the most frequent parasitic cause of acute diarrhea in both humans (especially severe in immunocompromised individuals and infants in both developed and developing countries) and cattle (calves), while asymptomatic infections are less often documented. Cryptosporidium (C.) hominis once considered to be restricted to humans accounts for the majority of pediatric cases in several countries. C. parvum can also infect cattle as well as C. bovis, C. andersoni, and C. ryanae. Recently, cattle C. hominis cryptosporidiosis has been reported, suggesting that the presence of C. hominis in calves was previously underestimated. The aim of this work was to characterize Cryptosporidium spp. infection in both asymptomatic and symptomatic dairy and beef calves from Metropolitan France. From February to November 2015, C. parvum or C. hominis infected calves were detected in farms from 5 geographic regions of France. Surprisingly, C. hominis was present in about one fifth of Cryptosporidium spp. infected calves, and exhibited genotypes which were previously reported in human and nonhuman primate. Further investigations are aimed at documenting direct or indirect C. hominis transmissions between and among livestock and humans.

Introduction

Cryptosporidium spp. are Apicomplexa which include parasite species causing asymptomatic to severe gastrointestinal infections in a wide range of vertebrate hosts, and exhibiting varying degrees of host adaptation [1]. Previously, information on cryptosporidial host restriction of natural cryptosporidial infection was usually obtained from animal and human cases for which clinical symptoms, ages and immune statuses were recorded. However, evidence of asymptomatic sustained or transitory infection, and the role of additional parameters such as parasite detection methods, host’s genetic background, co-infection and environmental factors such as climate, seasons and socioeconomic status were less documented [2]. For some cryptosporidial host specialisations, information is presently limited to experimentally infected immunocompetent or immunosuppressed laboratory animals [3].

In humans, cryptosporidiosis is presently identified as the most frequent zoonotic cause of parasitic diarrhea, especially severe in immunocompromised individuals and infants in both developed and developing countries [47]. In addition to 8 others sporadically observed species, C. hominis, once considered to be restricted to humans, and C. parvum, of which some isolate genotypes also infect ruminants, account for more than 90% of reported human cases worldwide [810]. There is equal or higher prevalence of C. hominis than C. parvum in humans in many parts of the world except in Europe where C. parvum largely prevails, likely reflecting the ratios of human to animal sources of anthroponotic C. hominis and anthropozoonotic C. parvum contamination, respectively [1115].

In cattle, the main symptom of cryptosporidiosis is watery and profuse acute diarrhea which can be associated with dehydration, anorexia, and impaired growth [16]. It was previously established that cattle can be infected by at least 4 Cryptosporidium species, i.e. C. parvum, C. bovis, C. andersoni, and C ryanae [17, 18]. In France, C. parvum, C. bovis and C. andersoni predominate in newborn and older calves, respectively, C. parvum infection is identified as a major cause of diarrhea in newborn calves of less than one month old, with economically significant morbidity and mortality. However, detailed epidemiology on the occurrence of viable oocysts from normal feces of asymptomatic calves is unknown [19, 20]. Recently, a limited number of observations reported of cattle cryptosporidiosis due to C. hominis have been reported in Australasia, Asia, Africa and Europe, suggesting that the presence of C. hominis in calves was previously underestimated in studies on diarrheic and adult animals [2127].

The aim of this work was to document the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp oocysts in calves from five different geographic regions of Metropolitan France. Farms were randomly included in the study, the clinical status of each animal was recorded, and the presence of calves with Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in feces was investigated. Isolates were genetically characterized for their synzootic and zoonotic potentials.

Methods

Calves and fecal samples

From February to November 2015, 412 calves aged from 1 to 9 weeks were selected in 44 farms from a national list of farms under regular veterinarian survey (16 veterinary offices, from 1 to 4 farm(s) per office). Farms were randomly selected, and within farms, calves aged from 1 to 9 weeks were randomly selected. Selected farms were situated in 14 “départements” (an administrative sub-region) distributed in 5 geographic regions of Metropolitan France: western (Côtes d'Armor, Ille-et-Vilaine, Morbihan), central western (Vendée, Deux Sèvres, Mayenne), northeastern (Pas-de- Calais, Moselle), southwestern (Landes, Pyrénées atlantiques, Tarn, Hautes-Pyrénées), and central (Puy-de-Dôme, Allier). For each calf, the clinical status was evaluated and recorded by all veterinarians at the time of sampling as follows: presence or absence of digestive symptoms such as diarrhea and abdominal bloating and/or respiratory symptoms, and evaluation of the general condition as follows: "Normal general condition: shiny hair coat, regular appetite; impaired general condition: delayed growth, dull hair coat, capricious appetite; Poor general condition: dull hair coat, capricious appetite, marked growth retardation."

From each farm (housing from 11 to 50 calves), feces samples were obtained by veterinarians from 5–10 calves by rectal stimulation. Most farms were dairy farms and breeds consisted of Salers, Holstein, Charolais, Montbeliard, Blonde d'Aquitaine, Parthenaise, Limousine and the Belgian Blue Breed (BBB). In all farms, calves were kept in semi-intensive farming systems and separated from their dams.

Microscopic detection of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in calf feces

The presence of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts was microscopically determined by the same experienced clinical parasitologists using Bailenger type feces concentration method [28] and Heine staining [29]. The presence of other intestinal parasites (Giardia, Strongyloides, and coccidia) detected in some of the calves using various methodologies was not considered in the present study.

Cryptosporidium speciation and genotyping

All samples were subjected to molecular analysis for speciation and genotyping of speciation positive samples. Before DNA isolation, feces were subjected to a pre-treatment with a mechanical lysis in Lysing Matrix A Tubes (garnet matrix and ¼ ceramic spheres) (Qiagen, CA, USA) with the Fastprep-24 device and transferred into 2 ml Eppendorf tube prior to thermal shock lysis (6 freeze-thaw cycles). Samples were placed in an ultrasonic bath for sonication (3x20 sec bursts). In accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, a modified QIAamp Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA) was used to isolate DNA from the pre-treated samples. All centrifugation steps were performed at RT (20–25°C), at 14.000 rpm. Eight hundred μL/tube of ASL buffer was added, and tubes were heated at 99°C for 15 min.

For speciation, a 18S rRNA gene sequence was amplified using a nested PCR and restriction digestion of the secondary product with SspI (NEB, MA, USA) and VspI (NEB, MA, USA) was performed [30]. Briefly, for the primary PCR step, a PCR product (about 1,325 bp long) was amplified by using primers 5-TTCTAGAGCTAATACATGCG-3 and 5-CCCTAATCCTTCGAAACAGGA-3. For the secondary PCR step, by using 5 μl of the primary PCR product and primers 5-GGAAGGGTTGTATTTATTAGATAAAG-3’ and 5-AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACCTCCA-3 a PCR product (819 to 825 bp long, depending on the species) was amplified.

Each PCR mixture (total volume, 50 μl) contained 5 μl of 10X DreamTaq Buffer, each deoxynucleoside triphosphate at a concentration of 0.2mM, each primer at a concentration of 100 nM, 2.5 U of DreamTaq polymerase, and 5μL of DNA template. Then, 1.25μL of DMSO (100%) was added to the mixture.

A total of 40 cycles, each consisting of 94°C for 45 s, 55°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min, were performed. An initial hot start at 94°C for 3 min and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min were also included. Each amplification run included a negative control (PCR water) and two positive controls (genomic DNA from C. parvum oocysts purchased from Waterborne Inc., and C. hominis genomic DNA from fecal specimen collected at Rouen University Hospital). Products were visualized in 2% agarose gels using ethidium bromide staining and identification was confirmed by sequencing. Positive samples were further genotyped by DNA sequencing of the gp60 gene amplified by a nested PCR following the protocol described by Sulaiman et al. [31] (2005). All Amplification experiments were repeated at least thrice to check reproducibility.

Purified PCR products were sequenced in both directions on an ABI 3500 sequencer analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) by using the secondary PCR primers and the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The obtained sequences were inspected using the 4 peaks software (https://nucleobytes.com/4peaks/index.html), edited with the BioEdit sequence alignment editor (version 7.2.5), and analyzed for DNA database search and comparisons using the BLAST server (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). Genotypes were named using the established gp60 genotype nomenclature [31].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square (χ2) test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate using the Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS), version 2000 to determine the association between the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection vs regions, and sampling periods. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics statement

Before carrying out this work, informed written authorization to perform and anonymously publish the present epidemiological study was obtained from all cattle owners and veterinarians. Clinical examination of calves and stool harvest were part of routine breeding and veterinary procedures, without any invasive, traumatic or specific containment method. Such procedures are not qualified as animal experimentation involving vertebrate according to French laws, and no specific ethical clearing was required.

Results

As shown in Table 1, infected calves were detected in 29/44 farms from all geographic regions and “départements” except Puy-de-Dôme and Mayenne, with no inter-regional difference in the ratios of the number of infected farms to the number of included farms. C. hominis and C. parvum were found in calves from 12/44 and 26/44 farms, respectively. In 9/44 farms, both C. parvum and C. hominis infected calves were found with no mixed infection in any animal. No mixed infection of C. hominis and C. parvum was noted in any animal.

thumbnail
Table 1. Geographic distribution of 15 Cryptosporidium hominis and 71 Cryptosporidium parvum infected calves from 44 farms in 5 regions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006355.t001

Eighty-six of 412 included calves exhibited Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in feces, of which 15 and 71 had C. hominis and C. parvum infection respectively. There were no inter-regional differences in the ratio of the number of infected calves to the number of included calves (p = 0.839). In the western region, the ratio of C. hominis infected farms (8/13) was higher than in all other geographic regions (p = 0.018), while no interregional difference was found for C. parvum (p = 0.122). Infections were found in calves from 2 weeks to 7 weeks of age (3 to 7 weeks and 2 to 7 weeks for C. hominis and C. parvum cases, respectively).

As shown in Table 2, C. hominis IbA9G3 genotype isolates were predominant and present in all geographic regions. The incompletely characterized Ib and the IbA13G3, Ib A9G2 and IbA14G2 genotypes were only represented in the western region.

thumbnail
Table 2. Geographic distribution of 15 Cryptosporidium hominis genotypes from infected calves in 5 regions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006355.t002

For C. parvum, IIaA16G3R1 genotype was the most frequent with no geographic clustering (p = 0.574), and the limited number of isolates exhibiting other genotypes precluded further investigation on their geographic representation (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Geographic distribution of 71 Cryptosporidium parvum genotypes from infected calves in 5 regions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006355.t003

No C. hominis infected calves exhibited diarrhea during the week before or at the time of stool sampling (Table 4). Two infected calves, one with genotype IbA9G2 and one with genotype IbA9G3 presented with general state alteration and non-diarrheal digestive symptoms. Ten calves infected with the most frequent C. parvum IIaA16G3R1 genotype presented with digestive symptoms, respiratory symptoms, or both, and 12 exhibited an impaired or poor general state. The limited number of observations, precluded from investigating further associations between symptoms and genotypes.

thumbnail
Table 4. Symptoms and general conditions of Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum infected calves.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006355.t004

The ratios of the number of infected calves to the number of sampled calves observed during the August-September (50/216) and October-November (28/106) periods were higher than those during February to March (3/45) and April to June (5/42) periods (p = 0.010) with no difference in the respective C. hominis and C. parvum representations (the corresponding values for C. hominis were 9/50, 4/28, 2/3, and 0/5, respectively, p>0.05). No seasonal effect on Cryptosporidium infection prevalence, however, could be unambiguously established, taking into account that due to the yearly calving cycle, most calves were sampled during summer and autumn, and that no feces sample was obtained in January, July and December. The age distribution of C.parvum infected calves is similar to that of C. hominis infected calves (Fig 1)

thumbnail
Fig 1. Age distribution of uninfected, C. parvum and C. hominis infected calves.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006355.g001

Discussion

In this work, the presence of C. hominis in calves was addressed for the first time in France by investigating both asymptomatic and symptomatic calves from randomly chosen farms in several geographic regions. Surprisingly, C. hominis was identified in about one fifth of Cryptosporidium spp. infected animals, a figure which to our knowledge has not been reported previously in Europe.

The random selection of farms resulted in a variety of geographic regions corresponding to different geologic and climatic characteristics with oceanic, or humid continental influences. Due to breeding procedures, most calves from all regions were sampled during summer and autumn. For each calf, age, clinical condition, farm and sampling date were recorded by veterinarians. The study was focused on calves, and unbiased sampling was confirmed by similar C. hominis infection rates of calves aged between 2 and 7 weeks. Most animals were clinically asymptomatic, none of them presenting diarrhea in the week before, or at the time of sampling, and a exhibiting digestive or respiratory symptoms and/or impaired or poor general condition consistent with clinical cryptosporidiosis. Sampling and preservation of samples were adapted to oocyst detection in calf feces: Heine-stained oocysts were detected microscopically by experienced parasitologists, and oocyst species and genotypes were determined using previously validated DNA amplification methods. C. hominis was unexpectedly detected in 15 calves. Four out of 15 C. hominis positive samples could not be identified at the genotype level, with unreadable superimposition of electrophoregrams which might result from amplification and sequencing of different genetic fragments from several genotypes present in the same sample. For both C. hominis and C. parvum, several subtypes were not seen in the same sample (32).

Farms from all “départements” except 2 presented both C. hominis and C. parvum-infected animals. C. hominis was present in about half of the “départements” with Cryptosporidium spp. infected calves, and C. parvum was present in all of them. Both the ratios of C. hominis infected farms and animals were higher in the western geographic region compared with other regions. In 9/44 farms, both C. parvum and C. hominis were detected in different calves. Although no data concerning the origin of water given to calves was available, a waterborne transmission of C. hominis is possible as illustrated by the recent occurrence of a C. hominis waterborne outbreak in France. All samples were obtained during the calving period; thus, no seasonal variation of Cryptosporidium species nor genotypes could be ascertained. The present unexpected high proportion of C. hominis infected calves compares with previously reported figures in New-Zealand Australia, Africa, China and Europe [21, 24, 25, 32, 33]. Several studies have established that cattle can be infected with at least 4 species (C. parvum, C. bovis, C. andersoni, and C. ryanae). C. hominis and C. parvum were the only species detected in the present study, likely due to the age of the calves, and possibly to the masking of concurrent infections by C. bovis, C. ryanae or C. andersoni by the predominant shedding of oocysts of other species, or to preferential PCR amplification of predominant species [17, 18, 35].

It was once generally accepted that C hominis primarily infects humans while C. parvum infects both human and non-human hosts, and reports of cattle C. hominis infections are few. Early observations based on 18S rDNA gene analysis revealed mixed cases with C. hominis in heifers and cows from 2001 to 2003, and C. hominis cases in domestic cattle and goats [22, 26]. More recently, limited numbers of C. hominis isolates from cattle have been genotyped in Africa, China, New Zealand, Australia, the UK and Italy [21, 2325, 34, 36, 37]. Besides cattle, C. hominis has been reported in sheep and goats in the UK and in foals in Brazil [38, 39].

In addition to species identification, gp60 genotyping was performed to provide clues to symptomatic, epidemiologic, and zoonotic characteristics of isolates. Genotypes included IbA13G3, IbA9G2, and IbA9G3 and the newly described IbA14G2, and for 4 isolates, only attribution to the Ib genotype family was obtained, due to unreadable superimposition of electrophoregrams. No association between genotypes and symptoms could be determined. While 1bA9G3 was only detected in one human patient from the western region, no evidence for C. hominis case clustering and no seasonal variation could be established using genotypes. To our knowledge, none of the above gp60 genotype sequences (IbA13G3, IbA9G2, and IbA9G3) has been previously reported in cattle. C. hominis gp60 IbA10G2 genotype has been detected in Australia and New Zealand [21, 34]. The present genotyping data suggest the existence of potentially zoonotic C. hominis isolates in calves, since the 3 genotypes mentioned above have been previously described in human and non-human primates. Genotype IbA13G3 was reported in wastewaters from a densely populated urban region (Shanghai, China) [40], genotype IbA9G2 was reported in humans and genotype IbA9G3 was found in non-human primates in Kenya and China [4143]. Such data aim at investigating associations between genotypes found in cattle and humans from the same geographic region, as reported in India for C. hominis genotype IdA15G1 found in one calf, and children from the same geographic region [44].

Conclusions

Present results indicate for the first time that in several geographic regions of France, C. hominis was present in about one fifth of both asymptomatic and symptomatic calves, and exhibited genotypes likely linked to human infection. Cattle have been considered to be a primary reservoir for Cryptosporidium spp. and to play a role in transmitting zoonotic C. parvum organisms to humans [44, 45]. Results of the present study suggest that calves in France also frequently harbor C. hominis isolates which might be cause of human infections. Further investigations are aimed at determining whether the source of cattle infections was other livestock or humans, and whether the transmission was direct or indirect.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Nikki Sabourin-Gibbs for her help in editing the manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Xiao L, Sulaiman IM, Ryan UM, Zhou L, Atwill ER, Tischler ML, et al. Host adaptation and host-parasite co-evolution in Cryptosporidium: implications for taxonomy and public health. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32(14):1773–85. Epub 2002/12/05. pmid:12464424.
  2. 2. Lake IR, Harrison FC, Chalmers RM, Bentham G, Nichols G, Hunter PR, et al. Case-control study of environmental and social factors influencing cryptosporidiosis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(11):805–11. Epub 2007/09/25. pmid:17891460; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2071968.
  3. 3. Kim CW. Laboratory animal models for experimental cryptosporidiosis: a minireview. Research and Reviews in Parasitology 1994;54 (1):13–28
  4. 4. Baldursson S, Karanis P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: review of worldwide outbreaks—an update 2004–2010. Water Res. 2011;45(20):6603–14. Epub 2011/11/04. pmid:22048017.
  5. 5. Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):209–22. Epub 2013/05/18. pmid:23680352.
  6. 6. Collier SA, Stockman LJ, Hicks LA, Garrison LE, Zhou FJ, Beach MJ. Direct healthcare costs of selected diseases primarily or partially transmitted by water. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;140(11):2003–13. Epub 2012/01/12. pmid:22233584; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4629238.
  7. 7. Karanis P, Plutzer J, Halim NA, Igori K, Nagasawa H, Ongerth J, et al. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium from animal sources in Qinghai province of China. Parasitol Res. 2007;101(6):1575–80. Epub 2007/08/19. pmid:17701218.
  8. 8. Caccio SM, Thompson RC, McLauchlin J, Smith HV. Unravelling Cryptosporidium and Giardia epidemiology. Trends Parasitol. 2005;21(9):430–7. Epub 2005/07/28. pmid:16046184.
  9. 9. Feltus DC, Giddings CW, Schneck BL, Monson T, Warshauer D, McEvoy JM. Evidence supporting zoonotic transmission of Cryptosporidium spp. in Wisconsin. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(12):4303–8. Epub 2006/09/29. pmid:17005736; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1698413.
  10. 10. Xiao L, Ryan UM. Cryptosporidiosis: an update in molecular epidemiology. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004;17(5):483–90. Epub 2004/09/09. pmid:15353969.
  11. 11. Fayer R, Ungar BL. Cryptosporidium spp. and cryptosporidiosis. Microbiol Rev. 1986;50(4):458–83. Epub 1986/12/01. pmid:3540573; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC373083.
  12. 12. Fayer R. Taxonomy and species delimitation in Cryptosporidium. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124(1):90–7. Epub 2009/03/24. pmid:19303009.
  13. 13. Chalmers RM, Smith R, Elwin K, Clifton-Hadley FA, Giles M. Epidemiology of anthroponotic and zoonotic human cryptosporidiosis in England and Wales, 2004–2006. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139(5):700–12. Epub 2010/07/14. pmid:20619076.
  14. 14. Zintl A, Ezzaty-Mirashemi M, Chalmers RM, Elwin K, Mulcahy G, Lucy FE, et al. Longitudinal and spatial distribution of GP60 subtypes in human cryptosporidiosis cases in Ireland. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139(12):1945–55. Epub 2011/02/02. pmid:21281547.
  15. 15. Gatei W, Das P, Dutta P, Sen A, Cama V, Lal AA, et al. Multilocus sequence typing and genetic structure of Cryptosporidium hominis from children in Kolkata, India. Infect Genet Evol. 2007;7(2):197–205. Epub 2006/10/03. pmid:17010677.
  16. 16. Klein P, Kleinova T, Volek Z, Simunek J. Effect of Cryptosporidium parvum infection on the absorptive capacity and paracellular permeability of the small intestine in neonatal calves. Vet Parasitol. 2008;152(1–2):53–9. Epub 2008/02/06. pmid:18248900.
  17. 17. Fayer R, Santin M, Trout JM. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in mature dairy cattle on farms in eastern United States compared with younger cattle from the same locations. Vet Parasitol. 2007;145(3–4):260–6. Epub 2007/02/09. pmid:17287086.
  18. 18. Fayer R, Santin M, Trout JM, Greiner E. Prevalence of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium found in 1-2-year-old dairy cattle in the eastern United States. Vet Parasitol. 2006;135(2):105–12. Epub 2005/09/15. pmid:16159697.
  19. 19. Delafosse A, Chartier C, Dupuy MC, Dumoulin M, Pors I, Paraud C. Cryptosporidium parvum infection and associated risk factors in dairy calves in western France. Prev Vet Med. 2015;118(4):406–12. Epub 2015/01/28. pmid:25623968.
  20. 20. Rieux A, Paraud C, Pors I, Chartier C. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from beef calves under one month of age over three successive years in one herd in western France. Vet Parasitol. 2014;202(3–4):171–9. Epub 2014/04/02. pmid:24685023.
  21. 21. Abeywardena H, Jex AR, Nolan MJ, Haydon SR, Stevens MA, McAnulty RW, et al. Genetic characterisation of Cryptosporidium and Giardia from dairy calves: discovery of species/genotypes consistent with those found in humans. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12(8):1984–93. Epub 2012/09/18. pmid:22981927.
  22. 22. Banda Z, Nichols RA, Grimason AM, Smith HV. Cryptosporidium infection in non-human hosts in Malawi. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2009;76(4):363–75. Epub 2009/12/01. pmid:21344786.
  23. 23. Gong C, Cao XF, Deng L, Li W, Huang XM, Lan JC, et al. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle in China: a review. Parasite. 2017;24:1. Epub 2017/01/18. pmid:28098070; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5264544.
  24. 24. Kang'ethe EK, Mulinge EK, Skilton RA, Njahira M, Monda JG, Nyongesa C, et al. Cryptosporidium species detected in calves and cattle in Dagoretti, Nairobi, Kenya. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012;44 Suppl 1:S25–31. Epub 2012/07/17. pmid:22797974.
  25. 25. Merildi V, Mancianti F, Lamioni H, Passantino A, Papini R. Preliminary report on prevalence and genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle from Tuscany (Central Italy). III-rd International Giardia and Cryptosporidium Conference, Orvieto, Italy, Abstract Book 84. 2009.
  26. 26. Park JH, Guk SM, Han ET, Shin EH, Kim JL, Chai JY. Genotype analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. prevalent in a rural village in Hwasun-gun, Republic of Korea. Korean J Parasitol. 2006;44(1):27–33. Epub 2006/03/04. pmid:16514279; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2532641.
  27. 27. Zahedi A, Monis P, Aucote S, King B, Paparini A, Jian F, et al. Zoonotic Cryptosporidium Species in Animals Inhabiting Sydney Water Catchments. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168169. Epub 2016/12/16. pmid:27973572; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5156390 interests. This study was financially supported by an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant number LP130100035. WaterNSW are an Industry Partner on this ARC Linkage grant and contributed financial support in the form of salaries for authors [AP] and laboratory work. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. WaterNSW played a significant role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of WaterNSW authors [AB] are articulated in the 'author contributions' section.
  28. 28. Bailenger J. Coprologie parasitaire et fonctionnelle. 3rd ed, Bordeaux: Drouillard. 1973.
  29. 29. Potters I, Esbroeck MV. Negative Staining Technique of Heine for the Detection of Cryptosporidium spp.: A Fast and Simple Screening Technique. The Open Parasitology Journal 2010;4: 1–4.
  30. 30. Xiao L, Escalante L, Yang C, Sulaiman I, Escalante AA, Montali RJ, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Cryptosporidium parasites based on the small-subunit rRNA gene locus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(4):1578–83. Epub 1999/04/02. pmid:10103253; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC91223.
  31. 31. Sulaiman IM, Hira PR, Zhou L, Al-Ali FM, Al-Shelahi FA, Shweiki HM, et al. Unique endemicity of cryptosporidiosis in children in Kuwait. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(6):2805–9. Epub 2005/06/16. pmid:15956401; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1151898.
  32. 32. Thompson RC, Ash A. Molecular epidemiology of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections. Infect Genet Evol. 2016 Jun;40:315–23 pmid:26458528
  33. 33. Chen F, Huang K. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle from farms in China. J Vet Sci. 2012;13(1):15–22. Epub 2012/03/23. pmid:22437531; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3317452.
  34. 34. Waldron LS, Dimeski B, Beggs PJ, Ferrari BC, Power ML. Molecular epidemiology, spatiotemporal analysis, and ecology of sporadic human cryptosporidiosis in Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(21):7757–65. Epub 2011/09/13. pmid:21908628; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3209161.
  35. 35. Tanriverdi S, Grinberg A, Chalmers RM, Hunter PR, Petrovic Z, Akiyoshi DE, et al. Inferences about the global population structures of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(23):7227–34. Epub 2008/10/07. pmid:18836013; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2592928.
  36. 36. Ghaffari S, Kalantari N, C AH. A Multi-Locus Study for Detection of Cryptosporidium Species Isolated from Calves Population, Liverpool; UK. Int J Mol Cell Med. 2014;3(1):35–42. Epub 2014/02/20. pmid:24551819; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3927392.
  37. 37. Smith HV, Nichols RA, Mallon M, Macleod A, Tait A, Reilly WJ, et al. Natural Cryptosporidium hominis infections in Scottish cattle. Vet Rec. 2005;156(22):710–1. Epub 2005/06/01. pmid:15923554.
  38. 38. Giles M, Chalmers R, Pritchard G, Elwin K, Mueller-Doblies D, Clifton-Hadley F. Cryptosporidium hominis in a goat and a sheep in the UK. Vet Rec. 2009;164(1):24–5. Epub 2009/01/06. pmid:19122222.
  39. 39. Inacio SV, Widmer G, de Brito RL, Zucatto AS, de Aquino MC, Oliveira BC, et al. First description of Cryptosporidium hominis GP60 genotype IkA20G1 and Cryptosporidium parvum GP60 genotypes IIaA18G3R1 and IIaA15G2R1 in foals in Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2017;233:48–51. Epub 2017/01/04. pmid:28043388.
  40. 40. Feng Y, Li N, Duan L, Xiao L. Cryptosporidium genotype and subtype distribution in raw wastewater in Shanghai, China: evidence for possible unique Cryptosporidium hominis transmission. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(1):153–7. Epub 2008/11/14. pmid:19005143; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2620847.
  41. 41. Gertler M, Durr M, Renner P, Poppert S, Askar M, Breidenbach J, et al. Outbreak of Cryptosporidium hominis following river flooding in the city of Halle (Saale), Germany, August 2013. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:88. Epub 2015/04/17. pmid:25879490; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4344771.
  42. 42. Gu Y, Wang X, Zhou C, Li P, Xu Q, Zhao C, et al. Investigation on Cryptosporidium Infections in Wild Animals in a Zoo in Anhui Province. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2016;47(3):846–54. Epub 2016/10/04. pmid:27691966.
  43. 43. Li J, Dong H, Wang R, Yu F, Wu Y, Chang Y, et al. An investigation of parasitic infections and review of molecular characterization of the intestinal protozoa in nonhuman primates in China from 2009 to 2015. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2017;6(1):8–15. Epub 2017/02/24. pmid:28229042; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5310928.
  44. 44. Feng Y, Ortega Y, He G, Das P, Xu M, Zhang X, et al. Wide geographic distribution of Cryptosporidium bovis and the deer-like genotype in bovines. Vet Parasitol. 2007;144(1–2):1–9. Epub 2006/11/14. pmid:17097231.
  45. 45. Morgan-Ryan UM, Fall A, Ward LA, Hijjawi N, Sulaiman I, Fayer R, et al. Cryptosporidium hominis n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) from Homo sapiens. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2002;49(6):433–40. Epub 2002/12/31. pmid:12503676.